Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ben and jerry's case study solution
Ben and jerry's case study solution
Ben and jerry's case study solution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ben and jerry's case study solution
Ben & Jerry’s Homemade Case Study #2 Upon review, Ben & Jerry’s Homemade should approve the offer from Unilever for $36.00 (cash) per share. In reviewing the offers two questions were presented. The two questions included: the social mission of Ben & Jerry’s surviving a takeover, and maintaining the best interests of the shareholders. To follow, will be the justification for the Unilever offer, alternative offers, and the risks that are involved with a possible takeover. Upon reviewing the four offers, Unilever proposes the best overall offer, in regards to maintaining the interests of the shareholders and the social mission of Ben & Jerry’s. Besides the $36 per share offer price, Unilever has three additional portions to their proposal. …show more content…
However, with some management staying on board, there is a possibility of compromise between the companies, in regards to social contribution (see Social Donation. Excel). If Ben & Jerry’s would lower the percentage of contribution from 7.5% to 5% or lower the amount of donation would have been less than $500,000 in 1999. A compromise in this regard, would benefit Unilever in keeping more profits in house, and help Ben & Jerry’s maintain their reputation of a social contributor. Along with a compromise of their social endeavors, Ben & Jerry’s can target a higher offer price in negotiations. Unilever has already increased in their offer before their most recent one, and may raise it again. Though Ben & Jerry’s is suffering raising stockholder value, they still own a large share of the market space at 45%. This and having the third highest price/earnings ratio of comparable companies (see Exhibit 6), gives Ben & Jerry’s leverage to ask for an increase in Unilever’s offer, to at least $42, which is twice the amount of Ben & Jerry’s current market …show more content…
Those alternatives are to: not accept an offer, or accept either Dreyer’s Grand, Meadowbrook Lane, or Chartwell’s offer. In not accepting an offer, Ben & Jerry’s would be in the same the place they are in now, and that is not improving the value for their shareholders. It is for that reason that, not accepting an offer is not a recommended alternative. The second alternative is to accept Dreyer’s Grand offer of $31 (stock) per share. The main points of Dreyer’s Grand proposal is to maintain management and to encourage social endeavors. This proposal does keep the social mission of Ben & Jerry’s intact but compared to the other offers, brings the lowest value to the
Market research and information about the industry is very important to the organization because it will allow the organization to position itself well in terms of sourcing chocolate raw materials and in identifying the market for its products. For example, understanding that some chocolate product purchases are seasonal, e.g., at Christmas; around Mother’s Day; and, on Valentine’s Day, allows the organization to have more product on hand and to create displays, in store, that will increase purchases and attract more customers when existing customers tell their friends about the availability of high end products, at reasonable prices, in their store.
How attractive to PepsiCo is the proposal to buy 30% of Deltex for 1.1B pesos (US$360M)?
... per share it had requested. As a result, it appears that Cooper should be successful persuading Nicholson shareholders and unaccounted for shareholders to accept the offer, and in return acquire at least 80% of the outstanding Nicholson shares of stock
Senior Management of PepsiCo is evaluating the potential acquisition of two companies – Carts of Colorado and California Pizza Kitchen – in order to expand the company’s restaurant business. If indeed PepsiCo decides to pursue the acquisition of one or both, they must decide how to align each of these business units in its historically decentralized management approach and how to forge relationships between the acquired business units and existing business units. In their evaluation, Senior Management is faced with the question of whether the necessary capital investment in order to purchase one or both of the businesses can be profitable for each of the acquired business units, but must also take into consideration that the additional business units will not hinder the profitability of the existing business units.
The $55 value is on the lower range of the analyst eztimates, with a best guess estimate of $67.94. Since the value of the stock had been below $45 for 4 months, the offer of 55 dollars represented a 29% premium to investors. Bollenbach knew that management would be resistant of any attempt to be acquired, regardless of price, because of failed previous attempts to negotiate a friendly merger at year end 1996. The 55-dollar benchmark created an expectation for ITT management to achieve that level, or higher and the premium is enough to demonstrate to investors it is a real offer. Their support will be key as they will have a vote deciding the fate of the poison pill provisions which need to be removed to make the deal necessary.
There are many valuation methods that could be used to evaluate this company. Finding a method that valuates the stand-alone value is difficult. The stand-alone value should be dependent upon the firm’s own assets and projected future income. We decided to evaluate this company based upon two methods: The Discounted Cash Flow Method and the Comparable Companies Method.
The corporation I chose to discuss is McDonald’s. McDonald’s is a publicly traded corporation that includes the following domestic companies, McDonald’s, Chipotle Mexican Grill, and Boston Market. This paper will discuss the following:
One is required to estimate the economic cost of its social agenda, and evaluate the implications of takeover defence strategies. Ultimately, we have to take a position on whether Ben & Jerry's should continue to independently pursue its social agenda or accept one of the attractive takeover offers and accept a shift toward greater profit orientation.
Many Wall Street analysts considered Krispy Kreme to be overvalued. Analysts said in April 2000 the stock was destined for the $15 to $20 share range at best, which is where most known food related stocks are located. Instead it had been hovering at a value of $40 a share for most of the year. The stock rose to a high of $54 and many analysts doubted Krispy Kreme's strategy and potential growth merited a stock price nearly 70 times projected 2002 earnings per share. I agree with the statement "the numbers just don't work."
For one of my selections for buying stock, I invested into Starbucks, this company has attracted me with their wonders of different coffees, and I knew many others were interested in the very popular coffee company. Starbucks all started 1971 in Seattle Washington. With three men which were Jerry Baldwin, Zev Siegel and Gordon Bowker each of them put in one thousand three hundred and fifty dollars along with a barrowed five thousand from the bank to start up there small coffee shop in pick place market, witch is located in down town Seattle. The name for this company was inspired from the character Starbuck from Moby Dick; this character was a coffee lover. There close friend designed there well known logo. These men never thought of this small company to get large they just thought of it as a small coffee shop. Out of all three men Siegel was the only one that work at it full time. The men depened on a man named Alfred Peet for there coffee beans but soon then started there own blends of coffee beans. With in a year opening the first store they were able to open a second store. When the 1980’s rolled around, it was a thriving company, in the Seattle area. However, the co-founders began to have other interests and were involved in other careers simultaneously. Despite that, the company was about to undergo a major turning point. A man by the name of Howard Schultz started to pursue an interest in the company. He noticed that the coffee shop had a wonderful environment. He started asking a questions and becoming more and more interested by every moment. He loved how the founders had so much knowledge on the coffee and each blend. In 1982, Schultz became director of retail operation. This was just the start to a new phase with the company.
1. If I were to design Ben & Jerry’s data warehouse I would use several dimensions of information. The first dimension would consist of the company’s products; ice cream, frozen yogurt or merchandise. The marketing department has to know which products are selling, if Ben & Jerry’s didn’t know that their T-shirts are selling out as soon as they hit the stores, then they wouldn’t be able to take advantage of the opportunity to sell the shirts. The second dimension would consist of the different areas of sales; US, Canada, Mexico, or Europe. I am not sure if they sell their ice cream in Mexico, but with data collection they can find out if their ice cream would be a better seller in the hot climate, rather than pushing for greater distribution in Canada. The third dimension would consist of the “specifics”; where the sale was made, when the sale was made, and who purchased the product. This information can help in the design of the product to focus on the buyer; it can tailor flavors to seasons, and packaging to buyer who looks for the better-looking product. If Ben & Jerry’s could know when a season was coming to an end in a specific area, then they could forecast the need or the decline in need and speed up, or slow down distribution to those areas. The focus of the information is that it needs to be useful, and almost any information is useful.
The analysis of the Kellogg’s case is presented in this chapter and will contribute to answer the research question. The case are evaluated and compared to the literature presented in the previous chapters and will support the conclusion of this paper.
The main external threats to Cadbury-Schweppes are competition from Coca-Cola and Pepsi and changing consumer tastes. External opportunities include increasing sales internationally and development of new products. Cadbury-Schweppes has many internal strengths and weaknesses in its organizational, marketing, operational, and financial activities. These characteristics along with economic analysis will be used to provide the answers needed in order to survive and thrive in the CSD industry.
Unilever is a multinational consumer goods company, which includes products like food, beverages, cleaning agents and personal care products. Unilever is the world third largest customer goods company. The brands of Unilever are trustworthy worldwide and because of the feedbacks given by the people, Unilever is stated as one of the most successful customer goods/products companies. Unilever have more than 400 brands which focuses on health and wellbeing, and this is the reason why Unilever has touched so many people lives in many different ways. Unilever collection of varieties varies from nutritionally composed foods to permissive ice creams, inexpensive soaps, comfortable shampoos and everyday domestic care products and goods. Unilever also produces world-leading brands such as Lipton, Knorr, Dove soap, Axe, Blue Band and many more. Unilever is a responsible business as their supportable living strategy sets out to decouple their development from their environmental influence, and at the same time growing their social encouraging influence as well. Their plan has three main aims to achieve by 2020 which are as follows:
... firm can attract qualified management without causing an influx in operational costs (wages), if portions of employee compensation were to be replaced with stock options; adjusting options with company performance. If accomplished in this manner, every employee would be concerned with how well the company was doing financially. I also recommend that Chuck Lacy find non-financial arguments and data which justify the recruitment of top managers in the marketing and production departments. In addition, Ben & Jerry's could counter employee turnover by establishing new techniques in the recruitment and interview processes to detect candidates who do not share values consistent with those of Ben & Jerry's.