Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Implementation of market research
Implementation of market research
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The history of Big Rock is that of confidence, determination and creativity. Since inception, Big Rock’s strategy has surrounded the idea of quality-first, producing great tasting products to drive sales revenues. Unfortunately, this product-first strategy has become less and less effective as time has gone on. The resulting poor performance of new products and declining profitability of previously successful products could be due to several factors.
The market research you provided us explains this decline through the limited loyalty of craft beer drinker as well as a flooded, highly competitive marketplace (increased availability). We feel that the other half of the story is that the current strategy at Big Rock doesn’t position its products for success. That is, creating a premium quality product isn’t enough to gain
…show more content…
This is a change which goes to the core of the current strategy. Making a great product that no one wants isn’t helping your shareholders make money. Instead, Big Rock should focus on their target consumer. For every new beer you create, decide which consumer segment you want to target (each beer can be different - it doesn’t have to define your brand!). After you have a core group to focus on, find out what they like. Collect market research before you start production. Maybe there is a space in your target markets beer portfolio which is left untapped, or if not, find out what your market currently likes and make something better. Create a beer to fill your customers’ needs, rather than creating a bunch of product you aren’t sure they’ll want. The current strategy relies too heavily on sales/marketing which are operating in the dark in a highly competitive space with little to no advantage. Instead, by determining where the need is first and then creating a beer to fulfill those needs Big Rock will be leveraging its true advantage - the expertise of creating delicious
Simpson, B. (2008). “New Belgium Brewing (B)” in Ferrell, O. C., and Hartline, Michael D., Marketing Strategy, Fourth Edition, Mason, Ohio: Thompson Southwestern Publishing, pp. 1-5.
The scope of this report is an evaluation of the profitability of each brand. The report does not intend to make recommendations of how invest and promote new products and how to increase brewing capacity.
Using consumer survey information, we devised a metric for calculating and projecting Coors market share. While only 300 customers were surveyed (Research Study G), we made an assumption that this sample sufficiently represented the preferences of the greater population in the two-county market area. We also assumed that attitudes toward Coors were equally distributed amongst consumer weekly beer consumption levels. Then, we forecast Coors market share by multiplying the percentage of people with a certain preference by the Coors purchase percentage for that preference. We projected an anticipated market share range, between 13.7% and 21.5%, illustrated in Exhibit 2.
Nevertheless, it must “defend” its current market share if not increase it, by maintaining premium quality and develop innovative products. The marketing mix strategies will effectively achieve targeted revenue and profitability in the near future.
While Ben & Jerry’s has multiple strengths, it is also worth noting some of the company’s weakness and how they can combat them. Although their commitment to clean resources draws in consumers, it also losing another group of people, those who do not wish to pay extra price the company must charge to offset clean technology choices. Ben & Jerry’s is one of the more expensive ice cream brands located in a local grocery store. This has direct correlation to their lack of an exceptionally large sale
As larger beer corporations move toward this growing market, NBB will have to develop measures to maintain market share (Gorski, 2013).
Mr. Flint’s comments were discussing what could happen during collective bargaining with employees’ pay and benefits, which is his opinion. Moreover, David Walsh writes, “Employers can make predictions about the likely consequences that unionization will have for the business—consequences that are objectively because of economic reality that is beyond the employer’s control.” (Walsh, 2013-2016, pg. 511) However, Mr. Flint’s comments were discussing a decrease in pay and less benefits, which could be construed as a threat.
As stated in the case, “the market for energy drinks was growing; between 2010 and 2012, the market for energy drinks had grown by 40%. It was estimated to be $8.5 billion in the United States in 2013 [and] forecasts projected that figure to reach $13.5 billion by 2018” (pg 5). However, much of this market’s revenue -- 85% in fact -- is dominated by five major brands, while the remaining 15% is split between approximately 30 regional and national companies. (pg. 5). With this saturated market, it might not be best for Crescent Pure to enter as a completely new product to the industry, as there is the possibility that it will be squeezed out of the profit shares by more established brands -- especially if it is not properly secure in its identity. In addition, while the market for energy drinks appeared to be growing at an exponential rate compared to the market for sports drinks -- which increased only 9% in five years and would be at approximately 60% of the rate for energy drinks in 2017 (pg 6) -- the consumers appeared to be wary of partaking in the market for several reasons, which would potentially harm the reach of Crescent Pure. These concerns included rising news reports discussing the safety of energy drinks (pg. 5). Taking into consideration the data provided in the case that concerns reasonings of why consumers choose specific drinks over others, there
Nearly a century after the conclusion of the civil war, our nation was still not united. However, no longer was tension between the north and south threatening the welfare of our country, but instead the segregation of African-Americans. A primary goal in the civil war was abolishing slavery and although that was accomplished, many believed that blacks were hardly better off. However, a sense that change was necessary had swept across the United States. The desegregation movement was just beginning and the effects of the Little Rock Integration Crisis was one of the earliest stepping stones leading towards a united nation; this event helped set new standards of integration, while setting an example to the rest of the world that old forms of segregation would no longer be accepted.
Relationships with interest groups and the public policy makers has been one of the many things that the Boston Beer Company has strived to maintain and expand. The company realizes that these relationships are critical for the future success of the company. Being in the brewing industry the policies and publics opinion can influence the changes in future policies and procedures that would affect the industry. Developing and maintaining the relationships with the interest groups as well as the policy makers could prove to be very beneficial to not only the company but the brewing industry as a whole.
After 1996, the U.S. beer industry had consistent growth with about 3,500 brands on the market in 2002 (Alcoholic Beverages, 2005). The U.S. exported beer to almost one hundred countries worldwide. The beer industry peaked production with 6.2 billion gallons in 2003 (Alcoholic Beverages, 2005). The U.S. beer industry haws over 300 breweries. However, this industry is dominated by three companies: Anheuser Bush (45% of the industry), Miller Brewing (23% of the industry), and Adolph Coors (10% of the industry) (Overview of the U.S. Beer Industry, 2005).
Diageo has long been the front-runner in the premium drinks business. Its brands include Guinness, Smirnoff, Bailey's, Johnnie Walker, and Cuervo complimented by broad range of local and specialty brands from around the world. In 2002, Diageo held a 15% (United States-Spirits, 2002) market share and was by far the leading manufacturer of spirits in the United States followed by Pernod, and Fortune Brands, Inc. The market is expected to have 9.8% (Huddleston, 2005) growth in the next three to four years, so new entrants may find the going hard unless they have capital to sustain themselves.
1.Red Bull differentiates itself in not only the soft drink industry by focusing on energy drinks solely, but also in the business industry, seeing how their strengths, weaknesses, opportunities for improvement, and threats all seem to blur together . The fact that Red Bull is seen as a luxury and sports drink is a strength, weakness, opportunity, and threat within itself (Kansara, 2); being labeled as such sets Red Bull apart from their competitors, pushing them into one field and industry to prosper in and be associated with, leaving them opportunity to determine the way that industry will grow as they are the pioneers but also threatening their hopes for expansion. In a nutshell, in order for Red Bull to truly work towards their mission
This competitive advantage has been rendered sustainable as other players have found it difficult to catch up with the company's competitive strategy. In spite of this clear advantage, it was noted that the company faces some challenges being the world leader in soft drink distribution. The canning and bottling of the product which is done in many countries have now fallen into the hands of independent companies, thus it becomes hard for a given company to control the quality of the packaging
Experimentation with the new market for carbonated beverages on the decline coke has done experiments in new flavors and healthier alternatives to try to stay competitive. As well as investing in “Keurig Green Mountain is a K-Cup maker but has a new Keurig Cold that can deliver Coca-Cola through the new system.” (Cooper, 2014)