Antisocial Networking? By Hilary Stout: Article Analysis

988 Words2 Pages

Social media plays a big role in the majority of people lives.  There is conflict on whether it’s more harmful or more helpful.  In the article, “Antisocial Networking?” from the New York Times by Hilary Stout dated April 30, 2010, she explains her position of being anti-social networking.  She claims that social media takes away the chance for the youth to develop empathy, recognize emotions, and apprehend meanings of facial expressions and body language.  Stout fears these skills will only fade away.  On the other hand, Melissa Healy explains her reasons for being pro-social networking in her article, “Teenage Social Media Butterflies May Not Be such a Bad Idea” from the Los Angeles Times dated May 18, 2010.  Considering social media allows teens to communicate with each other, build social skills, and create opportunities for adolescents, I disagree with Hilary Stout’s position. …show more content…

For instance, social networking sites like Instagram allow me to direct message my friends to see what’s up or to ask questions about school.  Furthermore, I text my friends to make plans or to have casual conversations.  Additionally, Donna Swartz Mills, a source from “Teenage Social Media Butterflies May Not Be such a Bad Idea,” says that her daughter uses social networking sites to keep connected with her friends and coaches.  Moreover, 60 percent of my class uses social networking sites to stay in touch with friends.  Finally, Melissa Healy states, in her article, “Teenage Social Media Butterflies May Not Be such a Bad Idea,” “Adolescents are largely using social networking sites to keep in touch with friends they already know, not to converse with strangers”   In conclusion, social networking allows teen to communicate with one another more efficiently.

Open Document