Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Behavior modification in school classrooms
Behavior modification chapter 17
Behavior modification in school classrooms
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Behavior modification in school classrooms
Behavior Modification Worker, BMOD, arrived to Client, Quinton Garrett’s, school to observe and improve client’s behavior. The day began with a call from client’s school nurse with some concerns and issues she’s had with client. Upon arrival BMOD met with the school nurse to discuss her concerns. The nurse then states that for the past few Fridays client says that he has taken his medicine before he arrives to school. The nurse could not reach Mom by telephone for confirmation. BMOD informs nurse that client is a habitual liar and to question everything especially when medicine is concerned, but would confirm the validity of client’s compliance with Mom. The school nurse also says client has a bad habit of hiding when she is interacting with …show more content…
client; this morning in particular was one of the worst experiences she’s had with client explaining how it took her almost ten minutes to find client.
It is now mid-morning and school nurse still had not administered client’s medicine because nurse says she feels uncomfortable interacting with client. BMOD assured school nurse client’s inetreactions with her would be different going forward. After debriefing with the school nurse BMOD telephoned Mom during transit to Client’s class who comfirmed she had not given Client his medicine before school. Once BMOD arrived to Client’s classroom, BMOD observed client, who was unaware of BMOD’s presence, misbehaving. Once BMOD unlocked the classroom door, Client’s teacher said, “get em!” She then explained client was on his worst behavior today and had to be disciplined several times prior to class because client was hiding and playing in the hallway. She also stated that client would continue to disturb his peers as they tested and she would have to holler several times to to get client’s attention. BMOD observed client sitting at his desk with a smug look and an incomplete assignment as the teacher briefed BMOD on client’s behavior. BMOD requested for client to meet BMOD in the hallway to discuss his major inappropriate behavior. Clients’s unacceptable school behavior was a huge contrast to his progression in the
recent weeks. Before disciplining client on his behavior, BMOD asked client were there any changes within the home recently? Client who’s head was down the majority of the conversation simply shrugged his shoulders. BMOD praised client for not having an attitude while interacting with BMOD. After determing there was no changes within home circumstances, BMOD reminded client that he should be honest when questioned about his medicine and health by adults. BMOD also reminded client of the promise he made to stop hiding the day prior with both parents present. BMOD asked client how would he feel if BMOD broke a promise to client, client replied “Not Good.” BMOD informed client that he was very disappointed in client’s behavior today. BMOD pointed out to Client how proud and happy he and all the faculty was of him when he is acting his best. Bmod pointed out recent milestones and awards client recieved recently for most improved behavior and grades within recent weeks. Client volountarily apologized to BMOD and promised to make better decsions in BMOD’s absence. BMOD observed Client's attitude appeared more positive by the end of the conversation, versus client biting his nails with his head down, and his nose sneered, as BMOD talked. Client is now giving BMOD who is kneeled at Client’s level, eye contact. BMOD walked client to the nurse’s office, to have his medicine administered. BMOD asked client in the nure’s presence had he had his medicince this moring. Client replied “no sir.” BMOD asked client why does he continually lie and hide with the nurse. BMOD and the nurse reviewed with client the effects of not taking his medicince. BMOD prompted the nurse to refer to the medicnce as smarties, because client is convinced the medicine makes him smarter. Client accepted the coaching in a positive manner, and apologized to the nurse afterwards. BMOD praised client for handling the coaching in a positive manner while returning client to class. After arrival client was informed that he would be sitting with BMOD the remainder of the school day, since he did not want to act responsibly on his own. Amazingly, client did not throw a tantrum, or show any disrespect to BMOD, by snatching, slamming or throwing stuff as he has done in the past. BMOD praised client for not having an attitude. For the remainder of the day Client’s behavior improved drastically. Client asked his teacher for help with a test, which was very uncommon for client. In the past client would simply jot down an answer or skip the test completely. BMOD praised client for his efforts. As a part of client’s discipline for his inappropriate actions earlier that day, BMOD instructed client to join BMOD for lunch, and recess. BMOD said, “Since it seems you missed me so much you acted out in order for me to come rejoin you on my day off.” Client who normally gets an attitude with BMOD, even when BMOD’s nice, seems to be coping with BMOD’s authority well, responded by nodding his head. Client continued his day, no longer needing to be disciplined, and interacting well with his peers. BMOD left Client with teacher, no further contact made.
As the EAI team was discussing Molly’s case, one of the ED Residents made a few telephone calls. Molly’s PCP reported that during her last visit about 2 weeks ago, Mollie was alert and able to respond to questions appropriately. He confirmed that Mollie’s daughter and son in law have experienced psychiatric problems, adding that the son in law has expressed anger regarding Mollie’s living arrangements. The home health care agency was contacted. The RN and aide both report they have never met the son in law and have had very limited contact with Mollie’s daughter. When contacted by telephone, the daughter provided no explanation for Mollie’s extensive bruises noted on admission to the hospital. The daughter stated that Mollie did not fall, but in fact lowered herself to the floor in an effort to draw
The Mabo case was a legal case held in 1992. It was named after an Aboriginal man called Eddie Mabo, who challenged Australian legal system. He fought for claiming the legal rights of Aboriginal and Torres Strait inhabitants. From Mabo’s perspective, Aboriginal people are the traditional owners of their land as they occupied and lived in Australia for thousands of years, much longer and earlier than British people’s arrival in 1788. However, after British people took charge of this continent, Aboriginal people’s life went from bad to worse. They had no legal rights and were treated like animals. Their lives were severely threatened. Moreover, they lost their homes although they were the original owner of the land. After ten years
The term ‘Mabo’’, as described in media reports refers to all the issues concerning the Australian High Court Judgment in the Mabo against Queensland Case. The Mabo decision was named after Eddie Mabo, a Torres Strait islander who regarded the Australian Law on land ownership wrong and challenged the Australian legal system. Eddie Mabo was born on the 29th of June 1936 on Murray Island. Murray Island is between mainland Australia and Papua New Guinea. In his early days of childhood, at the age of 16, Mabo was banished from Murray Island for breaking a customary law and moved to Queensland, where he worked various jobs such as a deck hand and cane cutter. At the age of 23 he married Bonita Nehow and settled in Townsville and had ten children. In Townsville he was a spokesperson for the Torres Strait Islander community and was involved in the Torres Strait islander advancement league. While working as a groundskeeper on James Cook University in 1974, he discovered that his people’s traditional land was actually owned by the government.
Mrs. Hylton is a 45 year old female who presented to the ED via LEO under IVC by her therapist, Melanie, from ADS. Per documentation Mrs. Hylton denies suicidal ideation and homicidal ideation to nursing staff and MCM before the evaluation. She also contracted for safety with MCM. Dr. Horton requested a mental health assessment on Mrs. Hylton. Before the assessment Ms. Melanie and her supervisor Melissa were contacted. Ms. Melissa reports Mrs. Hylton verbally contracted for safety, however left before ADS could type up terms of verbal agreement. Melissa reports afterwards she was not aware of Mrs. Hylton symptoms of psychosis when speaking with her until being informed by Melanie of findings after conversation with Mrs. Hylton. Melanie upon
At the end of the previous school year, Carol, and her daughter’s teachers noticed that Carol’s daughter was not progressing in her studies, and an evaluation conducted by the child study team revealed that she had a specific learning disability. An IEP meeting was scheduled, and conducted. The determination was made to place Carol’s daughter in the same resource room as Carol’s client Jody, for half of the day. Carol instantly realized that this decision put her in a predicament where a dual relationship would be created. She would then cross a clear boundary, and become a parent of a classmate, as well as the professional she has already established herself as to Jody and her parents. This would undoubtedly lead to instances in which both her client, and the client’s family would be interacting with her at both school functions and on class trips. She knew that allowing this to happen was against the BACB Guidelines for Responsible Conduct for Behavior Analysts. Carol voiced her opposition and explained the ethical quandary to those attending the IEP meeting, and what would occur if her daughter was placed in the same room with her client. Carol stated that she would speak with her supervisor, but it was probable that he would determine that she would not be able to continue working with Jody. Carol felt that having to become accustomed to another behavior analyst
Nurse A seemed confident and calm while nurse B appeared tired. With the first patients, I noticed that both nurses were asking for first and last name and confirmed the information with the picture in the computer and the medication cup. After a few minutes, I turned my attention to nurse B because I noticed she did not ask a particular patient for his name. Instead, she relied on the name provided by a patient care technician. When she was about to give the medication to the patient, nurse A noticed that the patient on the computer screen was not the patient on the counter. She immediately told nurse B “ That is not Mr… girl ” and nurse B responded while laughing “ He looks exactly like …, I need to get some coffee ASAP”. The patient immediately realized what happened and told nurse B his name. After that, nurse B reached for the right cup and administered the medication to the patient. Even though a medication error was not committed and no harm was inflicted to the patient, by violating important QSEN competencies this incident could have caused a negative patient outcome.
Muybridge was instrumental in the development of instantaneous photography. To accomplish his famous motion sequence photography, Muybridge even designed his own high speed electronic shutter and electro-timer, to be used alongside a battery of up to twenty-four cameras. While Muybridge 's motion sequences helped revolutionize still photography, the resultant photographs also punctuated the history of the motion picture. Muybridge actually came close to producing cinema himself with his projection device the 'Zoöpraxiscope '. With this device, Muybridge lectured across Europe and America, using the Zoöpraxiscope
The Dallas County Community College District (DCCCD) has been a driving force in continuing education to the citizens of Dallas County and surrounding areas in Texas. The leadership that DCCCD has in the community is a direct result of the leadership within the organization. We will focus on the current Chancellor, Dr. Joe May.
Candidate Bohac briefed a detailed, thorough 5-paragraph order. However, SNC did not develop an initial plan for execution prior to delivering his order. SNC consistently used filler words and cleared his throat during his brief, detracting from the confidence and effectiveness of the brief. SNC did not address security even after asked by another candidate if security was necessary. Upon execution of the problem, Candidate Bohac began to regain his confidence. He placed himself at the point of friction by being the second member to enter the sewer, enabling him to observe the situation on the far side and continue to command and control his fire team. Candidate Bohac was clearly in charge throughout the execution, giving clear, confident,
The critical incident that I will be explaining about is regarding an eight-year-old girl currently a student at Victory Independent School District (VISD). This student wrote on her class journal that her uncle was touching her in her private parts when no one was watching. The teacher was so confused to what to do when he read Bianca’s journal, especially because he was wondering if it was appropriate for him to ask her questions about it. The teacher was concern that due to being a male that the student was going to feel uncomfortable if he were to ask her about what she had wrote in her journal. The teacher did know what to do and he was so confused because he was reading and grading the journals at home during the weekend. He continued reading Bianca’s journal and feeling more worried about his student's well being at home.
The client started experiencing delinquent behavior problems at age 11 around the time his father left out of his life, which may be hard for him to cope. To find out the cause of the client’s action, a meeting was setup with the family to discuss Marcus delinquent behavior. A social worker sat with the client and their family to gather information before client’s court appearance. The client’s family that was present at the session was 35 years old Mrs. Demetress Walker (client’s mother), 12 years old Janessa (sister), 38 Jamarcus Walker (step-father), and 14 years old Tyrus Walker (step-brother). During the session, each family member expressed their issues they have with the client. The social worker notices the tension each family member had towards Marcus. Mrs. Walker relationship towards her son is loving and protective. However, Mrs. Walker does say that Marcus is the one who refuses to get along with the family. Mrs. Walker has been married three times which seems to present a major issue with Marcus, especially since he does not like who she married. It is clear that Mrs. Walker wants to protect her son because she stated that she is scared that anything she says might get him in more trouble. Janessa and Marcus share the typical sibling relationship. Janessa expressed how she is embarrassed because her friends would know when
Abby identified substance used in larger amounts over longer periods, persistent desire or unsuccessful efforts to cut down or control, spend considerable time in activities to obtain the substance, recurrent failure to fulfill major role obligations, continued use despite having recurrent problems, recurrent use in situations in which it is physically hazardous, tolerance, and withdrawal. The identified criteria have been present in excess of 12 months.
ECHO and CT provide great diagnostic tools in diagnosing complications associated with LVADs. The complications can further be subdivided into perioperative and late post-operative complications. In the perioperative period, low flow rates can cause hemodynamic stability which can be caused by an obstructing/malpositioned inflow cannula, hemorrhage, or tamponade (1-23). Later complications include thrombus of the inflow and outflow cannulas, bend relief malpositioning, aortic valve stenosis/insufficiency, and infection. Right sided heart failure can appear as an early or late complication (1).
In the case study that will be discussed throughout this essay a nurse was working for a two physician practice. The physicians decided to end their working relationship and the nurse was assigned the task of photocopying the charts of the physician who was relocating. In order to complete the assignment, the nurse decided to come in on a Saturday, when the office was closed, with her children aged eleven and thirteen, to assist her. One of the physicians had also stated he would pay the children for their assistance in photo copying the charts. When the second physician came in the office and saw what was occurring, he stopped the children from photocopying the charts. He then contacted the board of nursing and filed a complaint for violation of patients’ medical confidentiality against the nurse in the office. In turn, the board of nursing brought disciplinary action against the nurse. She in turn filed a lawsuit. Ethical issues to evaluate and...
The nurse confirmed patient identification, asked subjective questions focusing on chief complaints, performed a focused assessment, obtained medication list, baseline vitals, and assessed the patient’s past medical history. She asked the patient questions such as previous hospitalization/surgery, metal implants, allergies, health history, sleep apnea, and alcohol/tobacco use. The nurse told the patient the doctor would be with her shortly. The nurse reported to the doctor regarding the patient and obtained orders for treatment from the doctor. The nurse then started an IV line and hung an IV solution bag of normal saline because the patient was experiencing abdominal pain. The nurse also administered pain medications and the patient was ready to be discharged. The nurse gave discharge instructions and made sure that the patient had a ride