Being Unjust Analysis

1194 Words3 Pages

Have you ever ask yourself how much being unjust impacts your everyday life and decisions, and how your life would change when you are just? Plato wrote in this book’s expect about how Glaucon perceives the basic idea of justice and how we humans perceive justice as. People created own laws and are deciding whether or no to follow them. One of Glaucon’s argument is that we follow justice to get things or because of its consequences. He also argues that we should preserve justice as a way to gain things not to value it for its own sake. The first of Glaucon’s two claims is the descriptive claim which talks about and explains that humans instrumentally value justice instead of intrinsically valuing it. The argument for descriptive …show more content…

Glaucon defines perfectly unjust person, as a person that unjust but has reputation for being just. Person being unjust is matter of skill and be a good deceiver. The matter of being unjust is getting way with no matter who gets hurt in the process. It also means that person has resources and money to get away with it. In other words make your victims of injustice go away and you ever facing the terrible consequences of your wrong doings. On the other hand, Glaucon defines perfectly just person as having no reputation for being just. There one conflict with being just is you do not know if they are being just because of its consequences or its own sake. Glaucon’s normative claim is how should we value justice for consequences, not for its own sake and should see as a way for us to get stuff. Plato wrote, “Indeed every man believes that injustice is far more profitable to himself than justice” (Plato, 360d). The comparison in normative argument is not fair because just person is put into more extreme situation than unjust. Glaucon portrayed unjust person being punish and tortured for things he or she did not committed. They are punished because they have the reputation of being unjust even though they are actually just. The unjust in the just situation and vice versa are portrayed in very extreme situation. It is unfair comparison because the situations are too extreme situations; even if a person had unjust reputation, can still live a normal life and not tortured for crimes he or she falsely accused of. This comparison remedied have more normal day-to-day situations where it shows daily consequence of having unjust and just reputation. An example would be people do not trust you or do not want be your friend. If the comparison was remedied with daily situations, then this way, people

Show More
Related

  • The Logical Response To The Fool, By Thomas Hobbes

    1004 Words  | 3 Pages

    Glaucon presents an argument against justice in order to pressure Socrates to give a more convincing argument for living a just life. He was unsatisfied with Plato’s counterargument against Thrasymachus. Glaucon wants to believe that justice is good and that living a just life will result in a good life, unlike the Fool in the Leviathan. However, Glaucon strengthening the argument that the unjust life is better. Glaucon starts his argument with the three ways in which something can be good: good in itself, good in itself and good for its consequences, and bad or indifferent in itself but good for its consequences. After presenting these three types of good things, Glaucon asks Socrates to place justice into one of the three categories. Socrates’s responds by saying the he would define justice as the kind of good that we like both for its own sake and for its consequences. Glaucon then requests that Socrates present a convincing argument that justice is good for its own sake, regardless of its consequences. He essentially wants to hear a compelling argument that shows justice as a kind of good that is good for its own sake. Glaucon eventually developed a case that supports the unjust life. He argues that anyone, just or unjust, would commit acts of injustice if they could get away with it and not suffer any consequences. To support his claim, he

    Read More

  • Be Warned and Study Justice:The Shifting Definition of Justice in Virgil’s Aeneid

    4362 Words  | 9 Pages

    Often, a person is seen as the embodiment of the value of their action, thus a person can be seen as “good” or “bad,” and the consequences of justice that affect them are based on the general value of their general actions. The value given to actions is based on a soc...

    Read More

  • Justice in Plato´s The Republic

    565 Words  | 2 Pages

    In book four of Plato's “The Republic” Socrates defines justice in the individual as analogous to justice in the state. I will explain Socrates' definition of justice in the individual, and then show that Socrates cannot certify that his definition of justice is correct, without asking further questions about justice. I will argue that if we act according to this definition of justice, then we do not know when we are acting just. Since neither the meaning of justice, nor the meaning of good judgement, is contained in the definition, then one can act unjustly while obeying to the definition of justice. If one can act unjustly while obeying this definition, then Socrates' definition of justice is uncertifiable.

    Read More

  • Just And Unjust Speech Analysis

    1184 Words  | 3 Pages

    The debate between Just and Unjust Speech highlights the ongoing debate between old and new traditions. These traditions can range from how to interpret laws to family values and the struggle between them is highlighted in Aristophanes Clouds. The battle between old and new is seen in argument between Just and Unjust Speech and the arguments between father Strepsiades and son Pheidippides. The constant battle between old and new is seen in many different areas throughout the Clouds such as justice, piety and issues of law.

    Read More

  • Justice Exemplified by Plato and Thucydides

    618 Words  | 2 Pages

    In conclusion three notions of justice developed in Book I of The Republics of Plato are outlined in On Justice, Power and Human Nature. Justice is viewed as telling the truth and paying debts, doing good to friends and harm to enemies, and the advantage of the stronger.

    Read More

  • Thrasymachus's Definition Of Justice

    931 Words  | 2 Pages

    In society we have laws in order to keep order and safety for citizens. The rulers set these laws for the common people to obey. In book I of “The Republic of Plato” by Allan Bloom, the meaning of justice is debated in book I and II. Thrasymachus ' definition of justice is challenged by the different views of the characters in the book. This in fact, claims to question whether justice is always the better path to decision making, morality and educating individuals.

    Read More

  • Analysis of Socrate´s The Republic

    860 Words  | 2 Pages

    Glaucon’s three examples prefer injustice, and he gives examples of the acceptance of injustice over justice. The only factual foundation that his argument holds, is that sometimes we let our wants and desires muffle our conscience. Sometimes we make bad decisions even though our conscience tells us it’s bad, but we ignore it because we desire our wants. Everyone will have their own views on this, but it really varies upon each person. Someone may be unjust and they can completely agree because they are reaping the benefits from being unjust versus when they were a just person, they just haven’t experienced the consequences of being unjust. I also believe that there are people who would be unjust if no consequences followed, but I think that there are more honorable people in our world simply because they choose to be.

    Read More

  • Response To Raphael Demos's Analysis Of Plato

    1238 Words  | 3 Pages

    He notes the uniqueness of Plato’s definition of justice and theorizes that in Platonic justice, it is not justice which has been changed, but rather its playing ground has been changed. Plato uses justice to mean harmony within a community, whether this community comprises parts of the soul or citizens within a republic. Demos focuses on the idea of ‘giving each its due’ in order to promote harmony. The failure to give one his due is the cause for injustice. Demos simplifies the solution to Sachs’ dilemma by proving through morality that vulgar justice stems from Platonic justice. He states that because the Platonically just soul can only be healthy through reason, and since “the concern of reason is that the good should be exemplified everywhere,” giving each his due becomes part of one’s self-fulfillment.

    Read More

  • Justice In Plato's The Republic

    1072 Words  | 3 Pages

    During the time period of The Republic, the problems and challenges that each community was faced with were all dealt with in a different way. In the world today, a lot of people care about themselves. For many people, the word justice can mean many different things, but because some only look out for themselves, many of these people do not think about everyone else’s role in the world of society. The struggle for justice is still demonstrated in contemporary culture today. One particular concept from Plato’s The Republic, which relates to contemporary culture is this concept of justice. In the beginning of The Republic, Socrates listeners, Cephalus, Polemarchus, and Thrasymachus, ask Socrates whether justice is stronger than injustice, and

    Read More

  • Moral Beliefs By Phillipa Foot Summary

    1234 Words  | 3 Pages

    Since we can all suffer from each other’s injustices, humans create a social contract agreeing to be just to one another to keep everyone in check. Justice is not something we practice for its own sake but something one engages in out of fear and weakness. He uses the example of the ring of Gyges to prove his point. Glaucon claims, that even the most just man would behave unjustly if he had this ring (359d). This tale proves that people are just only because they are afraid of the punishment and not that justice is desirable in itself. Following this, Plato states that “justice is only a social contract” and is to the advantage of the strong (362b). However, Socrates proves that justice is the best sort of good like

    Read More

  • The Golden Rule Is Unjust To Me

    1234 Words  | 3 Pages

    Unjust to me means anything that goes against the golden rule, which is to “treat others as you want to be treated". I have a fondness for the simplicity of the golden rule and I think it puts everything in perspective in terms of morality for everyone of all ages. From my point of view the concept of the golden rule epitomizes the moral code. The golden rule is best understood by saying “Treat others only as you consent to being treated in the same situation.” When you apply the rule you’d have to imagine yourself on the receiving end of the action. If you act a way towards someone and are unwilling to be treated that way under the same circumstance than you violate this rule, thus making it an unjust action. That includes having that other person’s likes and dislikes in mind. Of course I do believe there are levels to it, a murder isn’t on par with stealing your brother’s socks.

    Read More

  • Acting Unjustice In Plato's The Republic

    297 Words  | 1 Pages

    In Plato’s “The Republic” Glaucon makes the case that it is the consequences of acting unjust that make it unpleasant. And if a person could get away with unjust actions, it would be more beneficial to them than being just. Justice is a compromise between being a victim and being unjust. Being on the receiving side of injustice is extremely unpleasant, so as a community consequences have been created to discourage people from taking advantage of each other. Glaucon explains that acting unjust is actually the more profitable course of action, and only avoided to spare the consequences. So Glaucon has come to the conclusion that given the chance to act anonymously, even a person who appears to live a just life will take the chance to act otherwise.

    Read More

  • Plato's Views on Happiness

    928 Words  | 2 Pages

    To be just or unjust. To be happy or unhappy? Men fall into these two categories. Why does a man act according to these 2 extremes? Is it because they fear punishment? Are they quivering in fear of divine retribution? Or do men do just things because it is good for them to do so? Is justice, good of its rewards and consequences? Or is it good for itself. What is justice? Are the people who are just, just as happy as the people who are unjust? Plato sheds light on these questions and says yes, I have the definition of justice and yes, just people are happy if not happier than unjust people. Plato show’s that justice is worthwhile in and of itself and that being a just person equates to being a happy person. In my opinion, Plato does a good job and is accurate when explaining what it is to be just and this definition is an adequate solution to repairing an unjust person or an unjust city or anything that has an unjust virtue and using the definition of what justice is accurately explains why just people are happier than unjust people.

    Read More

  • Injustice Anywhere Is Injustice Everywhere Analysis

    153 Words  | 1 Pages

    What I think King means when he says, “injustice anywhere is injustice everywhere” is that if there is one example of unlawful conduct anywhere it becomes repetitive everywhere. For example, them denying them the right to vote is injustice although its their god giving right. The segregation is another way that the injustice is everywhere. The fact that the signs read “colored or “white” demoralizes a person because they can’t go where they want to go or do what they want to do. The fact that during this time Birmingham had the most bombings on black homes and churches than any other state in the south makes it obvious that injustice is everywhere. The fact that the political stand point is racially controlled is injustice and just wrong. In

    Read More

  • Plato and the definition of justice

    1771 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...ether they are part of the rulers' class or not. Plato stated that each person has a function in a political arrangement of justice. Opposite to Plato’s definition, Glaucon argued that sometimes people gain advantage from injustice and finally, Thrasymachus told that justice is when our unnatural self possessions demand more and more because of our natural desires.

    Read More

More about Being Unjust Analysis

Open Document