Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A complete eassy on Biblical interpretation
Reflection on how to read the bible for all its worth
Reflection on how to read the bible for all its worth
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: A complete eassy on Biblical interpretation
Maddie Galvan
Introduction to Sacred Scripture
Kendall
8 March 2016
Paper 1 - Interpretation of Scripture
Throughout history, the Bible has been used as means of a justification for many issues. In the case of Bob Jones University, the Bible was used as a way to justify discrimination within the school’s admission selection process. By stating that they were only following their religious beliefs through these discriminatory practices, Bob Jones displayed a misinterpretation of Scripture that proves to be problematic. From this case, one can see that many people interpret the Bible fundamentally, and do not take into account the various other factors should influence the way the Bible is examined in this present day and age. There is a clear
…show more content…
These problems include Biblical concepts such as, verbal inerrancy of Scripture, the divinity of Christ, virgin birth, vicarious expiation, and the bodily resurrection (Kendall 1/26). Essentially, Bob Jones took the Bible and its teachings as literal, using a worship approach rather than an analytic approach. True Biblical analysis would require knowledge of the various methods in which to interpret Scripture, such as the historical, source, redaction and literary forms of criticism (Kendall 1/26). Historical criticism provides the context in which the Scripture was written and typically attempts to explain the supernatural events taking place. Meanwhile, source criticism is used to determine from which cultures or civilization folktales, poetry or common stories may have been borrowed from, as this was typical of the Biblical times. Redaction criticism is also important in the way in which it explains the role and intention of the author, and even gives insight into how the text was edited or compiled. Lastly, literary criticism helps us to understand and examine Scripture as we now have it, taking into account any possible changes or hidden …show more content…
Instead, the Bible is focusing on the idea of sin and punishment, as it is a main theme throughout Genesis and the rest of the Pentateuch (Kendall 2/9). God punished Adam and Eve for their sin through banishment, He punished humanity for their sin through the flood, and He punished Ham for his sin against his father. The lesson of Genesis itself is that all humanity has rebelled against their Creator, and that the consequence of such rebellion is a universal punishment, hence the line of Ham. In a time when there was little known about genealogy, evolution and development, it is understandable why the author of Genesis described the basis of humanity to be of Noah’s sons. However, as we know now, this is not factually true, and is only a fundamental idea meant to teach a broad lesson as brought about by the worship
According to David M. Carr, the history of Scriptural interpretation indicates that religious texts are popular candidates for reinterpretation and, as such, are spaces wherein the personal identity of the reader frequently inscribes itself at length:
In 1949, a state-wide law was passed in Pennsylvania that required public school students to read scriptures from the Bible and recite the Lord’s Prayer everyday in class. This law stayed intact until Edward Schempp challenged it nine years later. Pennsylvania wasn’t the first or the only state to enforce law making it mandatory for students to read from the Bible during school. Twenty-five additional states had laws allowing “optional” reading for the Bible. But in eleven of the twenty-five states, courts had decided those laws were unconstitutional.
“But you must admit, Pastor, that not every decree in the Bible makes sense in this day and age.” “Only because you [Moretti] are taking the verses out of historical context-“ “Mr. Lincoln,” Angela Moretti says flatly. “You did first.” (Sing You Home p.388)
Cahill sees Scripture as having three dimensions, which she defines as “the specific texts on the issue at hand, specific texts on related issues, and general biblical themes or patterns” (64). For specific texts, she mentions Leviticus, Deuteronomy, and Paul’s letters to the Corinthians, the Romans, and Timothy. Citing the historical and social contexts of the Old Testament texts, she dismisses them as not easily applicable to modern society (65). When she considers Paul, she questions whether his lists of sins translate well into modern moral discourse because of Paul’s primary concern with idolatry and because of the Greek model of homosexuality, which greatly differs from modern homosexual relationships that resemble marriage (65). Though she does not specifically state it, implicit in these references to historical context is doubt about the Spirit-inspired nature of the Scriptures. In questioning the ability of the Scriptu...
It has played a major role in history, persecution, church, wars and most importantly in slavery. in this essay i have focus in how hypocrisy was use in race relations using the slave narrative Equiano. In Equiano 's slave narrative examines Christianity and how it allows hypocrisy in slavery. As Equiano travels he sees and learns how whites use religion as a pocketbook, whites pretended to be holy and virtue by attending church and being thrilled of their practice when in reality they were unjustly treating African slaves and not living up to the tenets outlined in the bible. Equiano studies the bible carefully; despite of the hypocrisy Equianos faces he remains loyal to god and always kept his faith in god. Once his convince of the authenticity of his spiritual transformation and studies of the bible then Equiano convert to Methodist
Slave-owners forced a perverse form of Christianity, one that condoned slavery, upon slaves. According to this false Christianity the enslavement of “black Africans is justified because they are the descendants of Ham, one of Noah's sons; in one Biblical story, Noah cursed Ham's descendants to be slaves” (Tolson 272). Slavery was further validated by the numerous examples of it within the bible. It was reasoned that these examples were confirmation that God condoned slavery. Douglass’s master...
...e to the study of the bible instead of all the doubts that was created by the other criticism. To them all the odd parts and repeated phrases or parts all add to a strikingly beautiful tale. They see the bible as a literary masterpiece in which the authors used gorgeous imagery to strike at the heart of the reader to show them God’s greatness. In essence rhetorical critics want you to see the big picture instead of all the little side pictures. The J story of Genesis as well at times the P story is filled with imagery that is meant to show God’s power.
Writings of historical scholars, Josephus, Aristotle, and Plato, to name a few, are taken as truth and fact, yet the writings of the Scripture are constantly disputed. Why? Perhaps because of the ethical imperatives imposed to which people do not want to adhere. Perhaps because of man’s ego and pride that disallows them to submit to a Higher Authority. Nonetheless, The Bible has been, and still remains, the most widely read and revered book of all
Even though humans wrote the text, translating it and passing it down from generations to generations, God’s truth is unchanging. Debates of the inerrancy of the bible cannot usurp God as the King of grace. Instead of focusing on the inerrancy of the Bible, individuals who wish to seek a life of faith should focus on the inspiration God is showing them in his word. These revelations should move them into applicable, daily life changing implications from what they have learned. God shows revelations of himself through the Bible, and his character is revealed time and time again throughout scripture. Any faulty facts or discrepancies in grammar or data, should not take away from the value that scripture holds. When we read scripture we bring new meaning of interpretations of the truths God shows us, since new eras and environmental factors will be influential on how we process information. The bible is not just a fact book, telling humans stories of the past, but instead the bible is inspired instructions for how we can deal with spiritual and ethical encounters we
The bible, also, condemns many aspects of our current day society and allows for slavery. Rather than taking the bible literally, one should consider the historical context and then adjust to today’s norms.
This is quite an important point because Ham essentially starts to doubt Noah and go against him once Noah does not allow him to bring a spouse onto the boat. Another significant point is that Ham is shown as the middle child in the movie with Japheth as the youngest whereas in Genesis Ham is referred to as Noah's youngest son, which if paid attention to, could have possibly altered the storyline of the movie.
While Exodus gives rules that govern certain aspect of society, Genesis gives a reason for these beliefs and value. Exodus places many rules protecting live stock but not crops, Genesis show God favored the meat offering rather than the fruit offering; thus revealing a society that value meat over vegetation. The Hebrew society also saw men superior over women. Genesis explain this gender inequality by saying that Eve was created from Adam and she is the reason for the fall of humanity, thus, deserving of her punishment to be under the control of her husband. Also, with a society that have rules protecting slaves, Genesis provides these citizens with reasoning why slavery came into existence. This society values animals, male dominance, slavery, but most importantly religion; therefore, literature like The Book of Genesis was created to state why these values came into existence using religious
Thus, an effort is made to highlight how Bible interpretation – through its publication – has developed in the history of Christianity.
Thiselton, A.C. (2005). Can the Bible mean whatever we want it to mean? Chester, U.K.: Chester Acadamic Press, 10-11.
Consequently we ask the question where does the idea of the Bible effecting Christian ethical decision making stop having unlimited interpretation. Interpretation can keep on being made of the biblical texts in so many different ways. A Christian living in today’s modern society who is practicing with the Bible as the role of how they base their ethical decisions has many things to consider. Mainly direct and indirect interpretation is to be had of the old and new testaments. Bringing the Bible stories and parables into context helps modern Christians to understand and live out ethically correct lives by applying it to the situation they are in.