Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on bail reform
Psychological effects on people in prison
Similarities between jails and prisons
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays on bail reform
The United States bail system was built based on a system that was created in England during the Middle Ages and has evolved since then to what we know today. It still holds flaws that should’ve been settled a long time ago. Many believe that it’s needed because criminals might be a flight risk or a threat to public safety. Although that may be true, there are many cases where it’s exploited against the poor and utilized to the sole purpose of benefiting the rich. There are many other alternatives that have been proposed to put an end to our bail system, that at the same time will save taxpayers money and put an end to our useless Money Bail System. Change is essential as humanity continues to advance forward in life, nothing stays the same …show more content…
as time goes by. Things that may have worked in the past might not be as successful or useful in the present because things are no longer the same, everything changes and so should our bail system. A person’s financial stability shouldn’t determine their freedom, that is what you call being unfair. It would be understandable if everyone were receiving the same payroll, but that’s not the case. Poverty roams everywhere we go and yet our bail system benefits those that have money. However, our bail system doesn’t just affect the poor it affects everyone in society. There are many consequences that come as a result of how our bail system is currently setup. The need for bail reform should be a requirement rather than a debate, many are suffering do to the unfairness and flaws our current bail system holds. Why don’t we first start off with a few reasons why our current Bail System is unfair towards those with limited financial stability. For many Americans bail is not an option, not because they don’t want to pay it, but because they just cannot afford it. “The Bureau of Justice Statistics data show that average bail amounts have increased by over $30,000 between 1992 and 2009”. According to the Eighth Amendment there shouldn’t be any type of excessive bail. However, in the past few years the opposite has been happening. Money bail just keeps increasing and most citizens cannot cope with these changes because they don’t have the resources to pay for that kind of money. As a result, many innocent defendants spend time in jail affecting their entire life. Just one day in jail can destroy a person’s entire life, most jobs will fire anyone who is constantly absent. Not only that though, being in jail increases stress which subsequently increases the likelihood of innocent defendants pleading guilty because of all the pressure they are being imposed to. This leads to many wrongful convictions which mainly impact communities of color. Our criminal justice system cannot function if plea bargaining was not an option, “more than 95% of the cases each year” are resolved by simply depending on plea bargaining to get rid of them. Which really makes you wonder, How many innocent men and women have we placed behind bars because we are so stubborn to change an ancient bail system? Furthermore, Pretrial detention puts a burden upon any defendant that is awaiting for the results of their trial.
Nevertheless, It doesn’t just affect them. It affects their family and the community they are in. Spending time in jail before trial puts individuals in a dreadful situation which increases stress and financial problems including loss of employment, education, and even housing. Individuals who are sitting in jail are usually thinking that fragments of their lives are still unfolding while they are not present which creates fear and extreme worriness. Incarceration is not something that everyone can handle. Defendants that have never been in jail before are in a new environment that they are just not used too and aren’t comfortable in which really puts them in a gloomy hole, defendants that cannot post bail are at a disadvantage when it comes to helping their attorneys. Which is another way the rich benefit from having a Money based bail system. Families also suffer because of how our system functions. Putting a family member in jail until their trial is over may take months and sometimes longer. Which puts many families in unforeseen situations. Most families aren’t stable enough to deal with such a problem. Especially color communities. Pretrial detention increases the the chances of a conviction. Just by knowing this is enough for any person to realize that our bail system is increasing convictions in poor communities which as a result increase prison population and create irreversible damage to a person’s life. Many individuals who are in jail awaiting for trial are only thinking about regaining their freedom and have spent too long in jail, when prosecutors threaten and tell defendants that pleading guilty will get them a lesser punishments it leads to many of them taking the deal. They spend so long in jail that their minds get used to the mentally that they just want to get out no matter what, even if they are innocent they are still likely
to take the deal just to increase the odds of getting out of the horror. Our current bail system favors those with money, meaning that those individuals that are able to post bail get a pat on the back and those that can’t are thrown under the bus. Just by understanding this how can anyone still believe that this system is in anyway fair. Communities of color are being discriminated by the way our bail system functions. Rich folks don’t have to go through the struggle of being behind bars for months and having crippling depression. “A money-based pretrial system poses inherent disadvantages to people of color living in poverty”. The only people benefiting from a Money based bail system are rich folks. One of the things that is usually used to protect our bail system is saying that it helps protect our society against criminals that might pose a threat to public safety. However, data proves otherwise. “Our data shows that low-risk, non-violent defendants are frequently detained.” and “our research has shown that defendants who are high-risk and/or violent are often released.” This really validates the point that our bail system is not an effective way to provide public safety. Many individuals that commit felonies such as murder are bailed out because they have the resources to do so. According to one of the most devotional principles of the Criminal Justice System everyone is innocent until proven guilty and if that is true then why are innocent defendants hold behind bars when they are still not guilty. Many will say that it’s to protect our communities because we don’t know if he or she is actually innocent. However, our bail system is currently letting many go simply because they have the money. There should be another way to determine whether someone should be kept in jail not based on money. Money Bail makes taxpayers waste money unnecessarily, by having a system that most people cannot afford it increases the odds of people being sent to jail increasing the money being wasted because now they are not providing any benefit to society and taxpayers are paying for their day to day life in jail until their trial is complete. “Pretrial detainees account for two-thirds of jail inmates and 95% of the growth in the jail population over the last twenty years.” the only thing our bail system is currently doing is increasing jail and prison population as a result also increasing the money being wasted in mass incarceration. “Taxpayers spend approximately $38 million per day to jail people who are awaiting trial.” If a reform for bail was passed all of this money could be spent on something that would actually benefit our society. Our bail system is mostly good for human population control and wasting money which should change there are many lives torn apart because of justice.
Conclusion: Congress hoped to achieve a greater degree of accuracy in assessing flight and danger of arrestees through establishing the Bail Reform Act of 1984, which set objective guidelines for judicial officers in assessing release conditions including taking into account for the first time the probability an offender will re-offend while on pretrial release. It was also hoped that the Act would bring back the community's trust in bond setting practice. Overall, the benefits of the Bail Reform Act of 1984 do exceed any detriments, but some problems do exist. These problems include the uniformity in the application of the Bail Reform Act of 1984, as well as the interpretation of dangerousness to the community. Through future legislative and executive reform, this Act will go through multiple changes until these issues are addressed.
The United States has a larger percent of its population incarcerated than any other country. America is responsible for a quarter of the world’s inmates, and its incarceration rate is growing exponentially. The expense generated by these overcrowded prisons cost the country a substantial amount of money every year. While people are incarcerated for a number of reasons, the country’s prisons are focused on punishment rather than reform, and the result is a misguided system that fails to rehabilitate criminals or discourage crime. The ineffectiveness of the United States’ criminal justice system is caused by mass incarceration of non-violent offenders, racial profiling, and a high rate of recidivism.
Cohen (1985) supports this sentiment, and suggests that community based punishment alternatives have actually led to a widening and expansion of the retributive criminal justice system, rather than its abolishment. The current criminal justice system is expensive to maintain. In North America, the cost to house one prisoner is upwards of eighty to two hundred dollars a day (Morris, 2000). The bulk of this is devoted to paying guards and security (Morris, 2000).
The flaws of the prison system not only affect inmates and their families, but affect every Californian. It is ironic that prison are created to protect society, but it also an institution that hurts society. More of state budget is moved into maintaining the flawed prison system at the expense of education and social services. Ironically, money for education and social services aid in preventing criminal population.
When bailing an accused person it usually means they are set out with a set of rules or with a surety (a person who promises to supervise an accused person while they are out on bail). If the offender does not break the conditions made by the court, the bonds person will not have to pay any of the bail fees, therefore making it free. “In some cases, a bail hearing, which is like a short trial, is held and a judge or a justice of the peace decides whether the accused will get out on bail.” I find that the bail system is not effective because the quote says they will see if the person is able to get out of bail and be set free due to his actions, but can’t there be serious offenders that just act nice during bail just to get out and do another offense? This also applies when they are still in bail. “Keyfer Dykstra was on police bail when he was involved in the gang murder of a 19-year-old man.” Keyfer was a 14-year old guy and was on bail for confidential reasons but was able to re-offend because of bail. This also shows that if we give people a chance to get away using bail, they would not learn of what their wrongdoings were and most likely re-offend. Removing bail will
It makes the individual's likelihood for prosperity extremely low. This is true of not only the workforce, but in their personal lives as well. They are placed back into fragmented populations, however, this time, it’s much worse. Their communities cannot sustain their emotional unravelling after the disturbing realities of serving time in prison. In the article “The Impact of Mass Incarceration on Poverty” written by Robert DeFina and Lance Hannon, they claim that the impoverished communities of color need the removal of imprisoned individuals for the improval of local economics. However, the article “The Effects of Mass Incarceration on Communities of Color” claims that it does nothing to help these communities. Interestingly, both make the claim that the U.S. pushes people of color who are impoverished together and lack the support they need for economic upturn. The removal of criminals in communities is great in theory, but only if the theory is based on the illusion that all criminals live in suburban environments, committing high levels of crime and different crime than all the other races. This can only be theorized if all people are being treated equally, an absolute delusion. Mass Incarceration on poor black men is a systematic cycle. Many decide to turn a blind eye, but nothing gets done when we all choose to believe that all crimes are equally justified without a
The proliferation of prison overcrowding has been a rising concern for the U.S. The growing prison population poses considerable health and safety risks to prison staffs and employees, as well as to inmates themselves. The risks will continue to increase if no immediate actions are taken. Whereas fighting proliferation is fundamentally the duty of the U.S. government, prison overcrowding has exposed that the U.S. government will need to take measures to combat the flaws in the prison and criminal justice system. Restructuring the government to combat the danger of prison overcrowding, specifically in California, thus requires reforms that reestablishes the penal codes, increases the state’s budget, and develops opportunities for paroles to prevent their return to prison. The following context will examine and discuss the different approaches to reduce the population of state prisons in California in order to avoid prison overcrowding.
United States locks up more people, per capita, than any other nation. Bail system has failed to keep people arrested out jail and the increasing rate of people in jail is alarming. Many District Attorney forment defendant to take a plea deal, instead of waiting for a trial (Buettner). Bail reform has help put fewer people in jail, but has lead to many lost jobs for people who works at the jail. Bail system is a profit motive for the bail industry.
Today, half of state prisoners are serving time for nonviolent crimes. Over half of federal prisoners are serving time for drug crimes. Mass incarceration seems to be extremely expensive and a waste of money. It is believed to be a massive failure. Increased punishments and jailing have been declining in effectiveness for more than thirty years. Violent crime rates fell by more than fifty percent between 1991 and 2013, while property crime declined by forty-six percent, according to FBI statistics. Yet between 1990 and 2009, the prison population in the U.S. more than doubled, jumping from 771,243 to over 1.6 million (Nadia Prupis, 2015). While jailing may have at first had a positive result on the crime rate, it has reached a point of being less and less worth all the effort. Income growth and an aging population each had a greater effect on the decline in national crime rates than jailing. Mass incarceration and tough-on-crime policies have had huge social and money-related consequences--from its eighty billion dollars per-year price tag to its many societal costs, including an increased risk of recidivism due to barbarous conditions in prison and a lack of after-release reintegration opportunities. The government needs to rethink their strategy and their policies that are bad
"Too many Americans go to too many prisons for far too long, and for no good law-enforcement reason … Although incarceration has a role to play in our justice system, widespread incarceration at the federal, state and local levels is both ineffective and unsustainable. . . We need to ensure that incarceration is used to punish, deter and rehabilitate – not merely to convict, warehouse and forget"(Holder). Former Attorney General Eric Holder does not dispute that prisons play an important role in the justice system. He believes that along with punishing the inmate’s prisons should provide them with rehabilitation. With the already overpopulated prison system across the US there should be alternative for lesser nonviolent offences.
According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, in the year 1980 we had approximately 501,900 persons incarcerated across the United States. By the year 2000, that figure has jumped to over 2,014,000 prisoners. The current level of incarceration represents the continuation of a 25-year escalation of the nation's prison and jail population beginning in 1973. Currently the U.S. rate of 672 per 100,000 is second only to Russia, and represents a level of incarceration that is 6-10 times that of most industrialized nations. The rise in prison population in recent years is particularly remarkable given that crime rates have been falling nationally since 1992. With less crime, one might assume that fewer people would be sentenced to prison. This trend has been overridden by the increasing impact of lengthy mandatory sentencing policies.
Overcrowding in our state and federal jails today has become a big issue. Back in the 20th century, prison rates in the U.S were fairly low. During the years later due to economic and political factors, that rate began to rise. According to the Bureau of justice statistics, the amount of people in prison went from 139 per 100,000 inmates to 502 per 100,000 inmates from 1980 to 2009. That is nearly 261%. Over 2.1 million Americans are incarcerated and 7.2 million are either incarcerated or under parole. According to these statistics, the U.S has 25% of the world’s prisoners. (Rick Wilson pg.1) Our prison systems simply have too many people. To try and help fix this problem, there needs to be shorter sentences for smaller crimes. Based on the many people in jail at the moment, funding for prison has dropped tremendously.
The United States criminal justice system is an ever-changing system that is based on the opinions and ideas of the public. Many of the policies today were established in direct response to polarizing events and generational shifts in ideology. In order to maintain public safety and punish those who break these laws, law enforcement officers arrest offenders and a judge or a group of the law offender’s peers judge their innocence. If found guilty, these individuals are sentenced for a predetermined amount of time in prison and are eventually, evaluated for early release through probation. While on probation, the individual is reintegrated into their community, with restrict limitations that are established for safety. In theory, this system
With the substantial increase in prison population and various changes that plague correctional institutions, government agencies are finding that what was once considered a difficult task to provide educational programs, inmate security and rehabilitation programs are now impossible to accomplish. From state to state, each correctional organization is coupled with financial problems that have depleted the resources to assist in providing the quality of care in which the judicial system demands from these state and federal prisons. Judges, victims, and prosecuting attorneys entrust that once an offender is turned over to the correctional system, that the offender will receive the punishment imposed by the court, be given services that aid in the rehabilitation of those offenders that one day will be released back into society, and to act as a deterrent to other criminals contemplating criminal acts that could result in their incarceration. Has our nation’s correctional system finally reached it’s critical collapse, and as a result placed American citizens in harm’s way to what could result in a plethora of early releases of inmates to reduce the large prison populations in which independent facilities are no longer able to manage? Could these problems ultimately result in a drastic increase in person and property crimes in which even our own law enforcement is ineffective in controlling these colossal increases in crime against society?
In the 1970s and 1980s, a massive amount of inmates began fillin up the United States prison systems. This huge rate of growth in this short amount of time, has greatly contributed to the prison overcrowding that the United States faces today. In fact, the prisons are still filled to the seams. This enormous flood of inmates has made it practically impossible for prison officials to keep up with their facilities and supervise their inmates. One of the main reasons why many prisons have become overcrowded is because of states’ harsh criminal laws and parole practices (Cohen). “One in every 100 American adults is behind bars, the highest incarceration rate in the world” (Cohen). The amount of inmates in corrections systems, throughout the nation, sky-rocketed to 708 percent between 1972 and 2008. Today, there are about 145,000 inmates occupying areas only designed for 80,000 (Posner). Peter Mosko, “an assistant professor of Law, Police Science and Criminal Justice at New York’s John Jay College of Criminal Justice” (Frazier) stated, “America, with 2.3 million people behind bars, has more prisoners than soldiers” (Frazier). There have been studies that have shown “there are more men and women in prison than ever before. The number of inmates grew by an average of 1,600 a week. The U. S. has the highest rate of crime in the world” (Clark). Because of this influx in inmates, many prisoners’ rights groups have filed lawsuits charging that “overcrowded prisons violate the Constitution’s 8th Amendment ban on cruel and unusual punishment” (Clark). It is clear that the United States corrections system needs to be reformed in order to eliminate this problem. Prison overcrowding is a serious issue in society due to the fact it affects prison ...