Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay of comparison
Comparison essay after the fact
Essay of comparison
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The book, Bringing Down the House, was written in 2002 and has since been a New York Times Bestseller and enjoyed by plenty. Six year later the movie, 21, was made based on Bringing Down the House and it was successful becoming the highest grossing movie in its first and second weekends after opening. Both depictions of this popular story received great feedback showing striking similarities all throughout the movie from the book but ultimately having differences that set one another apart. Bringing Down the House and 21 are undoubtedly and purposefully similar; however they definitely have their difference that contribute and deter from the depth of the story. There are many similarities throughout the movie with the book that connect the …show more content…
two and are important. In the beginning the most obvious similarity between the movie’s Ben and the book’s Kevin is the school that they attend, MIT University from which they excelled in because of the motivation and natural skill and talent for doing well in school. Kevin was motivated and was exceptionally smart and got very high grades in school, as well as Ben. Because of these high grades and being so smart Ben and Kevin were singled out to join the secret blackjack team that met down the same infinite corridor in same type room told about in the book that was brought to the screen in the movie. Ben and Kevin both were hesitant in joining the group but were later both persuaded to join. At the end after his card counting career Ben and Kevin both were caught and do not know specifically what they should do for the rest of their lives because card counting was all they knew. Oppositely, there were plenty of differences throughout the story that set the book and movie apart from one another.
For example, at the beginning of the movie we learned that Ben had no father nor any sibling like Kevin did in the book. In the book, Kevin was motivated by his father to do well in school and get good grades to get a good job as well as being under his two sister’s successful shadows. In the movie, Ben had to be self-motivated and worked hard to get the grades that he wanted with only the support of his mother. Because of the similar plot the movie and book were pretty similar in the middle, but they did show different focuses. The book focused more on the card counting expertise and thoughts that came about because of the high stress lifestyle Kevin lived. In the movie they were able to focus on the party life of Ben because of his new lifestyle. A very significant difference was in the end of both stories and how one had a neat and tidy ending and one left the audience wondering what happened next. In the book Kevin does not know for sure what he should do for the rest of his life because of his attachment to the lifestyle of card counting. In the movie. Ben was sure he was not completely done card counting and even formed a new team to …show more content…
continue. In the adventure of Kevin’s life in the book he tells the author that the reason why he is telling this story is to explain himself and prove that what he did was not wrong, which I completely agree with.
Kevin is clearly very smart and the conventional route smart people take is getting high paying jobs, doing very important work. This was Kevin’s initial plan, however he decided to utilize his skills in a less conventional way. As continuously stated throughout the book and even the movie, card counting is not illegal. Kevin simply used his god given abilities to gain an advantage over someone else. The act of card counting is not wrong and Kevin should feel no remorse, however the things he did because he card counting such as lying to people including his friends and family is
wrong. Both forms of telling the same story could be better to different people because of their preference of movies to books or vice-versa, but I choose the book being better. The book is better because it has the time and ability to go in depth into the story of Kevin’s life of a card counter. In the book, Bringing Down the House, the author, Ben Mezrich, does a good job giving the reader a picture of Kevin’s full life sharing important details of the hard time balancing his love life with his girlfriend back home and his “Vegas life” women, particularly Teri Pollack. The book also does a better job than the movie when going into Kevin’s inner thoughts like in the beginning when he was not so sure about card counting’s effectiveness and consistency. Kevin’s inner thoughts were always on display in the book which made the book more interesting by being able to see what it was like to be in his shoes as opposed to being on the outside looking in and sometimes being allowed in his head. The audience for the movie mostly had to go off of what he was thinking by what he said out of his mouth. Because of obvious restraints of telling the story in the form of a film exposed the lack of being able to know what he was thinking at all times, which unquestionably took away from the movie. The book and the movie both do a very good job of explaining Kevin’s and Ben’s story respectively. Their differences do set them apart which can allow for one to be preferred over another, but their similarities make them unable to be talked about without the other being brought up. The audience gets to decide whether they think Ben or Kevin did something wrong or not, however no one can say for sure.
The books, A Wrinkle in Time and And Then There Were None, both have many differences in the movie versions. The directors of both movies change the plot to make the movie see fit to what they may have imaged the book to be, while still keeping the story line the same.
In both the novel and movie focus on the war. The war influences the characters to enroll.Also, the main setting is at the Devon School. However, in the novel Gene visits Leper at his house but in the movie Leper lives in the woods.In the novel Gene is coming back to the Devon School 15 years later.However, in the book he is coming to Devon as a new student.Therefore, similarities and differences exist in time and setting in the novel and the movie.In the novel and the movie there are similarities and differences in events, character, and time and setting.
There are many differences and similarities in the short story of “A Sound of Thunder” and the movie.
The book the and the movie City of Ember are great with lots of emotion and excitement. Jeanne Duprau is the author of the book, were comparing and contrasting the book the City of Ember and the movie the City of Ember. The book is about the main characters Lina and Doon that are 12 years old and want to find an exit out of Ember. The City of Ember is underground the world with lights everywhere so they can see and sometimes the lights go out and everyone worries they will not come back on. The City of Ember has many similarities and differences between the novel and the film; however the film was a more entertaining experience.
There are many examples in both movie and book that compare and contrast to each other. I felt that the book and movie portrayed characters differently. The main character of the book was Jon Krakauer, the book told about the way he felt about people and his struggles and toils. In the movie I felt
A Comparison A Sound of Thunder by Ray Bradbury and The Star by H.G. Wells
There were many things that were the same about the movie and book but I choose the main things that needed to be told. First off, True Son believes that he isn’t white and never will be. This is a very important part of the story so they had to include it in both because it shows how True Son changes throughout the story.
By comparing and contrasting the Catching Fire novel and film, one can see that the film was effective in conveying some themes, and was not effective in conveying others. Hope is a major theme in the entire Hunger Games trilogy, although in Catching fire it becomes more apparent because of the start of the rebellion and the people’s interest in turning against the capitol. In both the novel and film this theme is shown through acts of unity and fury against the capitol. Symbolism and humane vs. inhumane acts are themes shown more clearly at times either in the Catching Fire novel or the Catching Fire film. These themes show the similarities and differences between the Catching Fire novel and film.
As I read the novel, I couldn’t help but to compare each word to the movie. I may have just recently watched it, but I was suddenly unsure of what I had seen. Was my memory failing me or were things truly that different? I felt like these differences changed the entire story line. The narrator shouldn’t be in a building that was about to be destroyed, this defeated the purpose of Project Mayhem. Then again, I was only on page one.
For example Norman and Jesse are married way before Norman meets Neal (Jesse’s brother). In the movie Norman meets Neal while is he still courting Jesse. This brings forth another difference Norman doesn’t date Jesse in the book. When Jesse is first introduced, she is already married to Norman. A viewer of the movie who has read the book might also notice that when Norman is never offered a job to teach at Chicago University in the novel. Another big difference between the movie and the novel is the role that Norman’s mother plays, she is a very lively, dynamic character in the book, but in the film she is depicted to a flat character. Paul and Norman have equal fly-fishing skills, but in the movie Norman is just a mere amateur compared to Paul. Rev. Maclean expresses displeasure with Paul's decision to change the spelling of the family name in both version of the story. Someone who might have read the book may believe that the movie didn’t do the book justice when showing Paul’s struggle with his alcohol and gambling addictions. Norman offers to help Paul out with is personal struggles when he is driving Paul and his girlfriend home after a long night of drinking. The offer to help in the novel is done when Paul and Norman go fishing. Some other differences are Rev. Maclean’s personally is almost completely lost in the movie and his most important line “you can love completely without complete understanding” (a
The book, "Being There," is about a man named Chance, who is forced to move out of the house he lived in his whole life and his experience in the outside world. Based on the success of the book, the movie, "Being There," was made. The author of the book, Jerzy Kosinski, also wrote the screenplay for the movie. I think the major difference between the book and the movie is that in the book, we get to read what Chance is feeling and thinking, but in the movie, we only get to see his actions.
The book and the movie are both very different, yet they are also the same in a few ways. In the book they had different characters, then the movie. In the movie they had gotten rid of some of the characters and then added new ones. The theme in the movie and the book is the same.
The differences are sort of minor, but they are still fairly noticeable. One character difference is in the movie. There is one young man who is killed by the tiger but is not the boyfriend of the princess. This does not happen in the book. Also, in the movie, the characters are more modernized. The king has bodyguards and escorts (when he is driving to the amphitheatre), which is not mentioned at all in the short story. In the story, the king is so respected that one assumes he probably didn’t even need bodyguards since he had an iron will and that the people would do whatever he
The characters were different, and did different things in the movie as they did in the book. One of the most obvious differences in the characters that I see is with Hans. In the book, one of the main reasons that lisel and he bond, is because of their cigarette rolling sessions. Hans asks Liesel, “ You know how to roll a cigarette… next hour … playing with tobacco and cigarette papers…” This is showing how they were rolling the cigs together, but this was never featured in the movie. Another major difference I notice that was in the book and not the movie, was the absence of the narrator, Death. Death was present in the beginning of the movie, but wasn't even as close as present as he was in the book. The movie missed out on some of his helpings, quotes, and foreshadowing. Lastly, their were a list full of characters mentioned in the book not in the movie. Some of these being Hans Junior, and Vector
After reading the book and watching the movie, it is evident that the movie made a lot of changes, as do many movies. Some were for the better like Pearls narration, some. like the new characters, not so much. However, there are many similarities as well. Religion is just as important in the movie as it is in the book, and Hester's secret meeting in the woods is almost spot