Board Of Directors Analysis

984 Words2 Pages

In the corporate world, no matter the structure and formation of the board of directors, there is bound to be a conflict of interest regarding the interest of the board of directors and that of the shareholders. Every company needs the services of a board of directors to ensure the smooth running of the organization. In spite of the fact that the board is configured based on election or appointment, conflict of interest is always bound to arise.
Board of Directors refer to an elected group of individuals who represent shareholders in order to establish policies that are in relation to the corporate’s management and thereby making decisions on the company’s topmost issues. Their duties are to oversee the activities of a company. Company cannot …show more content…

Draft board of directors agreement
5. Draft an agenda
6. Maintain minutes
There are four main types of Board of Directors namely; Inside, Outside, executive and Non-Executive.
An Inside Director can be referred to as one who has a meaningful connection to the organization and has the interest of shareholders (major), employees and officers in mind and therefore adds value to the board due to their expertise and business market. Since it is regarded as a responsibility their roles on the company due to the positions they hold, they do not receive compensations. An executive director is also an inside Director and also an executive of the company. The CEO is an example and make easier the transfer flow of information between the board of directors and management.
An Outside Director on the other hand are absent when it comes to their involvement in the workings of the company within. Unlike the Inside Director, the Outside Director gets reimbursed and also receives additional payment when attending meetings. The Board of Directors perform the following duties;
• They establish policies and set out objectives in order to govern the organization
• They perform the functions of selecting, appointing and reviewing the performance of the …show more content…

EXECUTIVE SHARE OPTION SCHEME : It is designed to provide focus on longer term share price growth and reward the sustained delivery and quantity of earnings growth. This problem a rises when a public company pursue its own self economy interest ahead of shareholders interest. Thus executive directors or the board has several roles they play in the firm (supervising, planning, controlling etc.) which includes setting the pay for executive management. The same board is also the president, and part of executive management team that earns the compensation package. It’s in the chairman’s economy interest to press the other directors to adopt a generous pay package for executive management. When a compensation consultant is even brought into the firm, they are hired by the executive management and so the information they receive is from the executive management so amendment could be made to suit the executive management, firm putting in place measures that shows how fair the share option is will resolve agency

Open Document