Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Recommendations for the collection of evidence
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Recommendations for the collection of evidence
Delivery of evidence
The evidence collected from the scene should be properly packaged, labeled and sealed before it is delivered to the laboratory for testing. Proper labeling is essential for laboratory applications as well as for court usage. All the items to be submitted to the laboratory should have the name or the names of the suspects or victims, a brief description of the contents of the package, the location the item was collected, the investigator's name and the date and time the items were collected. It is also imperative to place different items in different packages to avoid cross contamination. The packaging containers should be properly selected according to the items to be packaged. Sealing the outer packages of the evidence helps in maintaining the quality of evidence and ensures that the evidence is not tampered with while being delivered to the laboratory. It is also significant to take into consideration safety issues while packaging the evidence. Where the contents of the packages contain items that are likely to be hazardous it is critical to label such packages appropriately to avoid harm.
How to test blood evidence
There are three types of tests that can be conducted on blood evidence. The first test is the conventional serological tests which analyses proteins, antigens and enzymes present in the blood samples. The elements tested here are vulnerable to degradation and requires large samples to obtain ideal results. The other test is the restriction fragment length polymorphism, which analyses the presence of certain DNA sequences in the white blood cells. DNA does not degrade rapidly like proteins and enzymes and, therefore, this procedure is less likely to be affected by degradation. The third type o...
... middle of paper ...
...arious factors such as the presence of other elements in the samples. These elements do not affect the tests in a similar way and others are more susceptible to these elements than others. The RSID for semen, for instance, is more accurate than the RSID for both blood and saliva since it tests for an antigen that is only specific to the human semen.
Works Cited
Butler, J. M. (2005). Forensic DNA typing: biology, technology, and genetics of STR markers. Academic Press.
Jobling, M. A., & Gill, P. (2004). Encoded evidence: DNA in forensic analysis. Nature Reviews Genetics, 5 (10), 739-751.
Gunn, A. (2008). Essential forensic biology. John Wiley & Sons.
McClintock J. T. (2014). Forensic Analysis of Biological Evidence: A Laboratory Guide for Serological and DNA Typing. CRC Press.
Vince J. J., & Sherlock W. E. (2004). Evidence Collection. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Office of the Inspector General. (2010). Review of the Federal Bureau of Investigation Laboratory’s Forensic DNA Case Backlog. U.S. Department of Justice.
Peschel, O., Kunz, S. N., Rothschild, M. A., & Mützel, E. (2011). Blood stain pattern analysis. Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 7(3), 257-270. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12024-010-9198-1
In certain situations, it is necessary to identify DNA retreived from a sample. When there is a
Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) is an acclaimed extraordinary discovery that has contributed great benefits in several fields throughout the world. DNA evidence is accounted for in the majority of cases presented in the criminal justice system. It is known as our very own unique genetic fingerprint; “a chromosome molecule which carries genetic coding unique to each person with the only exception of identical twins (that is why it is also called 'DNA fingerprinting ')” (Duhaime, n.d.). DNA is found in the nuclei of cells of nearly all living things.
. DNA can be left or collected from the hair, saliva, blood, mucus, semen, urine, fecal matter, and even the bones. DNA analysis has been the most recent technique employed by the forensic science community to identify a suspect or victim since the use of fingerprinting. Moreover, since the introduction of this new technique, there has been a large number of individuals released or convicted of crimes based on DNA left at the crime scene. DNA is the abbreviation for deoxyribonucleic acid.
Nowadays, DNA is a crucial component of a crime scene investigation, used to both to identify perpetrators from crime scenes and to determine a suspect’s guilt or innocence (Butler, 2005). The method of constructing a distinctive “fingerprint” from an individual’s DNA was first described by Alec Jeffreys in 1985. He discovered regions of repetitions of nucleotides inherent in DNA strands that differed from person to person (now known as variable number of tandem repeats, or VNTRs), and developed a technique to adjust the length variation into a definitive identity marker (Butler, 2005). Since then, DNA fingerprinting has been refined to be an indispensible source of evidence, expanded into multiple methods befitting different types of DNA samples. One of the more controversial practices of DNA forensics is familial DNA searching, which takes partial, rather than exact, matches between crime scene DNA and DNA stored in a public database as possible leads for further examination and information about the suspect. Using familial DNA searching for investigative purposes is a reliable and advantageous method to convict criminals.
Crime scenes are known to have many clues left behind. The obvious would be a the body or bodies, clothing, and sometimes even the murder weapon. While these are great way to solve a case there's another kind of evidence; trace evidence. Trace evidence are small pieces of evidence that are laying around a crime scene. There are many types of trace evidence some of them include metal filings, plastic fragments, gunshot residue, glass fragments, feathers, food stains, building materials, lubricants, fingernail scrapings, pollens and spores, cosmetics, chemicals, paper fibers and sawdust, human and animal hairs, plant and vegetable fibers, blood and other body fluids, asphalt or tar, vegetable fats and oils, dusts and other airborne particles, insulation, textile fibers, soot, soils and mineral grains, and explosive residues. Although these are the most common found elements, they are not the only ones. The Trace Evidence Unit is known to examine the largest variety of evidence types and used the biggest range of analytical methods of any unit. materials are compared with standards or knowns samples to determine whether or not they share any common characteristics. In this paper I will discuss the different kinds of trace evidence and how crime scene investigaros use it to solve cases and convict criminal.
Once a crime has been committed the most important item to recover is any type of evidence left at the scene. If the suspect left any Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) at the crime scene, he could then be linked to the crime and eventually charged. A suspect’s DNA can be recovered if the suspect leaves a sample of his or her DNA at the crime scene. However, this method was not always used to track down a suspect. Not too long ago, detectives used to use bite marks, blood stain detection, blood grouping as the primary tool to identify a suspect. DNA can be left or collected from the hair, saliva, blood, mucus, semen, urine, fecal matter, and even the bones. DNA analysis has been the most recent technique employed by the forensic science community to identify a suspect or victim since the use of fingerprinting. Moreover, since the introduction of this new technique it has been a la...
“Advance in Forensics Provide Creative Tools for Solving Crimes.” www.ctcase.org. Np. n.d. Web. 17 March 2014.
"Using DNA to Solve Crimes." U.S. Department of Justice: National Institute of Justice. (September 9, 2014). Web. 29 May 2015.
“The rapid implementation and continuing expansion of forensic DNA databases around the world has been supported by claims about their effectiveness in criminal investigations and challenged by assertions of the resulting intrusiveness into individual privacy” (p545).
Savolainen, Peter, & Lundeberg, Joakim (1999). Forensic Evidence Based on mtDNA from Dog and Wolf Hairs. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 44 (1), 77-80.
Collection of evidence is usually a term designated to refer to the collection of physical evidence, government agencies such as police or environmental protection departments will have their own methods for the collection, storage and conservation of physical evidence and it is the responsibility of forensic personnel to adhere to these set guidelines. General principles which are shared amongst various agencies include, the creation of contemporaneous notes, recording the collection of evidence via photographing, videotaping and/or audiotapes, preserving the crime scene by sealing off the location and only allowing designated personnel to enter, avoiding contamination of the crime scene by investigators through the use of full body covering and also preventing cross-contamination with the scene and any suspects.
The amount of evidence can either help win or lose a case. Every crime scene has evidence available for officers to collect. It is important for them to know what the standard protocol is for collecting evidence and how to properly collect it without contamination.
Confirmatory test that can be used are: the Rapid Stain Identification^TM-Blood test, an enzyme immunoassay, the HemeSelect^TM test, the precipitin test, and various other tests as well (1, 3). But currently, the ability to determine if a bloodstain came for a human or animal source involves extracting nuclear DNA, or mitochondrial DNA from a blood sample (1). As a result, a DNA profiles are produced that have targeted species differentiations (1). These confirmatory tests are reliable, but they are destroy the blood samples, can have a multi-step process, can be time-consuming, and expensive (1, 3). As a result, scientists are researching other possible confirmatory tests that are less expensive, less time-consuming, and non-destructive