Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Latino immigration history
History of immigration essay
History of immigration essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
It is clear that illegal immigration has gotten out of control and constringent measures need to be taken to protect the United States borders. The local Government of Arizona recently decided to take control of the situation, by passing the “Support our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act” {House Bill 2162}. This bill gives law enforcement officers and agencies the authority, to lawfully stop, detain and arrest anyone who appears to look like an illegal alien. The bill out-right condones racial profiling and it violates civil rights, as well! Home Land security statistics on immigration verifies that there are approximately 11 million illegal immigrants who reside in the United States. In Arizona, there is an estimate of 460,000 unauthorized immigrants in 2009. (United States). Arizona borders with Mexico and it is implied that the majority of the illegal immigrants are of a Mexican background. These figures are understandable disturbing to Arizona’s local government primarily and the nation as a whole. The large influx of illegal immigrants is causing severe economic and social problems. Prisons, schools, and hospitals are the institutions that receive the direct blows of the state’s immigration problems. For these reasons, law makers in the State of Arizona justify their new “suspicious” immigration law (Matthews Mark K). The strong voices of Arizona’s new immigration law are, Governor Jan Brewer, State Senator Russell Pearce (R), and the infamous lawyer Kris Kobach. Legal Director of Southern Poverty Law Center {SPLC}, Mary Bauer, states that some of the personalities behind Arizona’s new immigration law are highly suspicious. State Senator Russell Pearce (R), in 2006 forwards an email to his neo-Nazi supporters d... ... middle of paper ... ...ow to write an evaluation argument. An evaluation essay changes an audience mind ethics of something. Tommy Christopher. "This Week: the Pros and Cons of Racial Profiling and Arizona Immigration Law." 21 June 2010 Mediaite is a News website that analyzes breaking news. Tommy Christopher is a Political Editor and White House Correspondent. Annotated Bibliographies Unite States. Department of Justice. Title Vii of the Civil Act Rights of 1964. United States, 1964. To uphold the law and protect the interests of the United States according to the law. United States. Office of Immigration Statistics. Department of Homeland Security. Population Estimates. Rytina Nancy Hoefer Michael and Baker Bryan C. Office of Immigration Statistics Policy Directorate, 2010. 4. Protects the United States Border from any form threat. I main purpose is to keep the nation safe.
Anti-defamation League. “Arizona: The Key Players in the Anti-immigrant Movement.” Adi.org. 2013. Web. 19 Oct 2013.
"Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964." ():-. Retrieved from http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/statutes/titlevii.cfm on Mar 17, 2014
Toby, Jackson. “Racial Profiling Doesn’t Prove Cops are Racist.” Wall Street Journal (March 1999). N. pag. Online. AT&T Worldnet. Internet. 30 Nov 2000. Available: www.frontpagemag.com/archives/racerelations/toby3-11-99.htm
It varies from lawsuits against the Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio for racial profiling, to Arizona laws against the Hispanic Community. Sheriff Apraio has been facing the lawsuit since 2007 and the federal judges have found the sheriff agency to have racially profiled Hispanics during patrol operations (Holstege). This creates a hostile environment towards law enforcement in general among the Hispanic community, not only the Sheriff Office. The law basically allows law enforcement officers to request documentation or proof of legal status of anyone who they have “reasonable doubt they are illegally in this country.” However, how can you have “reasonable doubt” that someone is illegal on this country? Well, their appearance, their language? South Phoenix, a neighborhood mostly composed by Hispanics from Mexican ancestry, has experienced the targeting of this law due to their appearance. Almost every Hispanic resident of South Phoenix neighborhood feared the repercussion of the law. Even US citizens and legal US residents were terrified of law enforcement officers due to their appearance. They stopped coming out of their houses, unless it was extremely necessary, just to avoid contact with law enforcement (Szkupinski). How can you trust the people that are supposed to protect you, if they are the ones terrorizing your neighborhood? How can you report a real crime, if you do you can
Homeland Security’s mission is “to secure the nation from the many threats we face. With honor and integrity, we will safeguard the American people, our homeland, and our values.”[3]
U.S. Census Bureau, (2010). Cumulative Estimates of the Components of Resident Population Change by Race and Hispanic Origin for the United States. Retrieved from http://www.prb.org/Publications/PopulationBulletins/2010/latinosupdate1.aspx
" Racial Profiling Exists, but What Does It Mean?. " Las Vegas Review-Journal (Las Vegas, NV). Jan. 14 2001: 34A+.
This article was written by Pricilla Alvarez on 6 Jun. 2017 to provide information of the concerns of Texas enforcing the SB4 law and whether it will be harmful rather than beneficial for the state when reporting crime or catching criminals. A detailed explanation on the SB4 crackdown in Texas and what it could mean can be found on The Atlantic website. The article starts off by giving a background of the crackdown of the sanctuary cities by providing evidence of counties who banned or restricted sanctuary cities, and states that the law “protects immigrants who are witnesses and victims of crimes”. The article goes on to confess that local law enforcement share conflicting reviews of the law, and the punishments that follow if these officials
Overall, racial profiling is bad for the economy, unconstitutional, and sets borderlines for different races. Bad economic results can occur when racial profiling is accepted and urged to be used. Matthew Rothschild states, “Better to take nonviolent action and press our case with boycott”(3). Rothschild is referring to Arizona’s SB 1070 immigration law that allows local law enforcement the power to ask any suspect for proof of citizenship. This law outraged many people and the city also took offense to this new law.
In the article titled "Dying to Work" there is an excellent quote given by Rep. Kolbe says, “There are no two countries in the world that share a border where the economic disparities are greater than between the U.S. and Mexico.” (AZ Republic, 2002) My paper draws on the information from the “Worldwide Refugee Information: Country Report: Mexico” written in 2000 and the article titled “Dying to Work: The Arizona Republic” written in 2001. Both of these articles give numerous information about the Mexican Immigrants and refugees. I am focusing on the illegal Mexican immigrants as well as refugees that enter the U.S. through refugee status, because living in Arizona, there are many immigrants and refugees from Mexico that we see walking down the street. They are trying to come across the boarder to the United States. These immigrants and refugees come in search for a better life, not only for themselves, but for their families as well. Mexico is full of poverty and trying to find a good paying job in Mexico is slim to none. People depend on their family members that come across to the United States to support them. In this paper I will compare and contrast these two articles, trying to give you a better scope of how difficult things are for refugees and illegal immigrants that come to the U.S. from Mexico, in search for hope..
In 1965, President Johnson attempted to give priority to family reunification petitions by immigrants. In 1986, the United States apprehended 1.7 million undocumented immigrants. The Immigration Reform and Control Act was later established which gave amnesty to illegal immigrants then in the country, but also imposed sanctions on employers who hired undocumented workers. A 1996 law doubled the size of border control and created 600 new immigration naturalization services investigative agents, implemented newer technology to catch those crossing the border, made it easier to deport immigrants without proper paperwork, and harder for immigrants to gain political asylum. Although some laws have been made to help out both documented and undocumented immigrants within America, there are still some laws that are blatantly racist towards people of color. For example, an Arizona law allows local police to check a person’s immigration status and criminalizes those who fail to carry registration papers. The Obama Administration has challenged the
Vaughan, Jessica M. “Aliens Who Overstay Their Visas Are a Serious Security Threat.” Opposing Viewpoints: Immigration. Eds. David M. Haugen, Susan Musser and Kacy Lovelace. Farmington Hills, MI: Greenhaven Press, 2009. 182-193. Print.
This article was written by the San Jose Mercury News in 2010, which talks about the city of San Jose was considering to boycott the state of Arizona due to the immigration law, which is going get in the way of business for both parties. San Jose spended millions of dollars in business with companies that are located in Arizona, such as a stun-gun company called Taser International, and a commercial trash hauler named Allied Waste. There is a split decision on whether to go forward with the boycott, since there were some arguments that was mention in the article, and was the reason for the boycott delayed. The majority of the city council members wanted to send a message, a message that they do not support the immigration law, yet the other
“Understanding the rights and powers the states have to act in a policy area is called preemption; this either allows or denies the states power to control undocumented immigrants, especially those bordering Mexico” (Lenz and Holman, 2013) The states can create and mandate there own laws a regulations to try and control the immigration issues as long as they are considered constitutional by the federal government. This has become the main issue with Arizona’s bill SB1070 to control immigration, a bill that many other states tried to enforce as well. “SB1070 is a wide-ranging measure aimed at giving the state more power to enforce immigration” (Gilles, Grado, 2016) The bill was designed to allow officers and law enforcement the right to check documentation during routine traffic stops and when they thought was a suitable situation, while supreme court has regulated the bill to an extent saying it was unconstitutional the bill its self is still intact and in effect. Local and state officer 's and law enforcement to include border control are all designed to do their part in watching the borders and checking documentation to ensure all immigrants are documented and nothing is illegally entering U.S. soil that could be harmful like
Haines, David W and Rosenblum, Karen E.: Illegal Immigration in America: A Reference Handbook. Westport, Conn: Greenwood Press. 1999. EBook. , Database: eBook Collection (EBSCOhost).