Argumentative Essay On The Holocaust

Time goes by so fast, and it never slows down. There are many things that happen that people to forget over time, however, the Holocaust and its people are not something forgotten. There has been a long standing argument about whether or not Nazi war criminals should be put on trail even in their old age. In the end, crimes are crimes, and the Nazi criminals should still be charged regardless of their age, orders, or how much time has passed. Firstly, the amount of time passed does not change the actions committed by the Nazi criminals. What is done is done, and even though some of these criminals have managed to run free for that time they still have to pay the consequences when caught. There are a few that are still looking for those criminals today. Kurt Schrimm is one of those still hunting for justice, and in an interview with the New York Times he said “My personal opinion is that in view of the monstrosity of these crimes, one owes it to the survivors and the victims not to simply say ‘a certain time has passed, it should be

Like it or not, there is always a choice, and the Nazi criminals all chose to be a part of the party to begin with. The Nazis had the same outlook, many didn’t need an order from a superior to commit the crimes they did. Many people will argue that fact that some people may not have had a choice, however, according to CNN “...international law -- created in the wake of World War II and the Holocaust -- has rejected the alibi of superior orders and emphasized individual criminal responsibility, that every individual is responsible for his or her deeds, and must bear the consequences, even if they were ordered to do so by a person with a higher rank” (Zuroff 1). The law is a big deal, and in order to make an international law, there has to be a good reason. The world has seen the value and importance of charging the individual of the crime, regardless of