What is an atheist?
One of the most common misconceptions about atheism is that it is determined by a personal belief. People mistakenly attribute a position founded in theological knowledge to be a product of ‘believing’ something, which would be entirely contradictory. In order to clear up the misunderstanding, you have to fully understand atheism at its core. We must also have a sober understanding of the things that distinguish atheism from the other two theological positions: theism and agnosticism. Once we make clear exactly how the three theological positions are mutually exclusive, we will be much more properly equipped to form a full and correct definition of atheism.
Positive and negative atheism
The term ‘atheism’ first emerged in the 1500’s, based on the Ancient Greek vernacular used for ‘godless’. From the very beginning, there were a distinction in the way that people would choose to reject the notion of deities; positive atheism and negative atheism. Negative atheism, also know as ‘soft’ atheism, is when a person does not believe in deities but does not make the assertive claim that there are none that exist. The counterpart to negative atheism, positive atheism, is not negative atheism’s opposite but its more assertive variation. Positive atheism, unlike negative atheism, asserts with full confidence that deities cannot, have not, and will not objectively exist in ways that actively initiate real-word events. Negative atheism was coined by British philosopher Antony Garrard Newton Flew (February 11th 1923- April 8th 2010). Positive atheism’s publicity predates the coining of the term ‘negative atheism’ by a couple of centuries. Negative atheism was first coined as a term in 1976, and positive atheism was first...
... middle of paper ...
...f deities that are meant to be accepted without any factual, objective evidence. An atheist still may exercise some form of belief, but they will not assert the existence of higher forms as an objective fact. Atheists claim to know, theists believe, and agnostics make a statement of not being able to know.
Qualifying “Atheist”
An atheist makes their position based on the presence or lack of available, reliable information. It is a role that is willfully taken on, not unconsciously played out just by the nature of actions and thoughts. An infant with no sentience or self-awareness, then, cannot be an atheist; they are not yet aware enough of their own minds to state a position in knowledge, belief, or the lack thereof. Once one is fully aware of presence and bankruptcy of objective information there is to support theology, only then can they be called an atheist.
Atheist: one who does not believe in God or gods; they are often thought of as one without a religion.
In today’s society, there are roughly around 4,200 religions that exist on this planet. Some define "religion" as a cultural system of behaviors and practices that help people make important decisions in life. Out of the many religions, Judaism, Christianity, Buddhism have many similarities that connect them to one another. Themes of morality, justice, love are found through both the Buddha's teaching and the Hebrew and Christian Bible.
...uld be fair to judge someone, because they choose to believe in a greater force. However, while it is impossible to know if god or exist or not, I do believe that it is rational to believe in god based on the fact that it brings positive things to our lives. So, in the end, I believe we all must at least remain agnostic, and be open to different possibilities. It is likely that evidence will never surface that suggest god does exist, but what we must do is make a choice to believe or not.
Just because they do not believe in a God does not mean they are evil and absurd people. Not believing there is a God or not does not make a person evil. Another misconception is that agnosticism is a minority group. Like stated before, atheism, agnosticism, and unaffiliated religion have been increasing drastically over the years in the United States. People can also misinterpret agnostics that are prejudiced against religious people.
According to agnostics, there is absolutely no proof of a God and thus, “God” could actually be an existence fabricated from myths. In addition, it is believed that the universe is both ethereal and uncaused by any higher power; it is simply “just there”. Take the Big Bang Theory for example, agnostics claim the universe essentially sprang into existence all on its own and life is merely a series of random processes. Likewise, one could easily ask the question, if God created the universe then who created God? However, some may argue that deism is the most accurate worldview since it is most rationally correct. Many scientists today are actually discovering reasons to believe a God does exist but does not intervene in our daily lives. Philosopher, Antony Flew, was known for being a famous atheist that later took on the deist approach because of how modern science is beginning to “prove” the existence of a creator. Both agnostics and deists agree that there are explanations for mundane happenings and mystical occurrences are merely coincidental. Similarly, if there is a supposedly good God, why is there so much evil and suffering in the world? Why does he not
Theology is an intentionally reflective endeavor. Every day we reflect upon the real, vital, and true experience of the benevolent God that exists. We as humans tend to be social beings, and being so we communicate our beliefs with one another in order to validate ourselves. Furthermore atheism has many forms, three of the most popular atheistic beliefs include: scientific atheism, humanistic atheism and the most popular one being protest atheism. Scientific atheism is the idea that science is the answer for everything and god is not existent. The humanistic approach states that society is self-sufficient; therefore God is not needed for survival. Therefore how could he exist? The position that I will argue in this paper is the pessimistic idea of protest atheism.
It's remarkable how many of my friends insist I am not an atheist. It seems pretty obvious to me that I don't believe any god exists, and that pretty much makes me an atheist. Nevertheless, here these people are, so insistent that I cannot possibly be an atheist. "You're too nice," they say, or "you really believe, you just don't know it" (how's that again?). Sometimes I hear something like "You believe in something, and that is really god" or "you are still looking, but you'll find Him" (he's invited to stop by my house at any time). When I have the time to converse with these people, however, it usually comes down to this: I'm really an agnostic, they say, because I am willing to admit that I don't know there isn't any god. It is apparently so important for people to believe that I'm "really just an agnostic" that I find this to be a haunting sign of the hold religion has on people. It is tragic that the mere thought of a good friend or relative being an actual, avowed atheist is so horrible that it must be denied.
basis for belief in a deity were merely negations of, or tried to deny, the
Religion is the belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, especially a personal God or gods, a particular system of faith and worship or a pursuit or interest followed with great devotion (Oxford Dictionary, 2014). From religion, many new groups, communities and further derived religions have formed. Closely related to religion and with endless controversies surrounding it’s classification as a religion is the concept of Atheism- which is defined as the disbelief or rejection of a deity. Descending from this is a social and political movement in favour of secularism known as New Atheism. Understanding the historical content concerning the emergence of atheism, this essay will then address how various aspects within the field inclusive the goals, structures and approaches have emerged and developed over time in comparison to the original atheist ideals.
Geisler describes atheism as a belief that there is no God of any kind and anywhere. To discuss atheism, it is necessary to define first what the word "God" means and then what atheism is. Unfortunately, Geisler does not define God in his book, Christian Apologetics, but uses the word. Since it is about Christian apologetics, we will assume that God means the God of Christianity. Robert Flint points out that atheism is one of the theories which are "antagonistic to theism," among which are polytheism and pantheism, even though those two acknowledge the existence of deities.
Anatheism Theism is the belief in a God who is the creator of all things. Atheism, on the other hand, is the belief that there is no God or creator of all things. Throughout history there has been quite the battle between these two ways of thinking. Theist rely mostly on faith for what is true while atheists defend themselves with scientific thought. Some religious thinkers have even changed their stance on what they believe is true.
Of course, at that time, it was a taboo to be identified as agnostic. Agnostic, by the way, is a person who believes that everything exists because of God.
Let’s start off by explaining what atheism is, it’s when you don’t believe in any form of an “Intelligent Creator” or God, as usually referred to as. The word atheism comes from the root word “theism”, which is when you believe in a God, or numerous Gods depending on the religion, and the prefix “a”, which means “not”. There are no set practices of atheism, or a set list of beliefs. To be an atheist you must believe what you would like and simply live your life without constraints based on what you believe is good or bad, not what you are told is good or bad. There is a constant debate against atheism from the theist side, because both sides’ arguments are polar opposites and each believes their side of the argument is 100% valid. I will state my view on some arguments, and clarify some common atheist stereotypes.
6. Bohdan R. Bociurkiw and John W. Strong, Religion and Atheism in the U.S.S.R. and
INDTRODUCTION “Sex and Religion”? Those two don’t really go hand in hand,” commented a freshman student from UF. Like this student, numerous people around the world believe this misconception to be true. Whether people argue for or against the importance of gender in religion, more than just what goes on in the bedroom has been heating up lately. Many debates have sparked due to the negative connotation associated with sex when confronted about its position in religious cultures.