Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Police brutality ethical and moral problems
Unnecessary use of force by police
Police brutality ethical and moral problems
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Police brutality ethical and moral problems
Witnesses in this case described Brown and Wilson having a scuffle inside of the car, and the gun went off through the car before Brown jumped out and started running (Dennis & Santhanam). Once Wilson got out the car he immediately started shooting. Brown put both hands in air and tuned around towards Wilson and he shot 5 more times a total 6 shots until Mike Brown was dead on the ground (Dennis & Santhanam). Was it right for him to shoot him that many times, and was he a threat once he was away from Mr. Wilson? Why didn’t he take off on foot, or call for backup? Why did he immediately shoot, as well as shoot him up to six times? Were those ethical decisions, well these are just a few of the questions American citizens were discussing in their
homes. The unfortunate event that took place on August 9, 2014 led to many people in the community to be upset which led them to act in a destructive manner. People were on the streets looting breaking into homes, businesses, for example Walgreens, and gas stations (Sanchez& Lawler). Some stores as well as cars were set on fire. People were angry at the injustice they felt that Michael Brown was receiving. They also had peaceful protest that brought many celebrities to the streets of Ferguson to walk with the people. The people who were protesting on two different occasions that the media did in fact cover, had tear gas thrown at them to disperse the crowd. People were running eyes burning, coughing, and throwing up in the streets. Was that the correct thing to do in these situations where it was a positive peaceful protest? Was is ethically right for police to treat American citizens like this in America, and isn’t it a citizen’s legal right to protest peacefully? It’s one thing if people are hurting and or damaging their community for police to react to but is it ethical to use your power as police officers to throw tear gas at peaceful protestors just to disperse a crowd, which is breaking a right that American citizens have, which is to protest.
City of Pinellas Park v. Brown was a case brought to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District by the plaintiff Brown. In this case, the Brown family sued the City of Pinellas Sheriff Department on the grounds of negligence that resulted in the tragic death of two Brown sisters during a police pursuit of a fleeing traffic violator Mr. Deady. The facts in this case are straight forward, and I shall brief them as logical as possible.
Not guilty was the decision made by the jury during the George Zimmerman vs. Trayvon Martin trial. That verdict may have been the most controversial one of recent time. Many people were upset by the decision and felt that justice was not achieved for the young victim, Martin who was seventeen years old when he was killed. This incident seems to be a tragic example of stereotyping and racial profiling. It is also an example of how a verdict, based on the strict interpretation of the law can be the wrong verdict.
On October 20, 2014 a young male teen was fatally shot in Chicago, Illinois. The shooting occurred in the middle of the road and the suspect that was fatally shot was named Laquan McDonald. McDonald was just 17 years old and was the suspect after initial reports placed him in the scene of a possible car jacking. It was reported that Laquan McDonald had a knife and was also seen slashing tires of a police cruiser. When police had finally had him surrounded in the middle of the road, one officer opened fire and released 16 shots into his body. Another deputy on hand said the use of force was not needed because Laquan was not in any way trying to attack the officers present. The officer who fired the 16 shots into Laquan is named Jason D. Van
The Impact of the Dred Scott Case on the United States The Dred Scott Case had a huge impact on the United States as it is today. The Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments have called it the worst Supreme Court decision ever rendered and was later overturned. The Dred Scott Decision was a key case regarding the issue of slavery; the case started as a slave seeking his rightful freedom and mushroomed into a whole lot more. 65
For example, in Jacksonville, Florida, Jordan Davis, another unarmed teenager was killed by Michael Dunn. Davis and other teenagers were riding in a SUV with music blasting from the vehicle, when Dunn pulled up alongside of them and asked them to turn the music down . Words was exchanging between the two parties, and Dunn fired 8 to 9 shots into the SUV where he fatally shot Davis. Dunn was arrested and charged with first degree murder. Dunn claimed he fired in self-defense and invoked the “Stand Your Ground law” as his defense. ...
In our society today, it is very sad that the African-American community has lost a great trust and respect for the Mayor, the police commissioner and the N.Y.P.D. Amadou Diallo's shooting was very upsetting for the African-American community. The shooting shock many people because an unarmed innocent black male was shot 41 times in front of his home by four officers that assume him to be a rapist.
The report included testimony from Officer Darren Wilson, physical evidence, forensic evidence, and many witnesses. According to the Department of Justice report on the incident, Officer Darren Wilson was driving after finishing one of his calls and saw Michael Brown and his friend walking on the double yellow line in the middle of the street blocking traffic. According to his account, officer Wilson told them to move to the sidewalk in which they ignored. He then noticed they fit the descriptions he had earlier heard of the suspects of the robbery, he then parked his vehicle blocking traffic. He attempted to get out of his vehicle to speak to the boys but apparently Michael Brown blocked the car door and started to punch the officer. They engaged in a scuffle where Officer Wilson reached for his gun in which he claims that all he had access to. Michael Brown tried to take control of the gun, according to Wilson’s account. (Department of Justice, 2015) Officer Wilson then regained control of the gun and shot Michael Brown’s hand. Michael Brown then took off and Wilson chased him on foot. Brown started coming towards Wilson. Many witnesses even described Brown as “charging” towards Wilson. (McLaughlin, E. C. (2014, August 15) Wilson warned Brown multiple times and Brown kept moving forward towards Wilson
...aggressively. Zimmerman wanted to become a police officer you never shoot an unarmed person no matter what and for these reasons and others I feel Zimmerman is guilty Since Martin was no threat to a man twice the size of him this was murder and claiming self defense is just wrong.
On a dark and rainy night in October of 2011, Samuel Pauly was shot to death through the window of his rural New Mexico home by one of three state police officers investigating an earlier road rage incident. On behalf of Samuel Pauly's estate, his father filed a civil rights action against the three officers, the State of New Mexico Department of Public Safety, and two state officials, claiming defendants violated his son's Fourth Amendment right against the use of excessive force. During this entire case between White vs Pauly the main underlining issue was that, is it clearly established by law that a late-arriving officer at an ongoing situation must second-guess the actions of officers that had arrived before? What the Supreme Court is
To formulate an opinion on gun laws relating to places of employment the U.S. Constitution and Indiana Constitution must first be examined. The Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution states “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Simply proclaiming people of the U.S. have the preserved and irrevocable right to own and carry firearms to ensure safety and freedom of the people. The 14th Amendment extends these laws to the state by the “equal protection of the laws.” Written as “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws” the amendment gives power to the U.S. Constitution over state when a matter of rights is concerned.
Stepping up to the incident of Brown’s death and handling the tensions that occurred. The tensions rise then, violence came. The local police force was not enough to handle the situation. Martial law was brought up. The police sent S.W.A.T. to enforce. The local area was in Martial law. According to Newsweek, with the Martial law active, the National Guards were there to protect them and minimize violence. The S.W.A.T. also used tear gas and they were armed like the military. There were a lot of casualties, some of them are not involved in the looting and damaging property. People, witnesses of the tragic and violent event, described it like they were in a war zone. Even though there are ways that the police handles the situation and National Guards to lessen the harm to the citizens; there are still many who were victimized by the harsh situation. Politicians must concern themselves to minimize these casualties. The community claims that the used too much force. The politician may also cut the budget of police-militarization and use the budget on more proficient way. Budgets and funds must not concentrate on arming the police, but on how the police reduce the risk of both civilian and the
This particular shooting involved Officer Darren Wilson (which happened to be white) shooting and killing an unarmed black teenager (Michael Brown). As soon as this news broke out, angry citizens took to the streets of Ferguson within hours. They destroyed businesses, burned cars and assaulted officers. All of which these events took place before an investigation had even began. The rioters carried on for days without actual facts of what happened that Saturday when Officer Wilson pulled the trigger and let out six rounds into Michael Brown leaving him dead on the
A video from a dash cam showed what seemed to prove the officer had liable reason to shoot the man but when audio was released with the video the perspective really came into view. In the video the man is seen stepping out of his car as the officer told him to do, but when the officer tells the man to get his license and he reaches in the car to grab it he is shot. The officer is heard telling the man to “put his hands up and get out of the car.” When the man was shot he had his hands in the air, with his wallet in hand. While the officer had the right to defend himself against a potential threat it was extremely unnecessary to shoot at the man. Thankfully the man was not killed in the shooting but the man’s lawyer stated that his client was not unhandcuffed until an officer remembered that he did not have his handcuffs and went to the hospital to retrieve them.
Because of this man’s actions, many lives were saved. Without having guns in the hands of responsible citizens, many more incidents such as this one could take place. As it has since been stated earlier, gun control is not mandating the removal of guns from the hands of law-abiding citizens, but teaching the proper ways to store, manage, and use a gun responsibly. In America, restricting the ownership of guns to citizens should be prohibited. Although there are many people who oppose private ownership of firearms, what they don 't realize is that firearms can also protect their lives. When guns are in the hands of responsible individuals, they can benefit their own lives as well as the lives of those who cannot protect themselves or for just recreational purposes. However, there are many deaths caused by guns, but the amount of deaths prevented with gun use outweighs them tremendously. Also, the smart gun and training courses could prevent many of these deaths. “Nearly two million more crimes are prevented with guns than are ‘caused’ by guns” (Connell). Ultimately, guns in America have a huge impact on our life and many benefits are overlooked. After reviewing all the research, it is clear to see the many benefits of having guns prominently used in our society. Not only do guns protect the lives of
Mr. Rodriguez called 911 to report loud music from his neighbor’s house. He then walked to his neighbor’s house with his firearm and a video camera. After the confrontation with his neighbor, he called law enforcement once more to tell them he felt threatened and that he was standing his ground. While Paul Rodriguez waited for law enforcement to arrive at the scene, he used deadly force against Kelly Danaher. In this case, Mr. Rodriguez initiated the confrontation and there was no proven evidence that he was in danger (Flatow,