The passion for the game and the aspiration to compete has brought athletes to the intensity of intercollegiate sports. The industry of college athletics started as a chance to have a hobby outside of school. Playing a sport was always for recreational reasons back in the late eighteen hundreds until the mid nineteen hundreds when athletics more serious. The level of competition and the urge to be better than everyone created a game that grabbed attention from society. In order to keep control on how intercollegiate sports progressed in the early nineteen hundreds, the National Collegiate Athletic Association was created. Now that athletes and how the sports are being played has changed drastically, problems within the laws and regulations of the NCAA have risen. College sports has become more than a hobby, contracts are involved, there are millions of viewers, and billions of dollars being made off the athletes. The complexity of the NCAA and the issue of why college athletes should be paid or not paid, gives many people the purpose to research and find a solution for both the hard working, exploited athletes, and the National Collegiate Athletic Association. NCAA Division I Athletes should receive another type of compensation other than an athletic scholarship by allowing endorsement payments, should receive valuable medical coverage, and be expected to either graduate or excel during the academic year by allowing more time to concentrate on academics . In the beginning of the 20th century, Thomas Jefferson came together with a few members in the White House to discuss the continual injuries and deaths in college football practices. The first meeting after the gathering at the White House consisted of 13 higher-education inst... ... middle of paper ... ...s has been a problem with student-athletes for over...years and now the NCAA has finally realized the problem, The Legislative Council passed an unlimited meal plan for all Division I athletes on April 15, 2014, both walk-ons and scholarship athletes. The problem of not having enough food has been solved. College students have other costs besides food, there are entertainment costs, clothing, and the need to afford gas. The opposing argument for the entertainment costs is that most athletes do not have time for fun. Occasionally there might be time to do something other than working out or studying. Without having an income, there is no option to do something off campus. There is no necessity in having spending money but as college students…. To fill the gap between the full scholarship and the total cost of attendance would not affect the any profit for the NCAA.
They do not face problems of debt and tuition to the extent that the normal college student faces. Student-athletes are fairly compensated through publicity and financial benefits, and the NCAA should continue to refrain from paying them. The varying size and interest levels of universities makes it almost impossible to fairly pay all athletes. In order to avoid problems like those exhibited by Northwestern’s football team, who recently tried to unionize, all athletes would need to be paid equally. The excitement brought on by college sports is immense, and problems created due to paying athletes would only hurt the tradition and charisma that college athletics offer. In conclusion, College athletes are students and amateurs, not employees. “Remember student comes first in student-athlete”
Some feel that by not paying college athletes that college institutions are thereby exploiting their athletes free of charge, which is unfair. However, this article feels that college athletes are paid very favorably by the large amount of money they receive for schooling through scholarships. Also, since college athletes don’t pay to play or go to school they are receiving a free college degree whether or not they decide to stay in school for four years or not. With the training that they receive from professional trainers and nutritionists for a professional controlled diet they save possibly thousands within the 4 years they attend school and perform in collegiate athletics.
Imagine a business that brings in $60 million each year ,and the people fueling that industry receive none of the revenue(Wieberg). These same people work 40 hours in their sport every week, these “people” are college athletes. The NCAA, the governing body for major college sports, is the industry doing this to college athletes(Edelman). This is an issue of exploitation and control by large institutions over primarily poor people, the NCAA is guiding them in directions to make money for everybody while doing everything possible to keep the players out of the money. College Athletes deserve profit because they bring in large revenue into their program, the NCAA, and they invest tons of time into their sport.
Throughout the long history of college sports, football in particular, athletes have played squarely off of scholarships or as walk-ons. The NCAA generates millions without paying the athletes a dime. Recent years have caused huge problems in the country with paying athletes for playing. Scandal after scandal has rocked the image of college football and doesn’t appear to be getting better. The NCAA prohibits student-athletes from receiving improper benefits and selling memorabilia for a profit when they should be paying its athletes.
Today there are over 450,000 college athletes and the National College Athletics Association (NCAA) faces a difficult decision on whether or not college athletes should be paid. Many people believe that they should and many believe they should not. There are several benefits that college’s athletes receive for being a student athlete. Why should they receive even more benefits than their scholarship and numerous perks?
Student athletes should not be paid more than any other student at State University, because it implies that the focus of this university is that an extracurricular activity as a means of profit. Intercollegiate athletics is becoming the central focus of colleges and universities, the strife and the substantial sum of money are the most important factors of most university administration’s interest. Student athletes should be just as their title states, students. The normal college student is struggling to make ends meet just for attending college, so why should student athletes be exempt from that? College athletes should indeed have their scholarships cover what their talents not only athletically but also academically depict. Unfortunately, the disapproval resides when students who are making leaps academically are not being offered monetary congratulations in comparison to student athletes. If the hefty amount of revenue that colleges as a conglomerate are making is the main argument for why athletes should be paid, then what is to stop the National Clearinghouse from devising unjust standards? Eventually if these payments are to continue, coaches, organizations, and the NCAA Clearinghouse will begin to feel that “c...
There are many cost related to being a university athlete that the schooling doesn’t cover (Rivers). There are crucial expenses that aren’t covered by scholarships (Rivers). For instance, athletes who spend 90 hours every week coaching and studying will typically find themselves starving, well after the university’s dining facilities have closed (Rivers). University sometimes do not pay for textbooks, school supplies and clothes for going to football banquets more often than not have to come out of the players’ pockets (Keolanui). It is not fair that players have to put in extra time to keep up with their studies but also have to worry about being able to afford the extras that other students have to buy (Keolanui). If the NCAA paid its athletes, the scholars wouldn’t have so as to add additional stress worrying about where they’ll get their money from (Keolanui). If students didn’t need to worry about their funds, they might spend more time specializing in their game and their classes (Keolanui). This helps prevent drained and burnt out athletes from underperforming in their games
Athletic scholarships are a great way to receive a free education and many people believe that school is the only thing it should pay for. There are many reasons as to why individuals argue this. One consequence of passing a law relating to student-athletes receiving money may be possibly corrupting the NCAA system. Because the argument is based on how much the sport makes for the school, gambling and shaving points may occur more frequently in intercollegiate athletics. Shaving points is a method people use to pay off players if they miss shots on purpose in order to lose. Already a huge problem, this suggests athletes might have easier access to money and would affect their play. Another reason that athletes should not get paid is because they aren’t professionals yet. If they want to be paid, students need to enter themselves into a draft and make it their job. ...
Obtaining a scholarship through athletics has always been a number one goal for athletes and is more than enough to compensate for the hard work. The article “Pay to Play: should college athletes be paid?” states “According to the NCAA, [National Collegiate Athletic Association] college athletes often receive grants worth more than $100,000” (Birkenes). Athletes receiving grants of such a high price should have more than enough money to cover college needs. The payment of college athletes would cause not only athletic, but academic scholarships to be lowered and the cause of attendance to rise. The NCAA prohibits the payment of college athletes because athletic scholarships have been raised. In the article “The Call to Pay College Athletes Misdiagnosis the Problem” Yankah writes “The [United States Court of Appeals] required that the NCAA increase scholarship payouts to cover the full cost of attendance…” From the article one can understand that athletic scholarships have been raised, so colleges will not have to pay
College athletes are undoubtedly some of the hardest working people in the world. Not only are they living the life of an average student, they also have a strenuous schedule with their specific sport. One of the most discussed topics in the world of college athletics is whether or not student-athletes should be paid money for playing sports. The people who disagree with the idea have some good arguments to make. Primarily that the athletes get to go to school for free for playing sports. Another argument is that if student-athletes were to get paid then it would ruin the amateurism of college sports. People who are against paying the athletes do not want to see the young people become focused on money. “Paying student-athletes would dramatically shift their focus away from where it should be - gaining knowledge and skills for life after college” (Lewis and Williams). This is very understandable because one of the biggest reasons college sports are so popular is because the athletes play for school pride and for bragging rights. They play because they enjoy the game, not because it is their job. Most people that disagree with the idea of paying the athletes fail to realize what really goes on behind the scenes. At most Universities around the country the bulk of the income the school receives is brought in through the athletic programs. In fact the football and basketball teams usually bring in enough money to completely pay for the rest of the athletic programs all together. To get a better understanding of how much has changed in the world of college sports a little history must be learned.
The proposal of payment toNCAA student-athletes has begun major conversations and arguments nationwide with people expressing their take on it. “This tension has been going on for years. It has gotten greater now because the magnitude of dollars has gotten really large” (NCAA). I am a student athlete at Nicholls State University and at first thought, I thought it would be a good idea to be able to be paid as a student-athlete.After much research however; I have come to many conclusions why the payment of athletes should not take place at the collegiate level.The payment of athletes is only for athletes at the professional level. They are experts at what they do whether it is Major League Baseball, Pro Basketball, Professional Football, or any other professional sport and they work for that franchise or company as an employee. The payment of NCAA college athletes will deteriorate the value of school to athletes, create contract disputes at both the college and professional level, kill recruiting of athletes, cause chaos over the payment of one sport versus another, and it will alter the principles set by the NCAA’s founder Theodore Roosevelt in 1906. Under Roosevelt and NCAA, athletes were put under the term of a “student-athlete” as an amateur. All student athletes who sign the NCAA papers to play college athletics agree to compete as an amateur athlete. The definition of an amateur is a person who “engages in a sport, study, or other activity for pleasure rather than for financial benefit or professional reasons” (Dictonary.com).
The huge amount of money being made off college sports has led some to question whether student-athletes can be considered amateurs any longer, and whether they should, instead, be paid for their efforts, the argument can be made that the opportunity to both receive an education and get the exposure to win a major professional contract more than compensates NCAA athletes for their
I believe that college sports should be considered a profession. Athletes deserve to be paid for their work. College athletics are a critical part of America’s culture and economy. At the present time, student-athletes are considered amateurs. College is a stepping-stone to the professional leagues. The NCAA is exploiting the student- athlete. Big-time schools are running a national entertainment business that controls the compensation rate of the players like a monopoly (Byers 1).
“A scholarship doesn't equal cash in a player's pocket. Even with any type of scholarship, college athletes are typically dead broke” (Hartnett). Being an athlete in college is as demanding as a full time job. They also have to put the time in to be a full time student as well. That is a lot of time they have to commit for their university. Additionally if the student does not come from a wealthy family or a family willing to give them money, he or she may also have to add on a part time job on to that if they ever want to do something fun on a day off or get some food from somewhere other than the dining halls. Even when a student athlete has a job, it is almost impossible for them to keep it during the season because of their demanding schedule, ...
Abstract: Collegiate athletes participating in the two revenue sports (football, men's basketball) sacrifice their time, education, and risk physical harm for their respected programs. The players are controlled by a governing body (NCAA) that dictates when they can show up to work, and when they cannot show up for work. They are restricted from making any substantial financial gains outside of their sports arena. These athletes receive no compensation for their efforts, while others prosper from their abilities. The athletes participating in the two revenue sports of college athletics, football and men's basketball should be compensated for their time, dedication, and work put forth in their respected sports.