Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Why is the 4th Amendment so important
Why fourth amendment is important essay
Why fourth amendment is important essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
I Plead the Fourth
We all know the fourth amendment. It states that we have the right to our own privacy, it protects us from illegal searches, and keeps us from being randomly placed in jail without reason.“It begins by declaring that the “right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated.”(Rohde). According to the constitution, schools don’t have the right to search students’ lockers, because it violates the rights of the average student.
The first reason why schools don’t have that right is because it violates students’ privacy. Let’s say that a student is suspected of using illegal drugs. They don’t know the name of the suspect or what locker they have, but they get a drug sniffing dog on the campus sniffing every locker. Let's also say that another student has prescription drugs in their locker for their severe stomach pains. The dog stops at that student’s locker, the officer forces the locker open, takes out that student’s things, and rummages through every bag, binder, and pocket. All
…show more content…
while the student is unaware of the search being conducted at their locker. That student is later called down to the office and interrogated like a criminal, while more searches are being conducted at other lockers. They have no warrants, no legal authorization for the searches, and the students, teachers, and parents are completely unaware of these searches. There is also another reason why this is wrong. Let’s review the fourth amendment again.
“The Fourth Amendment is a catalogue of important personal rights that the Court has sought to interpret by balancing the right of privacy against the legitimate needs of law enforcement.... The Fourth Amendment also guarantees that “no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause.”...In essence, the Court uses a standard of reasonableness based on all of the facts and circumstances surrounding a challenged search or arrest” (Rohde). Searching through lockers without the parent’s or student’s consent or their knowing violates this amendment. The officers searching through the lockers don’t have warrants, which is required by law to make a search legal. By searching through lockers without a legal warrant, parental consent, or student consent, the officers searching the lockers and students’ personal items are violating the fourth
amendment. Some people disagree with this statement saying things like “Lockers are school property” and “Students don’t have access to their rights because they’re minors”. The majority that say the lockers are school property, yes, lockers are school property, but the student’s belongings are not school property. Yes, it is a well known fact that most students are minors, but we all know the famous “Bill of Rights” written by James Madison himself, in the “Bill of Rights” it states that everyone has access to the Rights listed in that document, not just adults. Schools are abusing their power and taking student rights away. Schools have been getting away with abusing their power for years and no one has made a move to stop it. The rights were created for everyone for a reason, do not let the schools take that away from a child, a teenager, or even adults. This can be prevented by letting students know their rights, learn how these rights can be violated, and if it ever happens, to report it to their parents. It doesn’t matter if the school is public, private, gender specific, or even religious. In the USA we all have rights, and schools must respect those rights, no matter the individual.
... is one that a reasonable guardian and tutor might undertake.” And he concluded that given the mission of public schools, and the circumstances of this case, the searches required by the school board's policy were “reasonable” and thereby permissible under the Constitution's 4th Amendment.
The 4th amendment provides citizens protections from unreasonable searches and seizures from law enforcement. Search and seizure cases are governed by the 4th amendment and case law. The United States Supreme Court has crafted exceptions to the 4th amendment where law enforcement would ordinarily need to get a warrant to conduct a search. One of the exceptions to the warrant requirement falls under vehicle stops. Law enforcement can search a vehicle incident to an individual’s arrest if the individual unsecured by the police and is in reaching distance of the passenger compartment. Disjunctive to the first exception a warrantless search can be conducted if there is reasonable belief
The 4th amendment protects people from being searched or having their belongings taken away without any good reason. The 4th amendment was ratified on December 15, 1791. For many years prior to the ratifiation, people were smuggling goods because of the Stamp Act; in response Great Britain passed the writs of assistance so British guards could search someone’s house when they don’t have a good reason to. This amendment gave people the right to privacy. “Our answer to the question of what policy must do before searching a cellphone seized incident to an arrest is accordingly simple - get a warrant.” This was addressed to officers searching people’s houses and taking things without having a proper reason. I find
The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution states that individuals have the right to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and impacts, against absurd searches and seizures, yet the issue close by here is whether this additionally applies to the ventures of open fields and of articles in plain view and whether the fourth correction gives insurance over these also. With a specific end goal to reaffirm the courts' choice on this matter I will be relating their choices in the instances of Oliver v. United States (1984), and California v. Greenwood (1988) which bargain straightforwardly with the inquiry of whether an individual can have sensible desires of protection as accommodated in the fourth correction concerning questions in an open field or in plain view.
The United State of America, established by the Founding Father who lead the American Revolution, accomplished many hardship in order to construct what America is today. As history established America’s future, the suffering the United State encountered through history illustrate America’s ability to identify mistakes and make changes to prevent the predictable. The 2nd Amendment was written by the Founding Father who had their rights to bear arms revoked when they believe rising up to their government was appropriate. The Twentieth Century, American’s are divided on the 2nd Amendment rights, “The right to bear arms.” To understand why the Founding Father written this Amendment, investigating the histories and current measures may help the American people gain a better understanding of gun’s rights in today’s America.
The Constitution of the United States of America protects people’s rights because it limits the power of government against its people. Those rights guaranteed in the Constitution are better known as the Bill of Rights. Within these rights, the Fourth Amendment protects “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable search and seizures […]” (Knetzger & Muraski, 2008). According to the Fourth Amendment, a search warrant must be issued before a search and seizure takes place. However, consent for lawful search is one of the most common exceptions to the search warrant requirement.
Which can be having armed officers walk though halls, making sure the school is safe from any harm that could potentially happen.
Which include danger to the school or any of the students and this should be the only way teachers and schools can restrict students’ rights. but schools tend to go too far restricting students’ rights “The principal had ordered the stories removed from the paper because he believed the story about teen pregnancy was inappropriate for some of the younger students at the school, based on its discussion of sexual activity and birth control”(What are the free expression rights of students in public schools under the First Amendment?) a student though that this was appropriate for the school to read and it was but the officials at the school did not think the same way. also another case Bazaar v. Fortune officials tried to stop publication of a book just because it had a few words in it that they did not like.(The First Amendment and Public Schools) this is taking there restrictions just too far. The government should be able to set guidelines of what the immediate danger is and what kind of expression goes way too far and have it sent out to all the schools in the United States. This might help schools from restricting our
The first amendment is the cornerstone of our American society founded years ago by our forefathers. Without the first amendment many ideas, beliefs, and groups could not exist today. The first amendment guaranteed the people of the United States the freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and freedom of religion, freedom of assembly, and freedom of petition. Although the first amendment guarantees us, Americans the freedom of speech, we cannot use it to cause others harm. This amendment has helped shaped Americans into what we are today, because of our right to assemble, speak freely, and worship as we please.
You may wonder why teachers have such a problem with the invasion of privacy. It's not about having something to hide, after all they are frequently observed, and after all the classroom is full of students. It's dehumanizing to have cameras trained on teachers and students at all times. You're treating them like they are all ready criminals, and I think students especially have enough to deal
I think school officials should be able to search students’ lockers if they suspect anyone has drugs/weapons. If a student has drugs or weapons in their locker, it needs to be addressed, so no one gets hurt. If schools didn’t search lockers randomly, students would be bringing drugs/weapons on a regular basis. Schools are a place for students to learn, not a place for students to hang out and get wasted. Drugs/weapons are a bad combination and lead to bad things like mass shootings.
In the Fourth Amendment it states that the rights of the people are to be secured in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizure. The people who are doing the testing have no right to invade the bodies of high school students for a test that they have no reasons to even to the test; they have no warrant or court order to do it. It becomes a violation when they do the testing without any reason or suspicion of drug use. This test will be used everyone despite what they do on their own time, outside of school, they can’t have a reason to believe everyone in the ...
The main reason for this is that at school, different rules apply to students. Some of these can lessen their rights to privacy. In addition to this, the safety of the student body is more important than full privacy rights at school. Drug testing student athletes is not a violation of the 4th Amendment because school rules permit limitations on the rights that students have. If we follow this policy, it is better for the common good because the Roanoke County Schools case shows that sometimes rights must be given up to obtain safety. If people understand this, they can avoid dangerous situations without unnecessary arguments concerning rights. It is clear from the case of Vernonia School District v. Acton (1995) that student privacy rights can be constrained by school rules. Also, the case of New Jersey v. T.L.O. (1985) proves that schools must balance student rights with safety, which is why drug testing should be allowed in school sports. When we ask if it’s Constitutional to limit students’ privacy rights, or if students always have full rights even if it makes the environment less safe it is clear what the answer is. It is evident that it is within the Constitution to lessen students’ privacy rights on campus to keep students
The school is legally responsible for ensuring the safety of students while in their care. The primary purpose of the school is to educate children. If the principal’s suggestion of id badges expedites attendance-taking, safety issues, and vandalism issues and maximizes the amount of time the school needs to perform its primary function, then no violation of rights has occurred.
So do you think that school officials should look through lockers and backpacks for drugs and weapons? Weapons and drugs can harm the schools and that students future, and it’s not worth it. If this argument is followed, we could have a safer learning environment, and there would be less teens in jail. Also, there would be a lot of teens making good