Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Aristotle contributions
Parable of the divided line by Plato
Aristotle contributions
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Aristotle contributions
Aristotle's Approach to Ethics and Plato's Divided Line
I. PLATO
3) Explain the so-called ‘Divided Line’. What do the different levels mean? How does this apply to
ethics? How does this apply to Knowledge, perception, and/or awareness? Explain in depth and detail.
Plato’s ‘Divided Line’ is a model indicating not only levels of knowledge, but basically levels of
everything. It is divided into four levels and two sides. The left side consists of ways we know, become
aware of, and perceive things, while the right side consists of the objects of knowledge, awareness, and
perception. The bottom half includes those things in the physical realm and the top half includes those
things in the spiritual and intellectual realm. The highest point in the physical realm is the sun, and the
highest point in the spiritual realm is the form of the good and beautiful, both of which are essentially
impossible to reach.
The different levels mean different things. On the lowest level, the left side is made up of our
imagination, perception, and conjecture. The right side is made up of shadows and mirages. The next
level up, on the left, is where we believe something because we see it. The right side of this level is
where we find all physical things. At the top of the physical realm before entering the spiritual realm, is
the sun. The next level up is the lowest level in the spiritual realm. The left side of this level includes
thinking from hypotheses, while the right side includes objects of math and science. The top level in
Plato’s model contains true knowledge and dialectical thinking on the left. The rite contains all forms
and ideas. The topmost point, the forms of the good and beautiful, is t...
... middle of paper ...
... vulgar, the political, or the contemplative. The vulgar lifestyle is based on
instant gratification. Goods are simply pleasures one enjoys immediately and temporarily. This lifestyle
is guaranteed to fail in the quest for Eudaimonia. The political lifestyle in one in which happiness is
determined by honor achieved. There are two types of honors one can obtain in the political life, the real
and the bogus. Bogus honors are simply to gain status in society and could be bought, but real honors are
awards for doing good and helping others. While politics itself is the study of the good, one could easily
disgrace oneself and become ostracized from the community. The contemplative lifestyle is one based
upon speculation and reflection into one’s own life. This lifestyle is ethical and is the best way to guide
one towards the good life and true happiness.
"Perception - Definition of Perception by the Free Online Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia." Dictionary, Encyclopedia and Thesaurus - The Free Dictionary. Web. 08 Feb. 2011. .
In the second stage, the cave dweller can now see the objects that previously only appeared to him as shadows. “Will he not fancy that the shadows which he formerly saw are truer th...
In spite of the fact that Aristotle was a companion and scholar of Plato, he didn't concur with Plato's speculations on ethical quality. In the same way as other Greeks, Aristotle did not have confidence in the presence of inalienably terrible practices.
Life without knowledge would be worthless. Talking about knowledge what i mean is knowledge about something. The description of the state of some object is knowledge. The object may be either abstract or physical. Some examples of abstract things include memory, feelings and time. But how we obtain knowledge? Many philosophers tried to find an adequate answer to this question. They came up with so many theories summarizing the process of knowledge. But none of them all was able to state a clear definition of pure knowledge. One of those philosophers is Plato. In this essay I am going to discuss the concept of knowledge according to Plato’s philosophic conception of knowledge. I will clarify what knowledge is not perception. And from this I will move to explain the justified true belief theory. Then I will show the lack in this theory by referring to counterexamples: the Gettier cases. To end up with a conclusion that states what is my understanding of the process of knowledge.
Throughout Aristotle’s life and career as a philosopher, he modified and formulated many ideas that deal with the psyche and state of the mind and body. One of the most prevalent ideas that he studied was the quest for happiness. He had many theories about it, but most merged to become the Nicomachean Ethics
"It was the secrets of heaven and earth that I desired to learn; and whether it was the outward substance of things or the inner spirit of nature and the mysterious soul of man that occupied me, still my inquiries were directed to the metaphysical, or in its highest sense, the physical secrets of the ...
Aristotle and the Book of Nicomanchean Ethics In Book I of Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle states that the ultimate human goal or end is happiness. Aristotle describes the steps required for humans to obtain happiness. Aristotle states that activity is an important requirement for happiness. He states that a happy person cannot be inactive.
In theory, the left and right hemisphere of the brain process diverse information to the corpus collosum. The corpus collosum will consecutively process information about what the left and right brain identify and then generate the conclusion. Both sides of the brain have its own specialized function to interpret the information but it cannot comprehend the same way. A research experiments conducted by Roger Sperry, validate the characteristics of each side of the brain. The left hemisphere of the brain is logic. It main focuses is language, critical thinking, numbers, reasoning, and objective. The right hemisphere is more creativity. It abilities include expressive, recognizing, music, reading emotions, color, images, intuition, and subjective.
In Book I of Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle states that the ultimate human goal or end is happiness. Aristotle then describes steps required for humans to obtain the ultimate happiness. He also states that activity is an important requirement of happiness. A virtuous person takes pleasure in doing virtuous things. He then goes on to say that living a life of virtue is something pleasurable in itself. The role of virtue to Aristotle is an important one, with out it, it seems humans cannot obtain happiness. Virtue is the connection one has to happiness and how they should obtain it. My goal in this paper is to connect Aristotle’s book of Nicomachean Ethics to my own reasoning of self-ethics. I strongly agree with Aristotle’s goal of happiness and conclude to his idea of virtues, which are virtuous states of character that affect our decision making in life.
In The Republic, Plato presents the relationship of the Divided Line and the Allegory of the Cave in connection to his epistemology and metaphysics. Throughout the Republic he discusses his beliefs on many topics using examples that express his ideas more thoroughly. He is able to convey very complex beliefs through his examples of the Divided Line and Allegory of the Cave. Plato’s epistemology depicts his idea of the Divided Line which is a hierarchy where we discover how one obtains knowledge and the Allegory of the Cave relates to Plato’s metaphysics by representing how one is ignorant/blinded at the lowest level but as they move up in the Divided Line, they are able to reach enlightenment through the knowledge of the truth.
There are many different Visual Perception principles in perception. The main principles are Gestalt. Gestalt is a German word meaning 'form' or 'shape'. Gestalt psychologists formulated a series of principles that describe how t...
The ideas introduced by Plato on the theory of forms, where deducted and critiqued by Aristotle. Both philosophers can be viewed as having opposing ideologies. Nonetheless, Plato and Aristotle are in agreement on certain factors of their philosophy.
Early thought processes concerning education laid the groundwork for the modern philosophy of education, including university structures and frameworks. What our ancients have advocated is said to be the cause of every century’s success in continually gaining knowledge. But Plato and Aristotle had very different opinions when it came to the education branch of life.
The real world of our universe one can present as consisting of the totality of the interconnected (through the known fundamental interactions) units of the nature, for example, photons, atoms, molecules, cells, living organisms, men, stars, galaxies and ets. Their materiality is shown, for example, in the outwards activity (the power), in which the units of nature come forward as integrated formations in the relation of other units of nature; their spirituality, enlightened through the materiality, in the form (in order of the growth of the spirituality) of the inside activity (that is of the spontaneous transitions into their different states), in the form of the senseorganized unity ( regulated by any laws), of the soul, and of the spirit. Different units of nature have different degrees of the spirituality, which are shown in the spontaneity, statisticality, selforganization, freedom of the will and so on, therefore one can say about corresponding spiritual aspects of any units of nature.
Many people will always say that, they are more of the left-brain-thinker or right brain thinker. Over the past years, different researchers on the functions of the brains have done extensive research. Most studies suggest that our brain works in two different ways (Brynie, 2009), however, some of the studies reveal that, the left side and right side of the brain works hand in hand with each other, and there is no way one side can function without the other. Human beings are labeled as right brain thinkers, and left-brain thinkers.