Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literary essay about civil war
Writing slave narratives
Analysis of a slave narrative
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Literary essay about civil war
In a divided society on the cusp of civil war, the controversial issue of slavery was one that pervaded throughout all facets of United States politics, resulting in a large scale debate that stretched across almost every aspect of American life. The literature of the time was no different in that regard, easily becoming a medium in which several authors saw fit to reach an audience on the social matter at hand. However, while some saw fit to employ an emotional appeal with the hope of changing a reader’s stance on the issue, others instead merely wanted to focus on the discussion of the moral topic of slavery itself, illustrating the sometimes opposing viewpoints present of the time. Thus, in order to fully understand the varying attitudes …show more content…
This attitude is best seen when the narration opts to describe the slaves as one might a buyable product, depicting them as predisposed to working while still maintaining a cheerful disposition, with “most negroes [being] natural valets and hair-dressers” (Melville 212). Even more so than this, whereas the narrative voice of The Heroic Slave could be seen as an extension of Douglass’s personal pro-abolitionist views, the one in Benito Cereno is notably separate from Melville as an author, as his own opinions on the matter of slavery are still far too murky to pinpoint as easily. Thus, it is safe to say that, rather than being the voice of the author, the narration in Melville’s work is more of its own character, one with a perspective different from that of the white protagonist as well. With this, another layer of ambiguity is added within the context of the story, especially when, at the climax, the narrator is proven wrong in the assumption that Babo is a simpleminded servant. Yet, while The Heroic Slave goes to great lengths to remind the audience of the Madison’s humanity through soliloquies and lengthy descriptions, Benito Cereno instead presents Babo as he is, never going into depth about his own personal emotions, thus forcing the readers to form their own assumptions as they would in
Despite each individual having different circumstances in which they experienced regarding the institution of slavery, both were inspired to take part in the abolitionist movement due to the injustices they witnessed. The result is two very compelling and diverse works that attack the institution of slavery and argue against the reasons the pro-slavery individuals use to justify the slavery
The narratives were written by African Americans, but read overwhelmingly by white audiences and in these narratives there is evidence that show Bibb, Northup, and Jacobs had their white audience in their mind while creating their stories. In Henry Bibb 's passage he states that "Both parties are caught in the act by a white person, the slave is punished with the lash, while the white man is often punished with both lynched and common law," (209). "The slave holders are generally rich, artistic, overbearing; and they look with utter contempt upon a poor laboring man, who earns his bread by the "sweat of his brow," whether he be moral or immoral, honest or dishonest," (209). In these sentences Bibb 's had his mind on the white audience due to the way he was describing the slaveholders and how a white person was not punished with lashes. Solomon Northup "He fears he will be caught lagging through the day; he fears to approach the gin-house with his basket-load of cotton at night; he fears, when he lies down, that he will oversleep himself in the morning," (215). Northup wanted to describe to the white audience how slaves and himself were scared for there lives everyday being a slave while working for their masters, and how much pain the master 's caused slaves. In Harriet Jacobs passaged she says "O, what days and nights of fear and sorrow that man caused me! Reader, it is not to awaken sympathy for myself that I am telling you truthfully what I suffered in slavery. I do
Where Melville is quite subtle, Beecher Stowe is much more obvious and sentimental. In Benito Cereno Melville uses irony and the naivety of Captain Delano as means to criticize slavery. He does this in a very subtle and tricky way. The reader is misled through the whole story, but that is only because of Captain Delano's description and misunderstanding of the situation on the San Dominick. Captain Delano is incapable of realizing what is really going on onboard.
In, “The Narrative of the life of Frederick Douglass”, readers get a first person perspective on slavery in the South before the Civil War. The author, Frederick Douglass, taught himself how to read and write, and was able to share his story to show the evils of slavery, not only in regard to the slaves, but with regard to masters, as well. Throughout Douglass’ autobiography, he shares his disgust with how slavery would corrupt people and change their whole entire persona. He uses ethos, logos, and pathos to help establish his credibility, and enlighten his readers about what changes needed to be made.
There are other contrasting aspects of the stories that call for attention. Most significantly Benito Cereno – ultimately – portrays slaves as evil and Babo as the mind behind the cunning plan that deceives Captain Delano. The reason for this one-sided representation is naturally the fact that we experience the story from Delano’s point of view. In the beginning, we perceive Babo as the typical docile, helpful, and faithful servant so often portrayed in other slave characters such as Stowe’s Uncle Tom and Jim in Twain’s Huckleberry Finn. Babo is more than just a slave; he is a “faithful fellow”, “a friend that cannot be called slave” . And despite all the underlying hints of a slave insurrection, Delano does not grasp their meaning. Examples are the slaves’ treatment of the Spanish sailors and the hatchet polishers , but in Delano’s narrow-minded world, only the white man is capable of conceiving plans of ‘evil’. And when he – and the reader too – finally sees “the mask torn away, flourishing hatchets and knives, in ferocious piratical revolt”, he is embarrassed and “with infinite pity he [withdraws] his hold from Don Benito” . From this moment on, Babo is a malign devil and Melville removes speech from Babo’s mouth. This strengthen our opinion of Babo as ‘evil’ even more, for how can we sympathise with him without hearing his version of the story? Apparently, Melville proposes no other alternative for the reader than to sympathise with the white slave owner Don Benito, whom Babo so ingeniously deceives.
The issue of Slavery in the South was an unresolved issue in the United States during the seventeenth and eighteenth century. During these years, the south kept having slavery, even though most states had slavery abolished. Due to the fact that slaves were treated as inferior, they did not have the same rights and their chances of becoming an educated person were almost impossible. However, some information about slavery, from the slaves’ point of view, has been saved. In this essay, we are comparing two different books that show us what being a slave actually was. This will be seen with the help of two different characters: Linda Brent in Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl and Frederick Douglass in The Narrative of the life of Frederick
Good and evil are part of human nature and an individual can have different perspectives and interpretations of both. Herman Melville’s “Benito Cereno” attempts to portray the everlasting struggle between recognizing the evil versus the good through the characterization of the narrator, Captain Delano. He uses Delano, an innocent and optimistic person, as the narrator of this story to portray the average American who is culturally conditioned to believe that slaves can only be depicted in a nonresistant and unassertive role. They can only be seen as loyal and obedient servants to their masters. But soon he realizes that he underestimated their power.
Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, An American Slave, brings to light many of the social injustices that colored men, women, and children all were forced to endure throughout the nineteenth century under Southern slavery laws. Douglass's life-story is presented in a way that creates a compelling argument against the justification of slavery. His argument is reinforced though a variety of anecdotes, many of which detailed strikingly bloody, horrific scenes and inhumane cruelty on the part of the slaveholders. Yet, while Douglas’s narrative describes in vivid detail his experiences of life as a slave, what Douglass intends for his readers to grasp after reading his narrative is something much more profound. Aside from all the physical burdens of slavery that he faced on a daily basis, it was the psychological effects that caused him the greatest amount of detriment during his twenty-year enslavement. In the same regard, Douglass is able to profess that it was not only the slaves who incurred the damaging effects of slavery, but also the slaveholders. Slavery, in essence, is a destructive force that collectively corrupts the minds of slaveholders and weakens slaves’ intellects.
Being that the novel was published in 1856, was Melville trying to hit on some major social issues without blatantly saying so?
Without being educated, slavers endure dehumanization and the control of their slaveholders. As a result, Douglass is motivated to get literate with ingenious strategies. He constantly bribes the “little white boys” and the “poor white children” who live closely with him to teach him reading with extra bread (Douglass 62). His writing lessons are from the boys who can compete with him in writing letters, Master Thomas’s book, and ship-yard. Along with his reading’s improvement, he comprehends the injustice between slaves and slaveholders from the books. A book “The Columbian Orator”, which provokes him the critical thinking about slavery and freedom. Through reading the Sheridan’s speeches that are from the same book, he claims, “[w]hat I got from Sheridan was a bold denunciation of slavery, and a powerful vindication of human rights” (Douglass 62). Sometimes he listens the discussion of abolition even though he does not really understands it. Until he gets a city paper that allows him to pray for “the abolition of slavery in the District of Columbia” (Douglass 63), he understands the meaning of abolition. Being literate helps him understand the extensive knowledge, which is ready for
At first glance, the book “my bondage and my freedom by Frederick Douglass appeared to be extremely dull and frustrating to read. After rereading the book for a second time and paying closer attention to the little details I have realized this is one of the most impressive autobiographies I have read recently. This book possesses one of the most touching stories that I have ever read, and what astonishes me the most about the whole subject is that it's a true story of Douglass' life. “ Douglass does a masterful job of using his own experience to expose the injustice of slavery to the world. As the protagonist he is able to keep the reader interested in himself, and tell the true story of his life. As a narrator he is able to link those experiences to the wider experiences of the nation and all society, exposing the corrupting nature of slavery to the entire nation.”[1] Although this book contributes a great amount of information on the subject of slavery and it is an extremely valuable book, its strengths are overpowered by its flaws. The book is loaded with unnecessary details, flowery metaphors and intense introductory information but this is what makes “My Bondage and My Freedom” unique.
Lying, deception, and miscommunication as themes within Benito Cereno and Why I live at the P.O is significantly evident throughout both narratives. Although, the methods in which fabrication is utilized varies, Stella Rondo, Babo,and Cereno do so because they figure it is in one’s best interest. In, Why I live at the P.O Stella Rondo is perceived as the favorite child and doesn't hesitate to exploit it to her convenience when it's time to face her family. Babo is as clever as someone could be and knows how to get people where he wants them. Unfortunately, Cereno isn't as witty and can’t manage to keep up with his portion of the “truth”. In the end none of these characters are able to convince one character ( Sister and Delano ) of their misleading stories. As a result the characters are stuck between what they believe is the truth and what is reality and in a sense becomes their validity.
Otherness is commonly a force of causing an individual to be separated from a majority group and, therefore, treated differently. The separation from the group has a large enough effect to cause otherness to be a major characterization of slaves in literature. Othering as a characterization normally denotes disempowerment, discrimination, and judgment. Yet, the story of Benito Cereno, where a whaling ship captain named Delano ends up finding and helping a merchant ship quell a slave rebellion, defies these conventions. Babo, the slave that starts the rebellion, highlights the subtle paradoxical nature of others leading to a reversal of the expected othering process.
When dealing with novella about slaves one would immediately assume that the “other,” hegemony, and silence characters would be the Slaves; Herman Melville creates many scenes in Benito Cereno that leads readers to believe that this is case, but that is not case in the end. The slaves in Benito Cereno often described as animals. Capitan Delano often describes Babo as a loyal dog. Later on Delano describes seeing a mother and her child to: His attention had been drawn to a slumbering negress, partly disclosed through lace-work of some rigging, lying with youthful limbs carelessly disposed, under the lee of the bulwarks, like a doe in the shade of a woodland rock.
When examining themes of freedom and captivity in the American canon, one would likely adduce the slave narratives as the authoritative texts of that aspect of American literature. However, Herman Melville and Edgar Allan Poe also harbour intriguing relationships with these contrasting themes, which are implicit within "Bartleby" and "The Black Cat" respectively. By inspecting the authors' own problems and fascinations, which are woven into the texts, we can appreciate their implicit use of the dichotomy between freedom and captivity. Furthermore, by analysing the characters within the texts with these themes, we can decipher what prompts their behaviour.