Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Family portrait descriptive essay
Family portrait descriptive essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Family portrait descriptive essay
Reg Narmour’s piece titled Family represent a portrait of a full family standing in the blue and red background. This painting is located in the Louise Hopkins Underwood Center for the Arts. This piece is hanging on the wall and only can be seen from one side. In his painting, Family, Narmour effectively creates the painting’s composition and employs the element of color, and the principle of focal point, to depict the story of a broken family. The Family painting is watercolor on canvas with dimension 30 x 70 cm. This piece is the representational of full family that consist of father, mother, baby, son, daughter and the dog. They are all standing in the red and blue background with different poses and positions. The daughter is in the …show more content…
very front with hands on her hips. She has yellow curly hair and face with no eyes. She wears a dress with many colors combinations and pets her dog with red rope. At her back, there are the father, son, and the baby. The father sits the baby on his right hand and holds the son by his left hand. His face has no eyes and mouth. He wears a shirt that has the same color combination as the daughter and dark blue jeans. His right hand is abstracted and seems to be blurrily combined with the son’s left hand. However, his left hand has greater details with fingers that could be easily identified. The son stands on the left of the father. Like the father, the son has no eyes and mouth. His both hands are abstracted with very less details. He wears white hat, blue shirt, and yellow jeans. On the father’s right arm, there is the baby. Unlike the other members of the family, the baby has eyes and mouth with no hair. The baby’s right hand could be identified, but the left hand is abstracted. At the very back of the painting, there is the mother. She has orange hair and face with no mouth and eyes. She wears orange long dress. Her left hand is abstracted and the right hand could not be seen because it is positioned at the back of the father. The Family conveys the story of the broken family. Even though, all family members in this art work are standing together, but the artist’s depiction and composition in this painting shows that the family is actually not in the harmony condition. All the members of the family, except the baby, has no eyes. Eyes are the windows of the soul. Family members who have no eyes means that he/she only sees the world as a black color. They do not care about somebody else, except their own self. They are individualistic and go with their own justification without listening to other’s perspectives. They are blind and walk with no direction. Furthermore, in his painting, Narmour painted the family members, except the baby and the daughter, with no mouth. This conveys the meaning that there is no effective communication between each member of the family. The way Narmour chose to depict the family’s members with no eyes and mouth expresses the message that there is a huge dissonance within the family. In this piece, Narmour actually shows that there is still a little hope for the family to be re-united again by depicting the baby with eyes and mouth. However, that hope is useless for the time being because the baby cannot talk and express the feeling to other family members. Narmour uses the element of color to convey the message of the painting. By using element of color, Narmour divided the family members into two different groups. The father, and the daughter wears clothing with combination of grey, black, yellow, red colors and they stands in the red background. The mother and son wear clothing with solid colors and stands on the blue background. The combination of grey, black, yellow, and red on the father’s and the daughter’s clothing and the red background conveys the feelings of anxiety, aggression, and angers. On the other hand, the blue background where the mother and the son stands shows the feelings peace and calm. This different feeling within the art piece conveys the meaning that there are conflicting principles within the family that alters the family’s harmony. In order to emphasize the sense of disharmony, Narmour darkens the value of the color in the transition between the red and blue background. He also uses very dark color at the middle to the bottom of the painting to accentuate the dramatic effect and to deepen the sense of the intense conflict within the family. Narmour employs the principle of focal point to show the viewer about the culprit behind the broken family.
The focal point of this painting is the head of the daughter. Narmour uses psychological lines in order to show the emphasis of the painting. The psychological line used in this painting is created by the perceptual connection between the daughter and the other member of the family. Even though most of the figure have no eyes, but the gesture of their head shows that they are looking at the daughter’s head. Narmour effectively employs this element in his painting, so when the viewers see this piece, their attention would first go to the daughter’s head. The daughter’s pose (hands on her hips) shows that she is the antagonist actor. This also could be seen by the dark color combination of her clothing and her face. Also, the dog that she pets looks sad and tortured emphasizing the sense of her bad personality. She is the only adult (teen) that has mouth. This means that she is the only person who talks to all family members and become the source information within the family. With that being said, by using focal points, Narmour wants to show to the viewers that the daughter is actually the person who causes all the chaos within the
family. During face-to-face viewing this art work, the viewer would notice that the texture of the painting is rough. Narmour used impasto technique where he laid the paint on the surface very thickly, so the paint is raised on the surface and the brush strokes in this painting are visible. This may have gone overlooked by viewing a photographic reproduction of this painting. Furthermore, this piece is surrounded by the other watercolor paintings with similar style. This painting is located at the end corner of the room. When the viewer observe this piece, he/she will stand at the very corner of the room, alone with the painting. This would help to enhance the intimacy between the viewers and painting and to help the viewers to obtain the real meaning of the piece and to reflect to their own family. In conclusion, Narmour successfully creates the painting’s composition and employs the element of color and the principle of focal point to depict the story of a broken family in his piece.
Surprisingly, fifty years later, artist John Sloan happen to meet all the qualifications Baudelaire has designed for Monsieur G— making urban life observations and drawing from memory. Sloan adopts and employs Baudelaire’s idea of urban watching and further expands it for an American audience. Born and raised in Philadelphia, John Sloan first begun his art career as a newspaper illustrator. After years of working, he developed his own artistic style and started making paintings and etchings. When he moved from Philadelphia to New York, he has found that city life scenes of great interest that he then started observing and making etchings for scenes of modern life. He was well-known and celebrated as the founder of the Ashcan School and was most celebrated for this urban genre scenes. (Lobel, Chapter1)
The face of the portrait is detailed, and more naturally painted than the rest of the composition. However, the left iris exceeds her eye and extends past the normal outline. The viewer can see every single brush stroke resulting in a unique approach to the capturing human emotion. The streaky texture combines with the smoothness flow of the artist’s hand creating contrast between the hair and the face. The woman’s hair is painted with thick and chunky globs of paint. The viewer can physically see the paint rising from the canvas and flowing into the movement of the waves of hair. Throughout the hair as well as the rest of the portrait Neel abandons basic painting studies and doesn’t clean her brush before applying the next color. Because of the deliberate choice to entangle the colors on the brush it creates a new muddy palate skewed throughout the canvas. Moving from the thick waves of hair, Neel abandons the thick painting style of the physical portrait and moves to a looser more abstract technique to paint the background. Despite the lack of linear perspective, Neel uses a dry brush technique for the colorful streaks in the background creating a messy illusion of a wall and a sense of space. The painting is not clean, precise, or complete; there are intentional empty spaces, allowing the canvas to pear through wide places in the portrait. Again, Neel abandons
The painting is organized simply. The background of the painting is painted in an Impressionist style. The blurring of edges, however, starkly contrasts with the sharp and hard contours of the figure in the foreground. The female figure is very sharp and clear compared to the background. The background paint is thick compared to the thin lines used to paint the figures in the foreground. The thick paint adds to the reduction of detail for the background. The colors used to paint the foreground figures are vibrant, as opposed to the whitened colors of the Impressionist background. The painting is mostly comprised of cool colors but there is a range of dark and light colors. The light colors are predominantly in the background and the darker colors are in the foreground. The vivid color of the robe contrasts with the muted colors of the background, resulting in an emphasis of the robe color. This emphasis leads the viewer's gaze to the focal part of the painting: the figures in the foreground. The female and baby in the foreground take up most of the canvas. The background was not painted as the artist saw it, but rather the impression t...
The painting depicts a mother and her four children, who are all leaning on her as she looks down solemnly, her tired, despondent expression suggests she felt trapped in her roles as being a mother and a wife. The woman and her children are clearly the focal point of the artwork as the bright colours used to paint them stand out impeccably against the dull, lifeless colours of the background. This painting appears to be centred around the ideology that women are home-keepers, whose main role is to satisfy and assist her husband while simultaneously minding the children and keeping the home tidy and ready for his return. The social consequences of this artwork could have been that the woman could have been berated for not taking pleasure out of being a mother and raising her children, as a woman should. She could have been made redundant as her husband may have felt as though she is no longer useful if she couldn’t adequately adhere to her roles as a mother and a
The piece shows Marie posing with her three children, the reason for this painting was to create a public message depicting her as more than just elegance and put her on the same level as the general public. Because the painting was meant for the eyes of the general public the painting is rather bland and lacks detail. Instead of Marie looking down on the population showing off her lavish and extravagant items she has just her children attempting to depict herself as a regular mother just like every other female raising children. There is very little details in the paint except for the empty baby carriage which was most likely only included to honor the death of one of her children at a young
It differs greatly, in its portrayal of mothers, from Le Brun’s Self-portrait with her Daughter and Cassatt’s artworks. Behind Marie Antoinette, you see a jewelry cabinet, off to the right of the canvas. This illustrates that, although she is with her children, she finds treasure within her own materialistic objects. Furthermore, her expression lacks emotion as she holds the child loosely within her arms. The child looks off, barely acknowledging its mother, who is holding him. Next, the child, on the far right of the canvas, reveals an empty cradle, alluding to a child who has died. Again, Marie seems unfazed or simply chooses not to acknowledge the boy’s actions. Furthermore, the young girl, on the right of the canvas, clings on to her mother as she lovingly looks up to her mother. Marie holds a wry smile, appearing somewhat annoyed or displeased. The color scheme is dark, but Le Brun utilizes contrast to emphasize the royal family. However, it only works to further expose the detached relationship between a Marie and her children. According to the lecture, “To counter people’s hatred of the queen and their criticisms of her as a bad (even a degenerate) mother, Vigée Le Brun was commissioned to paint this portrait of Marie Antoinette and her children” (Gartrell). Sadly, the painting was
“Dance is movement aware of itself. Dance is purposeful movement that employs artful communication to express ideas and feelings, meaning that aesthetic intention is present” (Cornett, 2014, p 394). Art could be anywhere and anything it just needs to have creativity in order to make it unique and beautiful. One simple art form, could speak for a thousand words and convey many significant messages such as the art form of dance. Baile Folklorico is a great example of communicating in a unique and a stunning art form. Baile Folklorico is a folk dance that elaborates different dances, music and costumes to represent a Latin or Mexican culture.
Examining the formal qualities of Homer Watson’s painting Horse and Rider In A Landscape was quite interesting. I chose to analyze this piece as apposed to the others because it was the piece I liked the least, therefore making me analyze it more closely and discover other aspects of the work, besides aesthetics.
Many might have been working on Good Friday, but many others were enjoying The Frist Museum of Visual Arts. A museum visitor visited this exhibit on April 14, 2017 early in the morning. The time that was spent at the art museum was approximately two hours and a half. The first impression that one received was that this place was a place of peace and also a place to expand the viewer’s imagination to understand what artists were expressing to the viewers. The viewer was very interested in all the art that was seen ,but there is so much one can absorb. The lighting in the museum was very low and some of the lighting was by direction LED lights. The artwork was spaciously
The artwork I chose for the art criticism project was ‘The Survivors’ by Kathe Kollwitz. The piece was created in 1923 in Berlin, Germany, where she resided with her husband. She and her husband resided in a poorer area, and it is believed to have contributed too much of her artwork style. ‘The Survivors’ is currently displayed in two museums, the MoMA and the Kathe Kollwitz Museum. In the piece there is a woman directly in the middle, with sunken in cheek bones is draped in a black cloak. Her arms are around three small children, who look very frightened. On each side of her body there are an additional four small children who convey sadness upon their innocent faces. Also, they are outstretching their arms as if they are begging for her to give them something. In the background, on the top left side, there are two elderly men with their heads down, looking as if they are very sad and
...ause the look of curiosity of the girl extends beyond the frame. This gives the painting a sense of curiosity.
The eyes in both the mother and child are not very detailed, but are on a paralleled connection between each other. Vonnoh sculpted the eyes with simple small slits and a slit rounding to emphasis the shape and dimension. This generalized depiction of the eyes allows the viewers to place themselves in the work. This is part of the reason that Vonnoh’s sculpture is seen as more down to earth. The slight tilt in the mother’s head and her gaze at the child’s face emphasizes her adoration and care for the child. The child’s eyes appear closed suggesting they are asleep, completely comfortable and safe in the mother’s arms. Aside from this, the child’s lips and cheeks are sculpted with a slight downward arc, further supporting a sense of relaxation. On the other hand, the mother’s brow appears to be furrowed and her lips a bit pursed. This tension can be interpreted as a concern for the child that all mother’s experience.
In the poem “One Art” the thesis statement declared in the first stanza, on the first line as “The art of losing isn’t hard to master” also repeating it again in line 6 and 12. The statement is better interpreted as “The skill of losing is not hard to attain”. Bishop speaks in the poem as if she has successfully mastered the skill of losing. She also goes around in circles admitting that the art of losing is not hard to master as if that is what she is making herself believe is true. She is also helping the reader create a habit as the reader reads and repeats the refrain of “The art of losing isn’t hard to master” not to mention the line 4 where she tells the reader to make it a habit to, “Lose something every day”.
In Memoriam II by Elisabeth Frink is at once a detailed and subtle piece. Through the use of purposeful and intended lines, geometric structuring, the bronze material and texturing, and many other formal qualities of the piece, Frink is able to capture heavy simplicity and a solemn strength in deep pain.
The focal point is the action that the maid is doing: the pouring milk, or the white milk. This painting meet on the eye level which is just above the kitchen maid's hand and their vanishing point, for example the daylights from the window, the maid’s face, also leads us directly into to the motion of the pouring milk.