Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Aristotle view on a good life
Aristotle view on a good life
Virtuous friendship according to Aristotle
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Aristotle view on a good life
This paper will explain Aristotle’s idea of the good life as well as how virtues fit into the equation and if they are stable and enduring. Pertaining to the prompt, I will explain the three types of friendships Aristotle describes and how one of the friendships is the best according to him. I will also show the reason why Aristotle views friendship as one of the greatest goods. To answer the critic, I will show that although Aristotle holds that the good life is self-sufficient, because he holds friendship in such a high regard, he believes that a person will not be able to obtain perfect happiness without friendship. In Aristotle’s novel The Nicomachean Ethics, his main concern is how humans are able to reach eudaimonia where eudaimonia means flourishing, happiness and for the purpose of this paper, the good life. Aristotle holds that happiness is the greatest human good and that people recognize that they need this to live a good life. People are able to come to this understanding but disagreements arise on what happiness truly is. Most people view happiness as being synonymous with pleasure but those who seek pleasure are not living the good life because they tend to go looking for it in the wrong places. Another view of happiness is that it involves honor. Aristotle thinks that …show more content…
Nancy Sherman summarizes that we need friendships at different points in our lives to serve different purposes whether it be for guidance or stimulation (Sherman, 208). Another way of putting it is by saying that friends are ways for us to practice our virtuous activities. Friends are also valuable because they belong absolutely to happiness. Happiness without friendship will be unfulfilling and the good life won’t be as meaningful. What Aristotle holds generally about friendship is that without friends, the good life will be harder for us to obtain because we are limited in what we are able to do
The Nicomachean Ethics, written by Aristotle, represents his most important contribution within the field of Ethics; it is a collection of ten books, covering a variety of interesting topics, throughout the collection. Aristotle tries to draw a general understanding of the human good, exploring the causes of human actions, trying to identify the most common ultimate purpose of human actions. Indeed, Aristotelian’s ethics, also investigates through the psychological and the spiritual realms of human beings. Without pretending to exhaust with too many references, it would be rather useful to focus on the most criticized part of the philosopher’s attempt, which is also the very starting point of his masterpiece, identified as eudaimonia (happiness, well being) and ergon (function), in Aristotelian terms.
II In Books VIII and IX, Aristotle discusses the role of friendship in the good life.
Aristotle believes that everyone is in need of some type of friend, he states that “for rich people and those who rule and have power, there seems to be the greatest need for friends.”(page. 144, book VIII) Aristotle believes that we as humans benefit greatly from having friends, no matter who we are or what position we are in wealthy or poor. There are three distinct types of friendship that Aristotle directs his beliefs towards. These three types of friendships include: Utility, pleasure, and Goodness or virtuous friendship. Aristotle believes that friendship is something that is extremely important to have and should be held above many things. Friendship Utility is unlike the friendships of pleasure or goodness because as Aristotle puts it is “for the old” he explains that friendship Utility is a friendship that two people may have where they only communicate with one another for self-benefit or to gain something for one’s self. These two people are not likely to live with each other and at times may not even be nice to th...
In conclusion, Aristotle’s elucidation of happiness is based on a ground of ethics because happiness to him is coveted for happiness alone. The life of fame and fortune is not the life for Aristotle. Happiness is synonymous for living well. To live well is to live with virtue. Virtue presents humans with identification for morals, and for Aristotle, we choose to have “right” morals. Aristotle defines humans by nature to be dishonored when making a wrong decision. Thus, if one choses to act upon pleasure, like John Stuart Mill states, for happiness, one may choose the wrong means of doing so. Happiness is a choice made rationally among many pickings to reach this state of mind. Happiness should not be a way to “win” in the end but a way to develop a well-behaved, principled reputation.
We are social creatures. We surround ourselves with other human beings, our friends. It is in our nature. We are constantly trying to broaden the circumference of our circle of friends. Aristotle understood the importance of friendship, books VIII and IX of the Nicomachean Ethics deal solely with this topic. A modern day definition of a friend can be defined as “one joined to another in intimacy and mutual benevolence independently of sexual or family love”. (Oxford English Dictionary). Aristotle’s view on friendship is much broader than this. His arguments are certainly not flawless. In this essay I will outline what Aristotle said about friendship in the Nichomachaen Ethics and highlight possible flaws in his arguments.
Aristotle’s philosophical theory for a person’s happiness includes friendship. In order for a person to achieve the greatest amount of happiness and well-being, one must have friendships. He states that even people who hold wealth and power seek friends, “nobody will choose to live without friends even if he had all the other good things” (Aristotle 258). Friendships according to Aristotle, are also the bond the hold communities together and have a higher importance than justice, since friendship is the primary object. They are three different types of friendships in which all share the equal amount of qualities, and a type of affection, however, only one is long lasting.
A happy person needs friends. Aristotle believed in the value of friendship and felt it was important to happiness. Therefore, living a solitary life is neither the best nor the healthiest thing to do. Aristotle believed there were three levels of friendship. These three levels are friendship of utility, friendship of pleasure, and good, true friendship. Friendship is either useful, pleasant, or good. Aristotle's three levels of friendship still apply today, and I believe true and good friendship is attainable in our society. I believe these levels are still relevant today. In this essay, I will discuss what Aristotle had to say about friendship, why friendships are important for having a happy life, and whether it is possible to
In Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, he distinguishes three types of friendships; utility, pleasure, and complete, of which corresponds to a particular type of good either coming from or residing in the friend. Aristotle states that friendships of utility and pleasure are defective, and that a complete friendship is the closest to perfection. Throughout all of the friendships each individual must be aware of the purpose of the relationship. In addition, friendship improves virtues such as modesty, and as a result enhances eudemonia.
Aristotle views friendship as “a virtue, or involves virtue” (1155a5) which is necessary for every human being and can hold cities together. A friendship is lovable (either good, pleasant, or useful) and mutual. Based on different motivations of being friends with one another, people experience different categories of friendship; it involves seeking of utility, pleasure, and goodness. The love between friends is reciprocated and friends are aware of it. The difference is that friends who love each other for goodness stand at the highest level of friendship which is called the complete friendship. For this paper I would like to discuss three kinds of friendship first, and use Aristotle’s idea of self-love to demonstrate why I think his reasons for
A friendship is a bond of mutual affection. To me, friendship is a bond that people share in which they have mutual kindness, loyalty, respect, and equality. According to Aristotle there are three types of friendships. They are utility friendships, pleasure friendships, and goodness friendships. Allow me to elaborate on what they mean; a utility friendship is when you can benefit from the other. A pleasure friendship is based upon admiration and desire to be in someone’s company. Lastly, a friendship based on goodness is the desire to see the other do better and succeed. It’s the longing for the other party to be a better him or her. It’s a “one hand washes the other” bond. For example, I have a really good friend and our main goal is to make sure that we are both good and are always on the up and up. We keep each other moving forward to become better people. In our friendship, there is no sugar coating of anything. If I have done anything wrong, she tells me to make me better and vice versa. I am honored to have her friendship because I know that there is a high chance at a long lasting friendship. Aside from the categories of friendship, I am going give you further knowledge. In this essay, I am going to be addressing some questions that may arise about friendship and the a few things that can affect it. Some questions about friendship is whether people of different levels should remain friends, can you have more than one friend, how are friendships affected by technology and can men and women platonically be friends.
For example, it is asserted that it is important that friendship be active because happiness, which plays a big part in friendship, is a certain activity, and an activity is clearly something that comes into being and not something that belongs to us like a sort of possession (NE1169b28-30). Back in book one, it is stated that happiness, or Eudaimonia, is the highest aims that a person has and happiness, according to Aristotle, is a public affair, not a private one, so who we share said happiness with is of great significance. There is debate as to whether or not a happy person needs friends. Aristotle disagrees that people who are blessed and self-sufficient have no need for friends since the good things are already theirs, but I feel that this assertion is somewhat true. A person that is happy and blessed can have friends, but it is not absolutely necessary that they would need friends. I believe that one needs friends more in bad fortunes because if it is a good, virtue-friendship, the friend will be there to uplift them and encourage them to do better and improve their fortune. This does not mean that when they come of good fortune that they stop being friends, but their friendship would be stronger because that friend was there for them through the tough times and there to help them grow, which is one of the best things one can do for another
Friendship is central to one’s life because friends it can contribute towards shaping someone’s personality as well contribute to who we want to be in the contemporary society. Aristotle agreed in his Book VIII of the "Nichomachean Ethics" that friendship exists in three broader forms: friendship based on utility, that based on a shared appreciation of the good, and that based on pleasure (Percival, 2015). Similarly, Cicero, the Roman philosopher who lived in a different time and place, contended in his writing that "On Friendship": "Let us, then, lay down this law for friendship: we must not ask wrongful things, nor do them, if we are asked to" (Mews, 2009). These two cases of these ancient philosophers perceived relationships based on something
Although, both Aristotle’s books VIII and IX contain some of the similar information dealing with backgrounds of friendship; it breakdowns the meaning and knowledge of each friendship and how it counteract against the other one. However, in book VIII he clarifies the difference between the three types of friendships: utility, pleasure, and goodness. Book VIII distinguishes details about how the friendships counteract with each other, he describes the connection among friendship, the community, and the political aspect of the constitutions. He also describes the political constitutions view of how one should act when dealing with the law. Book IX vivid the key points of friendship as Aristotle gives a more constructive outline on the terms
As previously mentioned, Aristotle has identified three forms of friendships. The first is friendship built on utility. This type of friendship is based on whether it is beneficially satisfying for both parties. For example, if there is no one familiar in a person’s new class, one will try to form a friendship to receive class notes when they miss. Aristotle demonstrates this when
Happiness can be viewed as wealth, honour, pleasure, or virtue. Aristotle believes that wealth is not happiness, because wealth is just an economic value, but can be used to gain some happiness; wealth is a means to further ends. The good life, according to Aristotle, is an end in itself. Similar to wealth, honour is not happiness because honour emphases on the individuals who honour in comparison to the honouree. Honour is external, but happiness is not. It has to do with how people perceive one another; the good life is intrinsic to the...