Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The challenges faced by Bismarck
The role of Bismarck in unification and integration
Bismarck' s essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Otto von Bismarck was appointed Prime Minister of Prussia during the mid-1900s and would forever change the history of this nation. During this timeframe, the state of political affairs throughout Europe was in a tumultuous frenzy. Even prior to the emergence of Bismarck, Europe had already suffered numerous wars which completely reshaped the balance of power. The Crimean wars eliminated any srt off absolute Russian hegemony. Other empires such as the Ottomans entered into a period of decline and the British place a greater focus on domestic over foreign policy. During these incidents, new styles of thinking were rising to prominence. The first was the emergence of Liberals, who advocated for personal freedoms, less religious influence, and …show more content…
With the use of realpolitik, Bismarck could implement ideas that he believed were necessary for his success of the country while maintaining flexibility in his ideological stance. This can be seen in his speech given in advocacy for a new insurance bill. He advocates that “the state must help persons in distress,” despite its appearance as a socialist position (Document 6). These actions show his willingness to compromise on important issues. Another reason for the distinction of Bismarck was due to his combined criticism from socialists, liberals, and even other conservatives. German socialist Willheim Liebknecht attacked Bismarck for only choosing to compromise, rather than fully supporting socialists positions (Document 2). On the other hand, conservatives also attacked Bismarch for even relinquishing any support for the socialist cause. Hermann Wagner, a prominent conservative, warned that ot’s a “political mistake” to give socialists any form of compromise based off “their social advocacy” (Document 3). Liberals also held grudges against Bismarck, accusing his domestic policies of being flawed and harmful. Liberal journalist such as Eugen Richter accused his policies as having “sinned against national life” (Document 7). These dramatic accusations represent opposition from partisans all over the spectrum. But having endured all that, these ideals allowed Bismarck to …show more content…
During his rule, he passed legislation such as the “Law of Concerning the Equality of All Religions with Respect to Civil Rights and Citizenship of July 3rd, 1869” and the “School Inspection Law of March 11, 1872” which all contradicted traditional conservative ideology and were more socialist and liberal, respectively (Document 1). By allowing policies that were clearly against traditional conservative positions, it helped prove that he lacked any strong loyalty towards a specific side, proving he wasn’t exactly a traditional conservative. His legislation wasn’t limited to simple social institutions and structures, but also involved the use of economic reform, particularly involving worker conditions. The Emperor of Prussia spoke of the policies involving “Consistent organization to the commercial health insurance system,” “state welfare,” all based off “moral foundation of a Christian national life” (Document 5). These statements allowed Bismarck to implement policies all over the board while maintaining a general and public position as a conservative who supported religion. This directly contradicts hs policies of religious equality rather than favoritism in Document 1. But he still maintains other conservative ideas by preventing any radical reform and maintaining stability within the
The focus of this study is the effect that Otto Von Bismarck's leadership and politics had on Pre-World War One tensions in Europe. This study investigates to what extent the actions of Otto Von Bismarck led to World War One. The focus of this study is the period between Bismarck's appointment to Minister President of Prussia on September 23, 1862 and the Austro-Hungarian declaration of war on Serbia on July 28, 1914. Bismarck's earlier career is discussed briefly but only as a method to understand his political attitudes. And similarly, as Bismarck was removed from office in 1890, the only events discussed between 1890 and 1914 will be based off of policies instilled by Bismarck, not those of Wilhelm II.
Between 1815 and 1851, there was an increase in conservative demands and ideals across Europe. Three nations fit into this mold exceptionally well, one of them being Prussia. The other nation that best shows how conservative ideals achieved their goals is France and how it changed after the restoration of the Bourbon monarchy. The third nation being, Austria and how the rulers handled the discontent of the different minority groups within it’s borders.
Bismarck’s government first passed four laws starting reasonably with the abolishment of restrictions on civil rights based on religious beliefs, but later descending to an irrational law stating that social-democratic, Socialist, and communist endeavors are to be prohibited (doc 1). In an attempt to gain more power for himself, Chancellor Otto Von Bismarck naturally created this series of laws to diminish the power within religious organizations. Additionally, in response to Bismarck’s unjust governing, Wilhelm Liebknecht made a speech stating that there is no point in sending a candidate to Reichstag if the government has the power to eradicate that candidate if they oppose his viewpoints (doc 2). As a German Socialist of the Social-Democratic Party, Wilhelm Liebknecht naturally wanted to maintain the fair amount of power that the Social-Democratic Party originally held, but Bismarck and the government were willing to deprive the powerful political party of their rights in order to gain more power for themselves. Lastly, a political cartoon published in 1879 displayed Chancellor Otto Von Bismarck steering the helm of a boat, but on the helm were the names of political parties implying his negative treatment to each of them (doc 4). In the satirical German magazine where the political cartoon, “At the Helm”, was published, the
In the colonization period, the urge to conquer foreign territories was strong, and many lands in the Western Hemisphere were conquered. With the colonization of these areas, a mercantilist relationship was formed between the conquered civilization and the maternal country. A major part of this was the restriction of exportation of native resources only to the mother country as well as the banning of trading with colonies of other countries. In turn, there was an increasing in the number of smuggling activities during the time. According to a British sailor named William Taggart in 1760, the illegal smuggling of goods into these areas had a positive impact because it brought prosperity to the people in Monte Christi, as there were only one hundred poor families. Likewise, Dominica governor John Orde praised the trading because it created prices much lower than with its maternal country. However, British admiral David Tyrell, Roger Elletson, Dominica governor John Orde, and a 1790 Bahaman newspaper report all had similar views on the harmful effects and corruptness present in smuggling. Despite this, physician George Lipscomb and British Lieutenant Governor Thomas Bruce had neutral opinions on the matter, and only stated what they witnessed in the process.
In 1893 a world fair was held in Chicago Illinois to celebrate the 4thcentenniel of Columbus discovering the Americas. The exposition displayed grand buildings with beautiful architecture, hundreds of exhibits ranging from exotic tribes of Africa, to new inventions, expertly constructed landscape, and astounding attractions such as the first Ferris wheel. The fair lasted for six months and had over 27 million visitors, including ¼ of the American population.
...racy from its arsenal. We shall become members of the Reichstag in order that the Weimar ideology should itself help us destroy it.”(Doc 7) This shows another Nazi member talking about conservative ideas and military forces which made this party tough competition for the republic to beat. Even the Communist Party encouraged militarization, and they were on the opposite end of the spectrum. This can be seen in the political cartoon by George Grosz, depicting a large communist military force.(Doc 5) This proves that overall, the conservative values were quite popular and gave the Weimar republic a lot to keep up with.
When Otto von Bismarck was recalled from Paris to become Minister-President of Prussia in 1862, German nationalism was already more than 40 years old. First apparent in the opposition to Napoleon´s occupation of the German states, national feeling grew into a movement after 1815. This feeling was encouraged by a growth of interest in German literature and music and by increased economic cooperation between the north German states. By 1848 it was strong enough to make the creation of a united Germany one of the main demands of the revolutionaries. Otto von Bismarck was a Prussian patriot who inherited the traditions of love of king, army and country from his family.
...of Carsten and similar historians writing at the time is that the far-left were not as politically strong as first thought so consequently there was a lack of any serious opposition to the established order and in turn they were allowed had more independence and self-determination in implementing Germany’s first republic. So the social basis for a constitutional government in Germany was a lot more widespread than formerly thought. Furthermore, the apprehensiveness of the social democrats can be interpreted in terms of distrusting the unstructured mass movements that existed in the pressing post-war years, and placing their trust in the old elites. However, works such as Feldman’s, ‘The great disorder. The German inflation 1914 – 1924’ argue that the perspective representative potential of soldiers and workers unions and councils were in fact decisively contentious
The general public of Germany had never had any say in political matters; they allowed the Kaiser to make all the decisions regarding themselves and their once-prosperous country. The groups controlling Germany began to change during October and November 1918. More power began to fall into the hands of the people as they realised the blame for their involvement in the war was the Kaiser’s. People such as the armed soldiers, sailors and workers started protesting and going on strike. This was a far cry from before the war, when Germany was wealthy, proud and ambitious. So for a brief period, it seemed that a revolution would take place, with the people of Germany wanting a social and political revolution.
The last battle of the Bismarck changed the tides during World War II. The Bismarck was Germany’s most famous battleship during World War Two, and was sunk on May 27, 1941. The Bismarck had already sunk the battleship HMS Hood before being sunk herself. For many, the end of the Hood and Bismarck symbolized the end of the time when battleships were the dominant force in naval warfare, to be replaced by submarines and aircraft carriers and the advantages these ships gave to naval commanders.
The time of World War One saw great variation in European politics. This ran from the rightist control in Italy under Mussolini to the Stalinist administration of the Soviet Union. Maybe no other country saw such an emotional legislative vacillation as did Germany. Germany started this time period as the staunch majority rule government of the Weimar Republic, was later swung to the rightist fascism of Hitler. The worst general purpose behind this extreme change in government was the Weimar Republic's insecurity. The uncertainy of the Weimar Republic can be credited to the way that legislature did not have clear objectives or prominent backing, and the staying request of military drive and firm control among the German citizenry.
The German Weimar Republic was an attempt to make Germany a more democratic state. While this was a very good idea in theory, the Weimar Republic was ineffective due to the instability that came with it. Several factors contributed to the instability of Germany’s Weimar Republic, such as the new political ideals brought forward and the government’s hunger for war. To begin, one of the factors that contributed to the instability of the Weimar republic was the presence of new political ideals. Marie Juchacz unintentionally highlighted that reason in her speech to the National Assembly.
Many people had voted for Hitler because of his economic policies, they believed it had a positive sense of direction. There was a widespread feeling that finally a government was doing something to get Germany back on her feet.
This man rose to power promising to restore Germany as a world power and establish the German people as the "master race". He was not German. His political views and anti-Semitism now seem very troubled. His legacy of death and destruction on a global scale effects the world even today.
“Bismarck and German Nationalism.” The American Historical Review Vol. 60, No.3 (1955): pg. 78. 548-556.