Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Aristotle’s theory of virtue
Meaning of courage according to socrates
Aristotle's theory of virtue
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Aristotle’s theory of virtue
When someone thinks about the mean of something, usually it involves numbers or some sort of mathematical concept, but Aristotle introduces mean in a different way. He explains that to be able to have our end purpose we must find a mean between each virtuous activity that helps contribute to our end; happiness. For example the mean between courage lies between two extremes. Excessive courage is called “rashness”. Not having any courage is called “cowardice”. Aristotle states “Thus we see that self-control and courage are destroyed by excess and by deficiency and are preserved by the mean.”(pg.36) to bring attention to the fact that a mean for one is going to be different for the mean of another human. Each mean is on a spectrum and relative
to that individual. Relative in the sense of the same “kind” of human. One with diabetes is going to have a different mean in the amount of sugar they can eat compared to a human who does not have diabetes. But each of those people need to be careful in the amount of sugar they eat, just the one with diabetes needs to eat less. Virtue within itself can not be either of the extremes, it will always be a mean.
Being the main character in Homer’s The Odyssey, Odysseus portrays many different character traits: some good, some not so good. Brave, cunning, intelligent, and unfaithful to name just a few. Throughout the story, Odysseus has his good and bad moments. Personally, I think more good moments than bad. What exactly has Odysseus done to earn such adjectives to describe himself? Let us analyze more to find out!
The ultimate end is what the masses strive for. Aristotle proposes that this universal good be thoroughly understood before continuing. All actions are to be built upon another in order to achieve this good; an end that is chosen for the sake of itself, we “choose [happiness] for its...
In the literary work, Speaking of Courage, Tim O’Brien highlights the trying struggle of a post-war solider attempting desperately to integrate himself back into American society. Paul Berlin’s trials and tribulations exemplify the “dominance of a citizen culture in the United States,” as mentioned by Dr. Decker in class. American society does not allow for the soldiers we have sent off to fight to return as warriors.
In Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle says that virtue and happiness come from achieving the moral mean. The moral mean is the midpoint between deficiency and excess in any particular behavior. For example, the moral mean of recklessness and cowardice is courage. In matters of ple...
...ercome my failures, I still strive everyday to be more like Aristotle’s courageous individual. Subsequent to reviewing the inner qualities of a courageous person, facing death (or failures) in honor of something greater, more poetic; and their balanced manner, it is clear that; if you obsess about death or one’s failures, one will never be able to overcome it. Realizing that the most important inner quality is facing death because if one does not, one will never amount to anything more beautiful (in a poetic sense) in their life. When one faces death or a failure, one is accepting the biggest challenge of all. And lastly, I strive to be like Aristotle’s courageous individual because it is in right in between the rash individual, and the coward.
A theory of virtues provides explanation on what makes something a virtue and why it is considered one. The theory analyzes historical virtues that are outdated and resonate double standards, it gives reason to why these virtues should be reconsidered and redefined. We need a theory to advise us to reflect on the true meaning of virtues and how they provide us with character traits that we ought to seek and sustain. It is important to understand and acquire virtues, which determines moral traits that ultimately convey happiness in one’s life.
The virtues defined by Aristotle consist of two extremes or vices, the excess and the deficiency. The mean or the intermediate between the excess and the deficiency is the virtue. One virtue Aristotle explains is bravery, with its vices being rashness and cowardice. Each aspect of these is contrary to the others, meaning that the intermediate opposes the extreme. Similarly, one extreme opposes the mean and its other extreme. The implications of this are that the excess opposes the deficiency more than the mean. This causes the mean to sometimes resemble its neighboring extreme. Obtaining the mean involves the challenge of being excellent. The challenging part, however, is “doing it to the right person, in the right amount, at the right time, for the right end, and in the right way” (Nicomachean Ethics 1109a28-29:29). Fortunately, one can steer themselves to the mean if one is conscious of the extreme they are naturally inclined to go towards. Since everybody is uniquely different the means by which one steers themselves in the right direction is different for each individual. In addition, Aristotle names three requirements for an action to be a virtue. First one must be cons...
Odysseus says, “ she disguises him as an old man, so that he can surprise the suitors , and then urges him to visit his faithful swineherd, Eumanvs. (401). odysseus wonted to show he’s not
Aristotle's ethics consist of a form of virtue ethics, in which the ethical action is that which properly complies with virtue(s) by finding the mean within each particular one. Aristotle outlines two types of virtues: moral/character virtues and intellectual virtues. Though similar to, and inspired by, Plato and Socrates’ ethics, Aristotle's ethical account differs in some areas.
... find the balance, once you find the balance you achieving the main goal in life and obtaining happiness. According to Aristotle, there is a right answer or an objectively correct mean for everyone when you take it into account his or her situation. All in all Aristotle’s reasoning are very legitimate, for humans finding a balance is a way of life for most of us, we are trying to achieve good and most definitely trying to expand and look for ways towards more happiness in life.
Aristotle’s “doctrine of the mean,” I believe, may shed some light on the nature of moral virtues (virtues of character). The doctrine of the mean can tell us some things about moral virtues, but I would also that the doctrine of the mean ultimately creates a rather unhelpful and overly simplistic concept of morality. More than anything, I think the doctrine of the mean tells us more about Aristotle than the nature of moral virtues. First, we should define the terms we are discussing. When Aristotle talked about “moral virtue,” he considered it a state of character— character as opposed to “virtues of intellect” (which Aristotle also talked about). The doctrine of the mean is Aristotle’s analytical model for determining how people can best
In this essay we will discuss and analyze Aristotle’s Doctrine of the Mean. This topic area can be found in Book II, page 888, 6—15, through 890, 25. The purpose for Aristotle touching on this subject matter was to discern the states of character which are virtuous from those which are not. By this, I mean he is attempting to categorize which virtues are causal of a human “to be in a good state and to perform their functions well”(888—15). In order to keep this paper orderly and comprehensible, we will work in chronological order through Aristotle’s variety of premises and conclusions which lead to his main idea which is ––––––––––––.
For Aristotle the doctrine of the mean is a way to categorize (one of his favorite activities) moral virtue; however, there are some exceptions, as Aristotle noted, leaving a gap that must be filled. The doctrine is very helpful and does work, but one must beware the exceptions and carefully contemplate for himself whether these things are so.
It was Aristotle’s belief that everything, including humans, had a telos or goal in life. The end result or goal was said to be happiness or “eudaimonia”. He explained that eudaimonia was different for each person, and that each had a different idea of what it meant. Further, he said that people must do things in moderation, but at the same time do enough. The theory, of “the golden mean of moderation” was the basis to Aristotle's idea of the human telos and concluded that living a virtuous life must be the same for all people. Aristotle maintained that the natural human goal to be happy could only be achieved once each individual determined his/her goal. A person’s telos is would usually be what that individual alone can do best. Aristotle described the humans as "rational animals" whose telos was to reason. Accordingly, Aristotle thought that in order for humans to be happy, they would have to be able to reason, and to be governed by reason. If a person had difficulty behaving morally or with ethics, he was thought to be “imperfect”. Moral virtue, a principle of happiness, was the ability to evade extremes in behavior and further to find the mean between it and adequacy. Aristotle’s idea of an ideal state was one where the populous was able to practice eth...
Moral courage, as defined in ADRP 6-22, is the willingness to stand firm on values, principles, and convictions. It enables all leaders to stand up for what they believe is right, regardless of the consequences. Leaders, who take full responsibility for their decisions and actions even when things go wrong, display moral courage. In most cases, one who displays moral courage is usually taking a stand against something that they know is wrong. Normally, it is not the popular decision. With physical courage, the fear factor is usually physical where with moral courage it is psychological. Often, a display of physical courage makes you the hero, while the same display with moral courage sometimes makes you appear to be the villain.