Benefits and Flaws of a Resistivity Survey

1158 Words3 Pages

What am I going to research? In this case study, I am going to research what resistivity is and how a resistivity survey works using the physics principles. I am also going to explore what benefits this technique might bring, but also what flaws there could be. Additionally, I am going to explore a famous historical use of this method. What is resistivity? Resistivity is the oppose to conductivity. It's a measure of material's ability to oppose the flow of electric current. It is a property of the material, and it remains constant, not depending on the certain shape of the material, however it does depend on the mass and density of the particular material. The resistivity of a particular material can be found by multiplying the resistance of the material by its cross sectional area, and then divided by it's length, this is shown in the equation below: ρ = (RA) ÷ l (where ρ= the resistivity of the material, R= the resistance of the material, A= the cross sectional area of the material and l= the length of the material) What is a resistivity survey and how does it work? A resistivity survey is a geophysical technique used to establish the structure of the Earth's surface. It is a technique which has been used and developed over the last couple of centuries. It uses a pair of probes to conduct electrical current into the soil, by doing this they can measure the resistance of the soil. In most archaeological surveys, one of the probes is used to conduct the current through the ground and another probe is used to measure the potential difference across the circuit of the current. The resistance of the soil between both probes can be then calculated by using the equation: R = V ÷ I (where R= the resistance of the soil, V= the potentia... ... middle of paper ... ...ite of the first Norman encampment and landing site prior to the well known battle of Hastings. In 1993 Austin carried the survey to cover an area of 560m by 320m, that he believed was the location of the focal Norman fort. By using a resilience meter and displaying his results on a computer, he took measurements of the resistance of the soil in 1m intervals. This interpreted data gave some regions of light spots, of low resistance which are most likely to be damp ditches, but it also uncovered areas of high resistance, indicating by dark spots. Austin though these were most likely walls. When interpreting his data, he led to believe he discovered the perimeter of the fort in which it was surrounding by ditches. However his most significant discovery, was a square like structure in the middle of the perimeter which he thought was likely to be the keep of the fort.

Open Document