Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What is capital punishment essay
What is capital punishment essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Although society struggles to see past brutality, Capote use of juxtaposition between the actions of Dick and Perry allows him to justifies Perry’s actions over those of his counterpart, therefore he asserts how good can even be found in people who have committed horrible crimes. Shortly after the Clutter’s murders, Capote describes Dick and Perry at a cafe. Perry has become extremely exasperated by the preceding events, allowing himself to become absorbed in the murders. His appetite and mind are gone, one non-existant and the other obsessed with his actions. He begins to describe a dream that he has been having,
“‘... now comes the part it makes me sweat even to think about. See, he starts to swallow me. Feet first. Like going down in
Capote tells the story in a way that makes you feel you are being told about the characters by a close acquaintance of each individual character. When you aren't hearing the voices of the characters as they tell their own stories, we hear, not the voice of an author, but the voice of a friend who knew the characters well. (Before saying her prayers, she always recorded in a diary a few occurrences... Perry didn't care what he drank... etc.)
Although Perry lives a complicated life and it’s hard to explain the way he thinks, Truman Capote utilizes rhetorical devices such as imagery and metaphors to make clear his past life, thus relaying what drives him to make the choices he makes.
He used imagery in many different ways the one that was the easiest to catch on to was tactile imagery. Capote uses this as he describes each man to convey an image how he sees and wants his reader to see the men. In In Cold Blood, Capote wanted to make Richard Hickock look as though he was a monster and a bully. Some of this imagery was given indirectly like Richard’s father describes him as, “An outstanding athlete-always on the first team at school. Basketball! Baseball! Football! Dick was always the star player.”(Capote, Pg. 250) This puts the picture of a star athlete and he hopes the reader has a perspective of how athlete are always bullying for the smaller kids and being all around jerks. Another description of Richard given by his father who said, “Concussed his head in a car smash-up.”(Capote, pg.251) This contributed the earlier statements about how Richard was messed up in the head and gave the reader an image of him with a dented head or a lopsided nose. Capote also uses imagery to describe Perry, but in contrast to Richard he makes Perry look as a kinder and a much more approachable man who doesn’t really mean harm to anyone. He did this by saying that Perry was a small man, but very muscular in his upper arms and chest. His feet and legs, however, are small and delicate. Trying to push that Perry really was an approachable
In the book “In Cold Blood” we meet Perry Edward Smith one of the men accused of killing the Clutter family. Perry is a unique man for how he see the world and how the world sees him. Although the townspeople and those who had heard of the murder only saw Parry as a murder. There is however one man who sees Perry more than he appeared to be and that man was Truman Capote. Perry had an interesting life from how he was raised, becoming friends with Richard Eugene Hickock, to the murder of the Clutter family, all the way to Capote writing about him and the trail he and Dick must face. It was Capote who brought the idea that Perry was not a bad person persa but rather he made a mistake that has caused him to spend the rest of his life behind the bars of a jail.
He tries to show his readers that Perry was a killer brought about by his environment and upbringing. Whether that justifies Perry’s action or if the justice system should have lessened his sentence is what Capote leaves to the reader. Dick who was born with his need to kill, was a complete sociopath by nature. Using interviews from Dewey specifically brings about a perspective which is purely objective, and his use of complex and literal diction makes for a more emotionally detached novel. The short and concise syntax makes it seem as though Capote is confused and unable to make his own decision on Perry. All of these various things bring about the novel which is In Cold
Truman Capote establishes respect and trust in what he writes from with audience, ethos, through the use of an extensive variety of facts and statistics, logos. Capote uses so many dates, times, and other facts about the crime committed in the book and the subsequent investigation that the reader has to believe what the author is writing. The use of all these facts shows that Capote did his research and he interviewed, questioned, and obtained the opinions of every person that even slightly important to crime itself and the investigation/trial. The author is obviously very meticulous when it comes to dates and times; every important event in the book has a date and sometimes even a time of day to go with it. Some examples of dates included were the day of the murders (November 15th, 1959), dates of when Perry and Dick were here or there (December 31th, 1959- a small restaurant in Texas or noon on December 25th, 1959- beach in Miami Florida), date when the two criminals were apprehended (January 1st, 1960), dates when they were brought from this prison to that one and finally when they were brought to death’s row (April, 1960). Other small facts are also used by the author, like facts about the criminal’s early lives or experiences that they had, which could only have been obtained through extensive interviews with Perry and Dick. The use of all these logos by Capote establishes strong ethos, showing the reader that the author did more than enough research to show that he has the knowledge to write a whole book on the subject.
On pages 265-266 of Capote’s novel, In Cold Blood, Capote writes about Perry’s imprisonment, more specifically Perry’s mental health, or lack thereof. Capote uses an ominous tone to convey the predicament Perry was in and portray the mental instability possessed by Perry. Capote first discusses a failed escape plan of Perry’s that consisted of throwing a document with a detailed rescue plan down to two men who often gathered below his window, thinking that they were there for him. However, as soon as he created the document, the men stopped coming. The strangeness of this scenario pushed Perry to question his sanity. Regarding this, Capote says, “a notion that he ‘might not be normal, maybe insane’ troubled him” (Capote 265). When Capote says that these issues
Capote uses different voices to tell the story, creating an intimacy between the readers and the murders, the readers and the victims, and all the other players in this event—townspeople, investigators, friends of the family. This intimacy lead...
Overall, these two passages are just an illustrative representation of Capote’s consistent characterization of Dick and Perry. What makes Capote’s methods of characterization so different is that he does not merely state facts of each in random order. Each detail included or excluded is done with a specific purpose to manipulate the mind of the reader into sharing the same opinions of each character as
Truman Capote finds different ways to humanize the killers throughout his novel In Cold Blood. He begins this novel by explaining the town of Holcomb and the Clutter family. He makes them an honest, loving, wholesome family that play a central role in the town. They play a prominent role in everyone’s lives to create better well-being and opportunity. Capote ends his beginning explanation of the plot by saying, “The suffering. The horror. They were dead. A whole family. Gentle, kindly people, people I knew --- murdered. You had to believe it, because it was really true” (Capote 66). Despite their kindness to the town, someone had the mental drive to murder them. Only a monster could do such a thing --- a mindless beast. However,
Even though Capote’s book is a master piece of non-fiction novel, his behaviors during his research to write the book are not ethical. He has crossed the line by lying others, pretending to be someone’s friend, and doing some inhuman behavior while Perry waits on death row in order to get a personal testimony of the night of the killings.
In Truman Capote’s non-fiction novel In Cold Blood, the Clutter family’s murderers, Perry Smith and Dick Hickock, are exposed like never before. The novel allows the reader to experience an intimate understanding of the murderer’s pasts, thoughts, and feelings. It goes into great detail of Smith and Hickock’s pasts which helps to explain the path of life they were walking leading up to the murder’s, as well as the thought’s that were running through their minds after the killings.
Capote's structure in In Cold Blood is a subject that deserves discussion. The book is told from two alternating perspectives, that of the Clutter family who are the victims, and that of the two murderers, Dick Hickock and Perry Smith. The different perspectives allow the reader to relive both sides of the story; Capote presents them without bias. Capote masterfully utilizes the third person omniscient point of view to express the two perspectives. The non-chronological sequencing of some events emphasizes key scenes.
The important items, that any person keeps close, strongly reflect the various aspects of their personality and the ideals they hold. This concept is clearly seen in Perry Smith, a creative and intelligent murderer, from Truman Capote’s In Cold Blood. This novel begins with Dick and Perry killing the Clutter family for their wealth. The story then follows Dick and Perry as they try to escape the pursuing police. Throughout, Perry and Dick’s conflicting personalities hinder their ability to carry out their original plan.
Although Capote explains Perry’s actions in the present time, he additionally displays the impact of Perry’s childhood experiences on his decisions throughout his life; therefore, asserting that a person’s life path is set by the events of their childhood.