Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Youth involvement in politics
The youth's political and social interests that needs to be addressed in voting
Voting rights age limit
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Youth involvement in politics
We all have kids, as we once were kids ourselves, at a young age I never wanted to vote as I am sure most people did not either. Having to leave home to vote was a factor and having to follow the whole political process.
Nobody wants to leave from there house to wait in lines just to place a vote even more so if they are younger and have plans or no time. With that being said lowering the age group of voting to under 18 is useless as is shown In the essay " Keep the Voting age at 18" states that " A U.S Census Bureau report only 38% of voters in the 18-24 age group voted in 2012." Therefore anyone under the age of 18 is 50% likely to not show up either.
There is more to the process that just going and putting stuff in a computer screen. When voting you have to follow the whole political process to even know what is going on, or what you are even going to vote for. As for teenagers it is hard enough to stay off the phone,they are more focused of texting or facebook than following the whoel process leading up to the election. The essay " Keeping the Voting Age at 18" tells us that " 62% of the youngewst voters showed disintrest in the political process by not voting." That alone proves that if adults are at disintrest and not voting that anyone under 18 would be the same way.
…show more content…
This is a good way to get the voting participation to where your country wants it to be. However requiring citizens to vote could have a negative outlook, for teenagers are young and have disintrest. Therefore most of the votes are done out of carelessness there would be no way of knowing if the election is a fair win because most teenagers when made to do soemthing go agianst it. With that they would more and likely just pick something not knowing anything about
All in all, compulsory voting can seriously help out the United States of America. Although, forcing people to vote will make a lot more ignorant people vote for no reason, it will help get rid of those people by making them more intelligent in the world of politics, it will help rid fraudulent votes, and will help people realize that there are many more required things that are less important than voting. Compulsory voting will
It’s very unsettling to know that there was a six percent decrease in young voters (ages 18-29) in the 2012 election compared to 2008 (Circle Youth data). In 2007 the National Conference of State Legislatures publicly released a report and data set on voter turnout in democratic countries. This is a quote from that report titled Getting out the Vote, “It should be noted that in 1972, 18-year-olds were added to the eligible voting population, thus decreasing the percentages. Nonetheless, voter tu...
It will take great strides to create a system in which American citizens will be represented in the political process, and only then will young Americans be truly compelled to vote. One way to achieve this goal is through the adoption of a system of proportional representation. This paired with the implementation of Internet voting, increased voter education, and same day voting will ensure a rise in voter turnouts and youth participation in government.
As of the ratification of the 26th amendment in 1971, the voting age in the US is 18. As I turn 18 this coming summer I now have the chance to participate in elections local, state, and national wide. The history of youth voting has changed over time with that more 18-24 year olds are voting as time goes on. The question comes to mind about voting in that why would someone want to vote and if it’s just a waste of time. I believe that if people have the chance to vote, then they should which is why I am going to vote in elections to come in the future.
Over the recent year’s American voters have brought back a way of voting that was used during the country’s old age of existence, this rediscovered act is known as early voting. Early voting started in the early 1990s, though the outcome has not had such a high consistency over the years it is still recommended to help the Election Day process in the country. Since voter turnout is not entirely consistent due to the process being constantly shortened by state laws, the argument against early voting is that it is a waste of taxpayers’ money, opponents believe it is ineffective. Although that is not the case, in his 2016 blog article, “A Brief History of Early Voting,” Michael McDonald inform readers on the brief history of early voting as he states how the rates of voters who has cast their ballots before election day has increased over the years, “from less than a tenth to about a third” (qtd. in McDonald) since the 1990s. This proves to show why the money being spent on this act is not simply being wasted. Although early voting has
If the voting age is lowered, it is true that a higher voter turnout would be a result. Other countries such as Belgium, Germany, and Austria have a lower voting age and enjoy a higher percentage of voter turnout. Belgium ranks at 93% voter participation, while the U.S. trails behind at just 38% turnout in congressional elections. These facts seem to indicate that a lower voting age has a direct impact on voter participation. However, there is no concrete proof that a lower voting age directly impacts voter turnout. I believe the problem lies deeper than age.
Today in America, less than half of young voters between the ages of 18 and 24 vote (TheBestColleges.org). What most of these new adults fail to realize, is that their government depends on them to vote and elect new leaders to represent their country. Many of them make excuses to avoid voting, when really, they benefit most from voting.
The Voting Age Must be Lowered for Democracy to Exist in America. Imagine for a moment that senior citizens were denied the right to vote. Imagine senior citizens being thought of as too incompetent to vote because some senior citizens are senile. Can you imagine such a large percentage of the American public being denied the right to vote – simply on account of their age? It doesn't happen in America, right?
Although there are 44 million eligible young voters ages 18-29, in 2012 only 45% of them voted. These young people make up one fifth, or 21%, of the eligible voting population, yet they often do not vote. Voting is a tremendous gift. Young people in many other countries around the world have to fight to gain this right. In America, voting is often taken for granted by all age groups, but the youth take it for granted the most. In this paper, the reason why young people do not vote will be explored and solutions as to how to get them to vote will be proposed.
Younger people do not understand the importance of voting just yet so they choose not to do it. Citizens aged 18 to 29 turned up to the polls at a rate of 15 to 20 points lower than people over age 30 in the years of 1972 to 2012 (What Affects Voter Turnout Rates). As a young voter myself, I have witnessed the flippant attitudes of my peers when it comes to voting. Many young people just agree with the opinions of their friends instead of using their own opinions. Young voters are greatly influenced by their peers when it comes to voting.
midterm elections is particularly low. Required voting offers one possible, if radical, solution. Like any political institution, laws on it have multiple, if disputed, consequences. The average voter is incompetent at politics. The citizens who refrain are, on average, even more incompetent. Many people don't vote because they don't care enough or know enough of the politics to get involved, and there is no convincing evidence that mandatory voting increases voter knowledge. Simply put, people who vote tend to know more about politics than those who don't. It is worth asking why we would want low information citizens voting in the first place. Just so they're "involved" even if they're trudging to the polls to avoid a fine? If we force everyone to vote, the electorate will become even more irrational and misinformed. The result will not only will the worse candidate on the ballot get a better shot at winning, but the candidates who make it on the ballot in the first place will be worse. The people who are forced to vote against their will to avoid a fine, are just going to vote for anyone just to fulfill their commitment and not be fined, is that what we want? Is this what American is coming to forcing people to go to the polls just to check a box just to avoid a
This makes it so that when people vote, they vote for someone that has the requirements to run a country, but with compulsory voting, voting would be illegitimate because even when people follow the law for compulsory voting, people would just pick the most popular person without thinking if they have any political experience to run a country or help the people if they need it, making them unqualified for the role of president. Because of the evidence shown and explained, this clearly shows that Americans should not be required to vote because uneducated/unaware voters could choose unqualified candidates. Americans should not be required to vote because uneducated/unaware voters could choose unqualified candidates. In document F, a political cartoon made by Nate Beeler from the Columbus Dispatch made on March 24th, 2015 called “Mandatory Voting” shows Barack Obama, 44th President of the United States saying that we should have mandatory voting, then it shows that with 92% votes in, it shows that the next president would be Kim Kardashian, a famous reality
Around the world, countries have enforced the idea of compulsory voting and it has worked out well for them. Although the United States in not like many of those other countries who are making it mandatory for everyone to vote, there are plenty of reasons why this would be beneficial for our country in particular. Compulsory voting would make the idea of voting an expected thing to do, level the playing field between social classes, and balance the relationship between candidates and citizens.
The United States of America was founded on freedom. Freedom from the British, freedom of speech and many more. Today, one of America’s many freedoms is the right to or not to vote, and enforcing mandatory voting would infringe on this very freedom. Compulsory voting requires money, encourages politicians to be vague and is unethical. It should not be considered for the United States.
Since candidates are using new media to directly target young voters, their support can transition over into young voters actually wanting to vote for the candidate. Since young voters are constantly using their smartphones, online voting would be a convenient option. With electronic voting, technology could help with reaching as many members of society as possible and increasing the numbers of people who participate in elections. Electronic voting has the ability to make the voting process easier for citizens. Young voters can cast their vote at anytime, which is helpful for voters who may be away at