Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Characteristics of Roman civilization
Characteristics of Roman civilization
Similarities to Rome
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Characteristics of Roman civilization
This discussion will first describe a marble statue of the emperor Augustus Caesar (27 BC-14 AD) dating from 15 AD during the reign of his successor Tiberius. It is thought to be a copy of an original statue from 20BC, and is located at the Villa of Livia, the then-home of Augustus’ wife, at Prima Porta. The statue portrays an idealised and youthful version of Augustus, as he is shown to have a full head of hair and young facial features, including the traditional Roman aquiline nose and a rounded mouth. This reflects a Greek style of art and subverts the traditional expectation of Roman statues, which usually portrayed their subject as old in order to convey their experience and conservatism. Therefore, this statue of Augustus is a political …show more content…
Located near Otricoli, Italy, the portrait portrays its subject as aged and haggard, with deep wrinkles, especially around his eyes, a furrowed brow, and sagging jowls. The man depicted has a large, hooked Roman nose, large ears, no hair, and an emotionless expression, which is in keeping with its veristic style, that is, an artistic style characterised by realism. This style was popular in Roman Republican portraiture as signs of age reflected experience and status; it communicated old Republican values of lineage and conservatism, however it didn’t represent people exactly as they were, but as they would want to be seen. This may be the reason why the old man’s aged features are so exaggerated, in order to convey his great status and experience. This is unlike the statue of Augustus; whilst both works portray men of status, the way in which they are presented is vastly different. The statue of Augustus portrays a, seemingly eternally, young man, whose face is youthful and shows little signs of aging in order to convey a new age of Rome, whilst the patrician in the portrait shows signs of aging, which reflect his experience. Even though both men have strong aquiline noses, that is the only real facial similarity they share- Augustus has a full head of hair, small ears, and smooth, unlined skin, which is the complete opposite of the Roman patrician. This could be explained by the fact that the portrait of the patrician was created during the Roman Republic, whilst the statue of Augustus was created (and then re-created) during the Roman Empire, and thus they would have different expectations and conventions placed upon them. In terms of differences, the portrait also only appears to be a bust, whilst the statue depicts Augustus’ full body, with its extremely detailed breastplate and small depiction of Cupid. They both are
In this paper I am exploring “Portrait of Augustus as general” and “Khafre enthroned”. From exploring and getting to know the Statues in my Art History Book I have compared these statues (Kleiner, 2013). The first and most obvious similarity between the two is in the artists’ idealization and immortalization of their subjects. Both Khafre and Augustus are portrayed in an idealized manner, designed to give the impression of nobility, timelessness, and divinity. The two statues were the political advertisements of their times that showed the public images of reliable leaders who one
The emotion in the figures is also very different. In the archaic figure, the face contains emotion other than the archaic smile. The eyes are closed with no facial expression. The classical statue on the other hand does not have any facial expressions but has open eyes and no smile.
The Res Gestae Divi Augustus (‘The Deeds of the Divine Augustus’), also known simply as the Res Gestae was a catalogue of the achievements Augustus had made during his life, specifically those that had an obvious positive impact on the Roman people. It was written in 13-14AD (E.S. Ramage, 1987) and presented to the Vestal Virgins alongside Augustus’ will upon his death in 14AD (M.C. Howatson, 1937). The biography, which was carved into bronze pillars outside of Augustus’ mausoleum (M.C. Howatson, 1937), is split into 35 sections; each recognizing a separate part of Augustus’ excellence. The fifteenth, which will be discussed in this commentary, describes the notable largesses donated to the Roman people by Augustus throughout his
Augustus was born in Rome on September 23, 63 B.C. He was originally named Gaius Octavianus, but when his great-uncle, Julius Caesar, was murdered, he took his name. Augustus’ real father died when his son was only four. Augustus was adopted in Julius Caesar’s will and was left to be his heir at the age of eighteen. Caesar was very fond of his grand-nephew and he sent him to the College of Pontifices at the age of sixteen. When Caesar was assassinated, Augustus was in Illyria, where he was sent to serve. It was only when he returned to Italy that he learned he was his great-uncle’s heir.
The Statue of a kouros and the Portrait statue of a boy both depict similar subjects, however are greatly different in how they accomplish this task. Through detail, or lack there of, the Greeks and Romans are able to display a certain value they have in its members. These two statues were made about 500 years apart and approach the sculpting process quit differently. The Greek statue seems to use geometric exaggerated lines to form the body while the Romans use a more realistic approach and sculpt the body with a more rounded finish. Statue of a kouros, from about 590 B.C and Portrait of a boy, from about the first century, do not share any great technical aspects and are basically nothing alike.
In regards to subject matter, both pieces of sculpture are of leaders, Mycerinus and Kha-merer-nebty II were the pharaoh and queen of Egypt around 2500 BCE., and Caesar Augustus was the Emperor of Rome from September 23, 63 BCE to August 19, 14 CE., shown in this work as a general from Primaport, Italy.
Changing social habits of a contemporary society have seen Cleopatra depicted in many different ways. Whilst few artefacts remain of the true image of Cleopatra, we see from her portrait on the coins (Fear, 2008, p, 21 Fig 1.4) that despite being no legendary beauty, she had the power to captivate two of the greatest Romans of her time. Cleopatra consummated her union with Julius Caesar, which strengthened her grip on the throne, following his assassination; she formed alliance with Mark Antony, in opposition to Octavian, a coalition that would lead to her downfall as both Antony and Cleopatra’s combined forces would be defeated against Octavian in the battle of Actium in 31 BCE. (Fear, 2008, p.7)
The Augustus of Primaporta depicts the emperor standing with his arm raised and with all his weight shifted into one foot. This is slightly different than the Votive Statue of Gudea, both positions are symbolic of the way a rule from each time period would have addressed troops. Augustus, along with his youthful features, is exactly how Augustus would have wanted to be remembered. This is also true of the Votive Statue of Gudea. There are many other symbolic details that relate to mythology and history incorporated into the statue of Augustus.
In my examination of the works, I came across a particular sculpture that portrayed both beauty and craftsmanship. A 15th century sculpture (1490), made in Venice, Italy by Tullio Lombardo, shows a life-size figure of Adam. Titled Adam, the work is the most prominent in the gallery mostly because of its 6-foot standing. It immediately caught my attention and gave me a very realistic impression. One beige color and made of marble, Adam is depicted simply, yet the statue has intense emotions. His meaningful glance is seen in the upward and tilted head position. Adam has almost lifeless looking eyes and seems to be staring into the distance. With these sagging eyes, parted lips, and lacking posture I feel Adam’s guilt is displayed in this figure.
Zanker, Paul. The power of images in the Age of Augustus. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1988. (P. 158 ~ 159)
The masculine and idealized form of the human body is an ever-present characteristic of Michelangelo’s sculpture. Many people over the years have speculated why this may be, but there has never been a definitive answer, and probably never will be. Through all of his sculpture there is a distinct classical influence, with both his subject matter and his inclination to artistically create something beautiful. In most cases, for Michelangelo, this means the idealized human figure, seeping with contraposto. This revival of classical influences is common for a Renaissance artisan, but the new, exaggerated form of the human body is new and unique to Michelangelo’s artistic style.
... middle of paper ... ... The Roman’s continued with a more realistic style with such statues as Aristocrat with Ancestors and Marcus Aurelius. In wall paintings at Pompeii, the artists used great color and realism on the people’s faces.
Here, we will be looking at a rendition of the high marble statue of Augustus Caesar known as “Augustus of Prima Porta.” Originating from 1st Century A.D., it is said that there is a possibility that the original sculpture could have been of greek descent. Upon a general overview of the sculpture, one can see that Augustus fulfils a millitarial role of some kind. From his very stance to the garments portrayed on him, Augustus is draped in a decorative cuirass and a tunic, accompanied by a figure of Cupid clutching on to his right calf. After taking the general themes of the work into account, one can then began to start unraveling the many symbolic elements embedded into the sculpture that allude to godly themes. Starting from the crown of his head, the very chiselment and structure of his face gives the work a youthful element to it, even though some say that Augustus was around 40 years old. A recurring theme within Greek and Roman culture is the matter of godliness and immortality amongst idolized figures themselves. This idea is usually depicted by displaying powerful human being in a younger light. This
Grant, Michael. From Alexander to Cleopatra: The Hellenistic World. New York: Micheal Grant Publications Ltd, 1982.