Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ways to prevent conflict without violence
Role of the United States military
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ways to prevent conflict without violence
Foreign aid is not a modern concept. Louis Picard and Terry Buss write that Egypt received the services of architects and contractors in 336 A.D., sent by Greece’s Alexander the Great to help build the city of Alexandria, named after its benefactor (qt. in Marshall). Throughout the United States’ history, national support of foreign aid has fluctuated. Some presidential administrations offered significant assistance, such as F.D. Roosevelt’s Marshall Plan to rebuild Europe after the devastation of World War II. Others participated less enthusiastically on the world stage, such as when G.W. Bush declined to have the U.S. take a seat on the newly-formed U.N. Human Rights Council in 2006 (Kesten). In 2017, the debate continues. The United States’ …show more content…
Alliance, and dramatically cut international economic assistance. The United States funds the largest portion of U.N. spending; therefore, the U.S. should decrease its contribution to a more equitable level (Kesten). Historically, substantial amounts of foreign aid have disappeared unethically, lining the pockets of corrupt leaders of foreign countries; it is estimated that $100 billion of assistance to Afghanistan (since 2001) has vanished this way (Marshall). Additionally, controversial social and medical programs such as abortion, sex education, and pregnancy prevention (despite being legal in the United States) often appears in arguments against U.S. assistance (Marshall). Finally, the current argument for downsizing foreign aid is to increase funding for President Trump’s top priorities, including boosting national defense, building a wall along the U.S. border with Mexico, and cutting taxes (Groppe). Clearly, these persuasive arguments support reducing U.S. foreign aid …show more content…
This makes them more likely to utilize established laws as a means of dispute resolution rather than turning to physical violence, such as terrorism. Similarly, aid targeted to promote education and health is also effective in dampening terrorism” (Savun and Tiron). Further, as Mark Lagon, Chief Policy Officer at the Council on Foreign Relations writes, “… [one finding] in international relations is that established democracies never go to war with one another,” a quite convincing argument for utilizing assistance to build foreign democratic states. Additionally, developing countries utilize U.S. aid to benefit their financial stability, resulting in a larger global export market for U.S. goods and services (Marshall). Altogether, United States foreign aid provides many valuable
The United States continues to give around $550 billion in aid to other countries each year, making America the world's top donor by far (Richardson). While the United States government only supplies $252 billion to needy Americans each year. Former Assistant to the President for Communications, Patrick Buchanan said, "The idea that we should send endless streams of tax dollars all over the world, while our own country sinks slowly in an ocean of debt is, well, ludicrous" (Foreign Aid). The United States need to give money to support the domestic impoverished rather than supporting developing foreign countries because the poverty and homelessness in America is increasing faster than the aid necessary to reduce this trend. Part of the reason that the United States should aid the domestic impoverished is that some foreign countries cannot be trusted with the money given to them and in certain cases, the money intended to aid countries are harmful for that country’s well-being.
During the tsunami in the Philippines, the U.S. was first to deliver food and many other items, spending $178 million. It brought stability internally and helped in following suit. Helping other countries can benefit the world, if assisting other countries in a time of need, it can bring a greater relationship closer together.
Before extending aid to other countries, we should focus on our more prevalent domestic problems. Patrick Buchanan said, "The idea that we should send endless streams of tax dollars all over the world, while our own country sinks slowly in an ocean of debt is, well, ludicrous. Almost every American knows it, feels it, believes it." The topic of United States foreign policy is greatly debated, and a decision on how to handle is very hard to come by. It seems as if we are finally leaning towards less aid to foreign countries, as we try to cut wasteful spending. The American government is finally opening its eyes to the realization that all of the aid we are giving out may not be worth it. Our priority should be to help our homeless, instead of other countries' poor.
Don’t Trust the American Government Why should citizens of their native country trust a government that lies, cheats, and steals from families? Back then, in past centuries, it used to be a very common thing to do. The American government is not the kind of people we should be trusting. “We the people” need to open our eyes and should elect politicians who can be trusted and reliable with good intentions of making this country back in tip top shape.
The history of the US’s relationship with the UN is complex, seeming to vacillate between warm cooperation and abject disdain as the national interests of the US and the rest of the world, and the short- and long-term interests of the US itself, align or oppose each other. The UN was originally the vision of US president Franklin Roosevelt and the product of US State Department planning and diplomacy. It was designed to forward the national interests of its strongest members, the P-5, to reflect and channel the geopolitical power structure rather than twist it into an unnatural and unsustainable hierarchy of weak nations trying to dominate strong. Because the Charter is based in a realist view of the world, during the Cold War, when the national interests of the two world powers diverged, the UN was paralyzed to deal with any of the world’s conflicts. When the Cold War ended it gave rise to the first war that should have been authorized by the Security Council—the Persian Gulf War from later 1990 to early 1991. Many hoped for a “new world order” after the success of the Gulf War, but the interests of the US and the rest of the world, primarily the rest of the members of the Security Council, soon divided again. Today, the world is still struggling to cope with the blow dealt to the UN by the US’s use of force in Iraq, including the US, which has not even begun to feel the long-term negative effects of its unilateralism. However, the war in Iraq could have been less detrimental to the UN and the US in particular, and by extension to the rest of the world, if the US had argued that it was acting to uphold resolution 1441 under the authorization of the Security Cou...
The United States is one of the leading suppliers of Foreign Aid in the world, and even though the US gives billions, European countries give aid money to the same countries, this causes many areas of the Middle East, Africa, and Asia to be almost fully dependent on foreign aid. This means that without aid from other countries, they would not be able to support themselves at all. Foreign aid is meant to help countries that are struggling with civil unrest, disease, or natural disasters, it is not meant to help keep the country out of debt, but that is where more and more of the US and The EU’s foreign aid budget is going. The question is, does all this money actually go where it is intended? It should be going towards the government and to help the people, but in many cases, the countries government does not have the resources to properly track the flow of money. The countries in most cases have poor infrastructure and corrupt or oppressive leaders, not always at a national level, but in the towns and cities. So this means there is almost no way to oversee the flow of foreign aid through the country, all we can see is that their situations aren't getting any better and the countries are still impoverished. If this is the case, where are the millions of dollars going? Countries like Afghanistan and Iraq receive the most money from American foreign aid and European aid, yet they are still under oppressive governmental rule and there is still an extreme difference between the rich and poor. Garrett Harding’s theory of “Lifeboat Ethics” exemplifies how not giving aid to others will allow the strongest of society to thrive, while teaching the impoverished to help themselves. He believes that giving aid to poor countries will only make ...
Foreign aid to countries can help in many ways. It can be used as a
I’m not here to argue whether there is poverty in America or not, but to tell you that there happens to be people out there who struggle. Sure American Citizens are better off than others in foreign countries, but some Americans fight the same battle as the others. The struggle to achieve the “American Dream” is very hard and not many get the opportunity to live it. Many low-income families who seek the same goal of getting out of poverty never manage to get out. It sounds bad, but not many may go to college due to money being tight and thus they work a minimum paying job and live in the cheapest housing affordable. Many neighborhoods that are cheap have poor teaching public schools. With poor education and a bad neighborhood a cycle begins and the next generation will most likely end up growing in the same neighborhood.
The first reasons to think that foreign aid should be spend is that “Aid saves lives” which is clearly illustrated by the researches conducted. Compare 1990 to 2010, as a result of aid in vaccines and health, there was a decrease in number of children who died from illness of pneumonia and diarrhoea (BBC). For example, in Botswana, the foreign aid fund had provided a test of HIV for pregnant mothers and therefore decrease the amount of newborn babies which catches HIV. Furthermore, in Bangladesh, there is a 62% drop in death rate for the under five children, the aid fund allows the government to be able to afford “vaccines and trained the midwives”.
Around the world there are many families and individuals who live in poverty, and this is something that is growing like wild fire. Poverty knows no race or gender, but when looking at the statistics, it shows the inequality, and that many of those below the poverty line in America are children and those of non-Caucasian. Many also call poverty to be a threat to the common good, and that with many living in poverty, we as a species do not care only but for ourselves. The focus will be of how poverty has taken hold in society and how poverty is causing harm to the common good and the teachings of Jesus Christ.
"There are 47 percent of the people who will vote for the president no matter what. All right, there are 47 percent who are with him, who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe the government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you-name-it." This is one of Mitt Romneys famous quotes. The scary part about this quote is that he is right. About half of our country is dependent upon government assistance, and some are passing this way of life on to their many children. This is the main problem, if the future generations begin to think this is a good way of life our government will crash, again. Government assistance is a problem due to the fact that; there is no incentive to work, people get handed money with no enforced restrictions, and there is no constant supervision for people, “needing” this assistance.
There is no static or perfect definition that can encapsulate all that may fall under the theme of humanitarian intervention. Philosophically speaking, humanitarian intervention is the idea that individuals have the duty to prevent human rights violations from occurring. Furthermore, the legal basis of humanitarian intervention is derived from the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Convention on the Prevention of Genocide and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Lecture 11/15/16). As decided by the UN in 1948, all nations have a responsibility to protect, or to prevent crimes against humanity, and while it was an important milestone for the recognition of human rights, not all those experiencing the crimes of genocide
activities are a crucial part of school because it shows you are involved into making your school
In recent discussion about helping the poor, one controversial issue has been whether to help or not to help. On one hand, some say that helping the poor is very simple and doesn’t take much. From this point of view, it is seen as selfish to not help the poor. On the other hand, however, others argue that by helping others you are in fact hurting yourself at the same time. In the words of Garrett Hardin, one of this view’s main proponents, “prosperity will only be satisfied by lifeboat ethics.” According to this view, we are not morally obligated to help other countries. In sum, then, the issue is whether to help poorer countries or not.
Globalization’s history is extremely diversified and began during the beginning of civilization. Now we live in a world that is constantly evolving, demanding people to use resources in locations that are very difficult to obtain certain resources. This could make it completely impossible to operate in these specific parts of the world. However, globalization allows people across the world to acquire much needed resources. Globalization creates the opportunity for businesses to take advantage and exploit the ability to take part of their business to a different country. Nevertheless, globalization is part of today’s society and will be involved in virtually all situations.