Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
An Essay about HAPPiness
Similarities and differences among theories of personality
The pursuit of happiness essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: An Essay about HAPPiness
Throughout the readings several theories are found on how to individuals achieve the genuine definition of happiness. With the hypotheses of many, it seems almost impossible to define happiness. Is it the thoughtful acts for others? Does it depend on an individual’s mindset? Michael Wiederman, Holy Schiffrin, S. Nelson, and Camille Noe Pagan, all provide many plausible theories of how to find the truth behind individuals’ happiness in their writings.
Camille Noe Pagan’s “Real Secret to Happiness” has the point of view that helping others is what makes people happy. By quoting Stefanie Ziev who is a life coach “helping others makes you feel better about yourself and the world around you” The article goes onto to say that our “bodies prime us
…show more content…
Nelson’s “Stressed and Happy” there are several different opinions of the true definition of happiness, which makes it quite difficult to define what makes an individual genuinely happy. By combining theories of many, the question is can one be happy without stress in their lives, or is stress a necessity for true happiness. One of the many included theories of their writing was Diener, which believed that there are three factors in individual’s lives that have to do with their happiness; their life satisfactions, positive emotions, as well as their negative emotions. Behind Diener’s theory it added that the three components create an overall observation of individuals’ happiness. With Schiffrin and Nelson’s article they tie stress to happiness, with Fredrickson and Levenson’s hypothesis they found that positive emotions have been known to have a factor in undoing of negative emotions. Unlike Diener, Seligman believed that for one to be genuinely happy, people need to have positive things in their lives and not negative. Seligman’s definition, which consists of three factors, the pleasant life, engaged life, and a meaningful life. With the philosophy that the most “satisfied” individuals try to pursue all three to find their own “pathway” of …show more content…
Step one, don’t put all emphasis on goals. Step two, make time for helping others, similar to Pagan’s theory that helping others brings happiness to individuals. Step three, moderate the use of things that make individuals happy. Wiederman used a favorite meal for an example, if an individual were to eat their favorite meal quite often, it eventually wouldn’t be their favorite as much. Things that tend to individuals happy tend to ware of, that being because of the constant urge to want to find something new and better. In the movie “Happy” it discusses the Hedonic Treadmill, how no matter what we gain we will always want more. With materialistic items us as individuals there is always something new and fresh around the corner, so finding satisfaction with items is only temporary. Step four, being content or satisfied, which kind of ties with moderation, by keeping things average. Instead of seeing someone else with something and wanting it, being content with what an individual has makes most be more appreciative of what they already have. It can be difficult to see others with something and not to feel jealously. When individuals are content with what they have they of a chance to have negativity in their lives. Which ties together with Seligman’s theory that individuals are happier with life when they have no negativity. Step five, go with the flow. By not putting pressure on making sure things go
In the essay Why Happiness, Why Now? Sara Ahmed talks about how one’s goal in life is to find happiness. Ahmed begins her essay with skepticism and her disbeliefs in happiness. She shows her interest in how happiness is linked to a person’s life choices. Ahmed also tries to dig deeper, and instead of asking an unanswerable question, “what is Happiness?” she asks questions about the role of happiness in one’s life.
Begley introduces sources such as Ed Diener, a University of Illinois psychology professor, who has studied happiness for twenty-five years, to further the point of her claim. In the article, she accounts an interaction Diener had with Scotland's Parliament and business leaders on the value of using traditional measures to compare what policies makes the country happiest. The Scottish were all in favor of increasing policies that increased wellbeing, but not because they make people happier. "They said too much happiness might not be a good thing, they like being dour, and didn't appreciate being told they should be happier" (555). Diener later concludes that levels of happiness coincide with longer, healthier, relationships. He contrasts this conclusion with an article he cowrote with, stating “once a moderate level of happiness is achieved, further increases can sometimes be detrimental to income, career success, education, and political participation” (556). Diener believes that negative emotions make you “more analytical, more critical, and more innovative” to help direct your thinking. Diener gives much evidence and experience towards Begley’s claim of happiness not being the best for you. Another source Begley uses to back up her claim that
Stephen M. Schuller and Acacia C. Parks research shows that circumstantial factors do not adequately explain different level of happiness. Positive reactions will contribute to everyone’s happiness just as well as negative reactions do. I agree with Schuller and Parks when it comes down to where your happiness comes from. I believe your happiness comes from how you react to every situation in your life and how you let it affect your happiness. Therefore, I do not agree with Newman and Larsen due to him believing your happiness is out of your control. Newman and Larsen state that most of what influences your long-term happiness is not in your control. Most circumstances that happen in your
Happiness is a reprise from the many trials and turmoil of life, and so it is natural that we should actively seek it. Ironically though, in our naïve belief that we can somehow augment the amount of happiness in our world, we are actually making our world more depressing to live in. Both John F. Schumaker, in The Happiness Conspiracy, and Ray Bradbury, in Fahrenheit 451, argue that our myopic pursuit of happiness is actually counterproductive. The two authors attempt to persuade the reader that happiness is, and should be, an almost-serendipitous byproduct of a truly fulfilling life, and therefore should not be an explicit objective.
Dale Carnegie once expressed, “Happiness doesn’t depend on any external conditions, it is governed by our mental attitude.” Analyzing this quote, it is crucial to note the underlining theme that happiness, true and genuine happiness, requires a shifting away from conformity and the status quo in order to discover the treasure found in one’s own self. Therefore, finding out who one’s self is mandates a state of solitude which acts like the green pastures by the still waters that restores the soul. However, with its roaring and hungry fire that sends up flutters of red and yellow and orange and white fireflies soaring into the carnivorous night, conflict is the key ingredient in shifting away from acquiescence and society’s present state of affairs.
In Martin Seligman and other’s article “A Balanced Psychology and a Full Life,” he states that the definition of happiness, “Is a condition over and above the absence of unhappiness” (Seligman et al 1379).
In the world, people are wired to hunt for happiness, but what they are really deeming for is satisfaction. Happiness and satisfaction are similar, but not the completely the same. Satisfaction is the content feeling you get after a big meal or taking a long nap on a Sunday afternoon, while happiness is a chosen factor that can only be achieved through willpower. Many try and search the external world for the happiness that lies within. Clarisse asks Montag if he is happy, and when he realizes he is not, he turns to knowledge to find it (Bradbury 10).
Happiness plays an important and necessary role in the lives of people around the world. In America, happiness has been engrained in our national consciousness since Thomas Jefferson penned these famous words in the Declaration of Independence: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness” (Jefferson). Since then, Americans have been engaged in that act: pursuing happiness. The problem however, as Ray Bradbury demonstrates in his novel Fahrenheit 451, is that those things which make us happy initially may eventually lead to our downfall. By examining Guy Montag, the protagonist in Fahrenheit 451, and the world he lives in we can gain valuable insights to direct us in our own pursuit of happiness. From Montag and other characters we will learn how physical, emotional, and spiritual happiness can drastically affect our lives. We must ask ourselves what our lives, words, and actions are worth. We should hope that our words are not meaningless, “as wind in dried grass” (Eliot).
Happiness is a feeling that everyone tries to accomplish, yet some people sometimes only capture portions of it. In Brian Doyle essay, “Irreconcilable Dissonance,” he explains that divorce is becoming common among many couples today. Most couples are putting less effort into making a relationship/marriage work. There are many couples who get married, and most of them know that if the marriage does not work that divorce is always an option. With divorce in their back of their mind they lack the true meaning of having a happy marriage. In Eduardo Porter essay, “What Is Happiness,” Porter states that happiness is determined by people’s qualities in their life. People who experience a positive viewpoint on life and about others are overall to
Martin Seligman has an interesting view on Psychology’s “Good, not good, and not good enough” aspects. I started to understand Seligman’s thought process on positive Psychology as each aspect broke down, for example; the “good” aspects: the disease model and fourteen treatable disorders. Positive Psychology’s benefits shows that the disease model usage helps treat conditions like the now fourteen treatable disorders. I would have to agree with Seligman’s three happy life types. Everyone defines “happiness” in their own ways; personally I spent the majority of my naive life believing the “good life” view was the only way to boost or obtain happiness. Money and achievements do not bring forth true happiness, in the words of Mahatma Gandhi, “true
In the book, The How of Happiness, author and researcher Sonja Lyubomirsky sets her book apart from other self-awareness books by being the first to utilize empirical studies. She uses data gained through scientific method to provide support for her hypothesis. This hypothesis consists mainly of the idea that we have the ability to overcome genetic predisposition and circumstantial barriers to happiness by how we think and what we do. She emphasizes that being happier benefits ourselves, our family and our community. “The How of Happiness is science, and the happiness-increasing strategies that [she] and other social psychologists have developed are its key supporting players” (3).
“The Art of Happiness: A Handbook for Living” is a collaboration by His Holiness the Dalai Lama XIV and Howard C. Cutler, M.D., who identify many possible components that could lead to a happy and satisfying life. Their approach combines and integrates the thoughts of East and West; Buddhist principles and practices on one hand and Western science and psychology on the other. Many everyday difficulties are highlighted in this book, and Dalai Lama and Dr. Cutler attempts to help the readers find appropriate solutions in order to find a balanced and lasting happiness. Dalai Lama’s understanding of the factors that ultimately lead to happiness is based on a lifetime of methodically observing his own mind, exploring the nature of the human condition, and investigating these things within a framework first established by The
Stearns, Peter N. “The History of Happiness. (Cover Story).” Harvard Business Review 90.1/2 (2012): 104-109. Business Source Complete. Web. 6 June 2015.
Throughout history, philosophers and scientists of various kinds have been trying to define happiness, identify its causes and the obstacles to reaching it. According to Jon Gertner, psychologist Gilbert and economist Loewenstein have succeeded in pointing out several reasons why people are unhappy (pp: 444-6). It is important to note that according to Gilbert, it is not that people cannot g...
...s. In addition, happiness results from activities such as well paying jobs, maturity, marriage, entertainment activities, and literature forms. As a result, a section of the populace seeks the aforesaid activities to increase their level of happiness. Conclusively, an evaluation of theories related to positive psychology provides an explanation of what is happiness thereby showing a number of activities that are crucial in enhancing levels of satisfaction.