Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of the Second World War on American society
Effects of the Second World War on American society
Impact of World War 2 on American society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of the Second World War on American society
Book Review: Robert Kagan Paradise and Power- America and Europe in the New World Order
Robert Kagan's book Paradise and Power' was a break through in writing concerning the new world order, which has especially developed during and after the Cold War.
In the first part of this review, I shall endeavour to summarise the book, focusing
on the difference between America and Europe's worldview's, and the historical reasoning behind the readjusting of the power balance between Europe and America. This includes analysing the affect of the Second World War and the Cold War which has lead to America's power being described as a Hyperpuissance' a term coined by the French Foreign Minister Hubert Védrine, to describe the power of America, which transcended that of a Super Power' (Kagan 2003 p.43).
Subsequent to the summary I should like to focus on an aspect of Kagan's critique, and attempting to contrast it with a different view.
Secondly I would like to look at the actual definition of power that Europe has, in comparison to America. Whereas Kagan argues that Europe is weak, their Kantian perpetual peace' reliant on American military might, Ian Manners prefers to describe Europe's power as Normative, showing how they have core ideals which they try to pass onto other nations, in order to create a more peaceful world culture based on economic rather than military dominance, democracy and the basic respect for human rights. (Manners 2002)
I will conclude by trying to determine whether a more docile approach to foreign policy does equal weakness, as suggested by Kagan, or is there merit in pursuing diplomatic means.
Paradise and Power paints a picture of America and Europe, living in two separate worlds with regards to foreign policy. America is depicted as an ardent supporter of hard politics'. They consider world power and politics to be defined in militaristic terms. They have little patience for diplomacy, and resort to force to resolve International Disputes quickly. They also have a very black and white view of the world' in that they see elements as good or bad'; friend or enemy'. . It is therefore said that America is living in a Hobbesian state of Anarchy, where freedom can only be protected using brute force and strength (Kagan 2003 p. 4). This has been clearly represented in America's war with Iraq and the Axis of Evil' that has been dominating American Foreign Policy discourse since 9/11.
The alliance formed between the US and USSR during the second world war was not strong enough to overcome the decades of uneasiness which existed between the two ideologically polar opposite countries. With their German enemy defeated, the two emerging nuclear superpowers no longer had any common ground on which to base a political, economical, or any other type of relationship. Tensions ran high as the USSR sought to expand Soviet influence throughout Europe while the US and other Western European nations made their opposition to such actions well known. The Eastern countries already under Soviet rule yearned for their independence, while the Western countries were willing to go to great lengths to limit Soviet expansion. "Containment of 'world revolution' became the watchword of American foreign policy throughout the 1950s a...
As the United States developed into a world economic power, it also became a military and political power. Certain things led Americans to become more involved in world affairs, such as territorial growth. There were also consequences to the nation’s new role, like conflict between citizens and people of power. United States government and leaders had to learn the “hard way”, the challenges and negativity that they would face, such as loss of money and lack of control between certain nations, and the positive effects such as expansion of territory and alliances.
It is somehow strange for today’s reader to find out that the situation with America’s foreign affairs hasn’t changed much. As some clever people have said, “The History book on the shelf is always repeating itself.” Even after nineteen years, Americans think of themselves as citizens of the strongest nation in the world. Even after the September the 11th. Even after Iraq. And Afghanistan.
Harmon, William, William Flint Thrall, Addison Hibbard, and C. Hugh Holman. A Handbook to Literature. 11th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2009. Print.
98-176. 5 Robert H. Ferrell, America as a World Power, 1872-1945, (New York: Harper & Row Publishers Inc., 1971), p. 265. 6 Arthur Meier Schlesinger, p. 46. 7 Hamilton Fish, FDR: The Other Side of the Coin, (New York: Vantage Press 1976), pp.
The first ancient civilization that Kagan highlights is the Greek. He writes of their republic city-states, and pioneering of a “political life come to be shared by a relatively large portion of people”. He uses the Greek culture as an influence of science and reason. “The Greeks exposed everything they perceived—natural, human and divine—to the searching examination of reason.” Finally he describes the Greek quest for virtue and morality. He uses these examples to show how similar our culture is to the Greek.
2 Charles S. Maier, ed., The Cold War in Europe: Era of a divided Continent (New York: Markus Wiener Publishing, Inc., 1991) 27.
Harmon, William, and C. Hugh Holman. A Handbook to Literature. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1996.
Harmon, William, and C. Hugh Holman. A Handbook to Literature. 8th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1999.
Nye, Jr., Joseph S. “Hard and Soft Power in American Foreign Policy.” In Paradox of American Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. 4-17. Print.
Shorter 8th ed. of the book. New York: Norton, 2013. Print. The.
The Soviet Union’s collapse at the end of the Cold War left the United States without its major global rival. Now alone at the top, the United States’ strategic imperatives have shifted remarkably. The shift has been significant enough to prompt fundamental questions about the international order and whether this new “unipolar moment” will last. Indeed, since 1989, political scientists have clamored to define the United States’ status relative to the rest of the world. Indispensable nation? Sole super...
In this book review I represent and analyze the three themes I found the most significant in the novel.