Arguments Against Active Euthanasia

1019 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Ethical issues surrounding active euthanasia

Many people debate whether the act of Euthanasia and Physician Assisted Suicide is an at of killing or caring. Euthanasia occurs when a patient cannot endure the pain and suffering anymore or if they are terminally ill. If making the decision to perform Euthanasia is agreed upon it consists of directly giving the lethal medication to the patient. The philosopher, James Rachels believed Active Euthanasia under certain circumstances was morally acceptable. I agree with James Rachels for many reasons and also believe Kantian beliefs come into play when considering Euthanasia. Rachels argues that active Euthanasia is only sometimes permissible. As stated in the book the Ethical Life “Rachel claims that any action that promotes the best interests of all concerned, and that violates no rights, is morally acceptable. Since, he claims, active euthanasia sometimes satisfies this description, it is sometimes morally acceptable.” (pg. 245) Rachels believes in the overall happiness for the patient if it does not interfere with their rights. He agrees that if someone was suffering or terminally ill they should have the option to end their life. It is a compassionate end result to relieve suffering patients of their pain. It would be in the best interest of the patient. It would also benefit his/her family and friends- Doing what is in everyone’s best interests which would produce the overall best happiness. The following agreement is based off of Euthanasia found in “The Ethical Life” book. …show more content…

If an action promotes the best interest of everyone concerned and violates no one’s rights, then that action is morally acceptable. 2. In at least some cases, active euthanasia promotes the best interests of everyone concerned and violates no one’s

Show More
Related

  • Thomas Sullivan's Views On The Permissibility Of Euthanasia

    1401 Words  | 3 Pages

    Euthanasia is a serious political, moral and ethics issues in society. People either strictly forbid or firmly favor euthanasia. Terminally ill patients have a fatal disease from which they will never recover, many will never sleep in their own bed again. Many beg health professionals to “pull the plug” or smother them with a pillow so that they do not have to bear the pain of their disease so that they will die faster. Thomas D. Sullivan and James Rachels have very different views on the permissibility of active and passive euthanasia. Sullivan believes that it is impermissible for the doctor, or anyone else to terminate the life of a patient but, that it is permissible in some cases to cease the employment of “extraordinary means” of preserving

    Read More

  • Bonnie Steinbock The Morality Of Euthanasia

    1590 Words  | 4 Pages

    In this essay, I will discuss whether euthanasia is morally permissible or not. Euthanasia is the intention of ending life due to inevitable pain and suffering. The word euthanasia comes from the Greek words “eu,” which means good, and “thanatosis, which means death. There are two types of euthanasia, active and passive. Active euthanasia is when medical professionals deliberately do something that causes the patient to die, such as giving lethal injections. Passive euthanasia is when a patient dies because the medical professionals do not do anything to keep them alive or they stop doing something that was keeping them alive. Some pros of euthanasia is the freedom to decide your destiny, ending the pain, and to die with dignity. Some cons

    Read More

  • Active And Passive Euthanasia Analysis

    1018 Words  | 3 Pages

    In James Rachels’ article, “Active and Passive Euthanasia”, Rachels discusses and analyzes the moral differences between killing someone and letting someone die. He argues that killing someone is not, in itself, worse than letting someone die. James, then, supports this argument by adding several examples of cases of both active and passive euthanasia and illustrating that there is no moral difference. Both the end result and motive is the same, therefore the act is also the same. I will argue that there is, in fact, no moral difference between killing someone and intentionally letting a person die. I plan to defend this thesis by offering supporting examples and details of cases of both active and passive euthanasia.

    Read More

  • The Moral Dilemmas Of Active And Active Euthanasia By James Rachels

    1097 Words  | 3 Pages

    Overall, Rachels states that although active euthanasia is prohibited, doctors should be aware that the law is forcing them to follow a predetermined moral doctrine and not their own personal moral beliefs (Timmons, 2007, p.349). The main take away from this argument is that the 1973 AMA policy forbids active euthanasia and allows some cases of passive euthanasia where the doctor is permitted to let the patient die, however, Rachels strongly believes that there is no moral difference between active and passive euthanasia (Timmons, 2007,

    Read More

  • Euthanasia: An Ethical and Moral Perspective

    295 Words  | 1 Pages

    Should Euthanasia be practiced? Is it justifiably moral and ethically right? Euthanasia is described as the painless killing of a patient in anguish from a fatal and agonizing sickness or in an indefinite coma. There are two major forms of Euthanasia that are morally and robustly debated, Active Euthanasia and Passive Euthanasia. Active Euthanasia is described as a good death, whether committed by the person themselves or from the assistance of a physician. Passive euthanasia is defined as the destruction of life through the act of withholding life-sustaining treatment. Active and passive euthanasia should be legally and ethically practiced. It can be argued that active and passive euthanasia is justifiably moral and ethically ok,

    Read More

  • Active Euthanasia- A Kantian Perspective

    1154 Words  | 3 Pages

    Those who support active euthanasia can argue that helping the ill to bring their own deaths, allowing them to determine the how and when, is not only a human act but also allows the person, who is "living to die," to maintain their dignity; this way, they will let them die in peace, rather than suffer to the end. Because if not, they think of themselves as a disgrace, to those they love. According to recent researches and surveys, many Canadians would agree to this, but my question is, have they taken a close look at the ethical debate? Those who are against active euthanasia would say not, and would argue that by participating in the practice of active euthanasia, they are "playing God," or perhaps, that they are not acting out of mercy, therefore, the act is nothing less than cold-blooded murder. Murder by the law is defined as; "The unlawful, premeditated killing of one human being by another." Euthanasia, in Canada, remains unlawful as of today, and the act of euthanasia is premeditated, whether for the purpose of mercy or not, euthanasia is, by definition, murder. According to Kantian perspective established by Kant the philosopher, and the Holy Bible, murder is both a sin and a crime, therefore we ought not participate in the practice of euthanasia, because it is murder, and it is the wrong thing to do.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Physician Assisted Suicide

    1224 Words  | 3 Pages

    “Michael Manning, MD, in his 1998 book Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide: Killing or Caring?, traced the history of the word euthanasia: ‘The term euthanasia.originally meant only 'good death,'but in modern society it has come to mean a death free of any anxiety and pain, often brought about through the use of medication.” It seems there has always been some confusion and questions from our society about the legal and moral questions regarding the new science of euthanasia. “Most recently, it has come to mean'mercy killing' — deliberately putting an end to someone’s life in order to spare the individual’s suffering.’” I would like to emphasize the words “to spare the individual’s suffering”.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Active Euthanasia

    1043 Words  | 3 Pages

    The morality of active euthanasia and whether or not it should be legalized is quite a controversial topic within the medical field that has long been debated by many philosophers. Active euthanasia is one of two forms of euthanasia, which is defined as the painless killing of a patient suffering a terminal illness that is considered incurable. Active euthanasia is when one actively brings about the death of a terminally ill patient through a specific act. This is in contrast to passive euthanasia, the other form of euthanasia, in which one merely ‘lets’ a terminally ill patient die by not doing the things necessary to keep the patient alive. I believe active euthanasia is both immoral and should not be legalized.

    Read More

  • Review Of Rachels 'Utilitarian Argument'

    209 Words  | 1 Pages

    Any action is morally right if its purpose is to increase the amount of happiness or decrease the amount of misery. An action is wrong if it serves to do the opposite.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Active And Passive Euthanasia

    1032 Words  | 3 Pages

    One of the main concerns that arose regarding active euthanasia is that it not only involves the death of a person, but the act of killing. (Person y kills person x for person x’s own benefit.) Killing is an inhumane act and is morally and universally wrong. When analyzing this point, many flaws appear. Passive euthanasia is when person y allows person x to die for person x’s benefit. Comparing the two situations, active and passive euthanasia are practically indistinguishable, except for the one point that in one you are killing someone, and the other you are simply letting someone die.

    Read More

  • Argument in Favor of Euthanasia

    1897 Words  | 4 Pages

    Today, medical interventions have made it possible to save or prolong lives, but should the process of dying be left to nature? (Brogden, 2001). Phrases such as, “killing is always considered murder,” and “while life is present, so is hope” are not enough to contract with the present medical knowledge in the Canadian health care system, which is proficient of giving injured patients a chance to live, which in the past would not have been possible (Brogden, 2001). According to Brogden, a number of economic and ethical questions arise concerning the increasing elderly population. This is the reason why the Canadian society ought to endeavor to come to a decision on what is right and ethical when it comes to facing death. Uhlmann (1998) mentions that individuals’ attitudes towards euthanasia differ. From a utilitarianism point of view – holding that an action is judged as good or bad in relation to the consequence, outcome, or end result that is derived from it, and people choosing actions that will, in a given circumstance, increase the overall good (Lum, 2010) - euthanasia could become a means of health care cost containment, and also, with specific safeguards and in certain circumstances the taking of a human life is merciful and that all of us are entitled to end our lives when we see fit.

    Read More

  • A Defense of Euthanasia

    1271 Words  | 3 Pages

    More than likely, a good majority of people have heard about euthanasia at least once in their lifetime. For those out there who have been living under a rock their entire lives, euthanasia “is generally understood to mean the bringing about of a good death – ‘mercy killing’, where one person, ‘A’, ends the life of another person, ‘B’, for the sake of ‘B’.” (Kuhse 294). There are people who believe this is a completely logical scenario that should be allowed, and there are others that oppose this view. For the purpose of this essay, I will be defending those who are suffering from euthanasia.

    Read More

  • Moral and Ethical Issues of Euthanasia

    1525 Words  | 4 Pages

    According Richard Gula, active euthanasia is legally considered homicide (5). Another intervention and approach to euthanasia could be through the use of analgesic means. The use of morphine or other anesthetic medication could be used to allow the patient to die or hasten their dying process. I consider the latter procedure to be more humane than that of the other because it is morally wrong to kill a person, rather it's humane for someone to die naturally. Before I discuss the rights and wrongs of euthanasia, I will define death or a person, when is it safe to say...

    Read More

  • Is Active Euthanasia Morally Wrong

    1213 Words  | 3 Pages

    Let me close with as I tell you about the principle of bioethics that were developed by Thomas Beauchamp and James Childress. Start with the principle of nonmaleficence; in healthcare it is common to see the words primum non nocere, first do no harm. In healthcare we should not harm others. The duty of nonmaleficence is to refrain from behavior interfere with well-being of others. The thought of this duty and principle shows that it is immoral to use active euthanasia within

    Read More

  • Argument Against Euthanasia

    477 Words  | 1 Pages

    Euthanasia is a medical procedure which speeds up the process of dying for people with incurable, painful, or distressing diseases.  The patient’s doctor can stop treatment and instead let them die from their illness.  It come from the Greek words for 'good' and 'death', and is also called mercy killing.  Euthanasia is illegal in most countries including the UK .  If you suffer from an incurable disease, you cannot legally terminate your life.  However, in a number of European countries it is possible to go to a clinic which will assist you to die gracefully under some very strict circumstances.

    Read More

More about Arguments Against Active Euthanasia

Open Document