Aristotle's Argument Analysis

The first reason that makes me believe that the views of Aristotle on metaphysics are accurate is the factual nature of the philosopher’s evidence. In essence, the thinker optimism regarding the nature of real forms existing on earth is practical. To illustrate this, no one should endeavor to prove the nature of human existence through abstract thinking such as “being preconceived” in an ideal world before humans appear on earth. Indeed, such thinking is at best, a fantasy, and proving such claims could be a daunting task, if not an impossible one. Conversely, I believe Aristotle is right in regard to the existence of forms, such as the human nature. To illustrate this, curious minds regarding the validity of a form of existence as whether

it is human or not could clear their uncertainty through empirical studies. For instance, by understanding the traits and principles that define a human being’s existence, could enable them to compare a form of existence with the traits and principles that dictates the validity of that existence to be classified as a human being. To illustrate this, if a human being is regarded so because of being biped, rational, cannot fly, sentimental, and has the ability to make a choice, then any form of existence that has these characteristics, capabilities, and principles should be regard as a human being. In contrast to Plato’s assertion, one does not need to imagine of an ideal form of that existence to name it human. It is human by the fact that such a form of existence meets the empirical traits of human nature. In others words, there is no need to assume of an interactions between an ideal human nature and the existing nature in order to determine whether human existence in its current form is an imitation of an ideal form that is beyond our physical world as opposed to a reality of a human being before our eyes in our physical world.