Boycotting Children Research Paper

867 Words2 Pages

Would you like to see a child digging out of a trash can looking for food? Or viewing a child having to disrespect its family’s religion? People should not be boycotting products that have been manufactured with the use of child labor. Little ones in child labor are usually in employment to not go into poverty, for traditional reasons, and for major companies in small countries who make huge incomes to not shut down. Accordingly, not boycotting products that have been manufactured with the use of child labor would give adolescents a chance to survive and not go into poverty. There are children in poverty employed at a young age to earn a little more money. In her article, “This Company Is Employing Children? Let’s Boycott their products! Or …show more content…

In the article “This Company Is Employing Children? Let’s Boycott their products! Or better not?” Nadria agrees when she writes “This happens for not only out of financial need, but also as part of their family’s work ethics.” Nadria’s point in saying this is that youngsters don’t only work for poverty, but because it’s also a tradition in their families to follow. Another quote Nadria writes is “In other cultures, children are expected to work with their parents.” This is restating that in different cultures, minors are expected to work for and with their parents. In not allowing young ones to work, that would oppose the first amendment of the Constitution, which asserts that all human-beings have the right to freedom of …show more content…

For instance, a major company in Pakistan called Saga Sports would be a corporation affected by all of this. To take case in point, when writing the article “Nike’s Dilemma: Is Doing the Right Thing Wrong? A child labor dispute could eliminate 4,000 Pakistani jobs” David Montero states “But it’s also likely, observers agree, to sink Saga, a corporation giant that makes 6 million of Pakistan’s annual production of 40-million soccer balls.” In other words, when boycotting products, a major company who makes a lot of money for Pakistan could end in this dispute. Another statement that David says is “Many here in Sialkot worry that Saga’s fall could chip away at a decade of progress; Low employment, stability, and a private sector that pours money into schools, clinics, and roads.” David is basically expressing that places like Sialkot (A state in Pakistan) are getting worried for Saga’s fall because this could eventually leave affecting the whole country. Saga Sports has had a decade of progress of funding for schools, clinics, and roads and with ending Saga, a huge amount of money could end this

Open Document