Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Factors affecting self-motivation
Factors affecting self-motivation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Throughout one’s mind there presumes to be a broad line between certainty and doubt. When in actuality there is a minesquel line dividing the two, which is solely dependent on the situation at hand. In many situations there is not always a black or white way with the way you endure aspects of life. British author William Lyon Phelps, once said “If you develop the absolute sense certainty that powerful beliefs provide, then you can get yourself to accomplish virtually anything…” a positive and optimistic attitude is a fortifying factor in achieving a desired goal... doubt is a beneficial factor. Bertrand Russel, British author and mathematician, once said “I think you ought to always entertain our opinions with some measure of doubt...” The value of doubt is immeasurable, …show more content…
Solely having only doubtful ideas brings about the more negative factors which, cause one to ultimately veer away from the effects of achieving the desired goal. Living with the constant assumption that “if you can believe it you can achieve it” causes the possible setbacks to diminish from one's mine. Just as when Apple first introduced the new Iphone. At first the corporation was hopeful that their product could become successful but simultaneously they took into the account the ways that could deteriorate success, for example, with the launch of a new product, critic’s views and competing companies, will be obstacles a company is forced to endure. Apple anticipated defeat but also worked to improve upon the Iphone in order to be certain of its success. Eliminating the factors that could weaken the effectiveness of a goal is a key step in reaching one’s goal. As a result the launch of the Iphone is to this day, one of the most revolutionary devices at our fingertips. This target could not have been obtained without focusing on the crucial factors of success: certainty and
John Patrick Shanley stresses doubt to be something “that changes things” (Preface To Doubt) rather than its typical depiction of disadvantageous in present day society. Growing up with a very Catholic background, Shanely’s childhood was marred with the belief that “We [Catholics] would all believe the same thing.” (Preface to Doubt). This relates with Shanely’s theory on our “culture of dogma” (Meanwhile: I am) which expresses how many choices we make today are influenced or even based on the authoritative figure(s) in our lives. However, Shanley urges you to not let respected figures in life sway your original opinion or response on a matter (Meanwhile: I Am). Furthermore, Shanley believes that without doubt (and living with complete certainty),
portrays is one of uncertainty and one which has a lack of self control. Faith
Baird and Kaufmann, the editors of our text, explain in their outline of Descartes' epistemology that the method by which the thinker carried out his philosophical work involved first discovering and being sure of a certainty, and then, from that certainty, reasoning what else it meant one could be sure of. He would admit nothing without being absolutely satisfied on his own (i.e., without being told so by others) that it was incontrovertible truth. This system was unique, according to the editors, in part because Descartes was not afraid to face doubt. Despite the fact that it was precisely doubt of which he was endeavoring to rid himself, he nonetheless allowed it the full reign it deserved and demanded over his intellectual labors. "Although uncertainty and doubt were the enemies," say Baird and Kaufmann (p.16), "Descartes hit upon the idea of using doubt as a tool or as a weapon. . . . He would use doubt as an acid to pour over every 'truth' to see if there was anything that could not be dissolved . . . ." This test, they explain, resulted for Descartes in the conclusion that, if he doubted everything in the world there was to doubt, it was still then certain that he was doubting; further, that in order to doubt, he had to exist. His own existence, therefore, was the first truth he could admit to with certainty, and it became the basis for the remainder of his epistemology.
... The point of doubt is to arrive at certainty, but to say that our beliefs are justified, we have to be able to base them on an idea that is definite. This could then provide a firm foundation on which all following beliefs are grounded and certified. If one believes in God, they perceive a certain knowledge that they stand by and accept is flawless. The meditator may be deceived about other ideas, but cannot help but determine God's existence to be so. Ultimately, they therefore cannot doubt their own existence without someone else actively doing the doubting. People’s perceptions may differ, so it only my own I must trust. I trust my senses, therefore I exist. When we think of ideas, we are thinking, even if we don't have bodies. The body we experience as our own is not irrefutable because we can doubt its existence, but we cannot doubt the existence of our minds.
In the book "Meditations on First Philosophy", author talks about knowledge and doubt. He considers doubt and knowledge a very strong tool and thus, states a philosophical method which is actually an extraordinarily powerful investigation of mind, body and rationalism. He formulates six meditations in this book, where he first discards all of his previous beliefs where things are not completely certain and then he tries to build things that can be surely known. He believed that people should do their own discerning and by using the process of simple mathematics, they could proceed on a path to an unquestioned knowledge. He wrote these meditations in a way supposing that he has meditated for six days, referring each last meditation as ‘yesterday’.
“I have noticed that the senses are sometimes deceptive; as it is a mark of prudence never to place our complete trust in those that have deceived us even once.” (Descartes, 60) He introduces doubt through the senses, dreams, and through the possibility of an evil genius at work. For instance he states that “There is no sure sign that I can tell that I am awake. If there are no sure signs that I can tell that I am awake then there is reason to doubt I am awake.
The relationship between certainty and doubt has been a heavily debated topic throughout history and especially in the mid-1800s. For most people, having some doubt on one’s opinions is much more beneficial than having absolute certainty because doubt allows one to review his potential choice and leaves room for him to make improvements on his choice. Someone who lives with absolute certainty cannot weigh the pros and cons because he has the confidence that what he believes is the right decision for everyone; however, there are situations in one’s life where absolute certainty is necessary, such as in team sports. With the exception of competitions, however, it is more important for one to have doubt in his or her life because doubt allows
I will argue that Unger mischaracterizes the nature of certainty as it is ordinarily used (something he says is important to his argument), and also that he has mischaracterized one of the sources he used to defend this definition. I will then present W.V.O. Quine’s psychologically based epistemology as presented in “Epistemology Naturalized” and “Two Dogmas of Empiricism”, and argue that this theory provides a more adequate account of the way knowledge and certainty are understood. I will also attempt to address the objections to Quine’s theory raised by Jaegwon Kim.
Severe as it is, this level of doubt is not utterly comprehensive, since the truths of mathematics and the content of simple natures remain unaffected. Even if there is no material world (and thus, even in my dreams) two plus three makes five and red looks red to me. In order to doubt the veracity of such fundamental beliefs, I must extend the method of doubting even more hyperbolically.
Cartesian Skepticism, created by René Descartes, is the process of doubting ones’ beliefs of what they happen to consider as true in the hopes of uncovering the absolute truths in life. This methodology is used to distinguish between what is the truth and what is false, with anything that cannot be considered an absolute truth being considered a reasonable doubt. Anything which then becomes categorized as a reasonable doubt is perceived as false. As Descartes goes through this process, he then realizes that the one thing that can be considered an absolutely truth is his and every other individual’s existence. Along with the ideology of Cartesian skepticism, through the thinking process, we are capable of the ability to doubt that which is surrounding them. This ability to think logically and doubt is what leads us to the confirmation of our existence.
In the article it says that “Think the right way! It minimizes gullibility and shame in succumbing to quackery and the laws of society” (Hess). Skepticism increases the self-esteem and confidence in students by allowing them to feel more relief if they disobeyed some of the social behaviors or standards. Many people especially in young age tend to feel guilty if they violated some of the typical behaviors that is usual for our society but skepticism will allow them to be unique and individual and have their own habits and not to feel shame if they are different in the way they behave or think. With skepticism students will understand that they should only do what makes them happy and their life. For example, it is typical for our society to get a specific education or get married before a certain age, and have a certain career status. Many people however, dot understand that it is their choice how to live their life and if they want to have unusual career, or get married after certain age they can definitely do it because it is their life. If there is something that will make a person happy, he should definitely do it and skepticism will help students to understand this concept. Also different article states that skepticism “generates personal responsibility for changing ourselves and our world rather than waiting for or giving
In Philosophy, we learn that it is okay to doubt things that occur in our lives. It is not only okay but it is a natural response to something you are unclear or uncertain about. Sometimes, though, the build-up of doubt becomes too much for someone to handle so they become suicidal or just give up trying to think about it all together. When this happens, there is a tendency to become cynical, and this is a tragedy because then you feel like nothing is really worth trying to figure out.
...ssurance and the rejection of shifting ground and sand in order to find rock or clay ”(50). He use doubt for finding truth which has no doubt in it and not for doubting itself.
Certainty and doubt ultimately go hand and hand. When there is certainty there is always a bit of doubt; and when there is doubt there is always a bit of certainty. Certainty ultimately sets us up for success. If we go into a situation with a confident and certain mindset, the outcome will almost always be success. If we go into a situation with multiple doubts and an overall negative attitude the outcome will almost always be failure, it is a simple mind over matter process.
The reader, like modern man, must not give into “the arrogant presumption of certitude or the debilitating despair of skepticism,” but instead must “live in uncertainty, poised, by the conditions of our humanity and of the world in which we live, between certitude and skepticism, between presumption and despair “(Collins 36).