Asphalt Film Thickness Case Study

2781 Words6 Pages

Chapter 3 Case Study 3.1. General The conventional procedure to determine the Asphalt film thickness is the concept of the Hveem Method which have been developed in California under the direction of Mr. F.N. Hveem in the 1930s. These method has been modified several times to adjust the changes in traffic and other conditions. Hveem assumed that each aggregate particle needed to be covered by the same optimum film thickness. The surface area calculation is a starting point to select asphalt content in the test series of Hveem method. The asphalt film thickness is calculated as a ratio of the effective volume of asphalt to the surface area of the aggregate. The current techniques for calculating film thickness is based on the surface area …show more content…

Multiply each sieve passing percentage by its appropriate area factor. E.g. if 5% passes 75 μm sieve, the calculation is 0.05 x 32.77 = 1.64 m2/kg Be sure to account for the material above 4.75 mm by using 100% times the factor, i.e.1 x 0.41. Sum all the above calculated areas. This equals the total surface area (SST) in m2/kg for the mix. Calculate the Absorbed Asphalt using the following formula: Absorbed Asphalt=(ASP x BSG-[(BSG (100+ASP))/TMSG-100]ASG)/BSG ………………. (Eq 3.3) Where: ASP = Asphalt content of the mix by dry weight of aggregate BSG = Bulk specific gravity of the aggregates in the asphalt mix TMSG = Theoretical maximum specific gravity of the asphalt mix ASG = Specific gravity of the asphalt cement in the mix Convert percent absorbed asphalt to percent absorbed by total mix basis (P_ba): P_ba=% Absorbed Asphalt x 100/(100+% asphalt) ………….. (Eq 3.4) Calculate percent asphalt content (P_b) by total mix basis: P_b=% Apshalt x 100/(100+% Asphalt) ………………………… (Eq 3.5) Calculate Effective Asphalt (P_be) by total mix …show more content…

The first group is control group without any conditioning while the second group is vacuum saturated (55-80%) at 28.6 in HG for 5 minutes. After saturation, the second group cores are placed in 140°F (60°C) water bath for 24 hours. Then the ITS test is performed on the sample at 77°F (25°C) at a loading rate of 2in/min. The minimum acceptable TSR used is 0.7 to 0.8 (Tunncliff et al. 1984). 2.4.4 Modified Lottman Test It is the combination of the Lottman Test and the Tunncliff and Root test. In this method, the second group after saturation is kept in a freezer (0°F or -18°C) for 16 to 18 hours. The frozen cores are then removed and kept in water bath at 140°F (60°C) for 24 hours. The Resilient Modulus and ITS test are performed after conditioning. ITS test is performed as per Standard Specifications 1995. The minimum acceptable TSR used is 0.7 (Roberts et al. 1996). 2.5 Retained Marshall Stability Test This method determines the retained Marshall stability on Marshall Compaction specimens after curing for 24 hours in a water bath at 60° C. (Standard Test Procedure Manual, 2001). Equipment Required:- Water bath capable of maintaining a temperature at 60°

Open Document