Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Make a comparative analysis of these two paintings
Comparison of artwork
Compare two art pieces
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Make a comparative analysis of these two paintings
The advantages that these pieces of art have are that they easily communicate to their audience. The ideas come across easy to understand by people who were both literate and nonliterate at the time. They concentrate on representing simple ideas to their audience and distinctly show political perspective. However, on the flip side, they tend to only show one side of an opinion, not both. This doesn’t allow for a person to see both sides and limits them to one opinion. They also only show a vague story and don’t deeply go into the underlying factors of the Revolution.
Source 16.1 shows the time period of when the people believed that everyone could live at peace with each other. It shows a hopeful future of the clergy, nobility and the commoners getting along. This time period lasted only three years of the revolution (1789-1791). Source 16.2 illustrates when people realized that instead of peace, the three estates switched class rolls. The figure represents three male figures of the three different estates of old France where the third estate member breaks free from the control of the clergy and nobility. Source 16.3 illustrates the time where christians and catholics were attacked and had their churches/ faiths taken away from them by the revolutionary government in an attempt to finance France’s wars.
…show more content…
The first source shows the attempt to eliminate the three different estate levels and make everyone fall on the same social level in society. The second source shows when the third estate had more revolutionary power than the clergy and nobility. The third source shows when the state tried to take wealth from the churches to pay for their war expenses. The fourth source shows when the people executed a French monarch and figured out a way to establish a republic. The three estates still persisted after the revolution ended in a social class
The first source is a political cartoon that is about the three Estates of France, pre-1789. The cartoon shows the different members of the three Estates and their perceived roles. The Third Estate (commoners), Second Estate (nobility) and the First Estate (clergy). This source advocates the idea that the First and Second Estates overpowers the Third Estate, resulting to their suffering. The old man (Third Estate) is drawn with bigger body shape than the other two people riding him (First and Second Estates), this shows that the whole body or population of the Third Estate were a lot bigger than the First and Second Estate. Although they had way bigger population than the other two Estates they were
First, the French Revolution was a result of the failed estate system and the extreme economic and social inequality it led to. Under the rule of Louis XVI, the people of France were divided into three main social classes or estates as they are called. The First Estate featured wealthy members of the Church such as Bishops and Priests who held great political power due to their influence on government affairs. The Second Estate was a class comprised of the wealthy nobles and
Beginning in mid-1789, and lasting until late-1799, the French Revolution vastly changed the nation of France throughout its ten years. From the storming of the Bastille, the ousting of the royal family, the Reign of Terror, and all the way to the Napoleonic period, France changed vastly during this time. But, for the better part of the last 200 years, the effects that the French Revolution had on the nation, have been vigorously debated by historian and other experts. Aspects of debate have focused around how much change the revolution really caused, and the type of change, as well as whether the changes that it brought about should be looked at as positive or negative. Furthermore, many debate whether the Revolutions excesses and shortcomings can be justified by the gains that the revolution brought throughout the country. Over time, historians’ views on these questions have changed continually, leading many to question the different interpretations and theories behind the Revolutions effectiveness at shaping France and the rest of the world.
The social condition in France before the French Revolution was very poor. The society was divided into three estates: first estate, second estate, and third Estate. The first and the second estates were made up of the Clergy
In all of the documents listed, liberty and equality are described with regards to the French Revolution. These concepts are shown to have evolved over the course of the revolution, and this is proven by the documents chosen. Liberty and equality were emphasized as either major or minor ideas in the documents, and although some were only alluded to, it is evident that the ideas of liberty and equality changed during the years of the French Revolution. Also, some of the terms used connoted different things at the end of the Revolution than the original Revolutionaries of 1789, which demonstrates the transformation of the use of words which were symbolic at that time.
Way back in the late 1789, a country went through a great change. France had always a monarchical country, as well as the rest of Europe and Great Britain. Despite the long history of being that, the people wanted a change. France had some great kings, but they also had some not so great ones, which I believe may had led them to their decision to revolt. There were many factors that caused them to be upsetted by bad kings, such as higher taxes, loss of land, mistreatment, or just corruptness (not all of the bad kings had these qualities)but, the thing that upsetted them the most, was the feudal system. People of higher classes were growing and the peasants just wanted to be free, they wanted their own land, and not have to work off someone else’s. Anyways, back to the revolt, this was no little revolt, this revolt turned into a revolution. The revolutionaries had good intentions, at first, to make a constitution, (they were inspired by the American revolution) but that didn’t go as planned, and it all went south. Later on, they planned to get rid of the King, and they did, beheading King Louis XVI, but after that, a thirst for blood continued, seeking out the people they despised, the Aristocrats.
Under the Old Regime, the people of the Third Estate did not have as much political power as the clergy and nobles. Correspondingly, the First and Second Estates had more social power over the Third Estate. The peasants, for example, were treated inhumanely and had to do all the work while the nobles took advantage of them. In a political cartoon, a peasant is illustrated as an old, weak man carrying a prelate and a noble on his back(Document A). The cartoon clearly demonstrates how unfairly peasants were socially treated in France by the clergy and nobles. Similar to how the peasant was depicted as carrying the other two men, the Third Estate in France had to do all the work for the other two estates. Despite some of the Bourgeoisie being wealthier than the nobles, everyone in the Third Estate was treated as socially weaker. Many of the people in the Third Estate wanted a change in how society treated them and how they were seen as. Many of them felt as if the Third Estate should be more socially powerful because they make up most of France. In the opinion of Abbe Sieyes as seen in his pamphlet What is the Third Estate, the Third Estate is, “Everything; but an everything shackled and oppressed”(Document D). Most people in the Third Estate felt socially oppressed and looked down upon, yet they were the most important people in France. The social injustice and
Prior to the revolution, King Louis XVI was at the top of the ancien régime, the social, economic, and political structure in France, which means he had absolute power. When he received the throne in 1774, it came along with insoluble problems. The people were split into three estates which divided social class. The first estate consisted of 100,000 tax exempt nobles who owned 20% of the land. The second estate consisted of the 300,000 tax exempt clergy who owned 10% of the land. The third estate consisted of the remaining 23.5 million French people who were 90% peasants. The third estate was the only estate that paid taxes. Their taxes ensured the financial well-being of the clergy, state, and nobles (French Revolution Overview 6).
The French revolution occurred from 1789 – 1795 but some argue that it went up till 1799. King Louis XVI was crowned after the 7 years’ war which plunged France into economical debt and led to rise of corruption. The king’s ignorance led to increase of privileges grasped by nobles and the rich. Years of bad or no harvest led to unrest in France as the rich enjoyed their position in society while the poor suffered. The people were divided into three different classes known as estates, namely third estate – the proletariat, second estate – the clergy and the first estate – the aristocrats or monarchs. All this lead to an uproar in 1789 which begun peacefully but the real revolution started with “The storming of Bastille” where revolutionist seized control of a prison fort in Paris. This was a start to a struggle which the led to the break off of third estate to form the National assembly. This was instrumental to bring together the Declaration of rights of citizen which brought together the idea that all classes were equal. External threats also shaped the revolution with France having to face off with Austria and Prussia and beat them in the battle of Flerus which uncovered the king had been in coalition with the enemy the whole time. This led to him facing trial along with the queen and as a result their execution. The outcome was the rise of another dictatorship – Napoleon Bonaparte. He plunged the country into war again with economy dropping to lows soon after the revolution
The first underlying cause of the French Revolution was the Old Regime. The people of France were divided into three estates. The first estate was composed of the highest church officials. They held about ten percent of all the land in France. They paid no direct taxes to the royal government. The second estate was made up of nobles. They were only two percent of France’s population, but owned twenty percent of the land. They paid no taxes (Krieger 483). The third estate accounted for ninety-eight percent of France’s population. The third estate was divided into three groups; the middle class, known as the bourgeoisie, the urban lower classes, and the peasant farmers. The third estate lost about half their income in taxes. They paid feudal dues, royal taxes, and also owed the corvee, a form of tax paid with work (Krieger 484).
“Society was cut in two: those who had nothing united in common envy; those who had anything united in common terror.” The French Revolution was a painful era that molded the lives of every citizen living in France and changed their ways of life forever. Beginning in 1789 and lasting ten years until 1799, the people of France lived in a monarch society under King Louis XVI’s rule. He was a very harsh ruler and had many restrictions placed on his people. They eventually overthrow him and become a monarch society. Among his deceptive ways, the people also experienced “The Reign of Terror,” which was a period where many lives were taken by the guillotine. Other revolutionary events included rebellions, constitutions, and groups. One of the popular groups that contributed greatly to the French Revolution were the Jacobins who were led by Maximilien Robespierre.
The main cause of the French Revolution involved the differences between the three different social classes in France (Soboul, 1977). This class structure left over from the ancien regime, the Middle Ages, consisted of three orders known as estates. The First Estate, the clergy, made up less than 1 percent of the population but owned about 20 percent of the land. The Second Estate, the nobles occupied about 4 percent of the population and also owned 20 percent of the land. The Third Estate, the working middle class, made up 95 percent of the population and paid all the taxes needed to pay off the debts that Louis XIV had left behind because he had spent his country‘s money to aid the American revolution as to embarrass the British. It is ...
The causes of tensions and conflicts generated in the old regime that contributed to the outbreak of revolution The composition of society was a major contributing factor to the tensions and conflicts generated under the old regime. Society was divided into Three Estates, the first Estate comprised of the clergy (1%), the nobility, and rest of the population was classified as the Third Estate. Not only was the Third Estate heterogeneous, comprising of the bourgeoise (lawyers, doctors, intellectuals, businessman, the traders, merchants, factory owners), peasants, and beggars, but all three Estates. Their were many distinguishing factors that set the three Estates apart. The first two Estates were associated with the monarchy and avoided or paid little taxes, whilst at the same time earning the most money. The Third Estate paid the highest taxes and earnt the least. Lefebvre saw the bourgeoisie as becoming stronger economically but still maintaining the same legal status as that of the poorest peasant. The bourgeois resented their nobles, who were simply 'born' into their position of wealth. They nobles believed that their noble birth' set them apart from the rest of society.' However, the nobility were also dissatisfied under the ancien regime, where they had little, yet still more then the bourgeois, influence in politics. Although the upper clergy enjoyed many privileges, including being exempt from paying taxes, owned about 10 per cent of the land, and received their wealth from the land they owned and the collection of the tithes. Yet, the lower clergy did not enjoy these same privileges, while the 'Bishop plays the great nobleman and spends scandalous sums on hounds, horses, furniture, servants, food and carriages, the parish priest does not have the wherewithal to buy himself a new cassock...the bishops treat their priests , not as honest footman, but as stable-boys.' It is clear that social unrest was felt by the whole population.
Those french insurgency (1789–1799) might have been An time of radical social Also political change done both french What's more european history. Those supreme government that needed managed france for hundreds of years broken down inside three quite some time. French culture underwent an epic change Concerning illustration feudal, noble and religious privileges dissipated under a supported ambush from liberal political bunches and the massenet on the roads. Of age plans around chain of importance Also convention succumbed will new edification standards of citizenship
The French Revolution began in 1789 and ended in 1792, though certain people include Napoleon’s reign as part of the revolution, stating it ended in 1804. It was a time of confusion, disorder, and bloodshed. The commoners of France decided that they were being treated unjustly and planned to overthrow their king. The French Revolution was a long and terrible war, which promoted democracy and equality for the people of France and resulted, not only in the death of Marie Antoinette and King Louis XVI, but with France becoming a more liberal country. This essay will investigate causes of the French Revolution such as enlightenment ideas, taxation and economical problems, and the political system of the time. It will be shown that there is not a single direct cause for the occurrence of the French Revolution, but many different reasons of varying importance.