Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Indentured servitude in colonial america
Indentured servitude in colonial america
Indentured servitude in colonial america
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Indentured servitude in colonial america
Could the majority become the minority? Peter Wood’s Black Majority is a historical book about the rising African population to colonial South Carolina between 1670 and the Stono Rebellion of 1739. He examines how this majority affected the still maturing Colony and how the rise of slavery boosted the economy. Wood argues that Negroes were the majority of the population in South Carolina and the backbone to the economy despite what other historical works say about slavery. The novel illustrates the South Carolina colony being shaped more by the numerical majority rather than the minority, the Englishmen, who had a greater power in the social structure of the colony. Wood’s emphases three main ideas throughout the book to describe how the population …show more content…
of African people in the colony surpassed the Englishmen. One point that Woods writes about is how the Englishmen in the colony would decide on what slaves would be able to make them the most profit.
They preferred African slaves to European or Native American slaves because they "could be held for unlimited terms, and there was no means by which word of harsh or arbitrary treatment could reach their homelands" (Wood, 43). The ability of the Englishmen to hold slaves for an unlimited amount of time and to use any methods of punishment gave them all the power. The indentured servant only worked to fulfill the previous contract as part of the headright system. Colonists "complained of the 'servants that dayley become free"(41). Since the servants had varying terms of service, it made it difficult to keep enough workers. Native Americans were cheap and did not have to be imported, but knew the land better than the Englishmen and could easily escape. There was also a language barrier and they died relatively quick, which made them not worth the investment. This shows some insight into how the African population started to become …show more content…
present. As the colonists settled more of South Carolina, they had to figure out a way to develop a successful trade market with other nations thus acquiring the needed necessities to achieve stability. In this search, the "readies market were found in the raising of livestock" (28). Because of the large quantity of land, livestock could graze at will, which caused the animals to reproduce at a very fast rate. However, this still was not enough to sustain the colony they needed a more reliable product. The colonists discovered that rice was a valuable resource that grew in this area, and it quickly became a cash crop. The African people "were more familiar with the planting, hoeing, processing, and cooking of rice than were the European settlers who purchased them" (61). If the African people had not been so knowledgeable about rice, the colony would not have been as prosperous as it was. Because of the Africans expertise, the colonists were able to capitalize on it, expand their farms, and purchase more slaves. By the Englishmen, doing this the population of African people in the colony was steadily increasing raising tension between black and white. The English settlers had major issues with diseases in South Carolina and the settlers discovered that during the summer and fall months the diseases would get worse.
They "developed a common routine of removing their families to Newport, Rhode Island, during that portion of the year" (73). By doing this, they lowered the risk of people getting sick and dying. They made a discovery that malaria and yellow fever were what was causing so many people to get sick. However, the African slaves were unaffected to these diseases and could endure working in the fields without getting sick. This being another reason African slaves were prevalent in South Carolina, and how they became the
majority. Wood explains how this growing black majority created tension in South Carolina. Englishmen felt more threatened because the African slaves were learning about the economy and tasks that helped them become involved. In order to maintain power over their slaves, they applied several limitations through slave acts that were so extreme they even said what clothes the slaves had to wear. These acts burdened slaves so much that they began to resist, leading to the Stono Rebellion.
Malaria is a mosquito born disease that originated in England. The disease infected the West Coast of the Americas in the 17th century. When the English colonists traveled to the New World, they unintentionally carried with them the Plasmodium parasite. The body reacts to the Plasmodium parasite in an ongoing cycle of fever and fatigue every couple months. The parasite would have rested in the liver among red blood cells for months and suddenly hit the victim with a full blown malarial attack. Malaria does not necessarily kill the victim, but it does drastically weaken him for weeks until his body can fight off the disease. African slaves were previously exposed to malaria. Therefore, many of them were immune to the parasite before being forced into slavery in the New World. Slavery intensified very quickly after the colonists realized that the slaves were not only an almost free work source but were also immune to the disease that tired
On September 9, 1739, as many as one hundred African and African American slaves were living within twenty miles of Charleston, South Carolina. This rebellious group of slaves joined forces to strike down white plantation and business owners in an attempt to march in numbers towards St. Augustine, Florida where the Spanish could hopefully grant their freedom. During the violent march toward Florida, the Stono Rebellion took the lives of more than sixty whites and thirty slaves. Ranking as South Carolina’s largest slave revolt in colonial America, Peter Charles Hoffer, a historian at the University of Georgia and author of Cry Liberty: The Great Stono River Slave Rebellion of 1739 tries to reinterpret the Stono Rebellion and challenges the reader to visualize what really went on to be a bloody uprising story in American History.
In Myne Owne Ground, the authors argue that it was not inevitable that black men and women were made subordinate to white colonists in colonial Virginia because in the early days there was more about wealth, economic standing, and religion than the color of one’s skin. For example, when a white man, Richard Ackworth, ask John Johnson to give testimony in a suit which Ackworth had filed against another Whiteman (Myne Owne Ground, 16). They were unwilling to allow a black man to testify in legal proceedings involving whites at first, but when they learned that John had been baptized and understood the meaning of an oat, they accepted his statement.
There are many contradictions pertaining to slavery, which lasted for approximately 245 years. In Woody Holton’s “Black Americans in the Revolutionary Era”, Holton points out the multiple instances where one would find discrepancies that lie in the interests of slaveowners, noble figures, and slaves that lived throughout the United States. Holton exemplifies this hostility in forms of documents that further specify and support his claim.
South Carolina was one of the only states in which the black slaves and abolitionists outnumbered their oppressors. Denmark Vesey’s slave revolt consisted of over nine-thousand armed slaves, free blacks, and abolitionists, that would have absolutely devastated society in South Carolina for slave owners, and could have quite possibly been a major step towards the abolishment of slavery in the United states. Robertson succeeded in describing the harsh conditions of slaves in pre-civil war Charleston, South Carolina. This book also helped me to understand the distinctions between the different groups. These groups including the black slaves, free blacks, extreme abolitionists, and the pro-slavery communities.
Writing around the same time period as Phillips, though from the obverse vantage, was Richard Wright. Wright’s essay, “The Inheritors of Slavery,” was not presented at the American Historical Society’s annual meeting. His piece is not festooned with foot-notes or carefully sourced. It was written only about a decade after Phillips’s, and meant to be published as a complement to a series of Farm Credit Administration photographs of black Americans. Wright was not an academic writing for an audience of his peers; he was a novelist acceding to a request from a publisher. His essay is naturally of a more literary bent than Phillips’s, and, because he was a black man writing ...
Between 1800 and 1860 slavery in the American South had become a ‘peculiar institution’ during these times. Although it may have seemed that the worst was over when it came to slavery, it had just begun. The time gap within 1800 and 1860 had slavery at an all time high from what it looks like. As soon as the cotton production had become a long staple trade source it gave more reason for slavery to exist. Varieties of slavery were instituted as well, especially once international slave trading was banned in America after 1808, they had to think of a way to keep it going – which they did. Nonetheless, slavery in the American South had never declined; it may have just come to a halt for a long while, but during this time between 1800 and 1860, it shows it could have been at an all time high.
With growing demand for labor came the increasing cost of indentured servants, whose four to seven years of labor would end. They would expand to the West, demanding land and creating their own lawless settlements. Bacon's Rebellion came to show landowners that white rebellious males posed a threat, and the event came to represent the threat indentured servitude had become. By 1763, landowners’ focus turned to African slaves for a number of reasons. The amount of land and demand for colonial raw materials and goods skyrocketed along with the developing plantation systems in the Chesapeake other southern colonies. These regions had enormous amounts of slaves; the southern colonies’ population was 30-60% slaves. Slaves were a more profitable source of labor since landowners did not have to pay them. Slaves were typically bound for life, versus the seven year cycle that indentured servants were bound to their masters. This proved to be a more efficient model, especially since slavery became legally perpetual. Slavery was extended through the generations, whereas indentured servants would eventually be
Advantages of indentured servants to the master were mainly monetary. Indentured servants were considerably cheaper in comparison to the purchase of slave. With that being said indentured servants were often subjected to some form of cruelty or brutality (Faragher 2009, p. 56). Incidentally, in many cases slaves received more humane treatment because they were seen as a lifetime investment ("Colonial america,”).
Curtin, Philip D: The rise and fall of the plantation complex:essays in Atlantic history (Cambridge, 1990).
Slavery in the eighteenth century was worst for African Americans. Observers of slaves suggested that slave characteristics like: clumsiness, untidiness, littleness, destructiveness, and inability to learn the white people were “better.” Despite white society's belief that slaves were nothing more than laborers when in fact they were a part of an elaborate and well defined social structure that gave them identity and sustained them in their silent protest.
England at the time was over populated, and jobs were hard to find. So many people that could not afford the boat trip over to America offered themselves as an indentured servant for a period of time. This contractual term can last from four to seven years. Many colonists preferred having indentured servants over slaves, because they also helped ward off Native Americans from attacking settlers. The one big drawback of indentured servants was that they usually did not make it past the first year of their contract.
... ocean. These diseases were due to the minimum ventilation, light, food, and sanitation necessary to survive the trip across the ocean. The slaves were also chained to prevent revolts and committing suicides by jumping over-board. Traders even hired freed blacks to spy on the slaves, to prevent an uprising to occur. Nearly 1/4th of the slaves died during the journey across the Atlantic, which was an average of 2-3 months. The slave ship then had either two paths to take; one to the American colonies or to the West Indies.
In addition, Africans had to endure the terrible heat, there was little or no food provided. They were subjected to diseases that quickly spread among slaves, and many died due to unsanitary conditions. Most of the time, the sick were thrown overboard to avoid infecting others. One writer describes the terrible conditions that African slaves had to endure, “In the voyage, one of every three Africans died from dysentery, smallpox, or suffocation and was thrown overboard to the sharks, who reportedly followed the slave ships from the coast of Africa all the way to the New World.”
When colonists realized that they needed extra help in farming the crop, they “turned to African slaves as a cheaper, more plentiful labor source than indentured servants” (http://www.history.com/topics/black-history/slavery). Overtime as technology advanced, the need for slaves became only more apparent as the farmers needed assistance in using their machinery and working in the fields. Over the course of just the 1700’s an estimated 6 to 7 million slaves were imported from Africa. (http://www.history.com/topics/black-history/slavery). Before even arriving on the ship to the New World, Africans were often branded with steaming hot metal and chained together. The conditions on the ship only got worse. “According to Equiano, "The closeness of the place, and the heat of the climate, added to the number in the ship, which was so crowded that each had scarcely room to turn himself, almost suffocated us. This produced copious perspirations, so that the air soon became unfit for respiration, from a variety of loathsome smells, and brought on a sickness among the slaves, of which many died."” It is estimated that close to 20% of the people on the ships died due to the atrocious conditions they were forced to withstand. (http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/aia/part1/1p277.html). For those who survived the treacherous journey, mere misery awaited them in America. They