Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The phenomenon of conformity
Conformity and obedience in society
Obedience and conformity in our society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The phenomenon of conformity
From an early age, I have felt the compulsion to conform. Conformity is common throughout society, most notably, in my experience, in schools. Nevertheless, I considered myself as an outlier to these tendencies. I assumed that I based my judgments on my own personal free will; Fascinatingly, while most people are conformist, many consider themselves to be a nonconformist .This realisation has convinced me that although I consider myself a nonconformist, I am influenced by my ‘social programming’. As a result of this realisation, I am interested in the concept of conformity in society, particularly how Social media has influenced conformity in today’s society, regarding a person’s culture, gender, generation and perception
After being introduced to the Asch
…show more content…
I found little on this area except for how it can be used for marketing purposes. I then analysed my secondary research and identified gaps, which lead me to develop my primary research methodologies.
In order to gain a primary research aspect for my PIP, I distributed surveys to numerous participants. This provided me with a broad insight into conformity.
I conducted interviews with Head Teachers and Deputy Principals to gain an in-depth view. This helped my PIP gain momentum, as I obtained qualitative evidence. These interviews have shown me a perspective of conformity as described by people who hold positions of power and authority.
I conducted an experiment, which I designed to mimic Solomon Asch’s conformity experiment of 1951. This allowed me to determine how individuals act when placed in unclear situations.
After distributing 185 surveys, conducting 60 experiments, 8 interviews, and collecting in-depth data from previous studies and internet articles, my PIP began to develop cohesion and allow me to establish trends within
The teachers would initiate a “shock” to the student every time they got an answer wrong, but the teachers were unaware that the shock was fake. As the experiment continued, the shocks became more severe, and the students would plead for the teacher to stop since they were in pain. Despite the fact, that the participants continuously asked the authoritative experimenter if they could stop, “...relatively few people [had] the resources needed to resist authority” (Cherry 5). The participants feared questioning the effectiveness of the experiment, or restraining from continuing in fear of losing their job, going to jail, or getting reprimanded by Yale. A majority of the participants were intimidated by the experimenter, hence why they continued to shock the students, even though they knew morally, it was incorrect what they were doing. This experiment concluded, “...situational variables have a stronger sway than personality factors in determining obedience...” (5). One's decisions are based on the situation they are facing. If someone is under pressure, they will resort to illogical decision making. There thoughts could potentially be altered due to fear, or hostility. In conclusion, the rash, incohesive state of mind, provoked by fear will eventually lead to the rise of
...’s obedience level is affected by the location and surroundings of the experiment; they also hold a mutual understanding on the question of ethics. Yet, there is a larger question. Could these points indicate that humans are not fully in control of their actions?
Conformity means a change in one’s behavior due to the real or imagined influence of other people. As a teenager, the pressure to conform to the societal “norm” plays a major role in shaping one’s character. Whether this means doing what social groups want or expect you to do or changing who you are to fit in. During class, we watched films such as Mean Girls, Ferris Bueller’s Day Off, and The Breakfast Club which demonstrate how the pressure to conform into society can change who you are. In the movies we have seen, conformity was most common during high school.
“Social conformity has been practiced in societies around the world since ancient times,” and the reason it is so effective is that humans have an inherent need to be accepted as part of a group (Sadat). Furthermore, Hossna Sadat reports that:
Solomon Asch developed and ran an experiment regarding the power of conformity that affects most populations. Psychologists have been attempting to fully understand the mental workings behind why people are so easily pressured into following others for the longest time. The main focus of psychologists, is to figure and understand what the causes are behind social conformity. Numerous terms are brought up when studying conformity. The “unspoken rules or guidelines for behavior in a group” (Hock 293) are labeled as social norms. When individuals are placed in large groups, the tendency is to lean with whatever the majority of the group thinks. The regular behavior of the individual tends to readjust to appease the superior crowd.
In 1951, Solomon Asch carried out several experiments on conformity. The aim of these studies was to investigate conformity in a group environment situation. The purpose of these experiments was to see if an individual would be swayed by public pressure to go along with the incorrect answer. Asch believed that conformity reflects on relatively rational process in which people are pressured to change their behaviour. Asch designed experiments to measure the pressure of a group situation upon an individual judgment. Asch wanted to prove that conformity can really play a big role in disbelieving our own senses.
Since Slater et al. were replicating Milgram’s study of obedience, their setup was also identical. The advantage of this was that the were no variances slipping into the experiment thus ensuring that the findings were solid and pure of contamination due to minor changes; The results were genuine findings into human behaviour.
Conformity is defined as the occurrence of people yielding to social pressures as a result of pressure from a group of their peers; when faced by the pressure to conform, people will alter their behaviour and actions to fit the norm demonstrated by their peers (Lilienfield et al., 2012). Conformity is studied so that is can be understood and used in society to facilitate positive outcomes, and help avoid situations where peoples’ predisposition to conform leads to negative consequences (Lilienfield et al., 2012). By understanding conformity and other social processes society as a whole is able to understand themselves better and motivates them to work on improving as a whole (Lilienfield et al., 2012).
Conformity, or going along with the crowd, is a unique phenomenon that manifests itself in our thoughts and behaviors. It’s quite simple to identify countless examples of the power of conformity in virtually all aspects of social life. Conformity influences our opinions and relationships with others, often to a higher extent than we realize. It is posited that people generally conform to the group in order to fit in and avoid rejection or because they truly believe the group is more knowledgeable than they are. After analyzing numerous studies and experiments on the nature of conformity, one will find that the motive of social acceptance is the greatest driver of conformity.
Conformity seems to be the new silent killer. More and more people are choosing to conform rather than be themselves. Conformity is spread across the world and in our generation it’s starting to spread like a wildfire in dead grass. In the article “The Sociology of Leopard Man” by Logan Fey, Logan argues that conformity is becoming one of the world’s most dangerous psychological disorders. I will share my position and provide my own experience in terms of how I classify non-conformist and conformists.
Social influence; it is a term which is used to describe the change in one’s behavior or emotions because of the others around that person. Social influence have different types and conformity is one of it. Conformity is best describe as a change in views or belief of an individual to fit in a particular group of people with the same views. Conformity have three types; compliance, identification and internalization. Compliance is when people conform to the majority but they do not agree with them in real. Identification conformity occurs when an individual agrees with some views or behavior for the sake of the membership of that particular group with people with similar view. Internalization is a totally different type of conformity from compliance and identification. In this type of conformity, an individual changes his or her views and behavior permanently and it becomes a part of their life.
Whether we know it or not, we all tend to succumb to the norm of others. We do something or act a certain way because we want to fit in with the others around us. Whether it be from bullying, persuasion, teasing, criticism, or social norm, conforming to the way of society is a part of life. Conformity is defined as a change in behavior or belief in order to accord with others. We all strive to be liked and to fit in, sometimes conforming to others around us is the only was we see fit to do so. Other factors that effect conformity are group size, unanimity, cohesion, public response, and prior commitment (Bikhchandani, Hirshleifer & Welch, 1998).
The study that I will be reviewing for this assignment is the Asch Conformity Experiment. This particular experiment struck my interest a lot more than the other options presented to us and I definitely wanted to look more into it. According to psychological terms, conformity refers to an individual's tendency to follow the unspoken rules or actions of the shared group to which one may belong(McLeod, 2007). Scientists for a very long time have been concerned with to what degree people follow or rebel against social norms. Solomon Asch took it upon himself to conduct an experiment to examine the extent to which social pressure from a mass group could affect an individual to conform.
Grover, R & Vriens, M 2006, The handbook of marketing research: Uses, misuses, and future
This experiment is very interesting as in reminded a lot of a very famous experiment that was conducted back in 1963, The Milgram’s Obedience Experiment. According to De Vos (2009), Stanley Milgram studied the willingness of an individual to obey instructions from an authoritative figure despite the fact that they might be acts that would conflict with a person’s consciousness. It was because of the horror during the Nazi era which was what promoted him to carry on the experiment. This is how I gained interest in this particular experiment, as I was curious in knowing whether those kinds of behaviors can still be elicited or not in today’s world.