Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Self driving cars argumentative essay
Self driving cars argumentative essay
Self driving cars argumentative essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Self driving cars argumentative essay
One of the biggest arguments that goes against self driving cars is that they have the potential to be hacked. Someone who is very skilled at hacking could hack into a computer of a self driving car. Once they are in they could potentially do things like disable brakes and just turn the car off all together. Robert J Samuelson from the article “Hackers Behind The Wheel” said “A hacker could lock a car remotely and refuse to open it until a ransom is paid. If millions of vehicles were shut down simultaneously the ransom paid by car companies could be staggering” James P Hoffa from the article “Drivers Wanted” also said “What happens when a platoon of trucks is hacked? Don't forget some of those trucks carry thousands of pounds of hazardous materials …show more content…
The car companies would test their systems very rigorously before they would be released to the public. The upside to self driving cars outweighs the negatives by a mile. People that are against self driving cars are putting a very rare thing that could happen over the improvement in so many other things. Self driving cars will improve so many peoples lives in so many different ways. Maclean’s from the article “Understanding the Future of Driverless Cars Is Crucial to Navigating Present Concerns Regarding Infrastructure and Public Transit” mentions “ Fully autonomous cars zipping by while passengers snooze or work. World of driverless cars means world is safer and less congested, workers more productive, cheaper housing options and greater mobility for elderly and people with disabilities”. People could get extra sleep during long rides or just a quick nap on your way to work. During a ride you could get your work done. Instead of wasting 2 hours driving to and from work everyday you could put that time to better use by getting some work done. Roads will be significantly better because of self driving cars. Car crashes will become a
Self driving cars are not a good idea because they cause people to be lazy. This means that with self driving cars, your license wouldn’t mean a lot. To put it in another way, the drivers wouldn’t really depend on their license due to the self-driving car. So when you get pulled over by the police, you get a ticket for something the car did.
For a while, Self Driving Cars, have never really been a thought, to be thought about in the driving industry. It has always been the regular transportation, like regular cars, trains and other types of transportation for getting around. It was crazy enough to have thought about self driving cars, but now to start to make and produce self driving cars, is even crazier. The question is, is it safe to have these cars on the road? Also what kind of hazards might these vehicles be for people who decide to purchase them? Bob Lutz from (www.cnbc.com) states that “"The autonomous car doesn't drink, doesn't do drugs, doesn't text while driving, doesn't get road rage,". This shows that in Bob’s opinion, the self driving car, could be safer than the
Although there are issues with implementing self-driving cars on the roads today, self-driving cars can ultimately benefit society. According to public announcements made by companies like Tesla and Nissan, we may start seeing self-driving cars on the roads within the next 3 to 6 years [Ref. 1 and 2].
While there have been surveys to understand how people feel about self-driving vehicles, they only surveyed a little over a thousand, which isn’t comparable to the millions of people who actually drive cars (Degroat). Many, more than 70 percent, do believe that autonomic vehicles will reduce accidents, the severity of the crash, and help the fuel economy, nearly as many are concerned about the way the car will perform under unusual or unexpected circumstances, as compared to the way a human could react and perform, along with if the vehicle would have any system malfunctions (Degroat). Even though the car companies are working on the technology to make the cars safe and dependable, it would be easy for someone to “hack” into the vehicle to steal it, or take personal information from the vehicle like where they have been and where they plan to go (Degroat). Many also wonder how well the car will do under different climate and driving circumstances; will the car’s mechanics and equipment work well in a tropical or artic like environment, or how will it interact in New York City as opposed to a very rural and rugged environment like a farm. With the sensors and cameras attached to the car, will it be able to tell the difference and respond differently among other vehicles, pedestrians, and non-motored objects on the
Some say NO, because they believe that they would be more prone to cyber security issues as a result of needing over the air updates, like the common smartphone. By updating the car, it makes it more vulnerable, and hackers will have an easier time accessing the vehicle. From their the hackers could then take control of the car when it is driving, or hold it for ransom. However, like most technology, self-driving cars will only become stronger against attacks like this, with more advanced technology. Another cost is ethical dilemmas. For example, if the car was to ever get into an accident, who would the car choose to be affected, the driver? Or the pedestrian that was jaywalking? Once self-driving cars become available, society would have to choose the
It might be hard to see where the self-driving car could have issues with safety but an interesting question arises when an accident is unavoidable. The question posed is “How should the car be programmed to act in the event of an unavoidable accident? Should it minimize the loss of life, even if it means sacrificing the occupants, or should it protect the occupants at all costs? Should it choose between these extremes at random?” (ArXiv). This is a very interesting question surrounding ethics. I’m not sure if there is a right answer to the question, which could stall the self-driving car industry. Before self-driving cars are mass produced a solution needs to be found to the question about unavoidable accidents. Although this question is a problem, there may not be a need to address the problem. It is said that “"driver error is believed to be the main reason behind over 90 percent of all crashes" with drunk driving, distracted drivers, failure to remain in one lane and falling to yield the right of way the main causes.” (Keating). Self-driving cars could eliminate those problems entirely and maybe with all cars on the road being self-driving cars, there would be no “unavoidable accidents”. Safety is the main issue the self-driving car is trying to solve in transportation and seems to do a good job at
In the past couple years, there has been a greater drive in making cars more technology based. The solution: self-driving cars. There are many different views on these new cars. Personally, I don’t think that they are practical. Self- driving cars are expensive and will not even expunge the risk of car accidents.
The opponents would also against self-driving cars because of personal privacy. The obvious point is that, if you use vehicles which is entirely control by a computer, your movements are extremely easy to be tracked by the company or a third party. Operating systems could be hacked, self-driving cars also do. Self-driving cars are facing with the serious privacy
There are many distracted or impaired drivers on the road which neither would be the case with a self-driving car. According to, The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Alcohol impaired driving accounted for 31% of auto accident fatalities in 2013 (NTSA 3). Therefore, Self-driving vehicles would essentially eliminate or at the very least dramatically reduce this statistic, saving many lives each year. It is like having a designated driver built into your vehicle.
Automotive executives touting self-driving cars as a way to make commuting more productive or relaxing may want to consider another potential marketing pitch: safety (Hirschauge, 2016). The biggest reason why these cars will make a safer world is that accident rates will enormously drop. There is a lot of bad behavior a driver exhibit behind the wheel, and a computer is actually an ideal motorist. Since 81 percent of car crashes are the result of human error, computers would take a lot of danger out of the equation entirely. Also, some of the major causes of accidents are drivers who become ill at the time of driving. Some of the examples of this would be a seizure, heart attack, diabetic reactions, fainting, and high or low blood pressure. Autonomous cars will surely remedy these types of occurrences making us
After reading the article I have concluded that the idea of self-driving cars sounds more so than ever like a plausible reality rather than another eccentric sci-fi topic. Aside from morality and subjective perceptions on the practice of self-driving cars I believe that the most major problem would the financial effect self-driving cars can have on America's financial infrastructure. The implementation of self-driving cars would almost quickly eliminate millions of jobs that would be made obsolete, unemployment rates would rise exponentially but that's not where the obstacles stop. Although this was not mentioned on the cons list it was hinted at. Self-driving cars have little to no security measures so that begs to question as to how software developers will combat hackers and software
It said that bus, taxi, and truck drivers could all be affected.” If this happens it will make it more difficult to find work for professional drivers. Self-driving cars can be helpful for the people that can’t drive themselves due to disabilities. The age group that would be interested in this would be someone that hates public transportation or needs to make multiple trips to different locations each day. This would also give them the right to freedom to travel to places that they were normally restricted to go their due to limited travel.
As was said before, self-driving cars would be a hassle because they could have glitches or shorts. Though technology is getting more advanced it still experiences problems. In the article it compares the car to our computers; they often encounter flaws in their circuiting which can be overlooked by manufacturers. Along with that the car will be expected to endure extreme heat, cold, vibrations, moister, et cetera.
It is shown that even “if ten percent of all cars were self-driving, as many as 211,000 accidents would be prevented annually” (Bell 2). This effect is exponentially increased when in the later stages of the technology. The same site also states that “if 90 percent of cars were self-driving… The Eno Centers study found up to 4.2 million accidents would be prevented; 21,700 lives would be preserved and more than 400 billion in related costs would be eliminated” (Bell 2). Alone, this gives enough reason to move to self-driving cars, but the benefits do not stop there.
Self-driving cars will be a good thing for our society. One reason is that people’s commute to work will be less tiring. Another is that self-driving cars would help the economy in many ways. Third, they will give people of all ages more options to live all over the country.