Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay prompt battle of the bulge
Essay prompt battle of the bulge
Battle of the bulge essay 123
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay prompt battle of the bulge
Since the beginning of the humanity, human nature revealed man himself has an internal instinct to protect their immediate surroundings and fellow man from harm. Conflict and deceit dates back to the first man and woman sitting in a garden under an apple tree. It is important to understand that conflict breeds war and war breeds death. This paper will provide an understanding of historical precedents contributing to the evolution of field artillery. From the first fire mission, to an informative narrative from the Battle of the Bulge, to include emerged implications playing a major role in today's modern battlefield. To this day, field artillery Soldiers remain King of Battle, now follow me.
Beginning in colonial times, American artillery
…show more content…
has served as coastal artillery to defend the coasts, siege artillery to bombard fortifications, garrison artillery to defend land fortifications, and field artillery to support infantry and cavalry. (Army Combat Branches: Artillery). During the beginning stages of the American field artillery's, the branch traveled in tandem with the infantry onto the linear battlefield. In the eighteenth century, field artillery’s primary mission when called upon was to soften the front lines of an opposing force with massing of direct fires, since the infantry muskets of early years could only range 50 to 100 yards somewhat accurately. According to McKenney (2007), “The maximum range of field artillery cannons, depending upon size, was from 1,200 to over 2,000 yards; however, with untrained Soldiers and imperfect weapons, the effective range was actually about 400 yards” (p.12).. This ensured that the cannons could provide mass fires on enemy lines without putting the cannons or their crew in danger from enemy fire, but that was about to change. The 1850s brought with it the introduction of a new battlefield weapon, the rifled musket, with greater effective ranges than the smooth bore musket. Early into the Civil War, the field artillerymen learned the hard way that they could not position their cannons within range of the enemy. This transformed the role of the field artillery from an offensive to a defensive role, and that too was about to change. The field artillery needed a breakthrough, anything to get out of the defensive role, and back onto the offensive, while maintaining safety of their equipment and Soldiers. With developments of rifled cannon bores, recoil systems, breech‐loading systems, cartridge ammunition, and high explosives, all which dramatically enhanced the range and lethality of rounds sent down range. Just like that, the field artillery again, is back on the offensive, but nothing has transformed the artillery more so than SGT Milton W. Humphreys. An 18 year old, Confederate SGT, SGT Milton W. Humphreys known locally in Fayetteville, West Virginia for being somewhat of child genius, credited with the innovation of indirect firing. On May 16, 1863 while under attack at the Federal Fort of Fayetteville, SGT Humphreys decided he would put his theory to the test. According to Walls (2017), Humphreys wrote: “The term 'indirect fire' is firing upon a point or place (A) from a point (B) which is not visible to people at (A). It is necessary, of course that the trajectory or path of the projectile should pass above the top of the 'mask' or intervening object. I claim no credit for the 'invention'; the thing is so obvious. In fact, if I invented it, I did not do it at Fayetteville, but in my day-dreams when I was about 8 years old”. (p.1). SGT Humphreys contribution to the field artillery revolutionized the way artillery batteries fought in every conflict since the inception of indirect fire. Many conflicts commenced since, with many Soldiers paying the ultimate sacrifice in battle. Soldiers of the 101st Airborne division, screaming eagles, led by Brigadier General Anthony C. McAuliffe, unlike no others, gave their all for what many may call the “Ardennes Offensive” the largest battle the United States Army has ever fought, most commonly known as the Battle of the Bulge. Early on the cold and bitter winter morning of December 16, 1944 at 0530 hours, more than 200,000 German troops and close to a 1,000 tanks launched Adolf Hitler's last-ditch effort to reverse the way the war was going, which began when Allied troops landed in France on D-Day. According to Battle of the Bulge (n.d.) Adolf Hitler was: Seeking to drive to the coast of the English Channel and split the Allied armies as they had done in May 1940, the Germans struck in the Ardennes Forest, a 75-mile stretch of the front characterized by dense woods and few roads, held by four divisions that had not seen battle; mixed with those that were fatigued from fighting and recovering. (p.1). The German offensive opened with a heavy barrage on the 6th Panzer Army's front. German forces were pushing forward conducting an all-out assault against American positions, located along the Elsenborn Ridge and Losheim Gap attempting to break through to the city of Liège. The Americans fired roughly 11,500 defensive artillery rounds from Elsenborn Ridge. The Germans pushed through the Allied front line, which created a “Bulge”. Meeting heavy resistance from the 2nd and 99th Infantry Divisions, the Germans had to commit their tanks into battle. In the center of the bulge, German troops opened a gap through the 28th and 106th Infantry Divisions. They captured two U.S. regiments in the process; increasing pressure on the town of St. Vith. The Germans created a special task force of Soldiers to impersonate American Soldiers, in an attempt to aid their advancing units. The special task force salvaged U.S. uniforms from the dead and captured, while driving captured U.S. or German vehicles modified to look like U.S. ones. Most, if not all the Soldiers selected for this special task force spoke English. Their mission was to forward through any holes created in the Allied line, capturing key terrain, crossroads, bridges, and to cut or destroy any communication lines or equipment they came across. Therefore, only a handful of these fake U.S. troops actually accomplished their mission by penetrating the Allied lines, but word of their existence quickly spread. The U.S. Soldiers started to combat this tactic by questioning any unfamiliar person in an U.S. uniform, to confirm if the men were actually American Soldiers or German spies. The unfamiliar personnel had to prove that they are American Soldiers by answering detailed questions about American movie stars or baseball players. Most Germans would not be able to answer those questions correctly or understand the questions, even if their comprehension of the English language was sound. This approach at times was counterproductive, as not all American Soldiers retained knowledge or interest in these two categories. In the north, the German Sixth S.S. Panzer Army element encountered fierce American resistance and did not advance anywhere near their mission objective. However, the southernmost German forces, the Seventh Army, made very slow progress due to the small number of tanks. Only the central German Force, the Fifth Panzer Army succeeded in making a breakthrough in the Allied line, after a successful blitzkrieg-style attack racing west towards the city of Bastogne. The German advance, assisted by bad weather kept Allied airplanes from being able to launch attacks. On December 17, “Eisenhower and his commanders concluded that the attack was an all-out offensive rather than a local assault and began rushing reinforcements to the area”. (Hickman 2017). The overall Commander of the glorious 101st Airborne division, Brigadier General Anthony C. McAuliffe, ordered his paratroopers to hold the crossroads of Bastogne at all cost. Soldiers of the 101st Airborne division arrived and occupied Bastogne just ahead of the Germans on 19 December, allowing minimal but ample time for the paratroopers to dig in, and begin emplacing a defensive perimeter around the town. Consequently, the Germans were not able to penetrate from the east, resulting in the Germans being redirected around Bastogne. By 21 December, Germans forces completely surrounded Bastogne. The following morning the Germans decided to send forward a message to General McAuliffe, saying they have surrounded his division and the situation at hand was pointless, demanding the screaming eagles surrender. General McAuliffe’s reply was “Nuts!”, nevertheless his position at Bastogne, now surrounded; they were crazy to think that the 101st Airborne Division would surrender. While the siege of Bastogne was under way, the German panzer divisions continued west toward the Meuse River, which was their final objective. Due to the unwavering dedication and refusal to relinquish an inch of ground to the German Soldiers, their tanks began to run out of fuel. A break in the weather on December 23rd allowed the American aircraft to start bombing German tanks and infantry, this day proved to be a vital turning point during the Battle of the Bulge. The last German attack against Bastogne took place on 4 January 1945.
That same day the German Command ordered the attempts to capture the city come to a halt, ordering a retreat. Instantaneously, the German Soldiers quickly withdraw from their remaining positions surrounding the Bulge. On 16 January 1945, Allied troops attacking from the north edge of the Bulge, linked up with those coming from the south edge, when those two elements crossed paths, the battle was over. The successful defense of Bastogne was one of the main reasons the German forces failed to break out of the “Bulge” to accomplish their main objective. During the Battle of the Bulge, the field artillery was the decisive factor, since troops could not receive air support. These Redlegs fired over 1,255,000 rounds from 4,155 guns over a 31-day …show more content…
campaign. Conclusion This paper discussed the history of exceptionally brave and strong-willed Soldiers for their contributions and sacrifice to the field artillery branch.
From the first fire mission tactics and techniques, with the emphasis relying heavily on volume of fires over accuracy, to today's emphasis that relies mainly on accuracy and safety with the implementation usage of precision guided munitions. Identifying lessons learned from a complete in-depth synopsis within the Battle of the Bulge, played a key role in developmentally reshaping the field artillery branch as a whole going forward. The field artillery branch continues to maintain and develop tactics, techniques, and procedures for today’s and future field artillery Soldiers, never relinquishing the crown as deemed to be, King of Battle, now follow them.
References
Army Combat Branches: Artillery. (n.d.). Retrieved April 23, 2017, from http://www.encyclopedia.com/history/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/army-combat-branches-artillery
Battle of the Bulge. (n.d.). Retrieved April 23, 2017, from https://www.army.mil/botb/
Hickman, K. (n.d.). Battle of the Bulge: Germany's Last Major Offensive of World War II. Retrieved April 23, 2017, from https://www.thoughtco.com/battle-of-the-bulge-2361488
McKenney, J. E. (2007). The organizational history of field artillery 1775-2003. Washington, D.C.: Center of Military History, United States Army.
Walls, K. (n.d.). Retrieved April 23, 2017, from
http://www.americanroads.net/civil_war_trail_spring2014.htm
Hamilton, John A. Blazing Skies: Air Defense Artillery on Fort Bliss, 1940 - 2009. Defense
Stewart R. W. (2005). American Military History (Vol. 1). The United States Army and the
Rather he focuses on the logistics of warfare through the innovations in gunfire, cannon manufacturing and operation, and defensive warfare. Moreover, Parker does not attempt to use his position and research to criticise other scholars position on the military revolution. He simply agrees with Michael Roberts definition and attempts to contribute his principles of innovation as a means to strengthen Roberts
Weigley, Russel F. History of the United States Army. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1st Edition, 1984.
Air Defense Artillery remains one of the most respected assets to the United States Army, ready to deploy its units and weapon systems at anytime and anywhere in support of freedom. Works Cited Brigade General Scales, Robert H. JR. Certain Victory. The U.S. Army in the Gulf War. NewYork: Macmillan Publishing Company, 1993.
In order to receive a victory in the Battle of the Bulge, General Patton used Mission Command Analysis in order to understand how he can be successful for this mission. The first thing of understanding t...
In the summer of 1944, General George S. Patton and his 3rd Army successfully broke through heavy German Forces resistance from the Normandy invasion. German forces were in total disarray by the end of August 1944. Patton pleaded with his boss, General Omar Bradley, that if 3rd U.S. Army could be allocated as little as 400,000 gallons of fuel, he could be inside Germany in two days. Time was crucial before the inevitable reaction by the Germans to shore up their defense, preventing Patton from advancing. General Bradley refused Patton's request for more fuel; Unfortunately, General Patton advanced to Germany. Morale ran high throughout Patton’s Army, and there was no sign of heavy resistance before the German border. Consequently, by early September, the 3rd U.S Army had ground to a virtual halt along the flooded Moselle River. In places, Patton's tanks and vehicles ran out of fuel on the battlefield and their swift momentum outran their supply lines (Fugate, 1999). Lack of logistics allowed the German forces to take advantage of Patton’s Army and initiate one of the largest tank battles of World War II, the Battle of Arracourt.
The prelude to the Battle of the Bulge began on a winter day in mid-December of 1944. Three powerful German divisions, were the last German offensives in the west at that time during World War II. They began after the Normandy invasion in June 1944. Allied had forces swept rapidly through France but became stalled along the German border earlier that year in September. On December 16, 1944 taking advantage of the weather, which kept the Allied aircraft on the ground, the Germans launched a counteroffensive through the semi-mountainous and heavily-forested Ardennes region in Germany, and advanced 31 miles into Belgium and northern Luxembourg near the Meuse River. Their goal was to trap four allied armies, divide the Americans and the British to force negotiated peace along the western front, and retake the vital seaport of Antwerp in Belgium. Thinking the Ardennes was the least likely spot for a German offensive, American staff commander chose to keep the thin line, so that manpower might concentrate on offensives north and south of the Ardennes known as the "bulge" in the Allied lines. These American lines were thinly held by three divisions in the Allied Army and part of a forth division, while fifth division was making a local attack and the sixth division was in reserve. Division sectors were more than double the width of normal defensive fronts, therefore there were more men scattered along a larger area. The German advance was halted near the Meuse River in late December. Even though the German Offensive achieved total surprise, nowhere did the American troops give ground without a fight. Within three days, the determined American stand and the arrival of powerful reinforcements insured that the ambitious German goal was far beyond reach. In snow and sub-freezing temperatures the Germans fell short of their interim objective- to reach the rambling Meuse River on the edge of the Ardennes. But they managed to avoid being cut off by an Allied Pincer movement.
U.S. Army. An Army White Paper: The Profession of Arms. West Point: Center for Army Profession and Ethic (CAPE), December 2010.
Keegan chooses the three well documented campaigns of Agincourt in 1415, Waterloo in 1815, and Somme in 1916 to answer the question of his thesis: To find out how men who are faced with the threat of single-missile and multiple-missile weapons control their fears, fix their wounds, and face their death. In his words he is seeking “to catch a glimpse of the face of battle.”
Artillery in the United States military throughout the years has evolved with the times, becoming more prominent with the addition of new technology and the refining of tactics. Innovations to the maneuverability and capabilities of artillery in the United States Army was proven critical in shaping the outcomes of battles. Battles during the Mexican-American war were a perfect example of how these innovations made instant impacts. This paper will discuss the progressive heritage and history of artillery, the evolution of artillery, and the effects artillery had on the military problem and leadership.
Warfare was in a state of transition. Older commanders and generals in the French and British militaries were very cavalry and infantry focused. These commanders believed that cavalry, infantry, and artillery would assure victory in any circumstance, against any foe. They clung to the static tactics of the bygone World War I era. World War I had been fought primarily on French soil, and the military as well as the government never wanted that to happen again, therefore they wanted to reinforce their main border against any future German. Little did they know that only twenty two years later they would be bested by German forces in a way that would shock the world. This research will be analyzing many important assumptions, oversights,...
Introduction: The Infantry faces many different challenges when it comes to making the training realistic and valuable to keep our infantrymen ready to fight in today’s complex operating environment. The term “train as you fight” is not necessarily true when training in a garrison atmosphere. The doctrine or methods of training used by the conventional infantry are outdated and paralyzed with range limitations and unrealistic guidelines and Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs). The infantryman is a master of his assigned weapon system, and the Army needs to do better at preparing our Soldiers for the battlefield. Marksmanship skills are essential for any unit conveyed to a wartime theater. This paper will examine the four significant army marksmanship
Samuel B. Griffith’s translation of “Sun Tzu: The Art of War” is an inside look at military practices of today. I did not find one technique that is not or would not be utilized in modern military maneuver, leadership, or training. The most astounding fact is that the Art of War was written well over two thousand years ago, even at the most conservative date. Although most of the techniques in this text are already in practice today, the value of “The Art of War” is a never-ending treasure chest of knowledge, and it deserves a place as a required reading for anyone seeking knowledge about war fighting or the history of war.
Massing Fires is a crucial technique of having “simultaneous execution of two or more firing elements to achieve maximum effects on a critical target” (FM 6-40 para. 5-7). Without this adopted skill, artillery and its effects would be minimal at best. The fire direction center enabled the ability to mass fires and solidified its place on today’s battlefield. One Historic point that helped shape the adoption of these new techniques and procedures was The Battle of El Guettar, Massing Fires has evolved and now contributes in modern day operations.