Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of symbolism
Everyday symbolism
Symbolism and interpretation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The importance of symbolism
Ashurnasirpal II Hunting Lions is a low relief sculpture depicting Assyrian king Ashurnasirpal II on a royal lion hunt. The relief is made out of alabaster and was created circa 875-860 BCE in ancient Kalhu; present day Nimrud, Iraq.
Ashurnasirpal II Hunting Lions is a large rectangular slab of rock, about 2.4 meters long and 88 to 99 centimeters tall. This is a small relief which makes it different form the other low reliefs created at this time because they were much larger and took up entire walls in comparison. The subject, of course, is Ashurnasirpal II; he is hunting some lions from his royal chariot, a passion of his that is depicted in many other reliefs of Ashurnasirpal.
The way a viewer can distinguish which figure Ashurnasirpal II form the others is because Ashurnasirpal is riding in the chariot and he is the only figure actually killing the lions. Also, Ashurnasirpal II is taller and more idealized, or perfect, than the other humans in this relief. For example, Ashurnasirpal has a very idealistic beard; it is braided so perfectly that each of his braids is the same length and width. In addition king Ashurnasirpal has some sort of arm band or bracelets that are
…show more content…
fairly detailed. The horses in the relief are idealistic too, in that their manes are braided and their tales are decoratively bound. The horses also have great detail in their legs and you can see the muscles rippling in the horses legs. The horses also have beautiful decorations attached to their backs’ and chests’. This detail is to show the viewer that Ashurnasirpal II had the best and strongest horses. Like the horses, the lions in this relief are also very muscular. The artist enhanced the muscles of these lions to show their power and might. The viewer can see the muscles tense as on lion prepares to pounce and the other cowers from being trampled by the horses. The lions were given more detail than the horses because they are of greater importance. The artist wants to show off the strength of the lions to say even though lions are very powerful beasts, they still are beaten by Ashurnasirpal II and make Ashurnasirpal look more invincible. Other details on the lions include the whiskers, razor sharp teeth, tongue, claws and paws, fold and creases of the ears, and the different textures of fur. The title has a very literal meaning in relation to the actual relief itself in that Ashurnasirpal II is actually depicted killing lions and the name of the piece is Ashurnasirpal II Killing Lions. Everything in this relief is proportionate in size which is odd because usually the main focal point, in this case Ashurnasirpal, would be larger than the other figures.
Even though the men are all about the same size, Ashurnasirpal is still raised and is the highest part of the relief to suggest that he as a ruler, is more important than everything and everyone around him. Also in regard to the difference between the other men and Ashurnasirpal is the way they are standing. Ashurnasirpal’s men are all standing profile but the king himself is standing in a frontal view with the exception of his head. The reason for Ashurnasirpal to be shown standing a different way from the others could be to show that he is different from everyone and that he is not equal to but greater than all other
men. Ashurnasirpal II Killing Lions was sculpted on a material called alabaster which is a mineral that is relatively soft. Because alabaster is so soft, it is very easy to work with and is most likely the reason the artist chose to use it for the relief. This relief has many details so it would be difficult to use a material that was harder because the details would not be as sharp or clear. The texture of the surface looks generally smooth with the exception of the depth of the sculpting to show how far away or close an object or person is to the viewer. The work looks very detailed and sharp considering it was created more than 2800 years ago. The major elements in this relief are king Ashurnasirpal, some of his warriors, lions, and horses. The sculptor layers everything in this relief in a very smooth and clear manner that makes it seem like the viewer is actually witnessing the spectacle. The layers are very realistic and the lines reconnect as soon as the object in the top layer ends. The lines are both actual and implied in this low relief sculpture. The actual lines are very sharp clean and clear. This is surprising because of how old the piece of art is and when one takes into account how soft the mineral alabaster is; it is amazing how the picture has not faded. The implied lines in this piece are in place only because of the layers. As mentioned before, the viewer can continue the lines in their head even if a top layer interrupts the line. The artist uses shadow to enhance the musculature of the lions and make the lions look more full and three dimensional. There are some shadows, however, that the artist might have incorporated unknowingly. These shadows cause the relief, in some places, to look like it has a back drop behind the scene instead of open air.
In this paper I am exploring “Portrait of Augustus as general” and “Khafre enthroned”. From exploring and getting to know the Statues in my Art History Book I have compared these statues (Kleiner, 2013). The first and most obvious similarity between the two is in the artists’ idealization and immortalization of their subjects. Both Khafre and Augustus are portrayed in an idealized manner, designed to give the impression of nobility, timelessness, and divinity. The two statues were the political advertisements of their times that showed the public images of reliable leaders who one
Both figures are in a very traditional, standing pose for the time period in which they were created. The sculpture of Augustus is based on the Greek classical statue of the Spear Bearer or Doryphoros by Polykleitos. He is standing in contrapposto, a very classical standing pose wherein the weight of the body is shifted naturally so the figure’s weight is more on one leg, with the other leg slightly bent behind and the hips tilted. Mycerinus and Kha-merer-nebty II are both in the standard Egyptian canon standing pose, in which the figures are rigidly frontal with the pharaoh’s arms down at his sides and fists clenched. Like Augustus, one leg is slightly ahead and one is behind, but there is no contrapposto, the figure’s weight is shared equally by both legs and the hips are squared and level.
Both pieces to me seem to represent godlike features. For example, in the palette the king is shown as larger than his enemies and in the stele the king is standing over the people and is much higher than them. As rulers, they are both depicted as strong and heroic and as humans, they are depicted as
Some people want to forget the fact on how cruel we were to blacks, however it did teach us a lesson to treat people equally. While we can not go back in time, books can help bring us those past experiences. One book that that does just that is The Lions of Little Rock. While the characters were fiction, the author Kristin Levine did give the reader a slight feel of the events that took place in this time period of the Civil Rights and school integration.
The Assyrian Winged Protective Deity is a low relief sculpture, so it does not stand out as much against the stone it was carved out off, but the viewer can easily distinguish the outline of the figure portrayed. One foot of the figure is stepping forward, which could symbolize a continuation with life even after death to protect the king. The stance of this figure greatly resembles Egyptian reliefs, since they would often have their statues have one foot forward. They did this because it symbolized eternity through the afterlife, which the ka of the person needed. The ka ...
And just like the Greek the statue are both big and almost human size. A great example of this is the “Augustus of Primaporta, 1st century C.E. (Vatican Museums).” It truly shows the evolution of art sculpting. It is a full size very detailed sculpture of Augustus. It very detailed from his hair showing every curl and split to the small details in his armor that also depicts a story as well is shows the god of the sky looking down on him and the goddess of the earth looking up towards him as they watch the Parthians surrender to him and returning the standards shows the great power that Augustus has, and not just that but also the sculpture itself is a symbol for how Augustus wanted everyone to see him as, as god like. And it even has a little small cupid on the side which is also detailed which shows that Augusts is decedent from a
Although the portrait does not show a realistic representation of Wadj-shemsi-su himself, the Egyptians instead identified him with glyphs located on the back of the lid and concentrated on creating an idealistic image that symbolized the kingdom’s power. The lid functioned to protect the king’s mummified corpse, but the portrait itself functioned to symbolize the wealth of the kingdom through the figure’s powerful face, strong bone structure, and painted ornate
I chose this sculpture because I was intrigued by the position of the man and the centaur. I was able to witness that the centaur is trying to invade the personal space of the man. The sculpture showed me that there is a strong relationship between man and creature. The quality of the sculpture made me realize that animals play a big part of a human’s life and can be seen as threatening to humans. It was interesting to see that both the man and centaur were created to have almost of the same structures. This statue has a metallic brown and green, bronze tone and appeared undersized. It has a height of four and a half feet, and six inches. It has long, thin, legs with calf muscles, and bulging thighs. The sculpture evolved from Olympia, Greece. The man and centaur sculpture was created in 750 BCE during an orderly time period. The colors used for this sculpture, proved that it has a longer lasting mold for statues. On the left side of the sculpture, the man has a wrap on his head, that can symbolize, he is some form of a god. On the right side, the centaur has the same head piece as the man, but the body of a horse. It can be seen that the man and
Comparing the Statue of the Royal Scribe Yuni and the Statue of St. John of Patmos
comprehends by writing it in a certain point of view. In Rios’ “The Secret Lion,” the first
At the top of both sides of the palette, hieroglyphs are shown with King Narmer’s name on it; a horizontal fish (nar) and a veritcal chisel (mer), then a top view groundplan is shown surrounding the hieroglyphs to ensure his kingship (Stokstad and Cothren, 51). To the left and right of Narmer’s hieroglyphic name on both faces of the palette are cow heads with human facial features that represent the goddess Hathor (El-Shahawy and Farid, 24). The goddess Hathor is depicted as a cow in many forms of Egyptian art because she is a symbolic mother of the pharaoh (Hart, 76). On the first side of the palette a figure appears to be standing on his own groundline which signifies that he is standing on sacred ground according to Stokstad and Cothren (51). He is King Narmer’s personal sandal-bearer who follows him around and continues onto the the other side (Stokstad and Cothren, 51). The god Horus is shown in the form of a falcon with a human head and holds a rope tied around the neck of a human head in which according to Stokstad and Cothren (50), represents Lower Egypt to show that King Narmer is now the ruler of both Upper and Lower Egypt unifying both lands into a single Egypt. The man who King Narmer is attacking is said to be someone of importance and likely the leader of Lower Egypt which enforces
Taking precedence amongst these reliefs is the lion, representative of the goddess Ishtar, to whom the gate is dedicated. The Processional Way leading to and from the great gate is lined with these beasts, in reverence to the deity Ishtar, but also in recognition of Nebuchadnezzar’s power over such awesome creatures; their even-spaced cadence gives the impression of being conducted or controlled by the king himself. The form of two other venerated creatures adorn the gate walls, that of the auroch (a now extinct ancestor to modern cattle/bulls) and a “composite creature” most closely resembling a dragon or serpent but with the features of a few different animals. The auroch is synonymous to the weather god Adad, while the serpent creature was frequently used to depict the god Marduk, patron god to the city of Babylon. In addition to Marduk being a paramount deity in the Babylonian pantheon, King Nebuchadnezzar chiefly associated himself and his rule to the god Marduk. The three symbols on the Gate of Ishtar are meant to convey that the rule of the king was not only under the protection of, but also in league with the gods themselves. Given that “divine right” to rule has long been crucial to strong leadership over subjects, it is no wonder why King Nebuchadnezzar had the entrance to his palace patrolled constantly by symbols of his culture’s most important deities. In addition to these divine sentries, an inscription on the side of the gate illustrates majesty possessed by the Babylonian ruler. An excerpt
On top of the column was a colossal bronze statue of Emperor Trajan himself which is since gone and a statue of St. Peter has been set in its place as ordered by Pope Sixtus V. Within the structure a spiral stairway was carefully carved to allow access to the top of it. (Campbell, 1998) There are multiple depictions of events from during the time. The base of the structure is shaped like a wreath which was traditionally worn as a victory crown and a number of Dacian spoils and weaponry is also depicted at the base too. Regardless of where the figures were in the scenes, they were all carved to be the same size.
The obvious difference in both faces is that Mask of Agamemnon is wider versus the taller face of Hip Pendant, pointing out the ethnic differences. Another difference is the mediums that were used the show in what color the face is. With the mixed elements used to create Hip Pendant, it has a brownish cream hue unlike the solid gold of Mask of Agamemnon. Mask of Agamemnon is also bigger in size considering it was used to cover an actual face of a deceased person. Hip Pendant’s eyes are open, whereas Mask of Agamemnon’s is closed.
In order to analyse how Shakespeare uses imagery to describe Antony and his world of Rome, and Cleopatra and her world of Egypt, it is necessary to look at how he breathes life into their larger than life personalities by the use of powerful, vivid language.