Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gender role in literature
Gender role in literature
Gender role in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The discovery of self-identity is a reoccuring theme in a multitude of Chicano and Race and Ethnicity literature. Gloria Anzaldúa’s compilation of essays and poetry, Borderlands La Frontera, best exemplifies this example as the author gives her story to finding herself in as a lesbian chicana in a predominantly white and straight society. Anzaldúa drags the reader through this by not limiting the problems she faces, but problems that everyone could face. She addresses the importance of overcoming conflicts with not only oneself, but society as well. Though these messages she portrays in her writing are not just hers, other popular authors such as August Wilson and Thomas King epitomize them in their writings as well. August Wilson’s African …show more content…
American play, Fences, portrays the struggle of an African American woman, Rose, with not only herself, but with societal norms that lead her to conform to them. Rose struggles with being a strong and self respecting woman while giving up her wants and needs for those of her husbands. Thomas King’s Native American novel, Green Grass, Running Water, illustrates a story of Native American blooded characters that enter white culture and submerge themselves forcefully in it, forgetting and abandoning their true sense of selves. Though they realize their errors and go back to their cultures, it is not without a few lessons learned from the harsh reality of life. Anzaldúa addresses an important issues when it comes to people dividing themselves culturally and socially through a both figurative and literal wall. Her compilation of essays and poetry, Borderlands La Frontera, directly explores this through self reflection. She discusses the plurality of beliefs and traditions amongst different races. Thomas King’s Native American novel, Green Grass, Running Water, supports Anzaldúa’s message by showing how one group of people can stray so far from themselves that they forced to change and assimilate thus unable to grasp full acceptance in dominant society in a different culture losing their identities. Anzaldúa speaks of a big wall dividing America and México, but the wall is more figurative than anything. She perceives the wall as something people have created to separate cultures and traditions: The psychological borderlands, the sexual borderlands and the spiritual borderlands are not particular to the Southwest. In fact, the Borderlands are physically present wherever two or more cultures edge each other, where people of different races occupy the same territory, where under, lower, middle and upper classes touch, where the space between two individuals shrinks with intimacy. (Anzaldúa 1) The way the wall is implemented cuts off communication and the sharing of cultures leading to ignorances that separate people. She feels the borderlands physical presence by how she feels the division from herself and the society in which she was born in. To Anzaldúa, she feels that a wall is present and active no matter where someone is and who they are around, as there is always something to split someone, or a group of people. Her struggles with herself cause her only to view the wall and its presence as negative, but that is not always the case. The idea of a wall is important because it does not only symbolize something negative, but something positive as well. Instead of representing division and separation a wall can also symbolize the preservation of certain beliefs and traditions without the tainting of others. This is not always bad as it prevents someone from losing their touch with themselves when they assimilate themselves in another culture. King’s novel best exemplifies this through the Sun Dance Festival the characters go to, to celebrate their cultures. Despite how they lose touch with their Native American side they still respect and cherish the festival as it is one that they have attended since a young age. The presence of a wall can give certain groups of people a sense of belonging and unity as the ‘white man’ does not take everything from them, “Karen told all of their friends that they were going back to Alberta to the Sun Dance that summer…” (King 381). Eli had lost all touch with his old life as he even assimilated himself into White society and married a white woman, in his efforts to runaway from not only his past, but also a large part of his life. While his wife is very excited to see and attend the Sun Dance, Eli brushes it off as if it is nothing, showing a great sense of irony as someone outside of culture is more into his culture than he who is part of it is. Eli takes it for granted and has lost touch with his Native American side so much so that he has not gone back to Alberta, his home, since he has married Karen. Though Eli does not realize the extent to the blasphemous act he is about to commit as he is going to let Karen come and view the Sun Dance. Because Karen is not Native American she is not allowed to come and watch, but Eli does not understand the history and the gravity behind this rule. As a wall can be bad in this case it is necessary as it provides, in this case, Native Americans with something that the white man will not take from them like they did their land throughout history. A wall also offers a division in a culture between spouses as it sets gender roles that the man or woman has to adhere to.
This was evident in Anzaldúa’s case as she was a lesbian woman who always challenged her duties of being a woman making her life a lot harder, “To this day I’m not sure where I found the strength to leave the source, the mother, disengage from my family, mi tierra, mi gente, and all that picture stood for. I had to leave home so I could find myself…” (Anzaldua 38). Anzaldua goes against her roles of a woman and leaves her household to further discover herself as a chicana in another confusing society. As a woman she is expected to live with her family and help with cooking and cleaning until she is married. Though Anzaldúa realizes that this is not the life for her and that for her to grow and really find herself she has to leave her family and find her own path rather than just be given one. While this seems scary for a woman to go off into the world not knowing what to really expect, it really reflects the strength to her character. She leaves her patriarchal household to find her own path in society veering off from the path that many women choose to follow. This closely relates to the character Rose Maxwell in Thomas King’s African American novel, Fences. Rose put up with a lot of her her husbands, Troy, immature behavior as he cheated on her, and even had a child out of wedlock with his mistress. This strength in character shows how empowered she is as she does not just let him walk all over him, but rather leaves him and finds her own path, leaving behind that strong patriarchal influence, “ ” (Wilson
). … conclusion is about to start, but there will be a lot of previous paragraphs before this point In conclusion, the preservation of self-identity is an underlying factor in a lot of Race and Ethnicity, as well as Chicano literature. With characters choosing to assimilate themselves into white society and disregard their past lives the idea of a wall becomes very important to maintaining your identity and your beliefs. While it can be very negative and counter-productive at times it can lead to bringing and keeping people together as King showed in his novel, Green Grass, Running Water, with direct examples from the lives of Eli and Karen, and Iron Eye Screeching Eagle (Portland). While the road to finding yourself can be long and hard you have to address conflicts that are in your way whether they come from oneself, as they did with Rose, or from themselves, as they did in Anzaldúa’s compilation of essays and poetry, Borderlands, La Frontera.
In a story of identity and empowerment, Juan Felipe Herrera’s poem “Borderbus” revolves around two Honduran women grappling with their fate regarding a detention center in the United States after crawling up the spine of Mexico from Honduras. While one grapples with their survival, fixated on the notion that their identities are the ultimate determinant for their future, the other remains fixated on maintaining their humanity by insisting instead of coming from nothingness they are everything. Herrera’s poem consists entirely of the dialogue between the two women, utilizing diction and imagery to emphasize one’s sense of isolation and empowerment in the face of adversity and what it takes to survive in America.
The Broken Spears is a book written by Miguel Leon-Portilla that gives accounts of the fall of the Aztec Empire to the Spanish in the early 16th century. The book is much different from others written about the defeat of the empire because it was written from the vantage point of the Aztecs rather then the Spanish. Portilla describes in-depth many different reasons why the Spanish were successful in the defeat of such a strong Empire.
Preceding her youth, in 1977, Anzaldua became a High School English teacher to Chicano students. She had requested to buy Chicano texts, but was rejected to do so. The principal of the school she worked for told her, in Anzaldua’s words: “He claimed that I was supposed to teach “American” and English literature.” She then taught the text at the risk of being fired. Anzaldua described, “Being Mexican is a state of soul – not on of mind.” All in all, the reprimanding she had to endure only made her stronger: “Until I can take pride in my language, I cannot take pride in myself.” It led to Anzaldua embracing her Mexican culture even more, contrary to shoving it aside. Anzaldua transformed her beliefs into something both cultures can applaud, and be honored
In “Once Upon a Quinceanera” Julia Alvarez follows the Hispanic coming of age tradition for females to explore how evolution of culture has shifted throughout generations. By doing this Alvarez discovers perceptions are influenced by cross cultural boundaries. In “Leave Your Name at the Border” Manuel Munoz, discusses the barriers between Mexicans and Americans when it comes to language and how it affects future generations. He does this by acknowledging socially expected norms for Mexican Americans in public and the tensions created when assimilating to such norms between a non-dominant and dominant group. In “What’s Black, Then White, and Said All Over,” Leslie Savan discusses how black talk and pop talk is connected because white people
Anzaldua grew up in the United States but spoke mostly Spanish, however, her essay discusses how the elements of language began to define her identity and culture. She was living in an English speaking environment, but was not White. She describes the difficulty of straddling the delicate changing language of Chicano Spanish. Chicano Spanish can even differ from state to state; these variations as well as and the whole Chicano language, is considered a lesser form of Spanish, which is where Anzaldua has a problem. The language a person speaks is a part...
As a journalist in 1920 for the New York Herald Tribune, Sophie Treadwell was assigned to go to Mexico to follow the situation after the Mexican Revolution. (Mexican Revolution 1910-1917) She covered many important aspects of the Mexican Revolution during this time, including relations between the U.S. and Mexico. She was even permitted an interview with Pancho Villa in August 1921 at his headquarters. This interview and other events that she experienced in Mexico are presumably what led her to write the play Gringo. In Gringo Treadwell tries to depict the stereotypical and prejudicial attitudes that Mexicans and Americans have about each other. There is a demonstration of how Mexican women are looked at in the Mexican culture and how they see themselves. The play also corresponds to similar events that occurred during the Mexican Revolution.
Torres, Hector Avalos. 2007. Conversations with Contemporary Chicana and Chicano Writers. U.S.: University of New Mexico press, 315-324.
In “How to Tame a Wild Tongue,” Gloria Anzaldúa explains the implications of living under the influence of two cultures. She begins with a story of how she was punished by a teacher for correcting the pronunciation of her name. Anzaldúa gives the reader anecdotes about her life in a dual culture society, explaining the trials of accepting her heritage, fighting to find her place in Mexican or American society, and establishing herself as a proud Chicana.
Many writers focus their works of written art on life situations. They focus on drugs, poverty, stereotypes, young adults living in a difficult world, and of course a topic that has been present for many years, male domination. Abraham Rodriguez Jr. in “The Boy Without a Flag” captures all these themes and more in his Tales of the South Bronx, that relate to the lives of many Hispanics and minority residents of the United States.
Moraga, Cherrie. “Queer Aztlan: the Reformation of Chicano Tribe,” in The Color of Privilege 1996, ed Aida Hurtado. Ann Arbor: University Michigan Press, 1996.
Although our society is slowly developing a more accepting attitude toward differences, several minority groups continue to suffer from cultural oppression. In her essay “How to Tame a Wild Tongue,” Gloria Anzaldúa explores the challenges encountered by these groups. She especially focuses on her people, the Chicanos, and describes the difficulties she faced because of her cultural background. She argues that for many years, the dominant American culture has silenced their language. By forcing them to speak English and attempting to get rid of their accents, the Americans have robbed the Chicanos of their identity. She also addresses the issue of low self-esteem that arises from this process of acculturation. Growing up in the United States,
The eternal endeavor of obtaining a realistic sense of selfhood is depicted for all struggling women of color in Gloria Anzaldua’s “Borderlands/La Frontera” (1987). Anzaldua illustrates the oppressing realities of her world – one that sets limitations for the minority. Albeit the obvious restraints against the white majority (the physical borderland between the U.S. and Mexico), there is a constant and overwhelming emotional battle against the psychological “borderlands” instilled in Anzaldua as she desperately seeks recognition as an openly queer Mestiza woman. With being a Mestiza comes a lot of cultural stereotypes that more than often try to define ones’ role in the world – especially if you are those whom have privilege above the “others”.
The struggle to find a place inside an un-welcoming America has forced the Latino to recreate one. The Latino feels out of place, torn from the womb inside of America's reality because she would rather use it than know it (Paz 226-227). In response, the Mexican women planted the seeds of home inside the corral*. These tended and potted plants became her burrow of solace and place of acceptance. In the comfort of the suns slices and underneath the orange scents, the women were free. Still the questions pounded in the rhythm of street side whispers. The outside stare thundered in pulses, you are different it said. Instead of listening she tried to instill within her children the pride of language, song, and culture. Her roots weave soul into the stubborn soil and strength grew with each blossom of the fig tree (Goldsmith).
“Who is more to blame though either should do wrong? She who sins for pay or he who pays to sin?” Throughout “You Foolish Men” by Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz the central question lies around who is to really blame for the suppression of women. De la Cruz attempts throughout her poem to portray men as ludicrous for their a double standard of women. However, De la Cruz blames human nature more than men for the suppression of women.
A person's ability to develop is due to two factors, maturation and learning. Although maturation, or the biological development of genes, is important, it is the learning - the process through which we develop through our experiences, which make us who we are (Shaffer, 8). In pre-modern times, a child was not treated like they are today. The child was dressed like and worked along side adults, in hope that they would become them, yet more modern times the child's need to play and be treated differently than adults has become recognized. Along with these notions of pre-modern children and their developmental skills came the ideas of original sin and innate purity. These philosophical ideas about children were the views that children were either born "good" or "bad" and that these were the basis for what would come of their life.