Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Why does history matters essay
How has literature changed
About Anglo Saxon religion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Why does history matters essay
British Lit Final Exam
May 26, 2010
Books Are Humanity in Print,
The human race is known for change; it has evolved from prehistoric ‘cavemen’, ancient empires, and Vikings to aristocratic monarchies, democracies, and dictatorships. With each passing year, there are technological advancements, changing political platforms, and a progressively mobile worldwide population. Each literary era reflects the human feats, lifestyles, and changing times: Anglo-Saxon epics consist of glory battle scenes, bloodied warriors, and feuding countries; Middle English works consist of glorified knights, the chivalric code, and a greedy, materialistic court; and, modern literary classics depict worlds of which the human race is ruled by technology. From ancient Greek mythology to the next big literary classic, the era in which a work is written reflects the period in which it was penned.
Centuries before the introduction of the printing press and written history, historical events were passed down through oral accounts to which people could take artistic liberties without a soul knowing. Spanning six-hundred years, the Anglo-Saxon period is one filled with feuding tribes, invading empires, and the spreading of Christianity to the British Isles.
The anonymously authored epic poem, Beowulf, illustrates the era through its mixture of religion, fate, and feudal systems. Beowulf portrays the Anglo-Saxon period as one ruled by warfare and the love of revenge, making people pawns in the ruling powers quest for land, power, guts, gold, and glory; however, the poem intertwines pagan and Christian beliefs signifying the changing times. During the Anglo-Saxon period, Romans, Anglos, Saxons, and Jutes invaded the isles and made the isles a war zone wi...
... middle of paper ...
... Huxley’s dystopian novel.
Each generation witnesses new feats, new lifestyles, and new ideas of how the world is and how it should be. The works of art that are produced during that time period are reflective of the shifting world. Literature contains many genres that attract a variety of different people; however, each literary classic that is taught in the classroom reflect the changing history of the world and how humanity has evolved throughout the centuries. To put it simply, “books are humanity in print.”
Works Cited
Tuchman, Barbara W. ""Books Are Humanity in Print"" Thinkexist Quotations. Web. 24 May 2010. .
Tuchman, Barbara W. ""Books Are Humanity in Print"" Thinkexist Quotations. Web. 24 May 2010. .
Burns, Olive Ann. “Boy howdy, ma'am you have sent us a fine book.” The English Journal. Dec. 1989: 16-20 Web. 14 NCTE Jan. 2014
Anne Bradstreet’s inability to perfect her work before it was released frustrated her to the point where she internalizes the book’s imperfections as a reflection of herself. Bradstreet uses an extended metaphor of a mother and a child to compare the relationship between herself as the author and her book. Rather than investing her spirit in God, she repeatedly focuses on trying to improve the quality of her writing with no success, “I washed thy face, but more defects I saw” (Bradstreet 13). Like a mother protecting her child, Bradstreet’s attempts to prevent critics from negatively analyzing her work of art (20). Her continuous obsession about people’s opinions consumed in the Earthly world and essentially distracted her from developing a spiritual relationship with God. Bradstreet was enveloped by her dissatisfaction with her to the point of ridiculing herself, “Thou ill-formed offspring of my feeble mind” (1). It was obvious that her mind and spiritual
His readers now see his perspective and why books should not be banned. It is clear the Conroy used the rhetorical devices in a planned way. This allowed him to create a letter designed to persuade the readers in a way that appealed to their emotions. He used positive and negative diction, positive and negative imagery, and conjunctions in a way that would grab the reader's’ attention leading them to believe banning books is ultimately censoring students from the harsh realities that the world has to offer. This is leaving them censored and ignorant to the truth of the
Almost twenty years later, contemplating the contemporary American publishing scene, I feel a Bealean rage coming on (and with it a vague longing for one of his fits).While three percent of the American population in 1976 would have been a little over six million readers, recent surveys suggest that the consistent buyers of books in this country now total no more than half that number, and may even be as few as one million.[1]
However, due to its stark and chaos-ensued exploration of human nature, it’s been quite controversial with it’s central theme of putting yourself before the common good. Other themes include conflict between civilization, the human impulse to control others, and living by the rules peacefully and in harmony. The book has thus made it’s home at number eight on the American Library Association’s list of frequently banned classic...
Imagine a world of uniformity. All people look the same, act the same, and love the same things. There are no original thoughts and no opposing viewpoints. This sort of world is not far from reality. Uniformity in modern day society is caused by the banning of books. The novel "Fahrenheit 451" illustrates a future in which the banning of books has risen to the extent that no books are allowed. The novel follows the social and moral implications of an over censored society. Even though the plot may seem far-fetched, themes from this book are still relevant today. Although some people believe that banning a book is necessary to defend their religion, the negative effects caused by censorship and the redaction of individual thought are reasons why books such as "Fahrenheit 451" should not be banned.
The authors do eventually (pg. 205) acknowledge that some may see the book as trying to enrage the public just to sell books. In fact, Ron Levy, P...
During the 1950s, America was facing the competitions with Soviet Union. Cold War, fear of atomic warfare, and communism influences intensified the society’s instability. What’s more, many social problems attracted people’s focus: many writers “concerns about censorship and conformity during a period when free expression of ideas could lead to social and economic ostracization” (Telgen 138). Many essays and novels reflected this social background. However, one author, Ray Bradbury, became a preeminent writer in that era. His work not only pointed out that the people are becoming more and more apathy as well as the censorship problem, but also showed people’s fear about war.
In Fahrenheit 451, Ray Bradbury created a fictional society in which the people only want to be happy. No one wants to offend and no one wants to get offended. To achieve this “bliss” their government has used technology to block out reality, to create a world of denial, and to provide endless, mind mushing entertainment. “[Bradbury] is unable, however, to support the idea that technology itself causes people to abandon independent thought in favor of simple conformity.” (McGiveron, 1996) Bradbury never proves technology is what destroyed intellectual thought, but the people in charge of mass communication. Bradbury is warning us that technology can be a conductor for mass exploitation.
Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 was written as a social criticism of 1950s America which was effectively constructed through Guy and Mildred Montag, and Captain Beatty, representing censorship, conformity and alienation. This American classic warns against the dangers of suppressing thought of becoming a totalitarian society, conveying the dangers of censorship and government control is as relevant as today as it was first written. ‘Oppressive government, left unchecked, can do irreparable damage to society by limiting the creativity and freedom of its
Prose, Francine. Interview by Katie Bolick. The Atlantic Online. N.p., 11 Mar. 1998. Web. 13 Feb. 2011. .
Carver, Raymond. Cathedral. “The Norton Introduction to Literature.” New York: W.W Norton &, 2014. Print.
Shen, F. (2002 September 24). Off the shelf; Who should decide what books you read? The Washington Post, pp.2. Retrieved December 2, 2002 from Lexis-Nexis/Academic database.
With the advance of technology in the contemporary world, the field of literary research is also facing the renovation of many of its theoretical frameworks. The implications of that form of restoration are overflowing both digital-born and traditional literature, especially when it comes to how texts are made available and accessible for a greater public. In such new media, materials are not completely context dependent, and may often appe...
Nussbaum, Martha C. “The Literary Imagination in Public Life.” Hard Times. Ed. Fred Kaplan and Sylvére Monod. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc, 2001. 429-439.