Argumentative Essay: Is Mt. Everest Safe?

444 Words1 Page

The magnificent Mt. Everest; a scenic natural location that has been a place famous for mountaineering for years. However, people have been debating whether or not Mt.Everest should be closed down temporarily for safety precautions or if the dangers should be supported. I am an opponent towards mountaineering because of the dangers involving both the people and nature involved.
The first reason why Mt. Everest should be closed down is due to the nature being mistreated by the sport and it not being properly protected. For such an amazing landmark it should be prohibited to climb for conservation of the mountain. In “Time for a break on Everest” the author gave the example of mountains being prohibited to climb in Australia when they wrote, “In Australia, for example, tourists are urged not to climb the thousand-foot-high sandstone formation known as Uluru, or Ayers Rock, since it is spiritually significant to the Aboriginal Agangu,”(Source 2). This shows how important it is to preserve the natural aspect of Mt. Everest and not let something as silly as mountaineering get in the way of people in the future not being able to visit this landmark. …show more content…

Everest. “The falling ice hit twenty-five men, killing sixteen of them, all Nepalis. Three of the bodies were buried beneath the debris and were never recovered,” (Source 2). This tragedy had occurred all when mountaineering. This is not something rare either, according to Source 1 “Keep Everest Open”, “...Everest exacted a ratio of one death for every four successful summit attempts”. This sport is extremely dangerous if something goes wrong, which means that the chance of death is high. So why would anyone want to risk their life just to climb a

Open Document