Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Social effects of the first world war
Social effects of the first world war
Social effects of the first world war
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Social effects of the first world war
World War I was a starting point to much of the chaos that ensues throughout 1914-1918, leaving many families in grief over a lost relative and pointlessly wasted lives. It was the kickoff to bloodshed between nations, different cultures, languages, and even commitment to country. This war caused pain and destruction that rivaled the infamous bubonic plague, aka the raging “Black Death.” People hoped that this nonstop crusade would not continue to operate uncontrolled. From our historians’ point of view, this struggle took a turn that made World War I take a “nose-dive” into the lengthy and unyielding conflict we recognize today. A considerable amount of time into the hostility could have been avoided and been managed to cease the pandemonium …show more content…
The bombardments throughout the war mainly served the purpose of bombing an area to take out adversaries within the blast range, leaving soldiers cornered in bomb shelters to protect themselves from the inferno. This also left officers mentally unwell, causing fear within them to try and escape their “tombs.” It also took long periods of time for a bombardment to fully complete, taking up to a full day to have a bomb run pass over. This also allowed the bombers opposition to either escape their fiery wrath, or take too long to take out an area to leave their allies waiting for hours to finally advance to their designated area of advance. Take this for example, the crown prince of Russia, Rupprecht, sent his chief of staff, Konrad Krafft von Dellmensingen, to take out a French trench on August 25th, 1914. After he was called to the task he began planning his way of attacking the heavily guarded Meurthe River, “He sent men from southern Germany against French trenches, supported by some of the heaviest artillery bombardments seen in more than a century. They made little headway”(Lorraine …show more content…
"The war that didn't end all wars: what started in 1914--and why it lasted so long." Foreign Affairs, Nov.-Dec. 2014. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Accessed 6 Feb. 2018.
“Lorraine: Was the 1914 German Offensive in Lorraine an Appropriate Response to Altered Circumstances on the Western Front?” History in Dispute, edited by Dennis Showalter, vol. 8: World War I: First Series, St. James Press, 2002, pp.179-185. World History in Context, Accessed 15 Feb. 2018.
“Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: Did the Tsarist Government Consider Public Opinion in Formulating Foreign Policy?” History in Dispute, edited by Paul du Quenoy, vol. 21: Revolutionary Russia, 1890-1930, St. James Press, 2005, pp. 107-112. World History in Context. Accessed 15 Feb. 2018.
Quenoy, Paul Du, and David L. Ruffley. “Tsar Nicholas II: Did the Decision of Tsar Nicholas II to Take Personal Command at the Front Accelerate the Fall of the Russian Empire?” History in Dispute, edited by Dennis Showalter, vol. 9: World War I: Second Series, St. James Press, 2002, pp. 237-244. World History in Context. Accessed 15 Feb. 2018.
Strachan, Hew. "The War to End All Wars?" Foreign Affairs, Jan.-Feb. 2003, p. 148. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Accessed 6 Feb.
With the coinciding of a revolution on the brink of eruption and the impacts of the First World War beginning to take hold of Russia, considered analysis of the factors that may have contributed to the fall of the Romanov Dynasty is imperative, as a combination of several factors were evidently lethal. With the final collapse of the 300 year old Romanov Dynasty in 1917, as well as the fall of Nicholas II, a key reality was apparent; the impact that WWI had on autocratic obliteration was undeniable. However, reflection of Russia’s critical decisions prior is essential in the assessment of the cause of the fall of the Romanov Dynasty.
2000 - 2004 -. The War to End All Wars. Michael Duffy. Original Material. Primary Documents Online -.
Storey, William Kelleher. First World War : A Concise Global History. Rowman & Littlefield Pub., Inc, 2010. eBook Collection (EBSCOhost), EBSCOhost (accessed March 11, 2012).
World War I is marked by its extraordinary brutality and violence due to the technological advancement in the late 18th century and early 19th century that made killing easier, more methodical and inhumane. It was a war that saw a transition from traditional warfare to a “modern” warfare. Calvary charges were replaced with tanks; swords were replaced with machine guns; strategic and decisive battles were r...
In 1914, with the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife from Austro-Hungarian Empire caused an enormous war called World War I, that killed and injured about thirty million lives. It also destroyed the economy later on. World War I changed combat tactics in a whole new way, where people would die in a blink of an eye. Commanders and soldiers did not know about the capabilities of their new arsenals. The new industrialized developed weapons devastated the battlefield with blood, mountain of corpses, and small craters. Some of the weapons that were used were machine guns, poison gas, mortars, and tanks. Soldiers described the battlefield as a nightmare. This was the start of a new era arising through warfare. A very dangerous way to bring great change to the world but was not intended. World War I brought great changes to the world but, considering the countless deaths, it was the worst war ever, an inhumane war.
So when asking the question what the causes of World War One are its important to remember that the rivalries between European states were intensified by the imperialism of the 19th century. Which lead to tension which became fear of invasion that in turn resulted in an intricate system of alliances “ensured what might have been an isolated crisis in the Balkans became a general war”. Whilst the effects of imperialism may not be the single cause of the war, it was undoubtedly a contributing
McCullough Edward E. How The First World War Began: The Triple Entente and the Coming of the Great War of 1914-1918. North America: Black Rose Books, 1999. Print.
Williams, Charles F. "War Powers: A New Chapter in a Continuing Debate." Social Education. April 2003: 128-133. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 07 May. 2014.
Professor Geoff Hayes, “4 August 1914: Slithering Over the Brink, The Origins of the Great War,” Lecture delivered 31 October, 2011, HIST 191, University of Waterloo
Blood, bodies, and bullets had littered trenches, making the land unusable for years to come. Eight million men never made it home to see their families, their souls rest where they have passed, the men’s dreams of freedom from a seemingly never ending war die along with them. Poppies bloom there in memorial, inspired by one of the first World War 1 poems, “In Flanders Field”. The poppy has become the iconic remembrance of the fallen men. The Great War had taken a toll on the environment, the French countryside left in ruins, miles and miles of holes dug in the ground left without intent to repair. Bodies left to rot, the men stuck in an eternal slumber. What was the cause of World War 1? Why did so many nations get involved, though original
However, when confronted with a strict policy of appeasement, by both the French and the English, the stage was set for a second World War. Taylor constructs a powerful and effective argument by expelling certain dogmas that painted Hitler as a madman, and by evaluating historical events as a body of actions and reactions, disagreeing with the common idea that the Axis had a specific program from the start. The book begins with the conclusion of the First World War, by exploring the idea that critical mistakes made then made a second war likely, yet not inevitable. Taylor points out that although Germany was defeated on the Western front, “Russia fell out of Europe and ceased to exist, for the time being, as a Great Power. The constellation of Europe was profoundly changed—and to Germany’s advantage.”
In 1914, Gavrilo Princip had assassinated Franz Ferdinand, The duke of Austria. The assassins had been put up by the Serbian government, soon the Austrian government found out and had decided to retaliate. This had been the tipping point that had caused World War 1. But this is not the only cause to World War 1. The other causes of World War 1 were MIlitarism which was strongest in Germany. Germany was allied with Austria-Hungary at the time which is also a cause, the alliances in 1914. A few main alliances were the Triple Entente, which makes Russia France and Britain watch and protect against the ever growing threat from Germany. There were alliances made all throughout Europe that bounded almost everyone to protect someone. Another cause was Nationalism, germany mostly. Germany because they were a fairly new country who wanted to prove themselves as a nation. The final cause was imperialism. which was happening all over the place and it made countries scared their land might be attacked. World War One was not only caused by an assassination but was caused by alliances made throughout Europe along with insane nationalism, extreme militarism and frantic imperialism.
World War I, also known as “The Great War”, was a global war that revolved mainly around Europe. It took place from 1914 to 1918. This was a very brutal war that caused many casualties. The soldiers who survived experienced severe trauma and mental discomfort. This trauma was a direct result of the violence and agony they experienced during the war. Motivation for this war was the idea of nationalism and the pride in one’s country. This war was the cause of disillusionment among many of the soldiers that were involved in it.
Wood, A. (1986). The Russian Revolution. Seminar Studies in History. (2) Longman, p 1-98. ISBSN 0582355591, 9780582355590
World War I was a conflict that claimed over 10 million peoples’ lives, ravaged all of Europe and engineered modern warfare, as it is know today. The Great War has been scrutinized and examined through many complex theories in order to understand how such a conflict escalated to one of the most epic wars in history. This essay, like many works before it, looks to examine WWI and determine its causes through two distinct levels of analysis, individual and systemic. The individual level of analysis locates the cause of conflicts in individual leaders or decision makers within a particular country, focusing on the characteristics of human decision-making. The systemic level of analysis explains the causation of a conflict from a system wide level that includes all states, taking in to account the distribution of power and the interaction of states in the international system.