Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The concept of women in politics
The concept of women in politics
Effects of gender in leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The concept of women in politics
Since the late 1700s, men have been leading the great nation of the United States successfully, and since then, the United States has risen to be one of the greatest and most prominent world powers. Many women have tried to rise up in the United States government system and claim their fair share of power but none have managed to climb high enough to snatch the presidency from their male counterparts. Recently, with the escalating popularity of a possible female presidential candidate, many have started to wonder if it is time for a female president. Seeing as how there has only ever been a male in the oval office, all mistakes made in the past by the executive branch have been attributed to the various male leaders and their staff, which has recently caused women to begin to claim that they believe a woman could do a better job. There is no doubt that women and males have different basic personality characteristics, so many are curious to see what a woman could achieve in office.
There are many opponents to the idea of a female taking office. One of the main points of arguments they bring up is that “experience suggests a world of women presidents and prime
…show more content…
ministers, queens and empresses would yield a world order not dissimilar to the one we have now” so there is not really a need for a gender specific president (Yaffe). Females are often thought to be more emotional and sometimes more unstable than men tend to be. Having a female is office could result in more conflicts occurring because of the instability of women. In addition, because of the age requirement of 35, the women are going to be at least 35, but probably older than 35. Seeing as how the average age of all the past United States presidents is 54 years of age, it would be safe to assume that if a woman were to take office, it would be an older woman at least above 50 years of age. Women also, on average, begin to experience menopause at the age of 51. This would mean that the United States would be led by a woman who is emotionally unstable, prone to fatigue, body aches, insomnia, and various other symptoms associated with menopause. The opponents of female presidents often also say that “women, like men, get to the top by way of a no-holds-barred political process and those without the perceived necessary skills don't make it,” one again, referring to the fact that the presidency is above genders or any type of discrimination in general (Yaffe). Meanwhile, there are many proponents of a female president that argue that the “the U.S. is ready for a woman president who projects a feminine image” (Rubin). Many believe that a woman in office would result in less fighting because women tend to be less aggressive in general. With the recently elected women chief executives in countries such as Chile, Liberia, Germany, supporters believe this is the first sign of change and that the United States needs to change also (Rubin). This shows that more women are taking power in different countries which are also powerful and it is causing many proponents and feminists to feel like we need to take steps towards a more gender equal government. Supporters of a woman president say a “female candidate must utilize mamisma—the power of her mature feminine qualities—to win over the nation” rather than trying to beat men using the same tactics as them. They believe that it is simply about time for a female president. Since the beginning, males have run everything and women have been discriminated against. Putting a capable woman in office would greatly boost the possibility of an increase of women’s rights support and legislation. While the opponents of a female president believe a male should always be in power, and supports of a female president believe a female should run the show, the best compromise is for voters to disregard gender in the election process.
Gender does not determine whether someone is a good leader or not. The characteristics of a good leader go deeper than gender or even looks in general. A person’s character and integrity define who they are and what type of leader they will be. A male can have female characteristics and still be an excellent political leader and a female can be aggressive and have male characteristics and be a great leader as well. A leader is someone who knows how to make hard decisions and decide what is best for the greater good and what the best thing to do is in certain
situations. Supporters and opponents of a female president both have strong points and both have strong support for their side. That being said, common ground is not unfeasible. It will require sacrifices from both sides, but, ultimately, it’s the best option to take steps towards national progression. Elections where gender is disregarded could solve the issue. It would result in the election of the best possible leader; the person who is most qualified for the job. If middle ground is not found, it will result in the election of sub-par candidates and poor leadership and could potentially cause the nation to suffer.
In relation to leadership and women, historically women who wanted to seek leadership roles were often seen projecting the traditional masculine model of leadership. This model means to be rational, unemotional and analytic. It also, means in order to succeed traditionally women needed to look and act like a man to be taken seriously in leadership positions. Women in the past often dressed up in suits and ties and anything feminine was seen as an internal “weakness”. To be a leader in power meant to exude confidence in masculinity and shy away from anything remotely girly. As opposed, to the feminine model which casts power as focused on connection and harmony instead of power over something, someone. This power can be skilled through collective gain or physical attractiveness (Kruse 22).
The initial effects of women’s suffrage on the national level was limited. To a great extent it remains limited; women have always been underrepresented at the federal level. In the first election after the 19th Amendment, 25 states failed to elect a woman, (Rothschild, p. 11). Currently, 26 states do not have a women in their congressional delegation, (Gendergap, p.1). There are also six states that have never elected a woman to federal office, (Rothschild, p.2). They are Alaska, Iowa, Vermont, New Hampshire, Delaware, and Mississippi. While women represent 52 percent of the population, they represent only 21 percent in Congress. Thus it can be seen that women still have steps to take to achieve true political equality with men.
Prompt 1: Who won the debate & why? Based on the performance and content of the presidential debate, Hillary Clinton emerged the winner. A debate is a typical adversarial argument, which is characterized by competition. There is one winner and one loser. The argument revolves around two people who have different or opposite ways of thinking, arguing on the same topic.
Throughout history, women have always fought to gain equal political rights, but conventional roles kept women from getting enough political representation. Many suffrage groups founded by women challenged the conventional roles of women during 1840 to 1968 with the dream of obtaining equal political representation. In 1919, the nineteenth amendment, drafted by Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton was passed. The 19th amendment has been desired by many women for years. Although the 19th amendment passed and women thought that they were able to be equal in politics, many women did not get equal political representation due to their conventional roles at the time period. Women were not able to achieve high roles in politics, shown through the fact that there has never been a woman president in the history of the United States. The presidency of women did not occur due to the perceptions that generally, women should be protected and hidden, not out in the open and leadin...
In 2008 the first woman was awarded the position of Speaker of the House, and Hillary Clinton ran for president. While Hillary had widespread support leading people to believe that the two different genders had reached equality, there were several that doubted whether or not a woman has what it takes to be a president. The women that came into power that was generally held by men, needed to perform a balancing act. This balancing act was between the characteristics of women and projecting the masculine strength and leadership needed to hold their position (Jenen 14). This problem in society has been continuing on for a long time. In the 1970’s women had no standing in academia. That women were no use to the department they were studying and
In the American society, we constantly hear people make sure they say that a chief executive officer, a racecar driver, or an astronaut is female when they are so because that is not deemed as stereotypically standard. Sheryl Sandberg is the, dare I say it, female chief operating officer of Facebook while Mark Zuckerberg is the chief executive officer. Notice that the word “female” sounds much more natural in front of an executive position, but you would typically not add male in front of an executive position because it is just implied. The fact that most of America and the world makes this distinction shows that there are too few women leaders. In Sheryl Sandberg’s book “Lean In,” she explains why that is and what can be done to change that by discussing women, work, and the will to lead.
This was backed up with the Princeton study that shows that women in the science field made 14% of the total faculty in their workplaces and one out of four reported their male colleagues occasionally engaged in unprofessional conduct focusing on gender issues (Quindlen paragraph 11). Similar things occur to women in politics. In Men Rule, it is stated that “When women run for office – regardless of the position they seek – they are just as likely as their male counterparts to win their races”(Lawless and Fox 2). This proves that women have the potential to succeed in politics, but raises the question of why it is that women are still underrepresented in politics. Studies in Men Rule shows that “gender gaps in political recruitment and perceptions of qualifications continue to hinder women’s interest in running for office just as much now as a decade ago”; and although women’s interest in politics have increased over time, men still run the show when it should be controlled equally (Lawless and Fox 16). This is why feminism is needed, through feminism women can be sufficiently represented in all areas of the
However, with regard to women and electoral politics, there was not a huge change accomplishments of women until the 1960s and onward (Anderson 1, 1996). Today there is a record number of women in congress, with 20 serving in the Senate and 82 serving in the House of Representatives, which is still below 25% of members of the government (CAWP 2014). Women are underrepresented and less likely to be involved with or run for local or national levels of government. A popular belief, while unproven, is that women are less likely to run because they are concerned about their family responsibility (Fang 2014). Women are less likely to seek government positions because women are less likely to be encouraged to seek government positions, and are therefore less likely to be seen as a candidate for an open government position. Despite this, a Gallup poll in 2014 showed that 63 percent of Americans say that the U.S. would be more well governed if there were more political leaders who are women. So while women need to be more involved in political affairs to reduce the wage gap, the barrier isn 't that women are not wanted in office, nor that they are too focused on their families, but instead that there is very little encouragment for women to enter the political arena at
‘Boys will be boys’, a phrase coined to exonerate the entire male sex of loathsome acts past, present, and potential. But what about the female sex, if females act out of turn they are deemed ‘unladylike’ or something of the sort and scolded. This double standard for men and women dates back as far as the first civilizations and exists only because it is allowed to, because it is taught. Gender roles and cues are instilled in children far prior to any knowledge of the anatomy of the sexes. This knowledge is learned socially, culturally, it is not innate. And these characteristics can vary when the environment one is raised in differs from the norm. Child rearing and cultural factors play a large role in how individuals act and see themselves.
...re difficult to classify as a good leaders because in order to be a leader, we often need to sacrifice our femininity. This belief is actually blocking many women from becoming successful leader. Therefore, even though there are increasing numbers of successful female leaders in the world, such as Hilary Clinton, Condoleezza Rice, and Ursula Burns’s female leaders are still a minority.
In the 106th United States Congress (which met from 1999-2001) only 58 of the 535 legislators were women, and only 18 were women of color. As a result, laws that benefitted women faced heavy opposition before they could be passed. In addition, women made up the minority of Supreme Court justices and presidential cabinet members at every point in the 20th century, and of the 15 presidents elected in those 100 years none of them were women.... ... middle of paper ...
What would you have done if an important woman in your life couldn't have her voice be heard? Would you help fight for her rights? Would you be okay that her voice wasn't heard, and continued on with your life? Would you be against her having any rights that you would try to maintain the imbalance in society instead? Women in the 1840s had no rights. They could not vote, own property, receive an education or participate in any professions such as a doctor, lawyer, or politician. It was time that they finally took a stand when in 1848 Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Lucretia Mott organized the first national women's rights convention in Seneca Falls, New York. It would take about 72 years for the United States to
About eight decades ago, the United States Constitution granted American women the right to vote. During the same era, only men ran for office and decided what is best for American citizens. Many females in the world today are becoming politicians. Today, many women will consider running for local offices in their communities. The “Women Rights” article states “women were excluded from the electoral process for more than 140 years”. The “Women Rights” article also states that women did not have the opportunity to attend college. Women in their communities are considering running for president, commissioner, secretary, etc. American citizens will decide who should hold office. The three reasons why I believe women should consider politics are
Throughout this essay it will be discussed how female representations affects society, what has changed, if has changed during the years. Representations of women were a crucial subject of discussion especially in the concepts of the gaze that often refers to women as objects of the active gaze. The gaze establishes relationships of power, representing different codes such as dominance and subjugation, difference and otherness (Sturken and Cartwright 2009: 111).
Women have fought through torture, blood, sweat, and tears to help women stand strong in our