Appiah There Is No Such Thing As Western Culture Summary

1814 Words4 Pages

Chima Okoro 5/10/24 Masterpieces of Western Art Critical Response to Kwame Appiah’s “There is no such thing as Western civilization”. Kwame Anthony Appiah's article, There is no such thing as Western civilization, challenges the notion of the existence of the concept we refer to as “Western civilization”. By Western civilization, our society is referring to an idea of a distinct culture shared by the West, so Appiah firstly establishes a modern-day understanding of “culture” as a mix between two definitions from Matthew Arnold and Edward Tylor. Arnold defines it as the “pursuit of our total perfection by means of getting to know, on all the matters which most concern us, the best which has been thought and said in the world”; Tylor views …show more content…

There is no essence to being English and so it's simply an inaccurate label, just like the label of Western. Intuitively, this claim makes sense. For instance, currently, there is a popular awareness of distinctions between generations. Generations are seen to have many shared traits, while different generations are seen as fundamentally different from each other. This understanding can reasonably be extrapolated to the conclusion that, for instance, a Generation Z from Brazil shares more in common with a Generation Z from England than does that same Brazilian with a Brazilian Baby Boomer. By the same token but temporarily extended, Appiah concludes that English culture 600 years ago is fundamentally different from English culture now, a claim that aligns with our intuitive understanding of the past as compared to the present. For me, this point by Appiah raises an important discussion about geography as it relates to the grouping of people. Geography can influence the physical traits of people as well as cultural practices simply due to differences in environment and natural resources. From this understanding, it seems possible to form a concept of culture based on geography, though admittedly …show more content…

However, I do not think genetics matter outside of a shared human identity. If we start from that base that, like every civilization, we are simply humans, then culture emerges from shared values between people, allowing us to relate to any group of people. From this understanding, the concept of Western civilization paints too broad a brush to accurately encompass what it means to have shared values. This results in much ambiguity as to what it means to be a member of Western civilization, and so perhaps cynically, I begin to understand it as an euphemism for the distinction between the “civilized” and “uncivilized”. In my opinion, this idea of uncivilized societies is a gravely incorrect perception that leads to intolerance and discrimination, which only further divides our society. In conclusion, Kwame Appiah's thought-provoking article challenges the conventional understanding of Western civilization. Through examination of European history and cultural interactions, Appiah argues that the concept of Western civilization is a flawed construct that oversimplifies the diverse array of cultures, thoughts, and contributions to the “Western world”. Appiah argues for a conception of culture based on shared values between

Open Document