Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare the different types of assessment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Compare the different types of assessment
Ability/ Intellectual In the, The RAIS and the Woodcock Johnson Tests, is used to measure a person’s basic intelligence. The test is shown that it only takes about thirty-five minutes based on who is administering the test and how the person receives the information. The test is split into four sections which consists of “Verbal intelligence index (VIX), a nonverbal intelligence index (NIX), a composite intelligence index (CIX), and the composite memory index (CMX)” (Sandhu, 2016). These all work together in the test to end with the final score or result. This will also demonstrate that of verbal intelligence. There are both nonverbal and verbal section within the test and the test can’t be done using the pencil and paper but has to involve the people giving it to the individual (Sandhu, 2016). I find this particular assessment/test to be useful as well in the classroom to help in aiding both the student and the teacher on skills both nonverbal and verbal based upon the student’s intelligence. In the, Wechsler Adult …show more content…
This is assessment is supposed to be given verbally by hearing what is being asked by the assessor. In and through this test, the students are not expected to be literate and know how to write or read exactly. In this assessment, they have provided up to four different tests to help in assessing the student 's progress for the end of each term to help see where the students are academically. Now, when giving this test, as the assessor we will ask the students to respond to certain sounds that letters make. It works on the sounds of the letters and not the letter itself. The assessment can take however long the student needs (PASA:Kindergarten, 2014, pp. 1-16). I find that these four different assessments would be very helpful to find out what the student is grasping when at school and how they are
The Development of the Test: The Woodcock-Johnson III covers 22 battery tests. The WJ COG tests include comprehensive-knowledge, long-term retrieval, visual-spatial thinking, auditory processing, fluid reasoning, processing speed, and short-term memory. WJ ACH series of test include reading-writing, mathematics, comprehension-knowledge, auditory processing, and long-term retrieval. The subtests for those tests include pair cancellation, general information, visual matching, decision speed, and many others. The WJ-III meets or surpasses the elementary standards. It qualifies as a gold standard IQ test along with the Stanford Binet and Wechsler Intelligence Tests.
Intelligence tests have been developed by scientists as a tool to categorize army recruits or analyze school children. But still discussing what intelligence is, academics have a difficult time defining what intelligence tests should measure. According to the American researcher Thorndike, intelligence is only that what intelligence tests claim it is (Comer, Gould, & Furnham, 2013). Thus, depending on what is being researched in the test and depending on the scientist’s definition of intelligence the meaning of the word intelligence may vary a lot. This essay will discuss what intelligence is in order to be able to understand the intelligence theories and aims of intelligence tests.
Howard Gardner’s theory contains eight main multiple intelligence. As the years have progressed there have taken one out and is left with the main seven. These seven are: Linguistic, Mathematical, Spatial, bodily, Musical, Interpersonal, and Intrapersonal. These are found in everyone; however, each person will excel in one or two. Once teachers can determine what intelligence the students will exceed on and teach to their strengths the student will learn much more.
In the kindergarten classroom students come to me in the fall and are struggling with phonological awareness skills. Many of these children do not possess the basic phonetic skills such as rhyming. The purpose of the needs assessment is to determine if these skills are lacking in all classrooms in the district that I work in, to determine if all instructors understand the value in educating the students, and the importance of these skills for beginning kindergarteners.
A third-grade teacher has been conducting a series of ongoing assessments of a student's oral reading. Shown below is a sentence from a text, followed by a transcription of a typical example of the student's oral reading performance.
In this world, there are many different individuals who are not only different in demographics but also different neurologically. Due to an immense amount of people it is important to first understand each individual, in order, to better understand them and to help them when it comes to certain areas such as education, the work force, and etc…. For this reason psychologists have aimed to further understand individuals through the use of psychological assessments. This paper aims to examine a particular assessment tool, the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales (Fifth Edition), which measures both intelligence and cognitive abilities (Roid, 2003). This assessment is usually administered by psychologists and the scores are most often used to determine placement in academics and services allotted to children and adolescents (despite their compatibility for adults) (Wilson & Gilmore, 2012). Furthermore before the investigation dives into the particulars of the test, such as its strengths and weakness’, it is best to first learn more about the intelligence scales general characteristics.
This test is based on the multiple intelligences theory by Gardner (1983) who “…concluded that all human beings possess at least eight intelligences: linguistic and logical-mathematical […], musical, spatial, bodily-kinesthetic, naturalist, interpersonal, and intrapersonal.” From the test I found my two most prominent types of intelligence: linguistic and interpersonal. Having linguistic intelligence means that I am “[sensitive] to the meaning of words, the order among words, and the sound, rhythms, inflections, and meter of words...” (MIO: n.d.). Alongside this I am also “[able] to interact effectively with others. [And be sensitive] to others’ moods, feelings, temperaments and motivations” (ibid). Upon reflecting (RO) on these results I realised that these were two very good intelligences to have. I have concluded in my ‘AC’ that due to linguistic intelligence being “most prized in school and […] central to success on standard intelligence tests” (ibid) it is a very desirable type of intelligence to have, especially at university. It is also desirable as I am doing a degree in English Language and Linguistics with creative writing; therefore, the need to be able to understand words properly is crucial to my development throughout my time at university. I also found that interpersonal
Teachers gather information everyday form student’s through classroom activities to get a picture of where a student’s progress and abilities are. There are many different ways to collect a child’s artifacts such as using a checklist, anecdotal notes, teacher reflections, video and audio recordings, and work samples. Each student has their own folder where all their notes, videos, recordings, and artifacts are kept. As stated in the text (Enz, 2014, p. 207, “They must systematically collect, store, organize, and analyze the samples in order to understand the children’s growth and to plan their next teaching” (Ackerman & Coley, 2012). I learned that an on-demand assessment is more like an annual physical checkup. On demand assessments happen at specific times during the course of the year. One day children will be asked to do something specific such as circle the numbers the teacher says out loud, or having to take a test with a pencil and paper. Some label on -demand assessments as tests. This is because children are asked to perform the same action at the same time and in the same manner during an on-demand assessment. “Standardized tests are administered, scored, and interpreted in the same way for all test takers” (Enz, 2014, p. 208). Some examples of an on-going assessment that could be used in a comprehensive approach to literacy
The Woodcock-Johnson Assessment utilizes achievement and cognitive measures that involve the entire representation of what is actually happening intellectually with a child. This information can be used to determine the diagnosis of a disability. The Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Achievement has four different versions with the latest being the VI. In 1977, the first version of the test was written and consisted of twenty-two subtest by Richard Woodcock and Mary E. Bonner Johnson (Woodcock, McGrew, Mather 2001). The assessment can be used with individuals of all ages and is given to one subject at a time and the administration is simple to manage (Blackwell, 2001). For the purpose of this paper, reliability and validity of the Woodcock-Johnson
The WISC-IV is intended to provide evaluation teams with an overall intelligence quotient, or full scale IQ, this score is used for placement and identification purposes. The scores of these various subtests are arranged in a way that a score of 100 would be considered an average score (Niolon, 2005). The 10 subtests are summed into four main indexes: verbal comprehension index, perceptual reasoning index, working memory index, and processing speed index (IUPUI, n.d.). The verbal comprehension index assesses a child's ability to listen to questions, draw upon learned information, think through the answer, and finally express their thoughts out loud (IUPUI, n.d.). The perceptual reasoning index assesses the child's ability to inspect a problem and use their visual-motor and visual-spatial skills to organize their thoughts, create an answer and then test the answer. The working memory index assesses the child's ability to memorize new information, store it in their short term memory, and then use that information to produce a reasoning process (IUPUI, n.d.). The processing speed index assesses the child's ability to focus their attention, discriminate between, and then sequentially order visual information (IUPUI, n.d.). The information that is revealed from these indexes will inform the students total
Intelligence Quotient (IQ) tests are common all over the world. The tests were initially conducted on young children mostly at the kindergarten age to measure their cognitive abilities in relation to others of the same age in a bid to ascertain the level of attention the pre-scholars would require from teachers upon joining school. In modern times, these tests are carried out on adults for different reasons such as for fun/general knowledge or to determine the best candidate for a job or academic purposes. It tests several aspects of personality and this paper identifies two IQ tests and develops sample questions for them in an academic setting.
The ability to test a student’s language skills is essential to have as a teacher. Over the years, classrooms have become much more diverse with a wide variety of impairments being presented on a daily basis. Often, these disabilities contain a language impairment that appears as a side effect of the main disability. Unfortunately, assessing language is not as easy as one may think because it is not clearly defined and understood. Kuder (2008) writes that “…language is not a unitary phenomenon- it is ‘multidimensional, complex, and dynamic; it involves many interrelated processes and abilities; and it changes from situation to situation” (pg. 274). Language also develops at different times for different individuals, thus making language assessment an even harder task for test administrators to grade and evaluate. In order to further understand the language impairment that students present, teachers need to be aware of appropriate language tests that could be administered. In order to assure that the best language test is being issued to a student, several various tests exist to choose from. To test a student’s overall language capability, a comprehensive language test, such as the Comprehensive Assessment of Spoken Language (CASL) or the Oral and Written Language Scales (OWLS), could be administered. If a teacher wanted to test a specific language skill such as pragmatics, phonology, syntax, or semantics, the teacher would need to find the best test for the student’s unique situation.
Assessment is a very important part to early childhood education. Assessments help educators by gaining information that can help make important decisions that will help with the development of children. Developmentally appropriate assessments can help educators learn what children can do and the things that they know. There are four purposes that the information from assessments are used for. According to McAfee, Leong, and Bodrova (2016) they are to monitor children’s development and learning, guide classroom planning and decision making to help children learn, identify children who might benefit from special help, and report to and communicate with others (p. 33).
It is important that teachers give children a fair chance to show their knowledge when assessing. “The purpose of assessment is to provide feedback that can be used to improve student performance” (Orange 2000). Teachers assess children to ensure that they are understanding the material, and to make sure they are learning. For young children, tests should never be the only criteria for assessment. Instructors should always make sure that their assessment is fair.
Cohen (1994) stated, “One of the primary reasons for conducting a language assessment in the classroom is to promote meaningful involvement of students with material that is central to the teaching objectives of a given course.” p. 13 Does the test on pages 2 – 6 promote meaningful involvement? In my opinion, the answer is no; I am not sure if the tasks assessed is reflecting the overall objectives of the program. A real question to ask is whether these goals were made known to the students at the commencement of the course. Consequently, when measuring this test against Cohen’s criteria for “evaluating assessment instruments” as it relates to instruction. I found that the instructions given for each section are clear and precise, the test can be given by another teacher if the designated teacher is not there. Also, the timing seems reali...