Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Women should not serve in the military
Gender Role In The Military
Should women be in combat
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Women should not serve in the military
Women in active combat are a very controversial topic with valid points at both sides, but fundamentally, there are just some facts that can’t be ignored. Men and women are not created equal. Now that’s not saying their social status isn’t equal; however, men and women are just not built the same physically. Through evolution men have become more physically inclined to hunt, fight and protect all the properties required for active combat; on the other hand women have evolved to mother children and go through pregnancy with their fragile frames (Nine Fundamental Pros). The point that is trying to be made here is that women weren’t made to see action in the military, so why go against nature to be something evolution did not intend to occur?
First and foremost, Women should not be in combat because men and women are not equal physically. For starters, it has been scientifically proven that men are approximately 30% stronger than women, have larger hearts and lungs, and utilize oxygen intake 20% better, thus leading
…show more content…
to overall better performance on the battlefield (Diferencia de Estructuras). In addition, despite the fact that women have better nocturnal vision, men usually have better depth perception, a longer range of vision, and better eyesight in bright light, all of which can be rather beneficial on the front lines (Diferencia De Estructuras). Many people who support women in the military may argue that if a woman can pass the same military fitness requirements as men, they must have the same physical capability as their male counterparts. This argument would be valid if it weren’t for the fact that the military fitness requirements are drastically different for men and women. For a 20 year old man to enlist in the army, he has to be able to complete thirty-five pushups and a sixteen minute mile (Smith); for a woman of the same age to enlist, she has to complete only thirteen pushups and finish the mile in twenty minutes (Smith). The fact that there is such a drastic difference in the scoring shows that even the military itself acknowledges that there is a huge difference in the physical capabilities between men and women. Therefore, men should be the only people in the military because they are physically superior to women, thus leading to a greater chance of victory during battle. For another thing, women play an important role in today’s society, and if they went off to fight in the military, they would not be able to fill those roles.
For example, women are needed in the household to care for their children. Supporters of women in the military might say that caring for children is not solely the responsibility of women, and men are able to care for children as well as women. However, while men are just as capable of raising children as women are, children who are raised without the presence of their mother often face more psychological repercussions than children who are raised without a father (Nine Fundamental Pros). If women were to go into the army, their choice to go to war would not only affect themselves, but also their innocent children. Therefore, women should not go into combat because these innocent children should not have to suffer more psychological damage because their mother went off to war instead of their
father. As a final point, while men and women may be intellectual equals, they are not the same psychologically. For example, a large majority of men have better spatial reasoning skills and mathematical abilities due to their psychological wiring (Diferencia de Estructuras). These psychological advantages can make men superior to women when it comes to fighting in a war since math and reasoning can both be used effectively in battle. Furthermore, men are a lot more psychologically sound than women are (Simmons). Both men and women are liable to develop psychological conditions, such as Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), as a result of being involved in combat, but according to scientific studies, women are much more prone to these repercussions than men are (Diferencia de Estructuras). Therefore, though men and women are the same socially and intellectually, men are psychologically superior to women and as a result, should be the only ones allowed in combat.
The military is trying to find new ways to recognize the fact that women now fight in the country’s wars. In 2011 the Military Leadership Diversity Commission recommended that the Department of Defense remove all combat restrictions on women. Although many jobs have been opened for women in the military, there is still 7.3 percent of jobs that are closed to them. On February 9, 2012, George Little announced that the Department of Defense would continue to reduce the restrictions that were put on women’s roles. The argument that “women are not physically fit for combat” is the most common and well-researched justification for their exclusion from fighting units. It has been proven if women go through proper training and necessary adaptations, they can complete the same physical tasks as any man. Though there seem to be many reasons from the exclusion of women in the military, the main ones have appeared to be that they do not have the strength to go through combat, would be a distraction to the men, and that they would interrupt male bonding and group
In the Upfront Magazine Article “Women Warriors”, author Rebecca Zissou told the story of two women who recently graduated the Army’s Ranger School, but whether they would be able to serve alongside their fellow male graduates was unknown. Zissou also delved into the issue of whether or not women should be allowed to serve in combat positions. However, I believe that women should be allowed to serve in combat positions in the U.S. armed forces.
With society’s past and present it is apparent that women are still not equal even if they have the title. Men are observably stronger and have a different mentality in situations than women. This is not to say that women should not be in the military but they should have the choice that way they can accept the responsibility and train themselves mentally and physically to achieve the responsibility and respect needed to fight for our country.
Since the resolution of World War II, the United States has been involved in over fifteen extensive military wars. Recent wars between Iraq and Afghanistan are being fought over several issues which affect women in both the United States and the other nations. While the military is often thought of a male dominated institution, women are present and affected all throughout the system as soldiers, caretakers, partners, and victims. Transnational feminists often fight against war due to the vulnerability that is placed on women during times of war. Despite often being overlooked, there is no doubt that women are heavily included in the devastating consequences of war.
From this, supporters of women joining the draft argue that their involvement in the draft should also reflect on their increasing involvement in the army. However, those who oppose women being apart of the draft argue that equality between men and women is an unrealistic mindset. This is proven in the New York Times with Catherine Rampell’s when she writes “Women earn 92.2 cents on the dollar of what men earn” (1). This is a statistic from 2011 that shows people that complete equality between men and women has still not fully been reached. Furthermore, those opposed to women and the draft argue that if America has not completely reached full equality within the genders, then neither should the army.
Many people today believe that women should go into combat and everything will be fine. Well, that is not true. If a woman goes into hand-to-hand combat, she will create many problems for her team, which results to her team losing the battle. If you think women should not go into hand-to-hand combat, read on and find out why.
Many women around the world have big responsibilities in the military, and although some people may disagree, I believe they can handle anything a man can handle when it comes to being on the battlefield. Some people think that women should not be able to fight in the military, where as other people think they should be able to fight in the military. Each supporter and non-supporter has their own reasons. Some of the reasons for the non-supporters are because of their gender. They think that because they are women, they cannot handle the challenges that being on the battlefield brings. Women are willing to fight, and they know what can happen, they know exactly what can happen. They are willing to fight for their country, and I believe they should be able to. The men that fight for our country are against women fighting in combat. They believe that women are not capable of doing what they do to defend and fight for our country. The men feel that they cannot trust women to help back them up at war simply because of the fact that they are women.
One argument in favour of women shows pictures of what men could be: A convict, lunatic, owner of white slaves, unfit for service and a drunkard. This portrayed men as being responsible, but they still could vote. Then it shows what women could achieve: Mayor, nurse, mother doctor or teacher or a factory hand, which showed them as responsible but they still couldn't the vote.1 Men's attitude towards women during the First World War was still negative. The ability of women to take on the roles of men meant that increasing numbers of men were vulnerable to conscription.2 The women were told that they couldn't vote because they weren't fighting for their country. They couldn't fight because they weren't allowed to.
...nto a situation of high testosterone, women are not considered to be a threat. Military research now however, has shown that women have the physical stamina to endure battle and do not disrupt the cohesion in the male units and can also be mentally tough without breaking when under fire. Women are not only discriminated against in the military, they are also discriminated against in Philosophy, religion, and Popular Culture.
The problem of women fighting in combat along with their male counterparts is not a one-sided problem. Elizabeth Hoisington has earned the rank of Brigadier General in the U.S. Army, leads the Women’s Army Corps and believes that women should not serve in combat because they are not as physically, mentally, or emotionally qualified as a male is and that ...
With a woman in combat, it would keep our service larger. (Sisters in Arms RSS, 2009). Men take up 67%, with woman serving 22% of all of the military in the United States of America today. (Sisters in Arms RSS, 2009) Imagine if that percentage of woman got larger. It would push the men to be better than them, equally making our nations military larger. Therefore, if we have more military, we have more defense for this
Both men and women fought on the battlefield. Hundreds of women served as nurses, laundresses, cooks and companions to the male soldiers in the Continental Army.6 In addition, there were some that actually engaged in battle. Seeing "no reason to believe that any consideration foreign to the purest patriotism,"7 Deborah Sampson put on men's clothing and called herself Robert Shirtliffe in order to enlist in the Army. "Robert Shirtliffe" fought courageously; "his" company defeated marauding Indians north of Ticonderoga.8 There is also the valiancy of the water carrier Mary Hays, otherwise known as Molly Pitcher, who took up arms after her husband fell.9 As a six-foot tall woman, Nancy Hart was considered an Amazon Warrior. Living in the Georgia frontier, this "War Woman" aimed and, with deadly accuracy, shot British soldiers who invaded the area.10 Mentioned in the beginning of this essay was Margaret Corbin, another woman on the battlefield.
Many agree, that in certain military occupations, women can function at the same level as men. The controversy about having women fighting with men in wars is the fact that they have a different physical structure, deal with stress and emotions differently , are more susceptible to injury and just don't have the killer instinct necessary to get the job done. Although the last statement might appear to be a stereotype, most women would not be capable of supporting the demanding rigors of war-like situations. It would be a great mistake to allow women in these stressful and dangerous situations.
Perhaps some of the most unfair double standards are that of women. One common one is the notion that women shouldn’t fight in war. Women are said to be too weak and unable, mentally and emotionally, to handle the aspects of war. When the men of our country left for World War II they had to abandon their jobs. Having work that still had to be done but with a majority of the male population gone and fighting in the war, the only reasonable solution was to have women take over their jobs. After the war was over and all of the men fighting in it returned home, they took their place back at their old jobs, removing the women. Women were seen as being more suitable at home tending to the house and children, rather than working in factories. Why is something that was sociall...
Should women be allowed in the military? My answer was at first a resounding “no.” However, once I started my research, my opinion changed. In 1948, Congress passed the combat exclusion law that prohibited women in the Air Force, Marines, and Navy to hold combat positions; however, the Army can assign these duties as they see fit (Schroeder). Some people assume that Americans are not ready to see a woman wounded or killed in war; however, there are female police officers that are wounded or killed daily (Schroeder). How can we rationalize that a woman has the right to die protecting our local communities but not our country? If a person chooses to be in a combat field, and can pass the physical demands required, gender should not be an issue. The arguments of physical differences and cohesion among the troops are valid arguments but not substantial enough to prevent women from serving in frontline combat roles within the military.