Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Movie vs book compare and contrast
Movie vs book
Movie vs book compare and contrast
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Movie vs book compare and contrast
As known by almost everyone, movies often deviate from the books. The Scarlet Letter is no different. The story follows Hester Prynne, and her life after she committed adultery. Her and her daughter Pearl are being shunned by society as she wears the scarlet letter upon her chest. In the meantime Hester's real husband Chillingworth, who was thought to be dead, secretly enacts his revenge to both Hester and Dimmesdale, the father of Pearl. The differences between the book and movies are easily found like all of the extra characters, and the narration being told by Pearl in the movie. There are many similarities as well. However they are quite rare. Theses including the major theme of religion, and Hester's meeting with dimsdale in the woods. …show more content…
In the book we only get the main characters and their story. The book in this way expands on those few people and is able to give a deep view into them. Unlike the book, the movie has many additional characters and their stories including Samson, who is trying to court a young woman. The Indians only added to plot change in the movie. In the movie we end up getting a backstory to characters that weren’t needed. Not only that but they changed the entire ending to the story. Now instead of dimmsdale dying at the end, he rides off on a hose to live happily ever after with Hester. These characters take from the main story’s plot of Hester and her life with the scarlet letter on her chest. The narration of the book and movie are different. In the book the narration is done from a third person point of view. In the movie Pearl is narrating the story. Many of the parts of the story seem better due to this change. Pearl gives a new perspective to the story that had been previously hidden while reading the book. Pearl is able to make it seem that, even though the entire town shuns her, she did nothing wrong. So really, Pearl becoming the narrator, although a huge difference, reveals a new side of the story not seen before. Despite these differences, the religious aspects of the story are just as relevant in the movie as the book.
In both Dimmsdale, their priest, is highly thought of by everyone. It was not until he revealed himself to be the husband, and fellow sinner, of Hester that he was looked down upon. Before that he was friends with many other highly regarded people in the town, and was present at every important gathering. In other words, religion plays a substantial role in both the book and movie. Another key event that happened within the story was Hester and Dimmesdale's meeting in the woods. The movie scene was shorter than the book but still encompassed everything, Including their conversation about running away together. Which is probably where they went after they rode off to at the end of the movie. The only slight difference is in the book the meeting happened in the middle of night, while it seemed to only be dusk in the movie. Overall the family’s meeting in the movie was really similar to what happened in the book. After reading the book and watching the movie, it is evident that the movie made a lot of changes, as do many movies. Some were for the better like Pearls narration, some. like the new characters, not so much. However, there are many similarities as well. Religion is just as important in the movie as it is in the book, and Hester's secret meeting in the woods is almost spot
on.
There are few similarities between the book and the movie. Usually most movies are similar to
The characters make a big difference in the movie and the book. One thing they both have in common is that Otis Amber and Berthe Erica Crow get married. And that Edgar Jennings Plum and Angela Wexler get engaged instead of Doctor Denton Deere. Also Jake Wexler is a gambler instead of being a bookie.
For example, Mama goes to the bank in the movie and is given a hard time about paying her mortgage, but this did not happen in the book. Another major difference is that the school bus scene, where the Logan kids played a trick on the white kids, was not shown in the movie, even though it was an important part of the story. There are some character changes as well. Lillian Jean, Jeremy, R.W, and Melvin are Simms’ in the book, but in the movie they are Kaleb Wallace’s children. However, the main plot difference is how the movie starts in the middle, summarizing everything from the first part of the book very briefly. Additionally, many scenes are switched around and placed out of order. Altogether, the plot and character changes contribute to my unfavorable impression of the
There are many differences in the movie that were not in the book. In the movie there is a new character in the movie that was not in the book. This character was David Isay.
The movie and the story had some of the same characters but some weren't exactly the same. The movie introduced many different characters and changed some of the others. For example, the movie had the plant lady and had the mentor of Anderton as the founders of Precrime while in the book, Anderton was the only founder of Precrime. Also, Witwer wasn't blond he had black hair and Kapler wasn't named Kapler he was named Crow. In the story they had the red head Fleming who did not exist
Throughout his literary endeavors, Nathaniel Hawthorne utilizes symbolism to present a certain theme that pertains to human nature and life. In his works, The Scarlet Letter and "The Minister's Black Veil", Hawthorne uses symbolism to present a common theme pertaining to religion; that though manifested sin will ostracize a person from society, un-confessed sin will destroy the soul.
Overall, the movie and book have many differences and similarities, some more important than others. The story still is clear without many scenes from the book, but the movie would have more thought in it.
Almost everything that I noticed while watching the movie was spot on to the book. One thing that was sure to grab my attention was the scene with Mary Warren and Abigail in the court where Mary attempts to convince the whole court that Abigail is lying. The group of girls follow
The plot in the film is very similar to the book but in parts, especially towards the end, the plot is slightly different to the film. The plot is varied in the film to show
I have only included what I have to believe are largely important plot gaps and differences in the movie version in comparison to the book one, and so I apologize again if I have missed any other major ones. Forgive me, please.
After close analysis, it becomes evident of the amount of work that is put into each, but one must ask, why has the director adapted their own style of depicting the story? How has the story of Hester Prynne been modified? Regarding works, major differences and similarities between the characterization, visual imagery, symbolism, narration and plot, shows how free adaptation is the correct term used. The characters of The Scarlet Letter show the ruthless, orthodox Puritan society. Hester was a feminist, self-reliant conformist, living on her own.
4. The Scarlet Letter was written and published in 1850. The novel was a product of the Transcendentalist and Romantic period.
There are many differences from the book and the movie. Like one of them was Turtle wexler was with Flora not Chris Theodorakis. Grace Wexler didn’t treat her kids fairly on what one was her favorite, in the movie she does. Angela originally marrys Denton Deere not Ed Plum. Angela planted the first bomb not Sandy Mcsouthers. George Wexler wasn’t playing the westing game in the movie. That’s just some of the differences with just the Wexler family.
For an example, in the movie when Michael was taken in by the Tuohys they had a little boy named SJ. SJ loved Michael and was best friends with him. SJ was not in the book though and that changed the plot in the movie. During the car crash, Michael was in, Michael was upset with himself because he hurt SJ. But, in the book Michael was more upset that he let down his parents instead of hurting SJ. Another part of the movie that was different was that Sean Tuohy wasn’t really in the story as much as he was in the book. In the book, he was making all of the decisions with Leigh. In the movie though, Sean was just the father, nothing else, it was as if Leigh Anne was the main character next to Michael, instead of both of the parents. And lastly in the beginning of the book Michael was a natural at football he knew all the techniques and what to do on every play. In the movie he was new to football and didn’t know much, he was very bad at first but through training a year he got very good. In the book Michael was able to play football in high school because of an athlete moved, Michael got on the team and was very good and was instantly a starter. It was not that easy for him in the movie though. He went through an entire season of not being very good and was never really noticed until the next year in the
Hester Pyrnne is a Puritan woman that thinks that her husband is dead or lost at sea. She has a love affair with Dimmesdale that no one knows about but themselves. Hester is ridiculed for it because she has a baby resulting from it, however nothing is done to Dimmesdale by his fellow Puritans because no one knows that he took part in the affair and is the baby’s father. The Puritans show their disapproval of Hester by doing a variety of things like spreading rumors, outcasting her, and even sewing a scarlet letter “A'; to her bosom. So is what being done here right? How about other Puritan views and attitudes? Are they right as well? Well, it is clear that Hawthorne doesn’t think so, and he shows this in so many ways and symbols that it is at some times hard to unfold. He clearly states in his writing that the Puritans are sinners themselves in the way they act because they are stubborn and believe that their way is the only way.