Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Quebec separatist movement
Essay on complexities of quebec separation
Should quebec and canada separate
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Quebec separatist movement
Quebec Should Stay with Canada
“Should I stay or should I go now? If I go there will be trouble, And if I stay it will be double”, sang The Clash a decade before Quebec held their second sovereignty referendum. The same question was on everyone's mind on the last few days of October 1995; should they stay or should the go? Quebec has always had an uneasy relationship with Canada. They tried to leave once in 1980 and they’ve had political, economic, cultural and regional differences, but in the end, nobody wins if Canada breaks up so it’s obvious that Quebec should stay Canadian.
First of all, Quebec already has major political influence in Canada. Alongside Ontario, Central Canada has 62% of Canada’s population at nearly 22 million and holds 181 seats (the majority) at the house of commons. These two provinces have control over most of Canada’s parliament and thus, most of Canada. They basically already govern themselves. With this kind of power, Parti Québécois’ push to be independently governed doesn’t make much sense.
Secondly, “La Belle Province” relies on Canada for economic support. The French speaking province receives the most in equalization payments of any in Canada. In turn, Canada makes profit off
…show more content…
of resources in the province and Montreal brings tourism. Without this Canada-Quebec alliance, both sides suffer economically. Then there’s the Quebecois who will argue that staying in Canada will destroy their culture.
On the contrary, staying with Canada may be the only thing Quebec can do to preserve its culture. French is an official language of Canada because of Quebec’s influence. However, North America is, for the most part, English. A French country would make things complicated as trade, communication, travel, etc. would become more elaborate and many Francophones would have to learn English to get by anyway. Then there’s the fact that the Canadian constitution preserves Quebec culture and protects minorities like the quarter of a million Aboriginal people living in Quebec. That is to say the federal government is properly preserving the history and culture of New
France. And lastly there’s its geographic region. Quebec is the largest province in the country and Canada would lose a lot if it lost Quebec. Francophone Canada is in the middle of Canada so if it were an independent nation, it would split Atlantic Canada from the rest. Canadians would need a passport to travel within their own country. Not to mention, Canada would lose the St. Lawrence, an important trade and transport route. If Quebec left, they would leave a 1.7 million km² hole in our hearts. So, in conclusion, Quebec should stay. All things considered, while we may have our differences, an independent, republic Quebec would not fare well politically, economically, culturally or regionally. Both Quebec and Canada as a whole will take major blows. Ultimately, this idealistic dream is not thoroughly thought out and in the end, will fall short of being it’s own functional, independant nation.
The Meech Lake accord was a set of constitutional amendments that were designed to persuade Quebec Province to accept the Canadian Constitution Act of 1982 (Brooks 152). This accord derives its name from the Meech Lake, where these negotiations were held by Mulroney Brian, the Canadian Prime Minister, and the ten premiers of the ten Canadian Provinces (Brooks 211). By the time the Canadian constitution was being implemented, Quebec was the only province that had not consented to it. Somehow, the partition of the constitution in 1982 was carried out without Quebec’s agreement, but it was still bound by the same law. Attempts were made to persuade this province to sign the constitution, which it agreed to do but only after its five demands are fulfilled by the Canadian government. Unfortunately, these demands were not met and this accord failed in 1990, when two provincial premiers failed to approve it. This paper answers the question whether Quebec asked for too much during the Meech Lake Accord negotiations.
As its own state Quebec would have the capacity to act, consolidate and further create their own cultural identity (Heard, 2013). For example, Quebec could foster the national language to be French. By gaining independence from Canada, Quebec can then create their own laws, own immigration rules and levy taxes (Heard, 2013). This would allow Quebec to be completely independent from the rest of Canada, but they would have connecting boarders like the United States and Canada do.
...ereignty. As mentioned Quebec does not have complete sovereignty and it shares its powers with the federal government (Johnson). Strong words like Johnson's found in the mass media are very significant to issues such as this. As elected representatives the government will not act against the wishes of the majority of citizens. Therefore if the Canadian citizens claim that Native Sovereignty in Canada can not coexist with Canadian sovereignty than it will not.
CBC-Digital. "CBC Digital Archives - Separation Anxiety: The 1995 Quebec Referendum - Separation Anxiety: The 1995 Quebec Referendum." CBCnews. CBC/Radio Canada, 06 Mar. 2014. Web. 02 Apr. 2014
Source I is a quote from the Paris Peace Talks by British Prime Minister; Lloyd George, where he states a desire for Germany to suffer. This line was said after the end of World War I, where nations met up to discuss the Treaty of Versailles or the treaty to end World War I. In that treaty, it claimed that Germany was responsible for the war and included all the punishments for Germany. Britain and France wanted to make Germany hurt, in return from all the losses it’s caused them, like death of loved ones and damaged property. Squeezing an orange until its pips squeak, means to apply intense pressure on one, until it suffers or in Germany’s case, becomes economically and militarily weak. The Treaty of Versailles harshly punished
The Quebec referendum that was held in 1995 was a second round of vote that was meant to give the residents of the Quebec province in Canada the chance to determine whether they wanted to secede from Canada and thus establish Quebec as a sovereign state. Quebec has had a long history of wanting to secede from Canada, considering that it is the Canadian providence that is predominantly inhabited by the French-speaking people, whose political relationship with the rest of the Canadian provinces, mostly inhabited by the English-speaking people has been characterized by conflicting ideologies . Thus, the 1995 referendum was not the first political attempt to have Quebec gain its own independence. The discussion holds that the Quebec 1995 referendum would have had both positive and negative implications. Therefore, this discussion seeks to analyze the political consequences that would have f...
Some Quebecers thought that separation was the only solution. They thought that as long as Quebec was associated with the rest of Canada, French-Canadians would never be treated equal. The FLQ (Front De Libération Du Québec) was founded in 1963. It was a smaller, more forceful group of separatists. They were a collection of groups of young people whose idea was to use terrorism to
The fall of Quebec was a turning point in Canadian history, changing it from a French colony to a British colony. Had this battle gone the other way, English might be the second language, not French. The battle of Quebec was one of many battles during the 'Seven Year War'. They called it the Maritime War. It was officially declared in May 1756. Britain and Prussia were on one side and France, Spain, and Austria on the other. The war moved across the Atlantic Ocean from Europe because the French and the British were fighting over furs and land. Britain, while subsidizing and aiding Prussia, its only European ally, sought victory in America and sent what was for that century an overwhelming number of regular troops in order to stiffen the military of the American colonies.
Quebec has struggled with a need to be maitres chez nous “masters of their own house” (Young, 1998). Many attempts at resolving Quebec's issues has resulted in tensions from both sides. Because Quebec has a strong national identity, and do not define themselves as strictly Canadian, Quebec is seen as difficult, unyielding and discontented. Quebec's separation perhaps is inedible and the future of Canada questionable. Canada without Quebec will bring about many complications and whether there is a rest of Canada (ROC) after Quebec a major challenge. Western alienation and the lack of representation in federal affairs will be a factor; moreover, past actions and historical events may have turned Canada into a time bomb, and the deterioration of the provinces the only sulotion. How First Ministers react to Quebec's sovereignty regarding economic factors, political structure, and constitutional issues will be of great importance. Whether emotional issues will play a major role in decision making is subjective; however, it is fair to say that it will be an emotionally charged event and it could either tear apart the ROC or fuse it together. Placing emphasis on investigating what keeps Canada together is perhaps the key to Canada's future, and salvaging a relationship with Quebec.
The root causes of Quebec Separatism go back almost a thousand years! This is because a large cause for Quebec Separatism is the conflict between the French and the English people. These conflicts go back to when France and England first became countries, and ever since then it seems the two countries have been at constant war with one another (Henley, 2011). This constant fighting spawns a built in belief of hatred for one another (Henley, 2011), which would make it hard for the two to live in the same country as they try to do in Canada. But out of all the wars the French and English fought, the most influential for Quebecois and all of Canada was the several year war taking place between 1756 and 1763 (Upper Canada History, 2011).
Regionalism is a growing concern for Canadians` as it affects economic stability, nationalism and western alienation. The economic stability is reliant on the regions having strong economic bases (Stilborn, 19). Nationalism with Quebec is a prime example of how distinct regional cultures hinder Canada’s unity, as they want to separate from Canada, while still having the federal Canadian government financially support them. Western Alienation is also a prime political culture that is regionally distinct.
The fear of the PQ is that if several of the floating voters out there feel that a sovereign Quebec must mean a partitioned, patchwork Quebec, the separatists might well fall back to 40% if that happens. One group of Quebeckers with the strongest-and geographically the widest claims for self determination, the Cree, Inuit, and Innu who occupy the resource-rich northern two-thirds of the province. The views of these nations, oddly enough, seem to go unmentioned. During the 1995 attempt to secede, these three groups all voted by more than 95% to stick with Canada. People outside of Canada are baffled at how Canada ended up in such a state of affairs.
government, t. p. (n.d.). Quebec Nationalism - Quebec History. Faculty.marianopolis.edu. Retrieved May 27, 2012, from http://faculty.marianopolis.edu/c.belanger/quebechistory/events/natpart4.htm
The people of Quebec feel that being in Canada is endangering their heritage. Canada has run the country in ways that help itself and hurt Quebec and they can tell. They feel they want to be their own countries so they can keep their heritage and have a government that focuses on their interests more. A big reason is that Quebecers don't feel any relations with anyone outside of their province. The idea has been floating out there ever since the Battle of the plains of Abraham, which the British fought them for their french colony known as
There are several reasons why Canada has adopted the equalization program. First, there are the vertical and horizontal imbalances between provinces and country. Next, Canadian provinces have a strong preference for provincial autonomy. Third, there is need for economical and political equity between provinces. Finally, equalization is needed for economic labour mobility efficiency within the feudalism.